Comment submitted by Dr. Thomas Schweizer, Director and Karin Jung, Department Manager Economy, Swiss Textile Federation

Document ID: USCBP-2005-0009-0006
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Customs And Border Protection Bureau
Received Date: December 02 2005, at 09:18 AM Eastern Standard Time
Date Posted: December 8 2005, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: October 5 2005, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: December 5 2005, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 800ea94a
View Document:  View as format xml

View Comment

Dear Sir or Madam, SWISS TEXTILES which represents the Swiss textile and apparel industry wants to comment on the new legislation published on October 5, 2005 in the Federal Register (Vol. 70, No 192, page 58009 to 58016) and implemented as of November 18, 2005. Our industry is astonished by the lack of communication and consultation on the part of the US on the specific issue of the Textile and Apparel Manufacturer Identification issue (later identified as MID in the letter) which creates discrimination compared to other manufactured products exported to the US. It is not understandable why the criteria for the MID for textiles and apparel is far more stringent than for products which evidently pose a greater threat to the health and security of the US citizen such as food or spare parts for cars or aeroplanes. Moreover, the Swiss textile and apparel industry has serious doubts on the need to issue such discriminatory legislation under the Homeland Security Act as if textile and apparel prod-ucts could put at risk the integrity of the US territory. These measures are having a severe and unjustifiable impact upon the Swiss industry?s ability to sell its products into the US market which is one of the principal export outlets and ap-proximately 7.0 % of all Swiss textile and apparel exports go to the US market! Since this legislation has come unexpectedly upon exporters of Switzerland, most of whom are small and medium size companies, it is creating huge problems and a growing number of companies are seeing their products blocked at Customs, thus imposing huge costs on them and placing several of them on the verge of bankruptcy through their inability to deliver prod-ucts on time to their US customers. Contrary to common and accepted practice of identifying the vendor as the manufacturer since the 80?s through a codification system, the new MID for textile and apparel is to be viewed as a breech in commercial confidentiality rules. The MID structure allows any importer or buyer to access the exact address of the manufacturer of a product, through the obliga-tion, for the first data entry of a new MID, to provide on the invoice the complete address of the manufacturer in order to check whether the syntax of the MID is correct, thus putting in danger the survival of some textile and apparel companies of Switzerland trading with the USA. The MID will allow buyers in the US to by-pass Swiss producers when they are obliged to find additional capacities in third countries to satisfy their customers needs. Moreover there is an apparent conflict in documentary needs between the US Treasury web-site, which limits the MID on the Form 7501 to the ?invoicing party? and the Federal Register which stipulates that the MID should relate to the ?manufacturer of the product?. Such dis-crepancy creates uncertainty and leads to mistakes and errors which are costing huge amounts of capital to companies obliged to completely modify their existing IT-systems (adding MID - fields in suppliers databases, changing export documentation, change of internal infor-mation flow) to ensure the correctness of the information delivered. Moreover the tracking of the goods shipped becomes a nightmare in itself. In addition, SWISS TEXTILES questions the conformity of the new regulation with WTO com-mon practice because it appears that a] the new legislation is much stricter and cumbersome than the previous one which regu-lated textile and apparel imports during the Multi Fibre Agreement (MFA) and the subse-quent WTO Agreement on Textile and Clothing (ATC); b] if our understanding of the legislation is correct, a few country suppliers, who have privi-leged relations with the US, are exempt from such obligations. In conclusion, SWISS TEXTILES firmly opposes the new MID regulation and will also request the Swiss government to forcefully request clarifications on this legislation which hampers the freedom to trade of Swiss companies. We need modifications of the MID implementation rules aligning textile and apparel products on the more general rule, thus allowing the vendor or invoicing company to put its MID on the invoice. Furthermore, SWISS TEXTILES would like to see a drastic simplification of the requirements in particular for Swiss companies producing textiles and apparel in the USA but importing partially or totally raw or semi- finished products (fabrics, trimmings, etc) from Switzerland and abroad. Yours faithfully, SWISS TEXTILE FEDERATION

Attachments:

Comment submitted by Dr. Thomas Schweizer, Director and Karin Jung, Department Manager Economy, Swiss Textile Federation

Title:
Comment submitted by Dr. Thomas Schweizer, Director and Karin Jung, Department Manager Economy, Swiss Textile Federation

View Attachment: View as format pdf

Related Comments

    View All
Total: 28
Comment submitted by Reinaldo Rodriguez, Customs and Trade Services, Inc.
Public Submission    Posted: 12/08/2005     ID: USCBP-2005-0009-0003

Dec 05,2005 11:59 PM ET
Comment submitted by Susan M. Presti, Executive Director, Express Delivery and Logistics Association (XLA)
Public Submission    Posted: 12/08/2005     ID: USCBP-2005-0009-0004

Dec 05,2005 11:59 PM ET
Comment submitted by William H. Lakin, Director General, European Apparel and Textile Organisation (Euratex)
Public Submission    Posted: 12/08/2005     ID: USCBP-2005-0009-0005

Dec 05,2005 11:59 PM ET
Comment submitted by Dr. Thomas Schweizer, Director and Karin Jung, Department Manager Economy, Swiss Textile Federation
Public Submission    Posted: 12/08/2005     ID: USCBP-2005-0009-0006

Dec 05,2005 11:59 PM ET
Comment submitted by Hershie Schachter, Cansew, Inc.; PLease see USCBP-2005-0009-0027 for the attachment to this comment.
Public Submission    Posted: 12/08/2005     ID: USCBP-2005-0009-0007

Dec 05,2005 11:59 PM ET