96-32950. In the Matter of John Maas; Confirmatory Order Prohibiting Involvement in NRC-Licensed Activities (Effective Immediately)  

  • [Federal Register Volume 61, Number 250 (Friday, December 27, 1996)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 68310-68312]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 96-32950]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
    [IA 96-100]
    
    
    In the Matter of John Maas; Confirmatory Order Prohibiting 
    Involvement in NRC-Licensed Activities (Effective Immediately)
    
    I
    
        Mr. John Maas was employed as President of National Circuits 
    Caribe, Inc. (NCCI) in Fajardo, Puerto Rico, in 1991. NCCI possessed 
    and used radioactive materials at its Fajardo, Puerto Rico facility 
    under the authority of a general license issued by the Nuclear 
    Regulatory Commission (NRC) pursuant to 10 CFR 31.5. The general 
    license authorized the licensee to use byproduct material contained in 
    devices designed and manufactured for the purpose of gauging or 
    controlling thickness of materials during industrial processes. NCCI 
    filed for bankruptcy under Chapter 11 in Puerto Rico in March 1991 but 
    the case was dismissed in October 1991 due to lack of response from the 
    company. The Fajardo facility was abandoned sometime around October 
    1991.
    
    II
    
        On June 23, 1993, the NRC was notified by the Commonwealth of 
    Puerto Rico's Bureau of Radiological Health (Bureau) of the discovery 
    of radioactive sources and a quantity of hazardous chemicals on 
    property leased from the Puerto Rico Industrial Development Corporation 
    (PRIDCO) by NCCI. Bureau personnel indicated that the abandoned sources 
    had been found in an abandoned building by PRIDCO personnel.
        The NRC, Region II, staff performed an inspection of the site on 
    June 30, 1993, and determined there were five sources containing 
    microcurie amounts of Thallium-204 or Promethium-147. The sources were 
    in backscatter gauges that were authorized for use by NCCI under an NRC 
    general license, specified in 10 CFR 31.5. The staff determined that 
    the source/gauges had been abandoned at the site since October 1991. 
    NRC and PRIDCO oversaw the disposal of the gauges, which was completed 
    in September 1994.
    
    [[Page 68311]]
    
        The NRC Office of Investigations (OI) conducted an investigation, 
    documented in OI Report No. 2-93-044 dated January 31, 1996, to 
    determine whether NCCI had deliberately abandoned licensed material at 
    the plant site. Based on the evidence developed and reviewed, OI 
    determined that during approximately October 1991, the five generally 
    licensed backscatter gauges were deliberately abandoned by the 
    licensee, with the knowledge of the President of the company, Mr. Maas.
        Mr. Maas, the former President of NCCI, was prosecuted by the 
    Department of Justice and on December 5, 1995, pled guilty to the 
    charges of (1) willfully and knowingly storing or causing to be stored 
    hazardous wastes for longer than ninety days without having first 
    obtained a permit or interim status for said storage, in violation of 
    Title 42, United States Code, Section 6928(d)(2) (a) and (2) willfully 
    and knowingly abandoning devices containing byproduct radioactive 
    materials, in violation of Section 223 of the Atomic Energy Act of 
    1954, as amended, Title 42, United States Code, Section 2273 and 10 CFR 
    31.5(c)(6). On August 8, 1996, Mr. Maas was sentenced to probation and 
    required to perform community service.
    
    III
    
        The Commission's regulation in 10 CFR 30.10 requires, in part, that 
    any employee of a licensee may not engage in deliberate misconduct that 
    causes a licensee to be in violation of any regulation issued by the 
    Commission. Based on the facts set forth above, the staff concluded 
    that Mr. Maas engaged in deliberate misconduct that caused the licensee 
    to abandon devices containing byproduct material in violation of 10 CFR 
    31.5(c)(6). As President of NCCI, Mr. Maas was responsible for ensuring 
    that NCCI conducted activities in accordance with NRC requirements. The 
    NRC must be able to rely on licensees and their officials and employees 
    to comply with NRC requirements. Mr. Maas' actions in causing NCCI to 
    violate 10 CFR 31.5 have raised serious doubts as to whether he can be 
    relied on to comply with NRC requirements.
        The NRC staff sent a letter dated October 10, 1996, to Mr. P. M. 
    Sandler, Mr. Maas' attorney, containing the proposed terms of this 
    Order which are set out in Section IV of this Order. The proposed terms 
    are that Mr. Maas be prohibited from any involvement in NRC-licensed 
    activities for a period of five years from the date of this Order, and 
    is required to notify the NRC of his first involvement in NRC-licensed 
    activities during the five years following the prohibition period. The 
    NRC staff requested Mr. Sandler to review the proposed items with Mr. 
    Maas and, if Mr. Maas agreed to the proposed terms of this Order, have 
    him indicate his agreement with those terms by signing an enclosed 
    acknowledgement. By letter dated October 22, 1996, Mr. Sandler 
    transmitted the acknowledgement of the proposed provisions of the Order 
    which had been signed by Mr. Maas. In the acknowledgement, Mr. Maas 
    indicated that he understood the proposed provisions, committed to 
    complying with them, and consented to the issuance of an Order 
    confirming these provisions. In the acknowledgment, Mr. Maas also 
    waived his right to have a hearing on such an Order.
        I find that Mr. Maas' commitments as set forth in the letter of 
    October 22, 1996, are acceptable and necessary and conclude that with 
    these commitments public health and safety are reasonably assured. In 
    view of the foregoing, I have determined that public health and safety 
    require that Mr. Maas' commitments in the October 22, 1996 letter be 
    confirmed by this Order. As stated above, Mr. Maas has agreed to this 
    action. Pursuant to 10 CFR 2.202, I have also determined, based on Mr. 
    Maas' consent and on the significance of the conduct described above, 
    that public health and safety require that this Order be immediately 
    effective.
    
    IV
    
        Accordingly, pursuant to sections 81, 161b, 161i, 161o, 182 and 186 
    of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, and the Commission's 
    regulations in 10 CFR 2.202, 10 CFR 30.10, and 10 CFR 150.20, it is 
    hereby ordered, effective immediately, that:
        1. For a period of five years from the date of this Confirmatory 
    Order, Mr. Maas is prohibited from engaging in or exercising control 
    over individuals engaged in NRC-licensed activities. NRC-licensed 
    activities are those activities which are conducted pursuant to a 
    specific or general license issued by the NRC, including, but not 
    limited to, those activities of Agreement State licensees conducted 
    pursuant to the authority granted by 10 CFR 150.20. This prohibition 
    includes, but is not limited to: (1) Using licensed materials or 
    conducting licensed activities in any capacity within the jurisdiction 
    of the NRC; and (2) supervising or directing any licensed activities 
    conducted within the jurisdiction of the NRC.
        2. At least five days prior to the first time that Mr. Maas engages 
    in, or exercises control over, NRC-licensed activities within a period 
    of five years following the five-year prohibition in Section IV.1 
    above, he shall notify the Director, Office of Enforcement, U.S. 
    Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555, of the name, 
    address, and telephone number of the NRC or Agreement State licensee 
    and the location where the licensed activities will be performed. The 
    notice shall be accompanied by a statement, under oath or affirmation, 
    that Mr. Maas understands NRC requirements, that he is committed to 
    compliance with NRC requirements, and that provides a basis as to why 
    the Commission should have confidence that he will now comply with 
    applicable NRC requirements.
        The Regional Administrator, Region II, may relax or rescind, in 
    writing, any of the above conditions upon a showing by Mr. Maas of good 
    cause.
    
    V
    
        In accordance with 10 CFR 2.202, any person adversely affected by 
    this Confirmatory Order, other than Mr. Maas, may submit an answer to 
    this Order, and may request a hearing within 20 days of its issuance. 
    Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the 
    time to request a hearing. A request for extension of time must be made 
    in writing to the Director, Office of Enforcement, U.S. Nuclear 
    Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555, and include a statement 
    of good cause for the extension. The request for a hearing shall, in 
    writing and under oath or affirmation, specifically set forth the 
    matters of fact and law on which any other person adversely affected 
    relies and the reasons as to why the Confirmatory Order should not have 
    been issued. Any answer or request for a hearing shall be submitted to 
    the Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Attn: Chief, 
    Docketing and Service Section, Washington, D.C. 20555. Copies also 
    shall be sent to the Director, Office of Enforcement, U.S. Nuclear 
    Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555, to the Assistant General 
    Counsel for Hearings and Enforcement at the same address, and to the 
    Regional Administrator, NRC Region II, 101 Marietta Street, NW, Suite 
    2900, Atlanta, Georgia 30323 and to Mr. Maas. If a person other than 
    Mr. Maas requests a hearing, that person shall set forth with 
    particularity the manner in which his or her interest is adversely 
    affected by this Confirmatory Order and shall address the criteria set 
    forth in 10 CFR 2.714(d).
        If a hearing is requested by a person whose interest is adversely 
    affected, the Commission will issue an Order designating the time and 
    place of any
    
    [[Page 68312]]
    
    hearing. If a hearing is held, the issue to be considered at such 
    hearing shall be whether this Confirmatory Order should be sustained.
        In the absence of any request for hearing, or written approval of 
    an extension of time in which to request a hearing, the provisions 
    specified in Section IV above shall be final 20 days from the date of 
    this Confirmatory Order without further order or proceedings. If an 
    extension of time for requesting a hearing has been approved, the 
    provisions specified in Section IV shall be final when the extension 
    expires if a hearing request has not been received. AN ANSWER OR A 
    REQUEST FOR HEARING SHALL NOT STAY THE IMMEDIATE EFFECTIVENESS OF THIS 
    ORDER.
    
        Dated at Rockville, Maryland this 12th day of December 1996.
    
        For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
    James Lieberman,
    Director, Office of Enforcement.
    [FR Doc. 96-32950 Filed 12-26-96; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
12/27/1996
Department:
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
96-32950
Pages:
68310-68312 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
IA 96-100
PDF File:
96-32950.pdf