I understand that the Coast Guard preferred option is to make the interim
enforcement policy permanent and add standardized mandatory reporting
requirements.
The EIS analysis shows that more modern equipment and practices may greatly
reduce the amount of cargo residue spilled. Nevertheless, the recommended
option does not provide incentives to adopt best management practices. I believe
that eliminating lost cargo would represent good business practices and
demonstrate corporate responsibility. We cannot afford to assume that over
time, industry will voluntarily adopt modern methods, install new equipment and
eliminate discharges.
Instituting a code of best practices aimed at minimizing bulk cargo loss,
measuring compliance with the code and tracking results would provide a pathway
to virtual elimination. The goal is to minimize stress on the environment and to
safely and economically eliminate bulk cargo loss rather than minimizing the
incentive for industry to improve operations as a result of the proposed
preferred option.
Gail Krantzberg
This is comment on Rule
NPRM - Dry Cargo Residue Discharges in the Great Lakes
View Comment
Related Comments
View AllPublic Submission Posted: 05/27/2008 ID: USCG-2004-19621-0034
Jul 22,2008 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 06/20/2008 ID: USCG-2004-19621-0065
Jul 22,2008 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 06/25/2008 ID: USCG-2004-19621-0066
Jul 22,2008 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 07/07/2008 ID: USCG-2004-19621-0067
Jul 22,2008 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 07/10/2008 ID: USCG-2004-19621-0068
Jul 22,2008 11:59 PM ET