Katie Pierce

Document ID: USCG-2004-19621-0188
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Coast Guard
Received Date: October 27 2012, at 12:00 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Date Posted: November 1 2012, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: July 30 2012, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: October 29 2012, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 1jw-81nf-z06s
View Document:  View as format xml

View Comment

Docket number: USCG–2004–19621 The proposed requirement for each vessel to carry its own vessel-specific DCR management plan on board, and to have that plan available for inspection, is central to the enforceability of a discharge minimization requirement. It is listed what would show a vessel's failure to minimize discharges in relation to the management plan, but how does the Coast Guard plan to enforce compliance? What happens to the vessel if it does not keep a management plan in accordance with the proposed rule? If the plan is central to the enforceability of a discharge minimization requirement, it is suggested that the proposed rule detail more of the implementation of inspections and what penalties the vessels will incur if they do not comply.

Related Comments

    View All
Total: 6
Shipping Federation of Canada
Public Submission    Posted: 11/01/2012     ID: USCG-2004-19621-0187

Oct 29,2012 11:59 PM ET
Katie Pierce
Public Submission    Posted: 11/01/2012     ID: USCG-2004-19621-0188

Oct 29,2012 11:59 PM ET
Lake Carriers' Association
Public Submission    Posted: 11/01/2012     ID: USCG-2004-19621-0189

Oct 29,2012 11:59 PM ET
Canadian Shipowners Association
Public Submission    Posted: 11/01/2012     ID: USCG-2004-19621-0191

Oct 29,2012 11:59 PM ET
Conservation Law Center
Public Submission    Posted: 11/01/2012     ID: USCG-2004-19621-0190

Oct 29,2012 11:59 PM ET