Dear Sir or Madam,
SWISS TEXTILES which represents the Swiss textile and apparel industry wants
to comment on the new legislation published on October 5, 2005 in the Federal
Register (Vol. 70, No 192, page 58009 to 58016) and implemented as of November
18, 2005.
Our industry is astonished by the lack of communication and consultation on the
part of the US on the specific issue of the Textile and Apparel Manufacturer
Identification issue (later identified as MID in the letter) which creates
discrimination compared to other manufactured products exported to the US. It is
not understandable why the criteria for the MID for textiles and apparel is far more
stringent than for products which evidently pose a greater threat to the health and
security of the US citizen such as food or spare parts for cars or aeroplanes.
Moreover, the Swiss textile and apparel industry has serious doubts on the need
to issue such discriminatory legislation under the Homeland Security Act as if
textile and apparel prod-ucts could put at risk the integrity of the US territory.
These measures are having a severe and unjustifiable impact upon the Swiss
industry?s ability to sell its products into the US market which is one of the
principal export outlets and ap-proximately 7.0 % of all Swiss textile and apparel
exports go to the US market!
Since this legislation has come unexpectedly upon exporters of Switzerland, most
of whom are small and medium size companies, it is creating huge problems and
a growing number of companies are seeing their products blocked at Customs,
thus imposing huge costs on them and placing several of them on the verge of
bankruptcy through their inability to deliver prod-ucts on time to their US
customers.
Contrary to common and accepted practice of identifying the vendor as the
manufacturer since the 80?s through a codification system, the new MID for textile
and apparel is to be viewed as a breech in commercial confidentiality rules. The
MID structure allows any importer or buyer to access the exact address of the
manufacturer of a product, through the obliga-tion, for the first data entry of a new
MID, to provide on the invoice the complete address of the manufacturer in order to
check whether the syntax of the MID is correct, thus putting in danger the survival
of some textile and apparel companies of Switzerland trading with the USA. The
MID will allow buyers in the US to by-pass Swiss producers when they are obliged
to find additional capacities in third countries to satisfy their customers needs.
Moreover there is an apparent conflict in documentary needs between the US
Treasury web-site, which limits the MID on the Form 7501 to the ?invoicing party?
and the Federal Register which stipulates that the MID should relate to
the ?manufacturer of the product?. Such dis-crepancy creates uncertainty and
leads to mistakes and errors which are costing huge amounts of capital to
companies obliged to completely modify their existing IT-systems (adding MID -
fields in suppliers databases, changing export documentation, change of internal
infor-mation flow) to ensure the correctness of the information delivered. Moreover
the tracking of the goods shipped becomes a nightmare in itself.
In addition, SWISS TEXTILES questions the conformity of the new regulation with
WTO com-mon practice because it appears that
a] the new legislation is much stricter and cumbersome than the previous
one which regu-lated textile and apparel imports during the Multi Fibre Agreement
(MFA) and the subse-quent WTO Agreement on Textile and Clothing (ATC);
b] if our understanding of the legislation is correct, a few country
suppliers, who have privi-leged relations with the US, are exempt from such
obligations.
In conclusion, SWISS TEXTILES firmly opposes the new MID regulation and will
also request the Swiss government to forcefully request clarifications on this
legislation which hampers the freedom to trade of Swiss companies. We need
modifications of the MID implementation rules aligning textile and apparel products
on the more general rule, thus allowing the vendor or invoicing company to put its
MID on the invoice. Furthermore, SWISS TEXTILES would like to see a drastic
simplification of the requirements in particular for Swiss companies producing
textiles and apparel in the USA but importing partially or totally raw or semi-
finished products (fabrics, trimmings, etc) from Switzerland and abroad.
Yours faithfully,
SWISS TEXTILE FEDERATION
Attachments:
Comment submitted by Dr. Thomas Schweizer, Director and Karin Jung, Department Manager Economy, Swiss Textile Federation
Title: Comment submitted by Dr. Thomas Schweizer, Director and Karin Jung, Department Manager Economy, Swiss Textile Federation
Comment submitted by Dr. Thomas Schweizer, Director and Karin Jung, Department Manager Economy, Swiss Textile Federation
This is comment on Rule
Country of Origin of Textile and Apparel Products
View Comment
Attachments:
Comment submitted by Dr. Thomas Schweizer, Director and Karin Jung, Department Manager Economy, Swiss Textile Federation
Title:
Comment submitted by Dr. Thomas Schweizer, Director and Karin Jung, Department Manager Economy, Swiss Textile Federation
Related Comments
View AllPublic Submission Posted: 12/08/2005 ID: USCBP-2005-0009-0003
Dec 05,2005 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 12/08/2005 ID: USCBP-2005-0009-0004
Dec 05,2005 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 12/08/2005 ID: USCBP-2005-0009-0005
Dec 05,2005 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 12/08/2005 ID: USCBP-2005-0009-0006
Dec 05,2005 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 12/08/2005 ID: USCBP-2005-0009-0007
Dec 05,2005 11:59 PM ET