Comment Submitted by Jack Sanderson

Reference: DHS Docket No. USCIS-2007-0061 “The pamphlet is required by the International Marriage Broker Regulation Act of 2005 and is intended to help such aliens understand the immigration process and prevent domestic violence.” PARTS OF IMBRA WILL BE OVERTURNED SHORTLY AND YOUR PAMPHLET MAY HAVE TO BE THROWN IN THE GARBAGE IF YOU ARE NOT CAREFUL. SINCE YOU ARE BEING PAID BY MY TAXPAYER MONEY, PLEASE DO NOT ASSUME YOU KNOW WHAT POLITICAL THINGS CONGRESS “INTENDS” WHEN THEY PASS A LAW. DO YOU REMEMBER THE EXPATRIATION ACT OF 1905? IT WAS REALLY INTENDED TO STOP AMERICAN WOMEN FROM MARRYING RICH EUROPEAN ARISTOCRATS, BUT IT PRETENDED TO HAVE MORE SERIOUS INTENTIONS. IMBRA IS THE SAME THING IN REVERSE: A POLITICAL GIFT TO FEMINISTS IN RETURN FOR THEIR ALLOWING ALITO TO BE CONFIRMED IN LATE 2005. IMBRA WAS INTENDED TO HARRASS AMERICAN MEN WHO MIGHT CONSIDER DATING A NON-AMERICAN WOMAN ONCE IN AWHILE. IT IS A RADICAL FEMINIST LAW THAT WILL BE OVERTURNED. IF YOUR TEXT SLANDERS MEN OR DATING SERVICES, THE COURTS WILL FORCE YOU TO THROW ALL PRINTED COPIES IN THE GARBAGE. “DATES: Written comments must be submitted on or before September 19, 2008.” YOU WILL RECEIVE A LOT OF COMMENTS FROM AMERICAN MEN. “FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrew Perry, Family and Victim Protection Division, Office of Policy and Strategy, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Department of Homeland Security” SINCE WHEN DOES DHS DO ANYTHING BUT PROTECT US FROM TERRORISTS? WHERE DOES THE CONSTITUTION GIVE THE FEDS JURISDICTION OVER DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ISSUES? IF YOUR TEXT IS SLANDEROUS OF MEN OR DATING SITES AND IT REQUIRES COURT ACTION AGAINST YOUR OFFICE, YOU CAN BE SURE THE FEDERAL COURT WILL BE ASKED TO USE MARBURY VS MADISON TO ELIMINATE THE OFFICE ITSELF OFR BEING UNCONSTITUTIONAL. ANDREW PERRY SAYS MEN SHOULD TALK TO THEIR CONGRESSPERSON. HE DID NOT UNDERSTAND THAT THE ONLY WAY TO STOP IMBRA’S SLANDER AGAINST AMERICAN MEN IS TO TAKE THIS TO THE COURTS. “Citing the fact that K nonimmigrants may face a higher risk of domestic violence in relationships arranged by International Marriage Brokers (IMBs), Congress enacted the International Marriage Broker” NO FACT WAS EVER CITED. THE OPERATIVE DOCUMENT WAS AN INS REPORT FROM A PRO-FEMINIST HOMOSEXUAL PROFESSOR WHO STATED THAT STATISTICS SHOWED THAT MEN WHO DATED WOMEN VIA THESE INTERNATIONAL MATCHMAKING ORGANIZATIONS (THE SINISTER SOUNDING WORD “MARRIAGE BROKER” WAS ONLY ADDED LATER) WERE 7 TIMES LESS LIKELY TO ENGAGE IN DOMESTIC VIOLENCE THAN ORDINARY AMERICAN MEN WHO DO NOT TRAVEL OR DATE INTERNATIONALLY. THIS PROFESSOR WHO WAS CLEARLY NO EXPERT ON ANYTHING, THEN SAID “BUT THIS DOES NOT SOUND LOGICAL SO THIS STATISTICAL RESULT MUST HAVE BEEN BECAUSE OF THE SAMPLE BEING SMALL”. HE BASICALLY SAID “IGNORE THE EVIDENCE BECAUSE IT IS ONLY LOGICAL THAT MEN WHO DATE FOREIGN WOMEN MUST BE MORE PRONE TO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE THAN ORDINARY MEN”. NEVER MIND THE FACT THAT MEN WHO DATE OVERSEAS GENERALLY HAVE A LOT OF MONEY WHICH IS NOT CORRELATED TO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AND THEY ARE OF THE HIGHEST EDUCATION AND OFTEN SPEAK SEVERAL LANGUAGES:::WHICH IS ALSO NOT CORRELATED TO FUTURE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE DO YOU THINK CONGRESS WOULD TRY TO REGULATE INNER CITY BLACK MEN WHO WANT TO DATE INNER CITY BLACK WOMEN? WHY NOT? BECAUSE INNER CITY BLACK MEN HAVE POLITICAL POWER IN THE USA WHILE INTERNATIONAL BUSINESSMEN HAVE ZERO POWER IN CONGRESS. CONGRESS WOULD NEVER TRY TO REGULATE GAY MEN WHO USE GAY DOT COM TO MEET EACH OTHER EVEN THOUGH STATISTICS SHOW THAT THEY ARE INFECTING EACH OTHER WITH HIV AT A HIGHER RATE THAN THE NORMAL POPULATION. IMBRA IMPLIES THAT CONGRESS COULD TELL GAY MEN TO DISCLOSE THEIR HIV STATUS TO EACH OTHER FOR THE GOOD OF THE YOUNGER AND PRESUMABLY MORE INNOCENT PARTY. PEOPLE ARE GOING TO HOPEFULLY GO TO JAIL FOR FOISTING THIS IMBRA FRAUD ON AMERICAN MEN. UNLESS YOU CAN COME UP WITH THE SOCALLED FACT THAT THERE IS A HIGHER RISK FROM THESE MARRIAGES, YOU SHOULD NOT PRINT THE WORD “FACT”. “8) Notification of the requirement under IMBRA that international marriage brokers provide their foreign national clients with background information gathered on U.S. citizen clients from searches of Federal and state sex offender public registries and collected from U.S. citizen clients regarding their marital history, and domestic violence or other violent criminal history.” THIS IS PRECISELY THE PART OF IMBRA THAT WILL BE OVERTURNED WITH 99% CERTAINTY. DISREGARD IT IF YOU DO NOT WANT TO THROW YOUR PAMPHLETS IN THE GARBAGE SOON AFTER THEY ARE PRINTED. IMBRA TELLS FOREIGN WOMEN THAT THEY ARE NOT ALLOWED TO BROADCAST THEIR CONTACT INFORMATION ON THE INTERNET TO STRANGERS THAT MIGHT BE AMERICAN MALES. THIS VIOLATES FOREIGN JURISDICATIONS AND ARROGATES AMERICAN POWER OVER FOREIGNERS SIMPLY BECAUSE THEY ARE PRESUMABLY USING AN AMERICAN OWNED SERVICE. IMBRA STRETCHES THE COMMERCE CLAUSE TO THE POINT OF OVERRIDING THE RIGHT TO ASSEMBLE GUARANTEED BY THE FIRST AMENDMENT. THE INFORMATION ON THIS RADICALLY UNCONSTUTIONAL STRIP SEARCH OF AMERICAN MEN IS IRRELEVANT IN THE CONTEXT OF A WOMAN WHO IS ALREADY APPLYING FOR A FIANCE OR MARRIAGE VISA. CAN THIS TEXT PLEASE. A LOT OF PAPER WILL HAVE TO GO INTO THE GARBAGE IF YOU USE THE WORD "FACT" OR "CONGRESS INTENDED" IN YOUR TEXT.