The requirement in the proposed regulations for attorneys to take a test similar to
the test for an Accredited Claims Agent is overly burdensome for both attorneys
and the VA. Additionally, after almost two decades of attorneys representing
veterans in the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, as well as at the
administrative level after a Court remand, it seems entirely unnecessary for
attorneys to take a test to prove their ability to represent veterans.
This requirement would impose a time consuming burden on an agency already
overwhelmed with paper work and struggling with a huge backlog of claims.
Considering that the agency has for almost twenty years accepted notification of
representation by attorneys on attorney letterhead, what would testing at this
point accomplish? Arduous years of school, interning, and researching the law
should make it reasonably clear that attorneys have a solid grasp on reviewing
records, researching, reviewing case law and making cogent arguments on behalf
of veterans.
Imposing this requirement leaves one with the perception that the agency wants to
discourage attorney participation and therefore runs counter to the intent of the
new law.
In reference to the requirement that agents must not represent veterans in an
adversarial manner ignores the fact that the concept of veterans disability
compensation and certain other benefits are, in fact, based in law. Therefore, the
process is in itself necessarily adversarial. It is possible that an Agent who
aggressively represents a veteran in a complicated claim may have his or her
accreditation terminated for such aggressive representation. Agents should be
able to provide to their veteran clients the same type of representation that
veterans can expect from an attorney, and should be able to do so without fear of
repercussion or termination of one's accreditation. It is a matter of fairness to the
veteran.
I urge the removal from the proposed regulations the requirement that attorneys
must take a test before permitted to practice administratively before the agency. I
also urge the removal of the requirement that would prohibit Agents from
representing veterans with the same aggressive zeal veterans would expect from
an attorney.
Thank you for your consideration of these comments.
The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) proposes to amend its
regulations governing the representation of claimants for veterans
benefits in order to implement provisions of the Veterans Benefits,
Health Care, and Information Technology Act of 2006, and to reorganize
and clarify existing regulations. The proposed regulations would
establish the procedures and rules necessary for VA to facilitate the
paid representation of claimants by accredited agents and attorneys
after a notice of disagreement has been filed with respect to a case.
The intended effect of these regulations is to fulfill Congress'
direction that agents and attorneys may be paid for services rendered
after a notice of disagreement is filed with respect to a decision by
an agency of original jurisdiction while ensuring that claimants for
veterans benefits have responsible qualified representation in the
preparation, presentation, and prosecution of claims for veterans
benefits.
AM62 - Comment - Leo D Dougherty
This is comment on Proposed Rule
AM62 - Proposed rule - Accreditation of Agents and Attorneys; Agent and Attorney Fees
View Comment
Related Comments
View AllPublic Submission Posted: 05/11/2007 ID: VA-2007-BVA-0020-0002
Jun 06,2007 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 05/18/2007 ID: VA-2007-BVA-0020-0004
Jun 06,2007 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 05/24/2007 ID: VA-2007-BVA-0020-0006
Jun 06,2007 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 06/05/2007 ID: VA-2007-BVA-0020-0008
Jun 06,2007 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 06/06/2007 ID: VA-2007-BVA-0020-0009
Jun 06,2007 11:59 PM ET