96-27713. Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and NAFTA Transitional Adjustment Assistance  

  • [Federal Register Volume 61, Number 210 (Tuesday, October 29, 1996)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 55821-55822]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 96-27713]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
    Employment and Training Administration
    
    
    Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for 
    Worker Adjustment Assistance and NAFTA Transitional Adjustment 
    Assistance
    
        In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as 
    amended, the Department of Labor herein presents summaries of 
    determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade adjustment 
    assistance for workers (TA-W) issued during the period of October, 
    1996.
        In order for an affirmative determination to be made and a 
    certification of eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance 
    to be issued, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222 
    of the Act must be met.
        (1) That a significant number or proportion of the workers in the 
    workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision thereof, have become 
    totally or partially separated,
        (2) That sales or production, or both, of the firm or subdivision 
    have decreased absolutely, and
        (3) That increases of imports of articles like or directly 
    competitive with articles produced by the firm or appropriate 
    subdivision have contributed importantly to the separations, or threat 
    thereof, and to the absolute decline in sales or production.
    
    Negative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance
    
        In each of the following cases the investigation revealed that 
    criterion (3) has not been met. A survey of customers indicated that 
    increased imports did not contribute importantly to worker separations 
    at the firm.
    
    TA-W-32,648; Raster Graphics, Inc., Redmond, OR
    TA-W-32,719; Contact Technologies, Inc., St. Marys, PA
    
        In the following cases, the investigation revealed that the 
    criteria for eligibility have not been met for the reasons specified.
    
    TA-W-32,721; Whirlpool Corp., Evansville, IN; York, SC
    TA-W-32,643; L.L. Brewton Lumber Co., Inc., Winnfield, LA
    
        Increased imports did not contribute importantly to worker 
    separations at the firm.
    
    TA-W-32,624; Dura-Bond Coating, Inc., Highspire, PA
    TA-W-32,702; C.J. Enterprises, Morganton, NC
    TA-W-32,606; Bonaventure Textiles USA, New York, NY
    
        The workers firm does not produce an article as required for 
    certification under Section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974.
    
    TA-W-32,638; EJL Boot Manufacturing, El Paso, TX
    
        The investigation revealed that criteria (2) has not been met. 
    Sales or production did not decline during the relevant period as 
    required for certification.
    
    Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance
    
        The following certifications have been issued; the date following 
    the company name and location for each determination references the 
    impact date for all workers for such determination.
    
    TA-W-32,691; Smith Corona Corp., Cortland, NY: October 6, 1996
    TA-W-32,763; F.K. Apparel (Future Knits, Inc.), Charlotte, NC: 
    September 5, 1995
    TA-W-32,772; Wan-Pat, Inc., T/A Silki Sportswear Ltd II, Newport, PA: 
    September 1, 1995
    TA-W-32,749; G.H. Bass & Co., Wilton, ME: August 29, 1995
    TA-W-32,712; Johnson & Johnson Medical, Inc., El Paso, TX: August 29, 
    1995
    TA-W-32,756; Mountain Bag Manufacturing Corp., Kalispell, MT: September 
    6, 1995
    TA-W-32,610; Runnymede Mills, Inc., Tarboro, NC: July 19, 1995
    TA-W-32,617; Jolie Handbag, Inc., Hialeah, FL: May 11, 1995
    TA-W-32,636; Columbia Textile, Paterson, NJ: July 23, 1995
    TA-W-32,644; Manson Wear, Inc., Tower City, PA: August 7, 1995
    TA-W-32,655; Clothes Connection, Santa Ana, CA: August 8, 1995
    TA-W-32,695; US Colors, Inc., Rocky Mount, NC: August 15, 1995
    TA-W-32,622; Bee Jay Apparel, Inc., Sparta, TN: July 25, 1995
    TA-W-32,631; S & D Creations, d.b.a. Santas By Donna, Owasso, OK: July 
    30, 1995
    TA-W-32,741; Jaywein Fashions, Inc., New York, NY: July 9, 1995
    TA-W-32,762; Austin Apparel Manufacturing, Inc., Louisa, KY: July 30, 
    1995
    TA-W-32,667; Jar-Car Manufacturing, Inc., El Paso, TX: July 24, 1995
    TA-W-32,681; Robertshaw Controls Co., Appliance Controls Div., Ellijay, 
    GA: August 12, 1995
    TA-W-32,664; Mobil Exploration & Producing U.S., Inc. (MEPUS), Mobil 
    Exploration and Producing Services, Inc. (MEPSI), Mobil Business 
    Resources Corp. (formerly MASCI) (MBRC) Headquartered in Dallas, TX: 
    and Operating in the Following States: A; TX, B; LA, C; CA, D; CO, E; 
    AL, F; KS, G; NM, H; OK, I; UT, J; WY: September 30, 1996
    TA-W-32,664 K; Mobil Exploration and Producing Technical Center 
    (MEPTEC), All Locations in The State of NJ: July 26, 1995
    
        Also, pursuant to Title V of the North American Free Trade 
    Agreement Implementation Act (P.L. 103-182) concerning transitional 
    adjustment assistance hereinafter called (NAFTA-TAA) and in accordance 
    with Section 250(a) Subchapter D, Chapter 2, Title II, of the Trade Act 
    as amended, the Department of Labor presents summaries of 
    determinations regarding eligibility to apply for NAFTA-TAA issued 
    during the month of October, 1996.
        In order for an affirmative determination to be made and a 
    certification of eligibility to apply for NAFTA-TAA the following group 
    eligibility requirements of Section 250 of the Trade Act must be met:
    
    [[Page 55822]]
    
        (1) That a significant number or proportion of the workers in the 
    workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision thereof, (including 
    workers in any agricultural firm or appropriate subdivision thereof) 
    have become totally or partially separated from employment and either--
        (2) That sales or production, or both, of such firm or subdivision 
    have decreased absolutely,
        (3) That imports from Mexico or Canada of articles like or directly 
    competitive with articles produced by such firm or subdivision have 
    increased, and that the increases in imports contributed importantly to 
    such workers' separations or threat of separation and to the decline in 
    sales or production of such firm or subdivision; or
        (4) That there has been a shift in production by such workers' firm 
    or subdivision to Mexico or Canada of articles like or directly 
    competitive with articles which are produced by the firm or 
    subdivision.
    
    Negative Determinations NAFTA-TAA
    
        In each of the following cases the investigation revealed that 
    criteria (3) and (4) were not met. Imports from Canada or Mexico did 
    not contribute importantly to workers' separations. There was no shift 
    in production from the subject firm to Canada or Mexico during the 
    relevant period.
    
    NAFTA-TAA-01218; Decotech Innovations, Marion, NC
    NAFTA-TAA-01191; Dico Tire, Inc., A Titan Wheel Co., Clinton, TN
    NAFTA-TAA-01214; Menominee Paper Co., A Div. of Bell Packaging Corp., 
    Menominee, MI
    NAFTA-TAA-01186; Raster Graphics, Inc., Redmond, OR Washington,
    NAFTA-TAA-01185; Hodge Apparel, Inc., Harrisville, WV
    NAFTA-TAA-01210; Murray, Inc., Lawrenceburg, TN
    NAFTA-TAA-01224; Penn Mould Industries, Inc., Washington, PA
    NAFTA-TAA-01235; Schreiber Foods, Inc., Green Bay, WI
    
        In the following cases, the investigation revealed that the 
    criteria for eligibility have not been met for the reasons specified.
    
    NAFTA-TAA-01161; Dura-Bond Industries, Dura-Bond Coating, Inc., 
    Highspire, PA
    
        The investigation revealed that the workers of the subject firm did 
    not produce an article within the meaning of Section 250(a) of the 
    Trade Act, as amended.
    
    Affirmative Determinations NAFTA-TAA
    
        The following certifications have been issued; the date following 
    the company name & location for each determination references the 
    impact date for all workers for such determination.
    
    NAFTA-TAA-01254; Nu-Tech Precision Metals, Waterbury, CT: September 20, 
    1995.
    NAFTA-TAA-01189; Precision Machining & Polishing, Milwaukee, WI: August 
    13, 1995.
    NAFTA-TAA-01168; Holiday Hosiery, Inc., Hudson, NC: August 1, 1995.
    NAFTA-TAA-01174; Tyler Farms, Inc., Balm, FL: July 17, 1995.
    NAFTA-TAA-01190; Strick Corp., Hughesville, PA; August 5, 1995.
    NAFTA-TAA-01216; Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., Topeka, KS: August28, 
    1995.
    NAFTA-TAA-01226; Mountain Bag Manufacturing Corp., Kalispell, MT: 
    September 6, 1995.
    NAFTA-TAA-01222; Douglas Randall, Inc., (A.K.A. Crydom Corp), A 
    Subsidiary of Silicon Power Corp., Pawcatuck, CT: August 23, 1995.
    
        I hereby certify that the aforementioned determinations were issued 
    during the month of October, 1996. Copies of these determinations are 
    available for inspection in Room C-4318, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 
    Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20210 during normal 
    business hours or will be mailed to persons who write to the above 
    address.
    
        Dated: October 16, 1996.
    Russell T. Kile,
    Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment Services, Office of Trade 
    Adjustment Assistance.
    [FR Doc. 96-27713 Filed 10-28-96; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
10/29/1996
Department:
Employment and Training Administration
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
96-27713
Pages:
55821-55822 (2 pages)
PDF File:
96-27713.pdf