Comment on AN46-Proposed Rule-V E Perley

Document ID: VA-2009-VBA-0029-0002
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Department Of Veterans Affairs
Received Date: December 17 2009, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Date Posted: December 24 2009, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: December 11 2009, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: February 9 2010, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 80a6cb24
View Document:  View as format xml

View Comment

VA needs to explain what exactly is missing in a claim, and what is exactly necessary to file a successful claim. If the claim is denied do not say it falls short of a regulation, the VA needs to explain exactly shat areas the claim fell short, did not meet, The claims process sometimes gets so wrapped in complex legal wording, the Veterans cannot understand what is needed to file a successful claim. If the VA is there for Veterans, then the claims process should be straight forward, and not subject to individual raters, boards or other VA likes or dislikes.

Related Comments

    View All
Total: 7
Comment on AN46-Proposed Rule-V E Perley
Public Submission    Posted: 12/24/2009     ID: VA-2009-VBA-0029-0002

Feb 09,2010 11:59 PM ET
Comment on AN46-Proposed Rule-Michael A. Leonard (NOVA)
Public Submission    Posted: 02/02/2010     ID: VA-2009-VBA-0029-0004

Feb 09,2010 11:59 PM ET
Comment on AN46-Proposed Rule-Carol Mauldin
Public Submission    Posted: 02/19/2010     ID: VA-2009-VBA-0029-0006

Feb 09,2010 11:59 PM ET
Comment on AN46-Proposed Rule-Daniel K. Akaka (SVAC)
Public Submission    Posted: 02/25/2010     ID: VA-2009-VBA-0029-0008

Feb 09,2010 11:59 PM ET
Comment on AN46-Proposed Rule-Don Stout
Public Submission    Posted: 01/21/2010     ID: VA-2009-VBA-0029-0003

Feb 09,2010 11:59 PM ET