Comment on AN67-Proposed Rule-Porter, Roxann

Document ID: VA-2010-VACO-0010-0009
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Department Of Veterans Affairs
Received Date: May 18 2010, at 12:00 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Date Posted: May 19 2010, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: April 19 2010, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: June 18 2010, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 80aefdeb
View Document:  View as format xml

View Comment

The risk iis already huge when a garnishment is received. The responsibility of the exemption of funds shoudl remain with the customer. The avenue is already in place to get exemption for the funds. It would be in the banks best interest to work with their customer on assisting them to receive this exemption instead of being the judge in the matter

Related Comments

    View All
Total: 91
Comment on AN67-Proposed Rule-Hudson, Ian J.
Public Submission    Posted: 04/22/2010     ID: VA-2010-VACO-0010-0003

Jun 18,2010 11:59 PM ET
Comment on AN67-Proposed Rule-Atkinson, Moya Marlene
Public Submission    Posted: 04/23/2010     ID: VA-2010-VACO-0010-0004

Jun 18,2010 11:59 PM ET
Comment on AN67-Proposed Rule-Oldham, William James
Public Submission    Posted: 05/05/2010     ID: VA-2010-VACO-0010-0006

Jun 18,2010 11:59 PM ET
Comment on AN67-Proposed Rule-Porter, Roxann
Public Submission    Posted: 05/19/2010     ID: VA-2010-VACO-0010-0009

Jun 18,2010 11:59 PM ET
Comment on AN67-Proposed Rule-Kansas Bankers Association
Public Submission    Posted: 05/24/2010     ID: VA-2010-VACO-0010-0010

Jun 18,2010 11:59 PM ET