99-3522. Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Illinois: Clean Fuel Fleet Program Revision  

  • [Federal Register Volume 64, Number 31 (Wednesday, February 17, 1999)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 7788-7790]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 99-3522]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    
    40 CFR Part 52
    
    [IL168-1a; FRL-6232-8]
    
    
    Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; 
    Illinois: Clean Fuel Fleet Program Revision
    
    AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
    
    ACTION: Direct final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The EPA is approving through direct final action a State 
    Implementation Plan (SIP) revision submitted on February 13, 1998, by 
    the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA). This SIP revision 
    delays the implementation of the Illinois Clean Fuel Fleet Program 
    (CFFP) purchase requirement from model year 1998 to model year 1999, 
    based on EPA's decision to allow States to delay purchase requirements. 
    This change is intended to ensure successful implementation of the 
    Illinois CFFP, and to ensure that an adequate supply of appropriate 
    vehicles is available for fleet operators to purchase once the program 
    is underway. In addition, the SIP revision includes two minor 
    corrections to the CFFP rules federally approved on March 19, 1996.
    
    DATES: This rule is effective on April 19, 1999, unless EPA receives 
    adverse written comments by March 19, 1999. If adverse comment is 
    received, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of the rule in the 
    Federal Register informing the public that the rule will not take 
    effect.
    
    ADDRESSES: Written comment should be sent to: J. Elmer Bortzer, Chief, 
    Regulation Development Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J), U.S. 
    Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, 
    Chicago, Illinois 60604. Copies of the State submittal are available 
    for inspection at the following address: U.S. Environmental Protection 
    Agency, Region 5, Air and Radiation Division, 77 West Jackson 
    Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. (It is recommended that you 
    telephone Francisco Acevedo at (312) 886-6061 before visiting the 
    Region 5 Office.)
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Francisco J. Acevedo, Environmental 
    Protection Specialist, at (312) 886-6061.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    I. Background
    
        The Clean Air Act (CAA) requires certain States to adopt and submit 
    to EPA SIP revisions containing a CFFP for nonattainment areas with 
    1980 populations greater than 250,000 that are classified as serious or 
    worse for ozone, or which have a design value of at least 16.0 ppm for 
    carbon monoxide (CO).
        In Illinois, the Chicago area is classified as a severe ozone 
    nonattainment area and is therefore subject to the CFFP requirements.
        The CAA provides that States' CFFP SIP revisions must require fleet 
    operators with 10 or more centrally fueled vehicles or capable of being 
    centrally fueled to include a specified percentage of clean-fuel 
    vehicles in their purchases each year. There are additional 
    specifications in section 246 of the CAA with which States' SIP 
    revisions must also comply, including the requirements that covered 
    fleet operators must operate the Clean Fuel Vehicles (CFVs) in covered 
    nonattainment areas on a clean alternative fuel, defined as a fuel on 
    which the vehicle meets EPA's CFV standards. EPA promulgated emission 
    standards for CFVs in September 1994. (See 40 CFR part 88) On September 
    29, 1995, the IEPA submitted to EPA a SIP revision which allowed for 
    the implementation of a CFFP in the Chicago ozone nonattainment area. 
    On March 19, 1996, EPA approved the Illinois SIP submittal and made the 
    program federally enforceable.
        On May 22, 1997, and April 23, 1998, EPA issued guidance and a 
    direct final rule respectively, allowing a one year delay of the CFFP 
    in those areas that are unable to meet the purchase requirements cited 
    in the Clean Air Act. (See 63 FR 20103 (April 23, 1998)).
    
    [[Page 7789]]
    
        On July 7, 1997, the IEPA filed proposed rules with the Illinois 
    Pollution Control Board (IPCB) to amend the CFFP pursuant to Section 
    28.5 of the Illinois Environmental Protection Act and incorporate the 
    one year delay of the program's purchase requirement. A public hearing 
    was held on August 27, 1997, in Chicago, Illinois and on November 20, 
    1997, the IPCB adopted a Final Opinion and Order. On December 5, 1997, 
    the rules were published in the Illinois Register. They became 
    effective on November 25, 1997.
    
    II. EPA's Analysis of Illinois' CFF Program
    
        In light of EPA's action on April 23, 1998, to allow a one year 
    delay in program implementation, States with adopted CFFP SIPs may 
    revise the SIPs to provide for a model year 1999 start date for the 
    CFFP purchase requirements. The EPA believes this action will provide 
    States and fleet owners the necessary flexibility in those areas that 
    are unable to meet the CFF purchase requirements due to vehicle 
    availability.
        Illinois has estimated that the first year of the program would 
    result in a volatile organic compound reduction of 0.3 tons per day 
    with a maximum reduction of about 2.8 tons per day when the program 
    becomes fully effective in model year 2003. With a one year delay, the 
    peak annual emission reduction will occur in model year 2004, which is 
    in advance of the 2007 ozone attainment date for the Chicago 
    nonattainment area. The Illinois submittal includes amendments to the 
    Illinois CFFP rules in 35 Ill. Adm. Code 241, sections 
    241.113(a)(1)(A), (B), and (C) and (a)(2); section 241.130(b); section 
    241.140, section 241. APPENDIX B Credit Values (Tables A and D). Fleet 
    owners and operators who acquire light-duty vehicles were required to 
    acquire 30% clean fuel fleet vehicles (CFFVs) beginning in model year 
    (MY) 1998, 50% CFFVs in MY 1999, and 70% CFFVs in MY 2000. The final 
    rules delay the requirements for the acquisition of light duty vehicles 
    until MY 1999, MY 2000, and MY 2001, respectively. In addition, fleet 
    owners and operators who acquire heavy-duty vehicles were originally 
    required to acquire 50% CFFVs beginning in MY 1998; they will now need 
    to meet the heavy-duty purchase requirement starting in MY 1999.
        The amendment to section 241.130(b) changes the date by which an 
    owner or operator of a fleet may earn credits for acquiring CFFVs 
    before the compliance date of the program. The amendment to section 
    241.140 changes the first date by which owners or operators of fleets 
    must submit annual reports to IEPA from November 1, 1998 to November 1, 
    1999. In addition to the one year delay, the EPA published a document 
    in the January 3, 1996, Federal Register correcting two credit values 
    for the CFFP credit program. These two values have been corrected in 
    the State rules submitted with this SIP revision under section 241. 
    APPENDIX B (Tables A and D).
    
    III. Final Rulemaking Action
    
        EPA is approving the delay of the CFFP implementation by one year 
    and the corrections made to the credit value tables. The EPA is 
    publishing this rule without prior proposal because EPA views this as a 
    noncontroversial revision and anticipates no adverse comments. However, 
    in a separate document in this Federal Register publication, the EPA is 
    proposing to approve the State Plan should adverse written comments be 
    filed. This rule will be effective without further notice unless the 
    Agency receives relevant adverse written comment by March 19, 1999. 
    Should the Agency receive such comments, it will publish a final rule 
    informing the public that this action will not take effect. Any parties 
    interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time. If 
    no such comments are received, the public is advised that this action 
    will be effective on April 19, 1999.
    
    IV. Administrative Requirements
    
    A. Executive Order 12866
    
        The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted this 
    regulatory action from Executive Order (E.O.) 12866, entitled 
    ``Regulatory Planning and Review.''
    
    B. Executive Order 12875
    
        Under E.O. 12875, EPA may not issue a regulation that is not 
    required by statute and that creates a mandate upon a State, local or 
    tribal government, unless the Federal government provides the funds 
    necessary to pay the direct compliance costs incurred by those 
    governments. If the mandate is unfunded, EPA must provide to the Office 
    of Management and Budget a description of the extent of EPA's prior 
    consultation with representatives of affected State, local and tribal 
    governments, the nature of their concerns, copies of written 
    communications from the governments, and a statement supporting the 
    need to issue the regulation. In addition, E.O. 12875 requires EPA to 
    develop an effective process permitting elected officials and other 
    representatives of State, local and tribal governments ``to provide 
    meaningful and timely input in the development of regulatory proposals 
    containing significant unfunded mandates.'' Today's rule does not 
    create a mandate on State, local or tribal governments. The rule does 
    not impose any enforceable duties on these entities. Accordingly, the 
    requirements of section 1(a) of E.O. 12875 do not apply to this rule.
    
    C. Executive Order 13045
    
        Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety 
    Risks (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), applies to any rule that: (1) is 
    determined to be ``economically significant'' as defined under E.O. 
    12866, and (2) concerns an environmental health or safety risk that EPA 
    has reason to believe may have a disproportionate effect on children. 
    If the regulatory action meets both criteria, the Agency must evaluate 
    the environmental health or safety effects of the planned rule on 
    children, and explain why the planned regulation is preferable to other 
    potentially effective and reasonably feasible alternatives considered 
    by the Agency. This rule is not subject to E.O. 13045 because it does 
    not involve decisions intended to mitigate environmental health or 
    safety risks.
    
    D. Executive Order 13084
    
        Under E.O. 13084, EPA may not issue a regulation that is not 
    required by statute, that significantly affects or uniquely affects the 
    communities of Indian tribal governments, and that imposes substantial 
    direct compliance costs on those communities, unless the Federal 
    government provides the funds necessary to pay the direct compliance 
    costs incurred by the tribal governments. If the mandate is unfunded, 
    EPA must provide to the OMB, in a separately identified section of the 
    preamble to the rule, a description of the extent of EPA's prior 
    consultation with representatives of affected tribal governments, a 
    summary of the nature of their concerns, and a statement supporting the 
    need to issue the regulation. In addition, E.O. 13084 requires EPA to 
    develop an effective process permitting elected officials and other 
    representatives of tribal governments ``to provide meaningful and 
    timely input in the development of regulatory policies on matters that 
    significantly or uniquely affect their communities.'' Today's rule does 
    not significantly or uniquely affect the communities of Indian tribal 
    governments. Accordingly, the
    
    [[Page 7790]]
    
    requirements of section 3(b) of E.O. 13084 do not apply to this rule.
    
    E. Regulatory Flexibility Act
    
        The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) generally requires an agency 
    to conduct a regulatory flexibility analysis of any rule subject to 
    notice and comment rulemaking requirements unless the agency certifies 
    that the rule will not have a significant economic impact on a 
    substantial number of small entities. Small entities include small 
    businesses, small not-for-profit enterprises, and small governmental 
    jurisdictions. This final rule will not have a significant impact on a 
    substantial number of small entities because SIP approvals under 
    section 110 and subchapter I, part D of the Clean Air Act (CAA) do not 
    create any new requirements, but simply approve requirements that the 
    State is already imposing. Therefore, because the Federal SIP approval 
    does not create any new requirements, I certify that this action will 
    not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small 
    entities. Moreover, due to the nature of the Federal-State relationship 
    under the CAA, preparation of a flexibility analysis would constitute 
    Federal inquiry into the economic reasonableness of State action. The 
    CAA forbids EPA to base its actions concerning SIPs on such grounds. 
    Union Electric Co. v. EPA., 427 U.S. 246, 256-66 (1976); 42 U.S.C. 
    7410(a)(2).
    
    F. Unfunded Mandates
    
        Under section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 
    (``Unfunded Mandates Act''), signed into law on March 22, 1995, EPA 
    must prepare a budgetary impact statement to accompany any proposed or 
    final rule that includes a Federal mandate that may result in estimated 
    annual costs to State, local, or tribal governments in the aggregate; 
    or to private sector, of $100 million or more. Under section 205, EPA 
    must select the most cost-effective and least burdensome alternative 
    that achieves the objectives of the rule and is consistent with 
    statutory requirements. Section 203 requires EPA to establish a plan 
    for informing and advising any small governments that may be 
    significantly or uniquely impacted by the rule. EPA has determined that 
    the approval action promulgated does not include a Federal mandate that 
    may result in estimated annual costs of $100 million or more to either 
    State, local, or tribal governments in the aggregate, or to the private 
    sector. This Federal action approves pre-existing requirements under 
    State or local law, and imposes no new requirements. Accordingly, no 
    additional costs to State, local, or tribal governments, or to the 
    private sector, result from this action.
    
    G. Submission to Congress and the Comptroller General
    
        The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the 
    Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally 
    provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating 
    the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, 
    to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the 
    United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other 
    required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of 
    Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior 
    to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot 
    take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal 
    Register. This rule is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 
    804(2).
    
    H. Petitions for Judicial Review
    
        Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review 
    of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for 
    the appropriate circuit by April 19, 1999. Filing a petition for 
    reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect 
    the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial review, nor does 
    it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be 
    filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. 
    This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its 
    requirements. (See section 307(b)(2)).
    
    List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
    
        Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide, 
    Nitrogen oxide, Ozone, Volatile organic compounds.
    
        Dated: February 2, 1999.
    David A. Ullrich,
    Acting Regional Administrator, Region V.
    
        Part 52, Chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is 
    amended as follows:
    
    PART 52--[AMENDED]
    
        1. The authority citation for Part 52 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
    
    Subpart O--Illinois
    
        2. Section 52.720 is amended by adding paragraph (c)(146) to read 
    as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 52.720  Identification of plan.
    
    * * * * *
        (c ) * * *
        (146) On February 13, 1998, the Illinois Environmental Protection 
    Agency (IEPA) submitted a revision to the Illinois State Implementation 
    Plan (SIP). This revision amends certain sections of the Clean-Fuel 
    Fleet Program (CFFP) in the Chicago ozone nonattainment area to reflect 
    that fleet owners and operators will have an additional year to meet 
    the purchase requirements of the CFFP. The amendment changes the first 
    date by which owners or operators of fleets must submit annual reports 
    to IEPA from November 1, 1998 to November 1, 1999. In addition, this 
    revision corrects two credit values in the CFFP credit program.
        (i) Incorporation by reference.
        (A) 35 Illinois Administrative Code 241; Sections 241.113, 241.130, 
    241.140, 241.Appendix B.Table A, 241.Appendix B.Table D adopted in R95-
    12 at 19 Ill. Reg. 13265, effective September 11, 1995; amended in R98-
    8, at 21 Ill. Reg. 15767, effective November 25, 1997.
        (ii) Other Material.
        (A) February 13, 1998, letter and attachments from the Illinois 
    Environmental Protection Agency's Bureau of Air Chief to the United 
    States Environmental Protection Agency's Regional Air and Radiation 
    Division Director submitting Illinois' amendments to the Clean Fuel 
    Fleet regulations as a revision to the ozone State Implementation Plan.
    
    [FR Doc. 99-3522 Filed 2-16-99; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
4/19/1999
Published:
02/17/1999
Department:
Environmental Protection Agency
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Direct final rule.
Document Number:
99-3522
Dates:
This rule is effective on April 19, 1999, unless EPA receives adverse written comments by March 19, 1999. If adverse comment is received, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of the rule in the Federal Register informing the public that the rule will not take effect.
Pages:
7788-7790 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
IL168-1a, FRL-6232-8
PDF File:
99-3522.pdf
CFR: (1)
40 CFR 52.720