G

Document ID: USCG-2009-0206-0026
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Coast Guard
Received Date: June 28 2011, at 12:00 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Date Posted: June 29 2011, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: June 17 2011, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: 
Tracking Number: 80eb5cf6
View Document:  View as format xml

View Comment

1) Penalties should not allow for seizure of vessel. Vessel should not be liable for "in rem" in case of infraction. The operator who is in violation should be held accountable but no seizure of vessel by the USCG should be allowed. 2) No retrofitting of existing vessels or motors should be required whether the vessel or motor has been put into use or not. Existing inventory of dealers or manufacturers must not be required to be retrofitted. 3) My 2001 motor cutoff switch failed after 10 years. Replacement part cost was $60 parts + $90 labor. 4) Personal responsibility for safe operation should allowed the domain of the individual. Civil damages/suits for negligence are good enough. No more regulation.

Related Comments

    View All
Total: 24
Gary LeRoy Martin
Public Submission    Posted: 06/27/2011     ID: USCG-2009-0206-0013

David Nicholas Willems
Public Submission    Posted: 06/27/2011     ID: USCG-2009-0206-0014

Gregory T. Absten
Public Submission    Posted: 06/27/2011     ID: USCG-2009-0206-0021

Bob Skribiski
Public Submission    Posted: 06/27/2011     ID: USCG-2009-0206-0022

G
Public Submission    Posted: 06/29/2011     ID: USCG-2009-0206-0026