Benson, Robert

Document ID: WHD-2011-0003-0003
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Wage And Hour Division
Received Date: December 29 2011, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Date Posted: December 30 2011, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: December 27 2011, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: March 21 2012, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 80f8aff0
View Document:  View as format xml

View Comment

I employ over 120 W-2 home care workers at $11.83 per hour. They provide dedicated, compassionate care to the disabled seniors whom we serve. I fully support the proposal to require minimum wage for these wonderful workers. However, requiring overtime pay will cause unintended negative consequences for these employees: 1) They cannot support their families working only 40 hours a week, even on our above-minimum wage pay. Virtually all our full-time employees urgently seek longer hours. However the proposed rule would force us to limit employees to 40 hours, rather than pass on additional costs to our clients, who already pay as much as $100,000 or more a year. 2) The only recourse we otherwiuse will have are to a) Reduce our base pay, so that employees net the same with overtime, or b) Transition to a registry model (commonplace in our industry) using 1099's, where protections for both employees and consumers are lacking. The proposed rule will hurt everyone and help no one.

Related Comments

    View All
Total: 9,714
Lawless, Matt
Public Submission    Posted: 12/30/2011     ID: WHD-2011-0003-0002

Mar 21,2012 11:59 PM ET
Benson, Robert
Public Submission    Posted: 12/30/2011     ID: WHD-2011-0003-0003

Mar 21,2012 11:59 PM ET
Mueller, Jean
Public Submission    Posted: 12/30/2011     ID: WHD-2011-0003-0004

Mar 21,2012 11:59 PM ET
Corder, Steve
Public Submission    Posted: 12/30/2011     ID: WHD-2011-0003-0005

Mar 21,2012 11:59 PM ET
Spector, Marc
Public Submission    Posted: 12/30/2011     ID: WHD-2011-0003-0006

Mar 21,2012 11:59 PM ET