99-26974. Change in Disease Status of Belgium Because of BSE  

  • [Federal Register Volume 64, Number 199 (Friday, October 15, 1999)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 55813-55814]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 99-26974]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
    
    Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
    
    9 CFR Part 94
    
    [Docket No. 97-115-2]
    
    
    Change in Disease Status of Belgium Because of BSE
    
    AGENCY: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA.
    
    ACTION: Affirmation of interim rule as final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: We are adopting as a final rule, without change, an interim 
    rule that added Belgium to the list of regions where bovine spongiform 
    encephalopathy exists. We took this action because bovine spongiform 
    encephalopathy was detected in a cow in Belgium. The effect of the 
    interim rule was to prohibit the importation of ruminants that have 
    been in Belgium and meat, meat products, and certain other products of 
    ruminants that have been in Belgium. The interim rule was necessary to 
    reduce the risk that bovine spongiform encephalopathy could be 
    introduced into the United States.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE: The interim rule became effective on October 31, 1997.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. John Cougill, Staff Veterinarian, 
    Animal Products Program, National Center for Import and Export, VS, 
    APHIS, 4700 River Road Unit 40, Riverdale, MD 20737-1231; (301) 734-
    3399; or e-mail: john.w.cougill@usda.gov.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Background
    
        In an interim rule effective October 31, 1997, and published in the 
    Federal Register on November 18, 1997 (62 FR 61433-61434, Docket No. 
    97-115-1), we amended the regulations in 9 CFR part 94 by adding 
    Belgium to the list in Sec. 94.18 of regions where bovine spongiform 
    encephalopathy (BSE) exists. We took this action because BSE was 
    detected in a cow born in Belgium.
        Comments on the interim rule were required to be received on or 
    before January 20, 1998. We did not receive any comments. Therefore, 
    for the reasons given in the interim rule, we are adopting the interim 
    rule as a final rule.
    
    [[Page 55814]]
    
        This action also affirms the information contained in the interim 
    rule concerning Executive Orders 12866 and 12988 and the Paperwork 
    Reduction Act.
        Further, for this action, the Office of Management and Budget has 
    waived the review process required by Executive Order 12866.
    
    Regulatory Flexibility Act
    
        This rule affirms an interim rule that amended the regulations by 
    adding Belgium to the list of regions where BSE exists. We took this 
    action because BSE was detected in a cow in Belgium. The effect of the 
    interim rule was to prohibit the importation of ruminants that have 
    been in Belgium and meat, meat products, and certain other products of 
    ruminants that have been in Belgium. The interim rule was necessary to 
    reduce the risk that BSE could be introduced into the United States.
        The following analysis addresses the economic effect of this rule 
    on small entities, as required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
        BSE is a slowly progressing, fatal, degenerative disease that 
    affects the central nervous system of cattle. The disease was first 
    diagnosed in 1986 in Great Britain, where it is sometimes called ``mad 
    cow disease.'' Infected animals may display changes in temperament, 
    abnormal posture, incoordination and difficulty in rising, decreased 
    milk production, and loss of body condition despite continued appetite. 
    The causative agent of BSE is not completely characterized, and there 
    is no treatment for the disease. At this time, the disease is not known 
    to exist in the United States. There is no vaccine to prevent BSE nor 
    is there a test to detect the disease in live animals. Given these 
    factors, the import restrictions imposed by the interim rule are the 
    most effective means available for ensuring that BSE does not enter the 
    United States from Belgium.
        Preventing the introduction of BSE into the United States is 
    critical. In addition to the potential threat to public health, BSE 
    also has the potential to cause severe economic hardship for the U.S. 
    livestock industry. Great Britain's experience with the disease 
    provides an insight into how damaging BSE can be to livestock. Between 
    November 1986 (when BSE was first diagnosed in Great Britain) and May 
    1996, an estimated 160,540 head of cattle in approximately 33,455 herds 
    were diagnosed with BSE in Great Britain. The epidemic peaked there in 
    January 1993, with almost 1,000 new cases per week. All of the animals 
    in Great Britain showing signs of BSE, most of which were dairy cows 
    between 3 and 5 years of age, were destroyed.
        If BSE were introduced into the United States, livestock losses 
    would likely be much greater than in Great Britain, because the United 
    States raises more cattle. However, assuming the same number of cattle 
    losses in the United States as in Great Britain (160,540), the 
    introduction of BSE into the United States would cost U.S. livestock 
    producers $189 million, based on the current price of $1,180 per head 
    for dairy cows. The $189 million figure does not include higher 
    production costs that would likely be incurred by U.S. producers, due 
    to the presence of the disease.
        U.S. export and consumer markets would also be affected. The United 
    States currently restricts the importation of live ruminants and 
    ruminant products from all regions where BSE is known to exist and from 
    regions that present an undue risk of introducing BSE into the United 
    States due to import requirements less restrictive than those that 
    would be acceptable for import into the United States and/or because of 
    inadequate surveillance. Presumably, if BSE were introduced into the 
    United States, other regions would adopt similar restrictions on the 
    exportation of live ruminants and ruminant products from the United 
    States. Such restrictions by other regions would be devastating 
    economically. In 1997, for example, the dollar value of U.S. exports of 
    both bovine animals and bovine animal meat totaled $3.1 billion. Those 
    export sales could be lost in their entirety. Consumers would incur 
    higher costs due to higher prices for ruminant products and increased 
    prices for competitive products, such as poultry.
        We expect that restricting the importation of live ruminants and 
    ruminant products from Belgium will have little or no effect on U.S. 
    consumers. Fewer than 100 ruminants were imported into the United 
    States from Belgium in 1996. This is compared with U.S. imports of 
    nearly 2 million cattle alone in the same year. There were no imports 
    into the United States of fresh sheep or goat meat from Belgium in 
    1994, 1995, or 1996. Further, there were no imports into the United 
    States of canned beef, sausage, and other prepared and preserved beef 
    and veal from Belgium in 1996.
        Placing Belgium on the list of regions where BSE is known to exist 
    also restricts the importation of bones, products made from bone meal, 
    blood meal, meat meal, offal, fat, glands, and serum from ruminants 
    from this country. Little effect should be associated with any of these 
    restrictions. Further, the importation into the United States of any 
    pet or animal feed from Belgium that may contain ruminant products is 
    restricted as a result of this action. Since animal feed imported from 
    Belgium in 1996 accounted for less than one half of one percent of 
    total U.S. animal feed imports in that year, we expect that there will 
    be very little or no effect on U.S. consumers as a result of this 
    restriction.
        Because Belgium is not a significant supply source for the U.S. 
    market, restrictions on imports from Belgium should not have a 
    significant effect on consumer prices in the United States.
        Under these circumstances, the Administrator of the Animal and 
    Plant Health Inspection Service has determined that this action will 
    not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small 
    entities.
    
    List of Subjects in 9 CFR Part 94
    
        Animal diseases, Imports, Livestock, Meat and meat products, Milk, 
    Poultry and poultry products, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
    
    PART 94--RINDERPEST, FOOT-AND-MOUTH DISEASE, FOWL PEST (FOWL 
    PLAGUE), EXOTIC NEWCASTLE DISEASE, AFRICAN SWINE FEVER, HOG 
    CHOLERA, AND BOVINE SPONGIFORM ENCEPHALOPATHY: PROHIBITED AND 
    RESTRICTED IMPORTATIONS
    
        Accordingly, we are adopting as a final rule, without change, the 
    interim rule that amended 9 CFR part 94 and that was published at 62 FR 
    61433-61434 on November 18, 1997.
    
        Authority: 7 U.S.C. 147a, 150ee, 161, 162, and 450; 19 U.S.C. 
    1306; 21 U.S.C. 111, 114a, 134a, 134b, 134c, 134f, 136, and 136a; 31 
    U.S.C. 9701; 42 U.S.C. 4331 and 4332; 7 CFR 2.22, 2.80, and 
    371.2(d).
    
        Done in Washington, DC, this 8th day of October 1999.
    Craig A. Reed,
    Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.
    [FR Doc. 99-26974 Filed 10-14-99; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 3410-34-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
10/31/1997
Published:
10/15/1999
Department:
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Affirmation of interim rule as final rule.
Document Number:
99-26974
Dates:
The interim rule became effective on October 31, 1997.
Pages:
55813-55814 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 97-115-2
PDF File:
99-26974.pdf
CFR: (1)
9 CFR 94