"REGS, RFS" <RFS.Regs@dhs.gov>
06/08/2005 02:50 PM
To: Docket EPADC@EPA
cc:
Subject: FW:PLEASE ADD TO E-DOCKET FOR DHS-2004-0009
-----Original Message-----
From: Penny Rosser [mailto:pennysun@mit.edu]
Sent: Friday, May 06, 2005 1:45 PM
To: Regs, Rfs
Subject: CIS No. 2295-03
May 6, 2005
Director, Regulatory Management Division
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
Department of Homeland Security
111 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W.
2nd Floor
Washington D.C. 20529
Re: Comments to Proposed Rule
CIS No: 2295-03
Subject: Petitioning Requirements for O and P Visa Classifications
Dear Sir or Madam:
We appreciate the opportunity to comment on Proposed Rule 2295-03
regarding Petitioning Requirements for the O and P Nonimmigrant Visa
Classifications.
The proposal to extend the time frame for submitting O or P nonimmigrant
petitions to a full year prior to the petition start date could be
helpful. In some situations, detailed plans are indeed known this far in
advance, and having the option to take advantage of this provision could
be beneficial.
However, we strongly object to the proposal to restrict the filing of O
and P petitions to a period of between twelve and six months prior to the
requested start date. Six months in advance is too long in many
situations and petitioners must have the flexibility to submit petitions
with less lead-time. The rule indicates that CIS will accept petitions on
a discretionary basis when the requested start date is less than six
months from the filing date. The rule also indicates that premium
processing can be used in such cases. All of these components of the
proposed rule will have a negative impact on academic institutions.
Academic institutions such as MIT use the O and P visa categories for
specific events, but also use the O-1 in particular for certain
high-level research and faculty appointments for qualified beneficiaries
for whom H or J status is not possible or appropriate. Generally,
academic appointments are not finalized more than six months prior to the
start date. Offers are typically made in late spring for academic
appointments that begin on July 1st. Additionally, the proposed rule does
not distinguish between initial petitions and petitions to extend status
of persons already holding this status. Details required for extension
petitions are not always known six months or more in advance.
The proposed long filing lead time would seem to encourage long
processing times, penalizing petitioners and beneficiaries and
contradicting CIScurrent efforts to streamline and reduce backlogs. If
CIS does have delays in processing, petitioners can elect to change plans
or use premium processing. We note that CIS proposes to accept petitions
filed closer to the requested start date on a discretionary basis, but
this is not a practical option. Attempts to reach CIS with such requests
are not always successful, and any CIS time evaluating such requests
could be more effectively spent on the standard adjudication process. An
increased need for premium processing will be the actual outcome of the
proposed rule, such that in most cases premium processing would be
required rather than elective. This would be an expensive burden on
non-profit academic institutions.
In order to ensure that the proposed regulation respects the needs of all
users, we respectfully request that the proposed filing window for O and
P petitions be amended. We support allowing petitions to be filed up to a
year in advance of the requested start date. We ask that a minimum
lead-time for filing petitions not be specified, but rather be dictated
by the reality of (improved) processing times.
Please feel free to contact me should you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Penny Rosser
Director,
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-
Penny Rosser
Director, International Scholars Office
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
77 Massachusetts Avenue, Room 4-105
Cambridge, MA 02139-4307
Tel: (617) 253-2851
Fax: (617) 253-6624
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)
Comment submitted by Penny Rosser, Director, International Scholars Office, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)
This is comment on Proposed Rule
Petitioning Requirements for the O and P Nonimmigrant Classifications
View Comment
Related Comments
View AllPublic Submission Posted: 05/03/2005 ID: USCIS-2004-0001-0002
Jun 27,2005 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 05/03/2005 ID: USCIS-2004-0001-0003
Jun 27,2005 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 06/08/2005 ID: USCIS-2004-0001-0005
Jun 27,2005 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 04/28/2005 ID: USCIS-2004-0001-0006
Jun 27,2005 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 06/02/2005 ID: USCIS-2004-0001-0007
Jun 27,2005 11:59 PM ET