My comments are submitted in response to Rim 2900-AM 74- Definition of Service
in the Republic of Vietnam
1. Diabetes mellitus, type II, may be presumed to have been
incurred in service secondary to herbicide exposure. 38
U.S.C.A. §§ 1110, 1116, 5102, 5103, 5103A (West 2002); 38
C.F.R. §§ 3.159, 3.303, 3.307, 3.309 (2006).
2. Prostate cancer may be presumed to have been incurred in
service secondary to herbicide exposure. 38 U.S.C.A. §§
1110, 1116, 5102, 5103, 5103A (West 2002); 38 C.F.R. §§
3.159, 3.303, 3.307, 3.309 (2006).
Simple law?, throw in: VAOPGCREC 27-97, 307(a)(6)(iii). 101(29] (A)
In some circumstances, a disease associated with exposure to
certain herbicide agents will be presumed to have been
incurred in service even though there is no evidence of that
disease during the period of service at issue. 38 U.S.C.A.
§ 1116(a) (West 2002); 38 C.F.R. §§ 3.307(a)(6), 3.309(e)
(2006). In this regard, a veteran who, during active
military, naval, or air service, served in the Republic of
Vietnam during the Vietnam era shall be presumed to have been
exposed during such service to a herbicide agent unless there
is affirmative evidence to establish that the veteran was not
exposed to any such agent during that service. 38 U.S.C.A. §
1116(f) (West 2002).
I fail to see the intentions of Congress on the above ambigious and contradictory
statues above. I will go on further to state that even those legislators who wrote
these laws, probably don’t know what the intentions were. How can a Veteran
navigate this system and get a claim approved fairly in this deliberate confusion.
The only intention, I arrive at, is the intention to confuse, discourage, delay and
deny
The purpose of this is to Define Service in the Republic of Vietnam? Or to create
even more confusion to an already overburden system with more claims piling
up . What we need is a system that treats all Veterans equitably and with
fairness. Where claim are approved or disapproved on merits. I’m referring to Blue
Water Navy personnel, who performed on the waterways of the Republic of
Vietnam. Our greatest generation, Blue Water Navy Personnel, would have been
offended if called WWII Era veterans.
Edgar Rosas - Comment on AM74 Proposed Rule
This is comment on Proposed Rule
AM74 - Proposed Rule - Definition of Service in the Republic of Vietnam
View Comment
Related Comments
View AllPublic Submission Posted: 04/17/2008 ID: VA-2008-VBA-0014-0002
Jun 16,2008 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 04/23/2008 ID: VA-2008-VBA-0014-0003
Jun 16,2008 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 04/23/2008 ID: VA-2008-VBA-0014-0005
Jun 16,2008 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 04/23/2008 ID: VA-2008-VBA-0014-0006
Jun 16,2008 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 04/24/2008 ID: VA-2008-VBA-0014-0007
Jun 16,2008 11:59 PM ET