Jeremy Thompson

Document ID: USCG-2009-0595-0007
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Coast Guard
Received Date: September 21 2009, at 12:19 PM Eastern Daylight Time
Date Posted: September 21 2009, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: September 8 2009, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: December 7 2009, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 80a27f69
View Document:  View as format xml

View Comment

I understand that the USCG and Army Corps of Engineers is evaluating the threat of the munitions and options for their remediation (plain speak: safely negating the hazard they pose). Someone should consider contacting the Navy if not already done so the Navy can consider (stress consider) the proper course of action. The only folks that are qualified to properly assess the hazard posed by these munitions are in fact Navy Explosive Ordnance Disposal personnel. I think if they were to be consulted, they might suggest that many factors may contribute to the relative high (or low) hazard posed by the munitions, taking into account the many decades after their deployment and after being subjected to decades of environmental and fishing abuse.

Related Comments

   
Total: 5
Steven R. Young
Public Submission    Posted: 09/10/2009     ID: USCG-2009-0595-0003

Dec 07,2009 11:59 PM ET
Stephen Patrick Rosen
Public Submission    Posted: 09/10/2009     ID: USCG-2009-0595-0004

Dec 07,2009 11:59 PM ET
Patrice McCarron
Public Submission    Posted: 09/15/2009     ID: USCG-2009-0595-0005

Dec 07,2009 11:59 PM ET
Jeremy Thompson
Public Submission    Posted: 09/21/2009     ID: USCG-2009-0595-0007

Dec 07,2009 11:59 PM ET
Jacob M. Thompson
Public Submission    Posted: 09/16/2009     ID: USCG-2009-0595-0006

Dec 07,2009 11:59 PM ET