95-1498. Pesticide Tolerances for Imazethapyr  

  • [Federal Register Volume 60, Number 13 (Friday, January 20, 1995)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 4091-4093]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 95-1498]
    
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    
    40 CFR Part 180
    
    [PP 1F4013/R2101; FRL-4930-9]
    RIN 2070-AB78
    
    
    Pesticide Tolerances for Imazethapyr
    
    AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This rule establishes tolerances for the sum of the residues 
    of the herbicide imazethapyr, 2-[4,5-dihydro-4-methy1-4-(1-
    methylethyl)-5-oxo-1H-imidazo1-2-yl]-5-ethy1-3-pyridine carboxylic 
    acid, as its ammonium salt and its metabolite, 2-[4,5-dihydro-4-methyl-
    4-(1-methylethyl)-5-oxo-1H-imidazol-2-yl]-5-(1-hydroxyethyl)-3-pyridine 
    carboxylic acid, both free and conjugated, in or on 
    [[Page 4092]] alfalfa, forage and hay at 3.0 parts per million (ppm). 
    The American Cyanamid Co. requested this regulation that establishes 
    the maximum permissible level for residues of the herbicide in or on 
    alfalfa.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE: This regulation becomes effective January 20, 1995.
    
    ADDRESSES: Written objections and hearing requests, identified by the 
    document control number, [PP 1F4013/R2101], may be submitted to: 
    Hearing Clerk (1900), Environmental Protection Agency, Rm. M3708, 401 M 
    St., SW., Washington, DC 20460. A copy of objections and hearing 
    requests filed with the Hearing Clerk should be identified by the 
    document control number and submitted to: Public Response and Program 
    Resources Branch, Field Operations Division (7506C), Office of 
    Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M St., SW., 
    Washington, DC 20460. In person, bring copy of objections and hearing 
    request to: Rm. 1132, CM #2, 1921 Jefferson Davis Hwy., Arlington, VA 
    22202. Fees accompanying objections shall be labeled ``Tolerance 
    Petition Fees'' and forwarded to: EPA Headquarters Accounting 
    Operations Branch, OPP (Tolerance Fees), P.O. Box 36277M, Pittsburgh, 
    PA 15251.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: By mail: Robert J. Taylor, Product 
    Manager (PM) 25, Registration Division (7505C), Environmental 
    Protection Agency, 401 M St., SW., Washington, DC 20460. Office 
    location and telephone number: Rm. 245, CM #2, 1921 Jefferson Davis 
    Hwy., Arlington, VA 22202, (703) 305-6800.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA issued a notice, published in the 
    Federal Register of March 11, 1992 (57 FR 8658), which announced that 
    the American Cyanamid Co., P.O. Box 400, Princeton, NJ 08540, had 
    submitted pesticide petition (PP) 1F4013 to EPA proposing that 40 CFR 
    part 180 be amended by establishing a tolerance under section 408 of 
    the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, 21 U.S.C. 346a, for the 
    combined residues of the herbicide imazethapyr, 2-[4,5-dihydro-4-
    methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-5-oxo-1H-imidazo1-2-y1]-5-ethy1-3-pyridine-
    carboxylic acid, as its ammonium salt and the metabolite, 2-[4,5-
    dihydro-4-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-5-oxo-1H-imidazol-2-yl]-5-(1-
    hydroxyethyl)-3-pyridine carboxylic acid, both free and conjugated, in 
    or on alfalfa, forage and hay at 3.0 ppm.
        There were no comments or requests for referral to an advisory 
    committee received in response to the notice of filing. The data 
    submitted in the petition and other relevant material have been 
    evaluated. The toxicology data listed below were considered in support 
    of the tolerance.
        1. Several acute toxicology studies placing technical-grade 
    imazethapyr in Toxicity Category III.
        2. An 18-month carcinogenicity study with mice fed diets containing 
    0, 1,000, 5,000, or 10,000 ppm with no carcinogenic effects observed 
    under the conditions of the study at levels up to and including 10,000 
    ppm (1,500 mg/ kg/day) (highest dose tested [HDT]), a systemic no-
    observed-effect level (NOEL) of 5,000 ppm (750 mg/kg/day), and a 
    systemic LOEL of 10,000 ppm (1,500 mg/kg/day), based on decreased body 
    weight gain in both sexes.
        3. A 2-year chronic toxicity/carcinogenicity study in rats fed 
    diets containing 0, 1,000, 5,000, or 10,000 ppm with no carcinogenic 
    effects observed under the conditions of the study at levels up to and 
    including 10,000 ppm (500 mg/kg/day [HDT]) and a systemic NOEL of 
    10,000 ppm (500 mg/kg/day [HDT]).
        4. A l-year feeding study in dogs fed diets containing 0, 1,000, 
    5,000, or 10,000 ppm with a NOEL of 1,000 ppm (25 mg/kg/day and a LOEL 
    of 5,000 ppm (125 mg/kg/day), based on decreased packed cell volume, 
    hemoglobin, and erythrocytes in females.
        5. A developmental toxicity study in rats fed dosage levels of 0, 
    125, 375, and 1,125 mg/kg/day, with a maternal toxicity NOEL of 375 mg/
    kg/day and a LOEL of 1,125 mg/kg/day (clinical signs of toxicity) and a 
    developmental toxicity NOEL of greater than 1,125 mg/kg/day (HDT).
        6. A developmental toxicity study in rabbits fed dosage levels of 
    0, 100, 300, and 1,000 mg/kg/day with a maternal toxicity NOEL of 300 
    mg/kg/day and a LOEL of 1,000 mg/kg/day (death) and a developmental 
    toxicity NOEL of greater than 1,000 mg/kg/day (HDT).
        7. A two-generation reproduction study in rats fed dietary levels 
    of 0, 1,000, 5,000, or 10,000 ppm with a NOEL for systemic and 
    reproductive effects of 10,000 ppm (500 mg/kg/day [HDT]).
        8. A mutagenic test with Salmonella typhimurium (negative); an in 
    vitro chromosomal aberration test in Chinese hamster ovary cells 
    (positive without metabolic activation but at dose levels that were 
    toxic to the cells and negative with metabolic activation); an in vivo 
    chromosomal aberration test in rat bone marrow cells (negative); an 
    unscheduled DNA synthesis study in rat hepatocytes (negative).
        Based on the NOEL of 25 mg/kg bwt/day in the 1-year dog feeding 
    study, and using a hundredfold uncertainty factor, the acceptable daily 
    intake (ADI) for imazethapyr is calculated to be 0.25 mg/kg bwt/day. 
    The theoretical maximum residue contrbution (TMRC) is 0.000100 mg/kg 
    bwt/day for existing tolerances for the overall U.S. population. The 
    current action will not increase the TMRC since no finite residues of 
    imazethapyr are expected from meat and milk derived from animals 
    consuming treated alfalfa. This tolerance and previously established 
    tolerances utilize a total of 0.05 percent of the ADI for the overall 
    U.S. population. For U.S. subgroup populations, nonnursing infants and 
    children aged 1 to 6, the previously established tolerances utilize a 
    total of 0.16 percent of the ADI.
        A maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) or Limit Dose (20,000 ppm) was not 
    evaluated in the chronic toxicity/ carcinogenicity study with rats. 
    However, the highest dose tested was within 50 percent of the dose 
    level necessary for an adequate carcinogenicity study in rats (20,000 
    ppm or 1,000 mg/kg/day); this chemical is structurally similar to two 
    other pesticides (Scepter and Assert) that were not carcinogenic in 
    rats or mice, and the genetic toxicity studies were negative for 
    imazethapyr. For these reasons, no further carcinogenicity testing is 
    required.
        Although an analytical method is available for imazethapyr on 
    alfalfa (confirmed by EPA), the Agency has requested that the 
    petitioner rewrite the primary enforcement procedure to include an 
    alternate CE buffer system as the confirmatory step and the petitioner 
    has agreed. This pesticide is useful for the purposes for which the 
    tolerances are sought. The nature of the residues is adequately 
    understood for the purposes of establishing these tolerances. Adequate 
    analytical methodology, capillary electrophoresis, is available for 
    enforcement purposes. Because of the long lead time from establishing 
    this tolerance to publication, enforcement methodology is being made 
    available in the interim to anyone interested in pesticide enforcement 
    when requested by mail from: Calvin Furlow, Public Response and Program 
    Resources Branch, Field Operations Division (7506C), Office Pesticide 
    Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 401 St., SW., Washington, DC 
    20460. Office location and telephone number: Rm. 1130A, CM #2, 1921 
    Jefferson Davis Hwy., Arlington, 22202.
        There are currently no actions pending against the registration of 
    this chemical. There is no expectation of residue occurring in meat, 
    milk, poultry, [[Page 4093]] or eggs from this tolerance. Based on the 
    data and information submitted above, the Agency has determined that 
    the establishment of tolerances by amending 40 CFR part 180 will 
    protect the public health. Therefore, EPA is establishing the tolerance 
    as described below.
        Any person adversely affected by this regulation may, within 30 
    days after the date of publication in the Federal Register, file 
    written objections with the Hearing Clerk, Environmental Protection 
    Agency, at the address given above. 40 CFR 178.20. A copy of the 
    objections and/or hearing requests filed with the Hearing Clerk should 
    be submitted to the OPP docket for this rulemaking. The obctions 
    submitted must specify the provisions of the regulation deemed 
    objectionable and the grounds for the objection. 40 CFR 178.25. Each 
    objection must be accompanied by the fee prescribed by 40 CFR 
    180.33(i). If a hearing is requested, the objections must include a 
    statement of the factual sue(s) on which a hearing is requested, the 
    requestor's intentions on each issue, and a summary of any evidence 
    relied upon by the objector. 40 CFR 178.27. A request for hearing will 
    be granted if the Administrator determines at the material submitted 
    shows the following: There is a genuine and substantial issue of fact; 
    there is a reasonable possibility that available evidence identified by 
    the requestor would, if established, resolve one or more of such issues 
    in favor of the requestor, taking into account uncontested aims or 
    facts to the contrary; and resolution of the factual issue(s) in the 
    manner sought by the requestor would be adequate to justify the action 
    requested. 40 CFR 178.32.
        Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, Oct. 4, 1993), the Agency 
    must determine whether the regulatory action is ``significant'' and 
    therefore subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget 
    (OMB) and the requirements of the Executive Order. Under section 3(f), 
    the order defines a ``significant regulatory action'' as an action that 
    is likely to result in a rule (1) having an annual effect on the 
    economy of $100 million or more, or adversely and materially affecting 
    a sector the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, 
    public health or safety, or State, local, or tribal governments or 
    communities (also referred to as ``economically significant''); (2) 
    creating serious inconsistency or otherwise interfering with action 
    taken or planned by another Agency; (3) materially altering the 
    budgetary impacts of entitlement, grants, user fees, or loan programs 
    or the rights and obligations of recipients thereof; or (4) raising 
    novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal mandates, the 
    President's priorities, or the principles set forth in this Executive 
    Order.
        Pursuant to the terms of the Executive Order, EPA has determined 
    that this rule is not ``significant'' and is therefore not subject to 
    OMB review. Pursuant to the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility 
    Act (Pub. L. 96-354, 94 Stat. 1164, 5 U.S.C. 601-612), the 
    Administrator has determined that regulations establishing new 
    tolerances or raising tolerance levels or establishing exemptions from 
    tolerance requirements do not have a significant economic impact on a 
    substantial number small entities. A certification statement to this 
    effect was published in the Federal Register of May 4, 1981 (46 FR 
    24950).
    
    List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
    
        Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, 
    Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and 
    recordkeeping requirements.
    
        Dated: January 9, 1995.
    
    Stephen L. Johnson,
    Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.
    
        Therefore, 40 CFR part 180 is amended as follows:
    
    PART 180--[AMENDED]
    
        1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as 
    follows:
    
        Authority: 21 U.S.C. 346a and 371.
    
        2. In Sec. 180.447, paragraph (b) is amended by revising the table 
    therein, to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 180.447 Imazethapyr, ammonium salt; tolerances for residues.
    
    * * * * *
        (b) *  *  *
    
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                  Parts per 
                             Commodity                             million  
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Alfalfa, forage............................................          3.0
    Alfalfa, hay...............................................          3.0
    Peanuts....................................................          0.1
    Peanuts, hulls.............................................          0.1
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    * * * * *
    
    [FR Doc. 95-1498 Filed 1-19-95; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6560-50-F
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
1/20/1995
Published:
01/20/1995
Department:
Environmental Protection Agency
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
95-1498
Dates:
This regulation becomes effective January 20, 1995.
Pages:
4091-4093 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
PP 1F4013/R2101, FRL-4930-9
RINs:
2070-AB78
PDF File:
95-1498.pdf
CFR: (1)
40 CFR 180.447