99-30148. Airworthiness Directives; British Aerospace Jetstream Model 4101 Airplanes  

  • [Federal Register Volume 64, Number 222 (Thursday, November 18, 1999)]
    [Proposed Rules]
    [Pages 62990-62991]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 99-30148]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    
    Federal Aviation Administration
    
    14 CFR Part 39
    
    [Docket No. 99-NM-146-AD]
    RIN 2120-AA64
    
    
    Airworthiness Directives; British Aerospace Jetstream Model 4101 
    Airplanes
    
    AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
    
    ACTION: Proposed rule; withdrawal.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This action withdraws a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) 
    that proposed a new airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to certain 
    British Aerospace Jetstream Model 4101 airplanes. That action would 
    have required revising the Airplane Flight Manual (AFM) to include 
    requirements for activation of the airframe pneumatic deicing boots. 
    Since the issuance of the NPRM, the Federal Aviation Administration 
    (FAA) has received new data that indicates that the specified AFM 
    revision is not necessary. Accordingly, the proposed rule is withdrawn.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Norman Martenson, Manager, 
    International Branch, ANM-116, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 
    1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98055-4056; telephone (425) 
    227-2110; fax (425) 227-1149.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal 
    Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to add a new airworthiness 
    directive (AD), applicable to certain British Aerospace Jetstream Model 
    4101 airplanes, was published in the Federal Register as a Notice of 
    Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) on July 16, 1999 (64 FR 38335). The proposed 
    rule would have required revising the Airplane Flight Manual (AFM) to 
    include requirements for activation of the airframe pneumatic deicing 
    boots. That action was prompted by reports of inflight incidents and an 
    accident that occurred in icing conditions where the airframe pneumatic 
    deicing boots were not activated. The action specified by the proposed 
    AD was intended to ensure that flightcrews activate the pneumatic wing 
    and tail deicing boots at the first signs of ice accumulation. Such ice 
    accumulation, if not corrected, could result in reduced controllability 
    of the aircraft due to adverse aerodynamic effects of ice adhering to 
    the airplane prior to the first deicing cycle.
    
    Actions that Occurred Since the NPRM Was Issued
    
        Since the issuance of that NPRM, the manufacturer of British 
    Aerospace Jetstream Model 4101 airplanes has requested that the NPRM be 
    withdrawn. The manufacturer advises that, based on the service history 
    and data provided to the FAA, the proposed AFM revision for those 
    models is unnecessary.
        The FAA concurs that the notice of proposed rulemaking for British 
    Aerospace Jetstream Model 4101 airplanes should be withdrawn based on 
    the following information. British Aerospace submitted a summary of the 
    handling and performance flight test results that were produced during 
    the original flight in icing certification, and referenced the data 
    summary in response to the proposed rulemaking. The FAA requested and 
    subsequently received copies of the full handling and performance 
    flight test results for certification in the icing conditions specified 
    in Appendix C of part 25 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 
    25), and the draft issue of AMJ25.1419, which was used as guidance for 
    compliance with JAR/FAR 25.1419. The FAA reviewed these reports and 
    guidance material and finds that the Jetstream 4101 airplane was 
    adequately tested with a variety of natural ice accretions on both the 
    protected and unprotected surfaces. Handling and performance flight 
    test was accomplished for the following: Normal Operation of the 
    Deicing Boots, \1/2\-to \3/4\-inch of ice on the protected wing leading 
    edges and up to 3 inches of ice on unprotected leading edges; Simulated 
    Failure of the Deicing Boots, approximately 1-to 1\1/2\-inches of ice 
    on all leading edges; and Ice Accreted During the Take-off Phase, a 
    thin rough layer of ice accreted during the initial take-off phase to 
    400 feet, prior to operation of deicing boots.
        These ice accretion depths are consistent with the operational 
    procedure of the airframe deicing system, and were established to 
    address the following: Ice accreted during the rest time of a deicing 
    cycle, delayed operation or failure of the system, and residual ice 
    accumulations. The flight testing examined stall speeds, stall warning 
    margins, stall characteristics, maneuver margins, longitudinal 
    controllability, flap configuration changes, ability to trim, 
    susceptibility to tailplane stall, and longitudinal, lateral, and 
    directional stability. The angles of attack for activation of the stall 
    warning system and stall identification system (i.e., stick shaker or 
    stick pusher) are reset to lower values (i.e., higher speeds) for 
    flight in icing and safe flight speeds (minimum operating speeds) 
    established accordingly. Affected AFM performance information was 
    derived for icing conditions based on the higher operating speeds, in 
    accordance with JAA draft AMJ25.1419.
    
    FAA's Conclusions
    
        Upon further consideration, the FAA has determined that, in light 
    of the above information, it is unnecessary to require the AFM revision 
    as proposed. Accordingly, the proposed rule is hereby withdrawn.
        Withdrawal of this notice of proposed rulemaking constitutes only 
    such action, and does not preclude the agency from issuing another 
    notice in the future, nor does it commit the agency to any course of 
    action in the future.
    
    Regulatory Impact
    
        Since this action only withdraws a notice of proposed rulemaking, 
    it is neither a proposed nor a final rule and therefore is not covered 
    under Executive Order 12866, the Regulatory Flexibility Act, or DOT 
    Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979).
    
    List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
    
        Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
    
    [[Page 62991]]
    
    The Withdrawal
    
        Accordingly, the notice of proposed rulemaking, Docket 99-NM-146-
    AD, published in the Federal Register on July 16, 1999 (64 FR 38335), 
    is withdrawn.
    
        Issued in Renton, Washington, on November 10, 1999.
    John J. Hickey,
    Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
    Service.
    [FR Doc. 99-30148 Filed 11-17-99; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
11/18/1999
Department:
Federal Aviation Administration
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Proposed rule; withdrawal.
Document Number:
99-30148
Pages:
62990-62991 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 99-NM-146-AD
RINs:
2120-AA64: Airworthiness Directives
RIN Links:
https://www.federalregister.gov/regulations/2120-AA64/airworthiness-directives
PDF File:
99-30148.pdf
CFR: (1)
14 CFR 39