96-28719. Loans to Executive Officers, Directors, and Principal Shareholders of Member Banks; Loans to Holding Companies and Affiliates  

  • [Federal Register Volume 61, Number 218 (Friday, November 8, 1996)]
    [Proposed Rules]
    [Pages 57797-57799]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 96-28719]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
    
    12 CFR Part 215
    
    [Regulation O; Docket No. R-0940]
    
    
    Loans to Executive Officers, Directors, and Principal 
    Shareholders of Member Banks; Loans to Holding Companies and Affiliates
    
    AGENCY: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
    
    ACTION: Supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking (supplemental 
    proposal) would amend the Board's Regulation O, which limits how much 
    and on what terms a bank may lend to its own insiders and insiders of 
    its affiliates. Under the supplemental proposal, the restrictions of 
    Regulation O would not apply to extensions of credit by a bank to an 
    executive officer or director of the bank's affiliate, provided that 
    the executive officer or director was not engaged in major policymaking 
    functions of the bank and the affiliate did not account for more than 
    10 percent of the consolidated assets of the bank's holding company.
        The supplemental proposal supersedes a similar proposal included in 
    a proposed rule published by the Board on May 3, 1996. The supplemental 
    proposal results from a recent change in the exemptive authority of the 
    Board under the Economic Growth and Regulatory Paperwork Reduction Act 
    of 1996. Other provisions of the earlier proposal have been adopted by 
    the Board as a final rule.
    
    DATES: Comments must be received on or before December 9, 1996.
    
    ADDRESSES: Comments should refer to Docket No. R-0940 and be mailed to 
    William W. Wiles, Secretary, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve 
    System, Washington, DC 20551. They may also be delivered to the guard 
    station in the Eccles Building Courtyard on 20th Street, NW. (between 
    Constitution Avenue and C Street), between 8:45 a.m. and 5:15 p.m., 
    weekdays. Except as provided in the Board's rules regarding the 
    availability of information (12 CFR 261.8), comments will be available 
    for inspection and copying by members of the public in the Freedom of 
    Information Office, Room MP-500 of the Martin Building, between 9:00 
    a.m. and 5:00 p.m. on weekdays.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gregory Baer, Managing Senior Counsel 
    (202/452-3236), or Gordon Miller, Attorney (202/452-2534), Legal 
    Division, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. For the 
    hearing impaired only, Telecommunications Device for the Deaf (TDD), 
    Dorothea Thompson (202/452-3544).
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Introduction
    
        Section 22(h) of the Federal Reserve Act restricts insider lending 
    by banks, and Regulation O implements section 22(h). 12 U.S.C. 375b; 12 
    CFR Part 215. Regulation O limits total loans to any one insider and 
    aggregate loans to all insiders to a percentage of the bank's capital 
    and requires that such loans be on non-preferential terms--that is, on 
    the same terms a person not affiliated with the bank would receive.\1\ 
    12 CFR 215.4 (a), (c), and (d). For this purpose, an ``insider'' means 
    an executive officer, director, or principal shareholder, and loans to 
    an insider include loans to any ``related interest'' of the insider, 
    including any company controlled by the insider. 12 CFR 215.2(h). 
    Regulation O requires that banks maintain records to document 
    compliance with all these restrictions. 12 CFR 215.8.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \1\ Regulation O also requires prior approval of the bank's 
    board of directors for certain loans to insiders and prohibits 
    overdrafts by executive officers and directors.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        On May 3, 1996, the Board proposed amendments to Regulation O to 
    conform its exceptions for executive officers and directors of 
    affiliates of banks to the requirements of section 22(h), as amended by 
    the Riegle Community Development and Regulatory Improvement Act of 1994 
    (Riegle Act).\2\ 61 FR 19,683. On September 30, 1996, in the Economic 
    Growth and Regulatory Paperwork Reduction Act of 1996 (EGRPRA),\3\ 
    Congress further amended section 22(h)(8)(B) by expanding the number of 
    restrictions from which the Board could exempt insiders of affiliates, 
    but narrowing the number of insiders of affiliates eligible for such 
    exemptions. In view of the changes in the Board's authority and the 
    comments received from the public concerning the Board's original 
    proposal, the Board is seeking comment on a new proposal to exempt 
    certain insiders of affiliates from Regulation O.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \2\ Pub. L. 103-325, section 334 (1994).
        \3\ Pub. L. 104-208, section 2211 (1996).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Background
    
        Section 22(h) restricts lending not only to insiders of the bank 
    that is making the loan but also to insiders of the bank's parent bank 
    holding company and any other subsidiary of that bank holding 
    company.\4\ Prior to FDICIA, the Board's rules exempted from all the 
    provisions of Regulation O an executive officer of the bank's 
    affiliates (other than the parent bank holding company) who did not 
    participate in major policymaking functions at the bank.\5\ 12 CFR 
    215.2(d) (1992). The Board considered this treatment appropriate for 
    two reasons. First, such persons generally were not considered to be in 
    a position to exert sufficient leverage on the lending bank to obtain a 
    loan on anything but arm's length terms, in contrast to executive 
    officers of the lending bank itself or its parent. Thus, the Board 
    considered the benefits, in terms of protecting the safety and 
    soundness of bank, of restricting loans to these insiders of affiliates 
    to be small. Second, applying these restrictions to executive officers 
    of affiliates would have required each bank to maintain an updated list 
    of all its affiliates' executive officers and all related interests of 
    these executive officers, and to check all loans against this list. 
    Particularly for a bank in a large bank holding company structure, this 
    effort would have constituted a significant burden not outweighed by 
    any substantial benefit.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \4\ As amended by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation 
    Improvement Act of 1991 (FDICIA), section 22(h)(8) provides that 
    ``any executive officer, director, or principal shareholder (as the 
    case may be) of any company of which the member bank is a 
    subsidiary, or of any other subsidiary of that company, shall be 
    deemed to be an executive officer, director, or principal 
    shareholder (as the case may be) of the member bank.'' 12 U.S.C. 
    375b(8)(A).
        \5\ Subsection (h) of section 22 was added in 1978. Financial 
    Institutions Regulatory and Interest Rate Control Act of 1978, Pub. 
    L. 95-630, Sec. 104. At that time, subsection (h) was ambiguous 
    about whether an executive officer of a bank's affiliate was 
    required to be treated like an executive officer of the bank itself. 
    The statute provided that an ``officer'' of a bank included officers 
    of affiliates, but did not similarly address ``executive officers.'' 
    The statute's restrictions on lending by a bank to ``executive 
    officers'' of the bank therefore did not clearly apply to 
    ``executive officers'' of affiliates. No such ambiguity existed with 
    respect to directors and principal shareholders of affiliates, who 
    were explicitly treated like their counterparts at the lending bank. 
    In 1980, the Board amended Regulation O to cover insiders of 
    affiliates, but included a regulatory exception for executive 
    officers of affiliates who did not participate in major policymaking 
    functions at the bank.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        However, after the FDICIA amendment, the language of the statute no 
    longer appeared to allow such an
    
    [[Page 57798]]
    
    exception for executive officers of affiliates. Under the amendment, 
    executive officers of affiliates were explicitly treated like executive 
    officers of the bank itself. Still, nothing in the legislative history 
    of FDICIA indicated that Congress intended to invalidate the Board's 
    regulatory exception and extend coverage to all executive officers of 
    affiliates.
        In the Riegle Act, Congress addressed this issue by amending 
    section 22(h)(8) again. Congress authorized the Board to make 
    exceptions for executive officers and directors of affiliates, provided 
    that the executive officer or director did not have the authority to 
    participate, and did not participate in, major policymaking functions 
    of the lending bank. The Board's exceptions, however, could not include 
    the provisions of section 22(h)(2), which prohibited lending on 
    preferential terms.\6\ Although the legislative history of the 
    provision indicates that it was intended to allow the Board to maintain 
    its existing exception for executive officers, its language did not 
    allow the Board to do so.\7\ The Board suggested and supported an 
    amendment to section 22(h) to make its language consistent with its 
    apparent intent.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \6\ The provision extending the statute to executive officers 
    and directors of affiliates was moved to a new paragraph (8)(A), and 
    the authority of the Board to make exceptions was placed in a new 
    paragraph (8)(B), which reads as follows: The Board may, by 
    regulation, make exceptions to subparagraph (A), except as that 
    subparagraph makes applicable paragraph (2), for an executive 
    officer or director of a subsidiary of a company that controls the 
    member bank, if that executive officer or director does not have 
    authority to participate, and does not participate, in major 
    policymaking functions of the member bank. 12 U.S.C. 375b(8)(B). 
    ``Paragraph (2)'' is the prohibition against lending on preferential 
    terms.
        \7\ The Conference Report stated, ``It is not the intent of the 
    Conferees to affect the exemptions that the Federal Reserve Board 
    has already extended to executive officers, but rather to allow the 
    Board the authority to provide appropriate treatment for 
    directors.'' House Report 103-652, 103d Cong., 2d Sess. at 180 
    (1994).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        EGRPRA resolved the situation by dropping the requirement in 
    section 22(h)(8) that the Board's exceptions not include the 
    preferential lending provision. EGRPRA therefore restored the ability 
    of the Board prior to FDICIA to exempt executive officers of a bank's 
    affiliates from all the provisions of section 22(h), and reconfirmed 
    the authority of the Board to make such an exception for directors of a 
    bank's affiliates as well.
        Congress further revised section 22(h)(8) in EGRPRA, however, to 
    introduce an additional restriction on the Board's authority to make 
    exceptions. Under the 1996 amendment, an executive officer or director 
    of an affiliate is not eligible for an exception if the assets of the 
    affiliate constitute more than 10 percent of the consolidated assets of 
    the highest-tier holding company controlling the affiliate and the bank 
    making the loan.
    
    Proposal
    
        Accordingly, the Board is proposing amendments to Regulation O that 
    would eliminate its restrictions on a bank's lending to executive 
    officers and directors of affiliates who are not involved in major 
    policymaking functions of the lending bank, if the assets of the 
    affiliate do not exceed 10 percent of the consolidated assets of a 
    company that controls the member bank and such subsidiary and is not 
    controlled by any other company.\8\ For the same reasons that it 
    originally exempted executive officers of affiliates, the Board 
    believes that retaining the executive officer exception and expanding 
    it to cover directors would relieve regulatory burden on bank holding 
    companies without increasing the risk of excessive or preferential 
    lending or resultant safety and soundness problems.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \8\ The proposed amendment also would retain the current 
    provision in Regulation O that excludes extensions of credit to 
    exempt insiders of affiliates from the recordkeeping requirements of 
    Sec. 215.8 of Regulation O. 12 CFR 215.8. The Board in its original 
    proposal retained the recordkeeping requirement because the lending 
    bank was required to identify loans to exempted insiders of 
    affiliates and their related interests in order to ensure that such 
    loans were not made on preferential terms. Under the proposed 
    amendment, however, the Board's exception would include all 
    prohibitions under section 22(h), including the prohibition on 
    preferential terms, and therefore make recordkeeping for loans to 
    exempt borrowers unnecessary.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        Simultaneously with this proposal, the Board has published a final 
    rule elsewhere in today's Federal Register to simplify the requirements 
    for board of directors action to exclude an executive officer of an 
    affiliate from participating in major policymaking functions of the 
    lending bank. Under the amended procedures, in order to be exempt from 
    Regulation O, the board of directors of a bank must adopt a resolution 
    listing by name or title the insiders of the bank and its affiliates 
    who are authorized to participate in major policymaking functions of 
    the bank and generally excluding all other persons from participation, 
    and the executive officer must not be included in the resolution and 
    must not actually participate in such major policymaking functions. 
    Previously, the regulation required the executive officer to be 
    excluded from major policymaking functions of the bank by name or title 
    in a resolution of the bank and of the affiliated bank or company where 
    the individual served as an executive officer. 12 CFR 215.2(e)(2)(i).
        The supplemental proposal reflects this simplified procedure for 
    excluding executive officers and extends it to directors. The Board 
    adopted the simplified procedures for exempting an executive officer of 
    an affiliate from Regulation O because the lending bank and its board 
    of directors have full and formal control over who participates in the 
    bank's policymaking. For the same reasons, the Board believes that 
    simplifying the requirements to exempt a director of an affiliate would 
    relieve regulatory burden without increasing the risk of evasion of 
    Regulation O.
    
    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
    
        The Board has concluded after reviewing the proposed regulation 
    that, if adopted, it would not impose a significant economic hardship 
    on small institutions. The proposal does not necessitate the 
    development of sophisticated recordkeeping or reporting systems by 
    small institutions; nor will small institutions need to seek out the 
    expertise of specialized accountants, lawyers, or managers in order to 
    comply with the regulation. The proposal is designed to reduce the 
    burden of Regulation O consistent with the requirements of the 
    underlying statute. The amendment would reduce the regulatory burden 
    for most banks by increasing the number of insiders of affiliates who 
    may be excepted from the insider lending restrictions of Regulation O 
    and substantially eliminating recordkeeping with respect to such 
    individuals. The amendment may increase the regulatory burden for some 
    banks by excluding executive officers of larger affiliates who 
    previously were eligible to be excepted. The Board therefore certifies 
    pursuant to section 605b of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 
    605b) that the proposal, if adopted, will not have a significantly 
    adverse economic impact on a substantial number of small entities 
    within the meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et 
    seq.).
    
    Paperwork Reduction Act
    
        In accordance with section 3506 of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 
    1980 (44 U.S.C. Ch. 35; 5 CFR Part 1320, Appendix A.1), the Board 
    reviewed the supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking under the 
    authority delegated to the Board by the Office of Management and 
    Budget. Comments on the collection of information should be sent to the 
    Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (7100-
    0036), Washington, DC 20503,
    
    [[Page 57799]]
    
    with copies of such comments to be sent to Mary M. McLaughlin, Federal 
    Reserve Board Clearance Officer, Division of Research and Statistics, 
    Mail Stop 97, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, 
    Washington, DC 20551.
        The collection of information requirements in this proposed 
    regulation are found in 12 CFR Part 215. This information is required 
    to evidence compliance with the requirements of section 22(h) of the 
    Federal Reserve Act. The respondents and recordkeepers are for-profit 
    financial institutions, including small businesses. Records must be 
    retained for two years.
        The Federal Reserve System may not conduct or sponsor, and an 
    organization is not required to respond to, this information collection 
    unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. The OMB 
    control number is 7100-0036.
        The proposed amendments are expected to provide for some reduction 
    in the recordkeeping and disclosure practices of state member banks, 
    and would not affect the banks' reporting requirements to the Federal 
    Reserve System. The recordkeeping and disclosure requirements on 
    extensions of credit by the reporting banks to insiders of the bank and 
    its affiliates are contained in the information collection for the 
    Consolidated Reports of Condition and Income (FFIEC 031-034; OMB No. 
    7100-0036).
        Because the records would be maintained at state member banks and 
    the notices are not provided to the Federal Reserve System, no issue of 
    confidentiality under the Freedom of Information Act arises.
        Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed revision to the 
    collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of 
    the Federal Reserve System's functions, including whether the 
    information has practical utility; (b) ways to enhance the quality, 
    utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (c) ways 
    to minimize the burden of information collection on respondents, 
    including through the use of automated collection techniques or other 
    forms of information technology.
    
    List of Subjects in 12 CFR Part 215
    
        Credit, Federal Reserve System, Penalties, Reporting and 
    recordkeeping requirements.
    
        For the reasons set forth in the preamble, and pursuant to the 
    Board's authority under section 22(h) of the Federal Reserve Act (12 
    U.S.C. 375b), the Board is amending 12 CFR Part 215, subpart A, as 
    follows:
    
    PART 215--LOANS TO EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, DIRECTORS, AND PRINCIPAL 
    SHAREHOLDERS OF MEMBER BANKS (REGULATION O)
    
        1. The authority citation for part 215 continues to read as 
    follows:
    
        Authority: 12 U.S.C. 248(i), 375a(10), 375b (9) and (10), 
    1817(k)(3) and 1972(2)(G)(ii); Pub. L. 102-242, 105 Stat. 2236.
    
        2. Section 215.2 is amended as follows:
        a. Paragraph (d) introductory text and paragraphs (d)(1) through 
    (d)(3) are redesignated as paragraph (d)(1) introductory text and 
    paragraphs (d)(1)(i) through (d)(1)(iii), respectively;
        b. A new paragraph (d)(2) is added; and
        c. Paragraph (e)(2) is revised.
        The addition and revisions read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 215.2  Definitions.
    
    * * * * *
        (d)(1) * * *
        (2) Exception. Extensions of credit to a director of an affiliate 
    of a member bank (other than a company that controls the bank) shall 
    not be subject to Secs. 215.4, 215.6, and 215.8, provided that--
        (i) The board of directors of the member bank adopts a resolution 
    identifying (by name or by title) all persons authorized to participate 
    in major policymaking functions of the member bank, and the director of 
    the affiliate is not included in the resolution and does not actually 
    participate in such major policymaking functions;
        (ii) The assets of the affiliate do not constitute more than 10 
    percent of the consolidated assets of the company that controls the 
    member bank and is not controlled by any other company; and
        (iii) The director of the affiliate is not otherwise subject to 
    Secs. 215.4, 215.6, and 215.8.
        (e) * * *
        (2) Extensions of credit to an executive officer of an affiliate of 
    a member bank (other than a company that controls the bank) shall not 
    be subject to Secs. 215.4, 215.6, and 215.8, provided that--
        (i) The board of directors of the member bank adopts a resolution 
    identifying (by name or by title) all persons authorized to participate 
    in major policymaking functions of the member bank, and the executive 
    officer of the affiliate is not included in the resolution and does not 
    actually participate in such major policymaking functions;
        (ii) The assets of the affiliate do not constitute more than 10 
    percent of the consolidated assets of the company that controls the 
    member bank and is not controlled by any other company; and
        (iii) The executive officer of the affiliate is not otherwise 
    subject to Secs. 215.4, 215.6, and 215.8.
    * * * * *
        By order of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve 
    System, November 4, 1996.
    William W. Wiles,
    Secretary of the Board.
    [FR Doc. 96-28719 Filed 11-7-96; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
11/08/1996
Department:
Federal Reserve System
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking.
Document Number:
96-28719
Dates:
Comments must be received on or before December 9, 1996.
Pages:
57797-57799 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Regulation O, Docket No. R-0940
PDF File:
96-28719.pdf
CFR: (1)
12 CFR 215.2