98-31315. Airworthiness Directives; British Aerospace HP137 Mk1, Jetstream Series 200, and Jetstream Models 3101 and 3201 Airplanes  

  • [Federal Register Volume 63, Number 226 (Tuesday, November 24, 1998)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 64848-64849]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 98-31315]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    
    Federal Aviation Administration
    
    14 CFR Part 39
    
    [Docket No. 98-CE-70-AD; Amendment 39-10825; AD 98-21-16]
    RIN 2120-AA64
    
    
    Airworthiness Directives; British Aerospace HP137 Mk1, Jetstream 
    Series 200, and Jetstream Models 3101 and 3201 Airplanes
    
    AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
    
    ACTION: Direct final rule; withdrawal.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This action withdraws direct final rule Airworthiness 
    Directive (AD) 98-21-16, which would have applied to all British 
    Aerospace (BAe) HP137 Mk1, Jetstream Series 200, and Jetstream Models 
    3101 and 3201 airplanes; and would have superseded AD 98-12-23 (this AD 
    will remain in effect, unless the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) 
    initiates additional rulemaking action). AD 98-21-16 would have 
    required repetitively replacing the windshield wiper arm, attachment 
    bolts, and assembly; measuring the material thickness of the upper and 
    lower toggle attachment brackets on the nose landing gear of the 
    affected airplanes, and replacing the toggle attachment bracket lugs. 
    Since the issuance of the direct final rule, the FAA has received a 
    written adverse comment. Accordingly, the direct final rule is 
    withdrawn.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. S.M. Nagarajan, Aerospace 
    Engineer, FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 1201 Walnut, suite 900, 
    Kansas City, Missouri
    
    [[Page 64849]]
    
    64106; telephone: (816) 426-6934; facsimile: (816) 426-2169.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA published AD 98-21-16 as a direct 
    final rule with request for comments in the Federal Register on October 
    8, 1998 (63 FR 54039). That direct final rule amended part 39 of the 
    Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to include an AD that 
    would apply to all BAe HP137 Mk1, Jetstream Series 200, and Jetstream 
    Models 3101 and 3201 airplanes. That AD would have superseded AD 98-12-
    23 with a new AD to require repetitively replacing the windshield wiper 
    arm, attachment bolts, and assembly; measuring the material thickness 
    of the upper and lower toggle attachment brackets on the nose landing 
    gear of the affected airplanes, and replacing the toggle attachment 
    bracket lugs.
        AD 98-21-16 was the result of additional mandatory continuing 
    airworthiness information (MCAI) pertaining to this subject received 
    from the airworthiness authority for the United Kingdom. The actions 
    specified in that AD were intended to prevent the windshield wiper arm 
    from corroding, detaching from the airplane during flight, and 
    penetrating the fuselage, which could result in possible injury to the 
    pilot and passengers; and to prevent collapse of the nose landing gear 
    caused by the current design, which could result in loss of control of 
    the airplane during landing operations.
    
    The Direct Final Rule Procedure
    
        The FAA anticipated that AD 98-21-16 would not result in adverse or 
    negative comment and therefore issued it as a direct final rule. The 
    requirements of AD 98-21-16 addressed an unsafe condition identified by 
    a foreign civil airworthiness authority and do not impose a significant 
    burden on affected operators. In accordance with Section 11.17 of the 
    Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 11.17), unless a written adverse 
    or negative comment or a written notice of intent to submit an adverse 
    or negative comment was received within the comment period, AD 98-21-16 
    would have become effective on January 6, 1999. If any written 
    comment(s) was received within the comment period that was adverse or 
    negative comment or written notice was received of the intent to submit 
    such a comment, the FAA would publish in the Federal Register a 
    document withdrawing the direct final rule (AD 98-21-16). The FAA could 
    then issue a notice of proposed rulemaking with a new comment period.
    
    Actions Since the Issuance of the Direct Final Rule
    
        During the comment period for the 98-21-16, the FAA received a 
    written adverse comment. The commenter objects to the 90-day repetitive 
    replacement requirement of the windshield wiper arm attachment bolt and 
    windshield arm assembly. The commenter suggests that these replacements 
    occur at 8 year intervals as specified in the service information.
        Accordingly, the direct final rule is hereby withdrawn.
        Withdrawal of this direct final rule constitutes only such action, 
    and does not preclude the agency from issuing a notice in the future, 
    nor does it commit the agency to any course of action in the future.
    
    Regulatory Impact
    
        Since this action only withdraws a direct final rule, it has no 
    adverse economic impact and imposes no additional burden on any person. 
    It will have no substantial direct effects on the States, on the 
    relationship between the national government and the States, or on the 
    distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of 
    government. Therefore, in accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is 
    determined that this action does not have sufficient federalism 
    implications to warrant the preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
        For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action is not 
    a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866; (2) is 
    not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures 
    (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a significant 
    economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small 
    entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    
    List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
    
        Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
    
    The Withdrawal
    
        Accordingly, direct final rule AD 98-21-16, Amendment 39-10825, 
    Docket No. 98-CE-70-AD, published in the Federal Register on October 8, 
    1998 (63 FR 54039), is withdrawn.
    
        Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on November 16, 1998.
    Michael Gallagher,
    Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
    [FR Doc. 98-31315 Filed 11-23-98; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-13-U
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
11/24/1998
Department:
Federal Aviation Administration
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Direct final rule; withdrawal.
Document Number:
98-31315
Pages:
64848-64849 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 98-CE-70-AD, Amendment 39-10825, AD 98-21-16
RINs:
2120-AA64: Airworthiness Directives
RIN Links:
https://www.federalregister.gov/regulations/2120-AA64/airworthiness-directives
PDF File:
98-31315.pdf
CFR: (1)
14 CFR 39