2012-02-10 Energy Conservation Program: Energy Conservation Standards for Distribution Transformers; Notice of proposed rulemaking and public meeting.
Document ID: EERE-2010-BT-STD-0048-0101
Comments
Total: 70
-
2012-04-03 Comment response to questions published in the NOPR and submitting that anything over what was proposed in the NOPR would be unreasonable
Posted : 04/10/2012 ID :EERE-2010-BT-STD-0048-0168 Agency : EERE -
Apr 10,2012 11:59 PM ET
-
2012-04-09 Comment expressing views on the proposed rule and stating that the current efficiency levels are satisfactory
Posted : 04/10/2012 ID :EERE-2010-BT-STD-0048-0169 Agency : EERE -
Apr 10,2012 11:59 PM ET
-
2012-04-10 Comment response to issues published in NOPR and giving technical correction to it; also providing general and detailed comments by transformer type
Posted : 04/10/2012 ID :EERE-2010-BT-STD-0048-0170 Agency : EERE -
Apr 10,2012 11:59 PM ET
-
2012-04-10 Comment citing a few factors that raise serious concerns about the present direction of the proposed Rule Making
Posted : 04/10/2012 ID :EERE-2010-BT-STD-0048-0171 Agency : EERE -
Apr 10,2012 11:59 PM ET
-
2012-04-10 Comment response providing general and specific recommendations to issues published in NOPR
Posted : 04/10/2012 ID :EERE-2010-BT-STD-0048-0172 Agency : EERE -
Apr 10,2012 11:59 PM ET
-
2012-04-09 Comment discussing the impact of new proposed standards stating that they are not economically justified
Posted : 04/10/2012 ID :EERE-2010-BT-STD-0048-0173 Agency : EERE -
Apr 10,2012 11:59 PM ET
-
2012-04-10 Comment response to published NOPR discussing the impact of proposed standards on the industry and stating that proposed efficiency standards should be abandoned in favor of the present 2010 standards
Posted : 04/11/2012 ID :EERE-2010-BT-STD-0048-0174 Agency : EERE -
Apr 10,2012 11:59 PM ET
-
2012-04-10 Comment response to published NOPR discussing the impact of proposed standards on the industry and stating that proposed standards are not economically justified and will cause undue costs and hardship
Posted : 04/11/2012 ID :EERE-2010-BT-STD-0048-0175 Agency : EERE -
Apr 10,2012 11:59 PM ET
-
2012-04-10 Comment response to published NOPR discussing the impact of proposed standards on the industry and stating that proposed standards are not economically justified and will cause undue costs and hardships to the US electric consumers
Posted : 04/11/2012 ID :EERE-2010-BT-STD-0048-0176 Agency : EERE -
Apr 10,2012 11:59 PM ET
-
2012-04-10 Comment response to questions published in the NOPR and providing additional input for DOE’s consideration.
Posted : 04/11/2012 ID :EERE-2010-BT-STD-0048-0177 Agency : EERE -
Apr 10,2012 11:59 PM ET
-
2012-04-10 Comment response to published NOPR providing recommendations, discussing the impacts of setting higher standards and stating that this will capture additional energy savings and accelerate the introduction of a new highly efficient material option without hurting current suppliers of traditional materials.
Posted : 04/11/2012 ID :EERE-2010-BT-STD-0048-0178 Agency : EERE -
Apr 10,2012 11:59 PM ET
-
2012-04-10 Comment fully supports efficiency levels in the NOPR, fully endorses EEI comments and recommends consideration of EEI suggested corrections.
Posted : 04/11/2012 ID :EERE-2010-BT-STD-0048-0179 Agency : EERE -
Apr 10,2012 11:59 PM ET
-
2012-04-10 Comment response to questions in published NOPR, providing additional recommendations and expressing some concerns with the interpretation and application of 10 CFR 431
Posted : 04/11/2012 ID :EERE-2010-BT-STD-0048-0180 Agency : EERE -
Apr 10,2012 11:59 PM ET
-
2012-04-10 Closing comments for the 2-23-12 public meeting, includes attachment response to issues in the NOPR and a technical white paper
Posted : 04/11/2012 ID :EERE-2010-BT-STD-0048-0181 Agency : EERE -
Apr 10,2012 11:59 PM ET
-
2012-04-10 Comment response providing general and specific recommendations to issues published in NOPR
Posted : 04/11/2012 ID :EERE-2010-BT-STD-0048-0182 Agency : EERE -
Apr 10,2012 11:59 PM ET
-
2012-04-10 Comment response to issues published in the NOPR including comment about scatter plots of the design lines
Posted : 04/11/2012 ID :EERE-2010-BT-STD-0048-0183 Agency : EERE -
Apr 10,2012 11:59 PM ET
-
2012-04-10 Comment response to published NOPR supporting proposed efficiency standards; includes attached letter to the Honorable Samuel W. Bodman, dated September 26, 2006
Posted : 04/11/2012 ID :EERE-2010-BT-STD-0048-0184 Agency : EERE -
Apr 10,2012 11:59 PM ET
-
2012-04-10 Comment consists of general comments, specific comments related to the rulemaking, and responses to the issues raised in the NOPR.
Posted : 04/11/2012 ID :EERE-2010-BT-STD-0048-0185 Agency : EERE -
Apr 10,2012 11:59 PM ET
-
2012-04-10 Joint Comment response to published NOPR; includes a separate email from ASAP noting a correction to the original comment and containing attached ABB slides.
Posted : 04/11/2012 ID :EERE-2010-BT-STD-0048-0186 Agency : EERE -
Apr 10,2012 11:59 PM ET
-
2012-04-10 Comment response to key issues in the NOPR
Posted : 04/11/2012 ID :EERE-2010-BT-STD-0048-0187 Agency : EERE -
Apr 10,2012 11:59 PM ET
-
2010-04-10 Joint comment response to general and specific issues published in the NOPR; recommends finalizing the proposed TSL 1 standards for liquid-immersed electric distribution transformers.
Posted : 04/11/2012 ID :EERE-2010-BT-STD-0048-0188 Agency : EERE -
Apr 10,2012 11:59 PM ET
-
2012-04-10 Joint comment response to the NOPR stating that higher standard levels than those proposed in the NOPR are both technically feasible and economically justified and would achieve significantly larger energy savings
Posted : 04/11/2012 ID :EERE-2010-BT-STD-0048-0189 Agency : EERE -
Apr 10,2012 11:59 PM ET
-
2012-04-10 Comment response to specific issues raised in the NOPR
Posted : 04/11/2012 ID :EERE-2010-BT-STD-0048-0190 Agency : EERE -
Apr 10,2012 11:59 PM ET
-
2012-04-10 Comment response consists of general comments, specific comments related to the rulemaking, and responses to the issues raised in the Federal Register notice
Posted : 04/11/2012 ID :EERE-2010-BT-STD-0048-0191 Agency : EERE -
Apr 10,2012 11:59 PM ET
-
2012-04-10 Comment response to general and specific issues raised by DOE and recommends that the DOE carefully evaluate any resulting changes in impedance values on future efficiency requirements
Posted : 04/11/2012 ID :EERE-2010-BT-STD-0048-0192 Agency : EERE -
Apr 10,2012 11:59 PM ET
-
2012-04-11 Comment response to general and specific issues raised by the Department of Energy.
Posted : 04/11/2012 ID :EERE-2010-BT-STD-0048-0193 Agency : EERE -
Apr 10,2012 11:59 PM ET
-
2012-04-10 Comment response received after comment close date supporting proposed rule and urging the DOE to adopt the Proposed Rule without modification.
Posted : 04/11/2012 ID :EERE-2010-BT-STD-0048-0194 Agency : EERE -
Apr 10,2012 11:59 PM ET
-
2012-04-10 Comment response to published NOPR; includes 4 attachments
Posted : 04/12/2012 ID :EERE-2010-BT-STD-0048-0195 Agency : EERE -
Apr 10,2012 11:59 PM ET
-
2012-04-10 Comment received after comment close date responding to the NOPR supporting proposed energy efficiency standards and opposing the calls to increase the efficiencies beyond what has been proposed in the rule
Posted : 04/13/2012 ID :EERE-2010-BT-STD-0048-0196 Agency : EERE -
Apr 10,2012 11:59 PM ET
-
2012-04-16 Comment received after comment close date, responding to the NOPR opposing new proposed standards, stating that they are not economically justified and will cause undue costs and hardships to the US electric consumers.
Posted : 04/17/2012 ID :EERE-2010-BT-STD-0048-0202 Agency : EERE -
Apr 10,2012 11:59 PM ET