98-28300. Airworthiness Directives; Cessna Aircraft Company 310, T310, 320, 401, 402, 411, and 421 Series Airplanes  

  • [Federal Register Volume 63, Number 204 (Thursday, October 22, 1998)]
    [Proposed Rules]
    [Pages 56579-56582]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 98-28300]
    
    
    ========================================================================
    Proposed Rules
                                                    Federal Register
    ________________________________________________________________________
    
    This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of 
    the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these 
    notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in 
    the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
    
    ========================================================================
    
    
    Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 204 / Thursday, October 22, 1998 / 
    Proposed Rules
    
    [[Page 56579]]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    
    Federal Aviation Administration
    
    14 CFR Part 39
    
    [Docket No. 90-CE-35-AD]
    RIN 2120-AA64
    
    
    Airworthiness Directives; Cessna Aircraft Company 310, T310, 320, 
    401, 402, 411, and 421 Series Airplanes
    
    AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
    
    ACTION: Supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM); Reopening of 
    the comment period.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This document proposes to revise an earlier proposed 
    airworthiness directive (AD) that would have applied to certain Cessna 
    310, T310, 320, 401, 402, 411, and 421 series airplanes. The previous 
    document would have superseded AD 72-14-08 R1, which currently requires 
    repetitively inspecting the fuel and oil flexible hose lines for 
    leakage or evidence of any damaged or deteriorated hose assembly on the 
    above-referenced airplanes, and replacing any discrepant part. This 
    document would retain from the previous proposed AD the requirement of 
    replacing the fuel and oil flexible hose assemblies in the engine 
    compartment on Cessna 401, 402, and 421 series airplanes with Cessna 
    hose assemblies of improved design, as terminating action for the 
    repetitive inspection requirement of AD 72-14-08-R1; and would provide 
    for the replacement of assemblies of equivalent design to that of the 
    Cessna parts. The proposed AD is the result of the Federal Aviation 
    Administration's policy on commuter class aircraft, which briefly 
    states that, when a modification exists that could eliminate or reduce 
    the number of required critical inspections, the modification should be 
    incorporated. The actions specified by the proposed AD are intended to 
    prevent deterioration of the fuel and oil hose assemblies, which could 
    result in fuel or oil leakage with consequent engine shutdown. Since 
    sufficient time has passed (more than 12 months) since the issuance of 
    the original proposal, the FAA is reopening the comment period and 
    allowing the public additional time to comment.
    
    DATES: Comments must be received on or before December 22, 1998.
    
    ADDRESSES: Submit comments in triplicate to the FAA, Central Region, 
    Office of the Regional Counsel, Attention: Rules Docket No. 90-CE-35-
    AD, Room 1558, 601 E. 12th Street, Kansas City, Missouri 64106. 
    Comments may be inspected at this location between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m., 
    Monday through Friday, holidays excepted.
        Service information that applies to the proposed AD may be obtained 
    from the Cessna Aircraft Company, P.O. Box 7706, Wichita, Kansas 67277, 
    telephone: (316) 941-7550, facsimile: (316) 942-9008. This information 
    also may be examined at the Rules Docket at the address above.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Paul O. Pendleton, Aerospace 
    Engineer, FAA, Wichita Aircraft Certification Office, 1801 Airport 
    Road, Room 100, Mid-Continent Airport, Wichita, Kansas, 67209, 
    telephone: (316) 946-4143; facsimile: (316) 946-4407.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Comments Invited
    
        Interested persons are invited to participate in the making of the 
    proposed rule by submitting such written data, views, or arguments as 
    they may desire. Communications should identify the Rules Docket number 
    and be submitted in triplicate to the address specified above. All 
    communications received on or before the closing date for comments, 
    specified above, will be considered before taking action on the 
    proposed rule. The proposals contained in this supplemental notice may 
    be changed in light of the comments received.
        Comments are specifically invited on the overall regulatory, 
    economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the proposed rule. All 
    comments submitted will be available, both before and after the closing 
    date for comments, in the Rules Docket for examination by interested 
    persons. A report that summarizes each FAA-public contact concerned 
    with the substance of this proposal will be filed in the Rules Docket.
        Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments 
    submitted in response to this supplemental notice must submit a self-
    addressed, stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: 
    ``Comments to Docket No. 90-CE-35-AD.'' The postcard will be date 
    stamped and returned to the commenter.
    
    Availability of Supplemental NPRM's
    
        Any person may obtain a copy of this supplemental NPRM by 
    submitting a request to the FAA, Central Region, Office of the Regional 
    Counsel, Attention: Rules Docket No. 90-CE-35-AD, Room 1558, 601 E. 
    12th Street, Kansas City, Missouri 64106.
    
    Discussion
    
        A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 
    CFR part 39) to include an AD that would apply to certain Cessna Models 
    310, T310, 320, 401, 402, 411, and 421 series airplanes was published 
    in the Federal Register as a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) on 
    October 23, 1990 (55 FR 42726). The NPRM proposed to supersede AD 72-
    14-08 R1, Amendment 39-4215, with a new AD that would:
    
    --initially retain the requirement of repetitively inspecting the fuel 
    and oil flexible hose lines for leakage or evidence of any damaged or 
    deteriorated hose assembly on all of the affected airplanes, and 
    replacing any discrepant part; and
    --eventually require, regardless if damage or deterioration was found, 
    replacing the fuel and oil flexible hose assemblies in the engine 
    compartment with Cessna hose assemblies of improved design for the 
    Cessna 401, 402, and 421 series airplanes, as terminating action for 
    the repetitive inspection requirement. The 310, T310, 320, and 411 
    series airplanes could either be inspected repetitively provided no 
    damage or deterioration was found or have the fuel and oil flexible 
    hose assemblies replaced.
    
        The NPRM was the result of the Federal Aviation Administration's 
    policy on commuter class aircraft, which briefly states that, when a 
    modification exists that could eliminate or reduce the number of 
    required critical inspections, the modification
    
    [[Page 56580]]
    
    should be incorporated. For the purposes of the NPRM, the 401, 402, and 
    421 series airplanes are considered commuter class and would be 
    affected by the proposed mandatory parts replacement.
        Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate 
    in the making of this amendment. Due consideration has been given to 
    the one comment received.
    
    Comment Disposition
    
        The commenter feels that mandatory replacement of the fuel and oil 
    flexible hoses is unjustified if the hoses are showing no signs of 
    damage or deterioration. The commenter states that he has had no 
    problems with his Cessna Model 402B for 5,600 hours time-in-service 
    (TIS) and that he shouldn't be penalized with an expensive hose 
    replacement AD.
        The FAA does not concur that mandatory replacement of the fuel and 
    oil flexible hoses is unjustified. The FAA has determined that reliance 
    on critical repetitive inspections on aging commuter-class airplanes 
    carries an unnecessary safety risk when a design change exists that 
    could eliminate or, in certain instances, reduce the number of those 
    critical inspections. In determining what inspections are critical, the 
    FAA considers (1) the safety consequences if the known problem is not 
    detected by the inspection; (2) the reliability of the inspection such 
    as the probability of not detecting the known problem; (3) whether the 
    inspection area is difficult to access; and (4) the possibility of 
    damage to an adjacent structure as a result of the problem.
        These factors have led the FAA to establish an aging commuter-class 
    aircraft policy that requires incorporating a known design change when 
    it could replace a critical repetitive inspection. Therefore, the FAA 
    has determined that replacement of the fuel and oil hose assemblies 
    should be mandatory instead of relying on repetitive inspections to 
    detect damage or deterioration.
    
    Events Since Issuance of the NPRM
    
        Since issuance of the NPRM, the FAA has received information about 
    equivalent fuel and oil hose assemblies to that of the improved design 
    Cessna parts. The FAA has determined that the proposed AD should 
    provide the option of installing the Cessna parts or FAA-approved 
    equivalent parts.
    
    The FAA's Determination
    
        After examining all information related to the subject described in 
    this document, the FAA has determined that:
    
    --the NPRM should be revised to add the option of installing fuel and 
    oil hose assemblies that are equivalent to the improved design Cessna 
    parts on Cessna 401, 402, and 421 series airplanes; and
    --AD action should be taken to incorporate these changes to continue to 
    prevent deterioration of the fuel and oil hose assemblies, which could 
    result in fuel or oil leakage with consequent engine shutdown.
    
    The Supplemental NPRM
    
        Since sufficient time has passed (more than 12 months) since the 
    issuance of the original proposal, the FAA is reopening the comment 
    period to provide additional time for public comment.
    
    Cost Impact
    
        The FAA estimates that approximately 2,617 of the 401, 402, and 421 
    series airplanes and 5,023 of the 310, T310, 320, and 411 series 
    airplanes would be affected by the proposed AD.
        The cost of installing the improved hose assemblies (parts and 
    labor) is estimated to be $3,520 per airplane (7 workhours at $60 per 
    hour = $420 plus $3,100 (average price) for parts). With these figures 
    in mind, the cost impact upon the public for the entire fleet of 401, 
    402, and 421 series airplanes would be approximately $9,211,840. The 
    cost impact upon the public if every airplane owner/operator of the 
    entire fleet of 310, T310, 320, and 411 series airplanes were to choose 
    to replace the fuel and oil hose assemblies would be approximately 
    $17,680,960.
        The proposed initial inspection for all affected airplanes would 
    take approximately 2 workhours to accomplish at an average labor rate 
    of $60 per hour. The cost impact for the proposed initial inspection 
    would be $314,040 for the 401, 402, and 421 series airplanes; and 
    $602,760 for the 310, T310, 320, and 411 series airplanes. These 
    figures only take into account the cost of the proposed initial 
    inspection and do not take into account the cost of any repetitive 
    inspections. The FAA has no way of determining the number of repetitive 
    inspections each owner/operator of the 310, T310, 320, and 411 series 
    airplanes would incur over the life of his/her airplane; or how many 
    repetitive inspections each owner/operator of the 401, 402, and 421 
    series airplanes would incur over the 12 months until the proposed 
    mandatory parts replacement occurs.
        In addition, the FAA estimates that around 75 percent of the 401, 
    402, and 421 series airplanes already have the proposed mandatory parts 
    replacement, and that numerous 310, T310, 320, and 411 series airplanes 
    have the proposed optional parts replacement. This would substantially 
    reduce the cost impact upon the public for both the inspection and 
    parts replacement aspects of this proposed AD.
    
    Compliance Time of This Proposed AD
    
        The compliance time for the proposed fuel and oil flexible hose 
    assembly replacement for the Cessna 401, 402, and 421 series airplanes 
    is 12 calendar months after the effective date of the proposed AD. The 
    FAA has determined that a calendar time for compliance is the most 
    desirable method because yearly operational times vary so greatly 
    throughout the fleet. According to FAA data, yearly operational times 
    vary from a low of approximately 64 hours TIS to a high of 
    approximately 2,824 hours TIS.
        Based on this information, the FAA has determined that using a 
    compliance time based upon hours TIS is unrealistic from a safety 
    standpoint since the hoses deteriorate over time. Therefore, to 
    maintain continuity and assure that all flexible fuel and oil hose 
    assemblies are replaced in a timely manner, the FAA is proposing a 
    compliance based upon calendar time.
    
    Regulatory Impact
    
        The regulations proposed herein would not have substantial direct 
    effects on the States, on the relationship between the national 
    government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
    responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in 
    accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this 
    proposal would not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant 
    the preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
        For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is 
    not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866; 
    (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and 
    Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) if promulgated, 
    will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a 
    substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the 
    Regulatory Flexibility Act. A copy of the draft regulatory evaluation 
    prepared for this action has been placed in the Rules Docket. A copy of 
    it may be obtained by contacting the Rules Docket at the location 
    provided under the caption ADDRESSES.
    
    [[Page 56581]]
    
    List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
    
        Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
    
    The Proposed Amendment
    
        Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the 
    Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration proposes to amend 
    part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as 
    follows:
    
    PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
    
        1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
    
    
    Sec. 39.13  [Amended]
    
        2. Section 39.13 is amended by removing Airworthiness Directive 
    (AD) 72-14-08 R1, Amendment 39-4215, and adding a new AD to read as 
    follows:
    
    Cessna Aircraft Company: Docket No. 90-CE-35-AD. Supersedes AD 72-
    14-08 R1, Amendment 39-4215
    
        Applicability: The following models and serial number airplanes, 
    certificated in any category, that do not have Cessna improved 
    design fuel and oil flexible hose assemblies (or Stratoflex 
    equivalent parts or other FAA-approved equivalent parts) installed 
    in accordance with either Cessna Service Information Letter ME81-17, 
    dated July 10, 1981; Cessna Service Information Letter ME81-17, 
    Revision 1, dated November 5, 1982; or the applicable maintenance 
    manual:
    
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Model(s)                          Serial number
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    310, 310B, 310C, 310D........  35000 through 39299.
    310F.........................  310-001 through 310-0156.
    310G through 310Q............  310G0001 through 310Q1160.
    310A (U-3A)..................  38001 through 38160.
    310E (U-3B)..................  310M0001 through 310M0036.
    T310P and T310Q..............  310P0001 through 310Q1160.
    320..........................  320-0001 through 320-0110.
    320A through 320F............  320A0001 through 320F0045.
    401..........................  401-0001 through 401-0322.
    401A and 401B................  401A0001 through 401B0221.
    402..........................  402-0001 through 402-0322.
    402A and 402B................  402A0001 through 402B1384.
    411..........................  411-0001 through 411-0250.
    411A.........................  411A0251 through 411A0300.
    421..........................  421-0001 through 421-0200.
    421A and 421B................  421A0001 through 421B0970.
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the 
    preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been 
    modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the 
    requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified, 
    altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of 
    this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an 
    alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (d) of 
    this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of 
    the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition 
    addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been 
    eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to 
    address it.
    
        Compliance: Required as indicated in the body of this AD, unless 
    already accomplished.
        To prevent deterioration of the fuel and oil hose assemblies, 
    which could result in fuel or oil leakage with consequent engine 
    shutdown, accomplish the following:
        (a) Within the next 60 hours time-in-service (TIS) after the 
    effective date of this AD or within the next 60 hours TIS after the 
    last inspection required by AD 72-14-08 R1, whichever occurs first, 
    and thereafter at intervals not to exceed 60 hours TIS, accomplish 
    the following in accordance with the applicable Cessna 300 and 400 
    Series Service Manuals:
        (1) Visually inspect the flexible fuel lines as follows:
        (i) Pressurize the fuel lines with the boost pump momentarily 
    operating in the prime position. When accomplishing this test, 
    assure that the mixture control is in the idle cutoff position. 
    While the lines are pressurized, examine all hose exteriors in the 
    engine compartment for evidence of leakage such as wetness and fuel 
    stains.
        (ii) After pressure testing fuel hoses, allow sufficient time 
    for excess fuel to drain overboard from the engine manifold before 
    attempting an engine start.
        (iii) Examine externally all fuel hoses in the engine 
    compartment for evidence of deterioration or damage such as cracks, 
    cuts, bulges, discoloration, hardness, chafing, and excessive wear.
        (2) Visually inspect flexible oil lines, as follows:
        (i) Examine all hose exteriors in the engine compartment for 
    evidence of leakage.
        (ii) Examine externally all oil hoses in the engine compartment 
    for evidence of deterioration or damage such as cracks, cuts, 
    bulges, discoloration, hardness, chafing, and excessive wear.
        (b) If, during any inspection required by this AD, leakage or 
    other evidence of any deteriorated or damaged hose assembly is 
    found, prior to further flight, replace that particular fuel or oil 
    flexible hose assembly with a Cessna improved design fuel or oil 
    flexible hose assembly (or Stratoflex equivalent parts or other FAA-
    approved equivalent parts).
        (1) Accomplish this replacement in accordance with either Cessna 
    Service Information Letter ME81-17, dated July 10, 1981; Cessna 
    Service Information Letter ME81-17, Revision 1, dated November 5, 
    1982; or the applicable maintenance manual.
        (2) Repetitive inspections are no longer necessary on any fuel 
    or oil flexible hose assembly replaced with improved design parts, 
    as specified in paragraphs (b) and (b)(1) of this AD.
        (c) For the affected Models 401, 401A, 401B, 402, 402B, 421, 
    421A, and 421B airplanes, within the next 12 calendar months after 
    the effective date of this AD, unless already accomplished in 
    accordance with paragraph (b) of this AD, replace all fuel and oil 
    flexible hose assemblies with Cessna improved design fuel and oil 
    flexible hose assemblies (or Stratoflex equivalent parts or other 
    FAA-approved equivalent parts).
        (1) Accomplish these replacements in accordance with either 
    Cessna Service Information Letter ME81-17, dated July 10, 1981; 
    Cessna Service Information Letter ME81-17, Revision 1, dated 
    November 5, 1982; or the applicable maintenance manual.
        (2) Repetitive inspections are no longer necessary when these 
    replacements are accomplished.
        (d) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with 
    sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 
    CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where 
    the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
        (e) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the 
    initial or repetitive compliance times that provides an equivalent 
    level of safety may be approved by the Manager, Wichita Aircraft 
    Certification Office (ACO), 1801 Airport Road, Rm. 100, Mid-
    
    [[Page 56582]]
    
    Continent Airport, Wichita, Kansas, 67209. The request shall be 
    forwarded through an appropriate FAA Maintenance Inspector, who may 
    add comments and then send it to the Manager, Wichita ACO.
        Note 2: Information concerning the existence of approved 
    alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be 
    obtained from Wichita ACO.
    
        (f) Questions or technical information related to the service 
    information specified in this AD should be directed to the Cessna 
    Aircraft Company, P. O. Box 7706, Wichita, Kansas 67277, telephone: 
    (316) 941-7550, facsimile: (316) 942-9008. This service information 
    may be examined at the FAA, Central Region, Office of the Regional 
    Counsel, Room 1558, 601 E. 12th Street, Kansas City, Missouri 64106.
    
        Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on October 15, 1998.
    Michael Gallagher,
    Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
    [FR Doc. 98-28300 Filed 10-21-98; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-13-U
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
10/22/1998
Department:
Federal Aviation Administration
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM); Reopening of the comment period.
Document Number:
98-28300
Dates:
Comments must be received on or before December 22, 1998.
Pages:
56579-56582 (4 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 90-CE-35-AD
RINs:
2120-AA64: Airworthiness Directives
RIN Links:
https://www.federalregister.gov/regulations/2120-AA64/airworthiness-directives
PDF File:
98-28300.pdf
CFR: (1)
14 CFR 39.13