95-26999. Airworthiness Directives; Societe Nationale Industrielle Aerospatiale and Eurocopter France Model AS 350B, BA, B1, B2, and D, and Model AS 355E, F, F1, F2, and N Helicopters  

  • [Federal Register Volume 60, Number 211 (Wednesday, November 1, 1995)]
    [Proposed Rules]
    [Pages 55491-55495]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 95-26999]
    
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    14 CFR Part 39
    
    [Docket No. 95-SW-04-AD]
    
    
    Airworthiness Directives; Societe Nationale Industrielle 
    Aerospatiale and Eurocopter France Model AS 350B, BA, B1, B2, and D, 
    and Model AS 355E, F, F1, F2, and N Helicopters
    
    AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
    
    ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    [[Page 55492]]
    
    
    SUMMARY: This document proposes the adoption of a new airworthiness 
    directive (AD) that is applicable to Societe Nationale Industrielle 
    Aerospatiale and Eurocopter France (Eurocopter France) Model AS 350B, 
    BA, B1, B2, and D and Model AS 355E, F, F1, F2, and N helicopters, 
    without an autopilot installed. This proposal would require a visual 
    inspection to determine whether the cyclic pitch change control rod 
    (rod) end fittings were safetied, and removal and replacement of the 
    rod if the rod end fittings were not safetied. This proposal is 
    prompted by a manufacturer's report that some of the rod end fittings 
    had not been safetied at the factory. The actions specified by the 
    proposed AD are intended to prevent loss of tightening torque on the 
    adjustment nuts of the rod, shifting of the neutral point of the cyclic 
    stick, reduction in the amount of available movement of the cyclic 
    stick in the roll axis, and subsequent reduction in the controllability 
    of the helicopter.
    
    DATES: Comments must be received by January 2, 1996.
    
    ADDRESSES: Submit comments in triplicate to the Federal Aviation 
    Administration (FAA), Office of the Assistant Chief Counsel, Attention: 
    Rules Docket No. 95-SW-04-AD, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663, Fort Worth, 
    Texas 76137. Comments may be inspected at this location between 9:00 
    a.m. and 3:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Richard Monschke, Aerospace 
    Engineer, FAA, Rotorcraft Directorate, Rotorcraft Standards Staff, 2601 
    Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, Texas 76137, telephone (817) 222-5116, fax 
    (817) 222-5961.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Comments Invited
    
        Interested persons are invited to participate in the making of the 
    proposed rule by submitting such written data, views, or arguments as 
    they may desire. Communications should identify the Rules Docket number 
    and be submitted in triplicate to the address specified above. All 
    communications received on or before the closing date for comments, 
    specified above, will be considered before taking action on the 
    proposed rule. The proposals contained in this notice may be changed in 
    light of the comments received.
        Comments are specifically invited on the overall regulatory, 
    economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the proposed rule. All 
    comments submitted will be available, both before and after the closing 
    date for comments, in the Rules Docket for examination by interested 
    persons. A report summarizing each FAA-public contact concerned with 
    the substance of this proposal will be filed in the Rules Docket.
        Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments 
    submitted in response to this notice must submit a self-addressed, 
    stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments 
    to Docket No. 95-SW-04-AD.'' The postcard will be date stamped and 
    returned to the commenter.
    
    Availability of NPRMs
    
        Any person may obtain a copy of this NPRM by submitting a request 
    to the FAA, Office of the Assistant Chief Counsel, Attention: Rules 
    Docket No. 95-SW-04-AD, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663, Fort Worth, Texas 
    76137.
    
    Discussion
    
        The Direction Generale De L'Aviation Civile (DGAC), which is the 
    airworthiness authority for France, has notified the FAA that an unsafe 
    condition may exist on Eurocopter France Model AS 350B, BA, B1, B2, and 
    D and Model AS 355E, F, F1, F2, and N helicopters, without an autopilot 
    installed. The DGAC advises that the manufacturer discovered that some 
    rod end fittings have not been safetied at the factory.
        Eurocopter France has issued Eurocopter Service Bulletin No. 01.38, 
    dated June 26, 1994, for the Model AS 355 series helicopters, and 
    Eurocopter Service Bulletin No. 01.42, dated June 28, 1994, for the 
    Model AS 350 series helicopters, which specifies a visual inspection to 
    determine whether the rod end fittings have been safetied; 
    reinstallation of the forward lower fairing if the rod end fittings 
    have been safetied, and removal and replacement of the rod with an 
    airworthy rod and reinstallation of the forward lower fairing if the 
    rod end fittings have not been safetied. The DGAC classified this 
    service bulletin as mandatory and issued AD 94-179-051(B) and AD 94-
    180-069(B), both dated August 3, 1994, in order to assure the continued 
    airworthiness of these helicopters in France.
        This helicopter model is manufactured in France and is type 
    certificated for operation in the United States under the provisions of 
    section 21.29 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.29) and 
    the applicable bilateral airworthiness agreement. Pursuant to this 
    bilateral airworthiness agreement, the DGAC has kept the FAA informed 
    of the situation described above. The FAA has examined the findings of 
    the DGAC, reviewed all available information, and determined that AD 
    action is necessary for products of this type design that are 
    certificated for operation in the United States.
        Since an unsafe condition has been identified that is likely to 
    exist or develop on other Eurocopter France Model AS 350B, BA, B1, B2, 
    and D and Model AS 355E, F, F1, F2, and N helicopters without an 
    autopilot installed, of the same type design registered in the United 
    States, the proposed AD would require a visual inspection to confirm 
    that the rod end fittings are safetied in accordance with the 
    manufacturer's service information, and removal and replacement of the 
    rod, if necessary.
        The FAA estimates that 498 helicopters of U.S. registry would be 
    affected by this proposed AD, that it would take approximately one-
    fourth of a work hour per helicopter to inspect the rod end fittings, 
    and 1 work hour to remove and reinstall the rod, if necessary, and that 
    the average labor rate is $60 per work hour. Required parts would be 
    provided by the manufacturer. Based on these figures, the total cost 
    impact of the proposed AD on U.S. operators is estimated to be $37,350.
        The regulations proposed herein would not have substantial direct 
    effects on the States, on the relationship between the national 
    government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
    responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in 
    accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this 
    proposal would not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant 
    the preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
        For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this proposed 
    regulation (1) is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under 
    Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT 
    Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); 
    and (3) if promulgated, will not have a significant economic impact, 
    positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under 
    the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. A copy of the draft 
    regulatory evaluation prepared for this action is contained in the 
    Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained by contacting the Rules 
    Docket at the location provided under the caption ADDRESSES.
    
    List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
    
        Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety. 
    
    [[Page 55493]]
    
    
    The Proposed Amendment
    
        Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the 
    Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration proposes to amend 
    part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as 
    follows:
    
    PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
    
        1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40101, 40113, 44701.
    
    
    Sec. 39.13  [Amended]
    
        2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding a new airworthiness directive 
    to read as follows:
    
    Societe Nationale Industrielle Aerospatiale and Eurocopter France: 
    Docket No. 95-SW-04-AD.
        Applicability: Model AS 350B, BA, B1, B2, and D, and Model AS 
    355E, F, F1, F2, and N helicopters, with cyclic pitch change control 
    rod, part number (P/N) 704A34-113-279, installed, and without an 
    autopilot installed, certificated in any category.
    
        Note 1: This AD applies to each helicopter identified in the 
    preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been 
    modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the 
    requirements of this AD. For helicopters that have been modified, 
    altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of 
    this AD is affected, the owner/operator must use the authority 
    provided in paragraph (d) to request approval from the FAA. This 
    approval may address either no action, if the current configuration 
    eliminates the unsafe condition, or different actions necessary to 
    address the unsafe condition described in this AD. Such a request 
    should include an assessment of the effect of the changed 
    configuration on the unsafe condition addressed by this AD. In no 
    case does the presence of any modification, alteration, or repair 
    remove any helicopter from the applicability of this AD.
    
        Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished 
    previously.
        To prevent loss of tightening torque on the adjustment nuts of 
    the cyclic pitch change control rod, shifting of the neutral 
    position of the cyclic stick, reduction in the amount of available 
    movement of the cyclic stick in the roll axis, and subsequent 
    reduction in the controllability of the helicopter, accomplish the 
    following:
        (a) Within 100 hours time-in-service (TIS) after the effective 
    date of this AD, remove the forward lower fairing and visually 
    inspect the cyclic pitch change control rod (rod), P/N 704A34-113-
    279, to determine whether the end fittings have been safetied (see 
    Figure 1, Detail 1, tabs bent around the adjustment nut).
        (b) If the visual inspection indicates that the rod end fittings 
    have been safetied, reinstall the forward lower fairing.
        (c) If the visual inspection indicates that the rod end fittings 
    have not been safetied (see Figure 1, Detail 2, tabs not bent around 
    the adjustment nut), accomplish the following in accordance with the 
    applicable maintenance manual:
        (1) Immobilize the cyclic control.
    
    BILLING CODE 4910-13-U
    
    [[Page 55494]]
    [GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TP01NO95.000
    
    
    
    BILLING CODE 4910-13-C
    
    [[Page 55495]]
    
        (2) Remove the rod and replace it with an airworthy rod on which 
    the rod end fittings have been safetied.
        (3) Reinstall the forward lower fairing.
        (4) Verify proper operation of the cyclic control.
        (d) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the 
    compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be 
    used when approved by the Manager, Rotorcraft Standards Staff, FAA, 
    Rotorcraft Directorate. Operators shall submit their requests 
    through an FAA Principal Maintenance Inspector, who may concur or 
    comment and then send it to the Manager, Rotorcraft Standards Staff.
    
        Note 2: Information concerning the existence of approved 
    alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be 
    obtained from the Rotorcraft Standards Staff.
        (e) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with 
    sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 
    CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the helicopter to a location where 
    the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
    
        Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on October 23, 1995.
    Eric Bries,
    Acting Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
    [FR Doc. 95-26999 Filed 10-31-95; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-13-U
    
    

Document Information

Published:
11/01/1995
Department:
Transportation Department
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
Document Number:
95-26999
Dates:
Comments must be received by January 2, 1996.
Pages:
55491-55495 (5 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 95-SW-04-AD
PDF File:
95-26999.pdf
CFR: (1)
14 CFR 39.13