We are a small business operating two marinas catering to recreational boaters. Our employees, about 12 total, are covered by state workers compensation, which is not inexpensive. As a rule, we do not perform work on customers boats, but the ambiguities created attempting to define what is a commercial boat and a recreational boat causes us great concern. We do not want to have our insurance coverage increased to cover LHWCA potential liabilities. We have never had a LHWCA claim, but we try to run our business conservatively and maintain good coverage for our risks generally. Clearly any incidental commercial business would be a rarity. Make changes cautiously and make it for the preponderance of business as commercial and except out the occassional occurance. Otherwise we will be forced to purchase LHWCA coverage to protect our assets and this would be devastatingly expensive.
Comment from William Schmicker, Pegasus Group
This is comment on Proposed Rule
Regulations implementing the Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act: Recreational Vessels
View Comment
Related Comments
View AllPublic Submission Posted: 11/01/2010 ID: WCPO-2010-0003-0007
Nov 17,2010 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 11/01/2010 ID: WCPO-2010-0003-0008
Nov 17,2010 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 11/01/2010 ID: WCPO-2010-0003-0009
Nov 17,2010 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 11/01/2010 ID: WCPO-2010-0003-0010
Nov 17,2010 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 11/01/2010 ID: WCPO-2010-0003-0014
Nov 17,2010 11:59 PM ET