99-33570. Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 747 Series Airplanes  

  • [Federal Register Volume 64, Number 248 (Tuesday, December 28, 1999)]
    [Proposed Rules]
    [Pages 72582-72584]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 99-33570]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    
    Federal Aviation Administration
    
    14 CFR Part 39
    
    [Docket No. 99-NM-206-AD]
    RIN 2120-AA64
    
    
    Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 747 Series Airplanes
    
    AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
    
    ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This document proposes the adoption of a new airworthiness 
    directive (AD) that is applicable to certain Boeing Model 747 series 
    airplanes. This proposal would require a one-time inspection to 
    determine whether H-11 steel bolts are installed as attach and support 
    bolts at the trailing edge flap transmissions, and replacement of any 
    H-11 steel bolt with an Inconel bolt. This proposal is prompted by 
    reports of fracture or cracking of H-11 steel bolts at the flap 
    transmissions. The actions specified by the proposed AD are intended to 
    prevent loss of a flap transmission, which could reduce lateral 
    controllability of the airplane.
    
    DATES: Comments must be received by February 11, 2000.
    
    ADDRESSES: Submit comments in triplicate to the Federal Aviation 
    Administration (FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate, ANM-114, 
    Attention: Rules Docket No. 99-NM-206-AD, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., 
    Renton, Washington 98055-4056. Comments may be inspected at this 
    location between 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except 
    Federal holidays.
        The service information referenced in the proposed rule may be 
    obtained from Boeing Commercial Airplane Group, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, 
    Washington 98124-2207. This information may be examined at the FAA, 
    Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, 
    Washington.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Barbara Mudrovich, Aerospace Engineer, 
    Systems and Equipment Branch, ANM-130S, FAA, Transport
    
    [[Page 72583]]
    
    Airplane Directorate, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind 
    Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98055-4056; telephone (425) 227-2983; 
    fax (425) 227-1181.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Comments Invited
    
        Interested persons are invited to participate in the making of the 
    proposed rule by submitting such written data, views, or arguments as 
    they may desire. Communications shall identify the Rules Docket number 
    and be submitted in triplicate to the address specified above. All 
    communications received on or before the closing date for comments, 
    specified above, will be considered before taking action on the 
    proposed rule. The proposals contained in this notice may be changed in 
    light of the comments received.
        Comments are specifically invited on the overall regulatory, 
    economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the proposed rule. All 
    comments submitted will be available, both before and after the closing 
    date for comments, in the Rules Docket for examination by interested 
    persons. A report summarizing each FAA-public contact concerned with 
    the substance of this proposal will be filed in the Rules Docket.
        Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments 
    submitted in response to this notice must submit a self-addressed, 
    stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments 
    to Docket Number 99-NM-206-AD.'' The postcard will be date stamped and 
    returned to the commenter.
    
    Availability of NPRMs
    
        Any person may obtain a copy of this NPRM by submitting a request 
    to the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, ANM-114, Attention: Rules 
    Docket No. 99-NM-206-AD, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 
    98055-4056.
    
    Discussion
    
        The FAA has received reports indicating that H-11 steel bolts on 
    trailing edge flap transmissions installed on certain Boeing Model 747 
    series airplanes have fractured or cracked due to stress corrosion. 
    Bolts made of H-11 steel are known to be susceptible to such stress 
    corrosion cracking. The presence of moisture leads to stress corrosion 
    and, combined with other factors such as preload and shank corrosion, 
    can result in fractured or cracked bolts. Broken bolts could lead to 
    loss of a flap transmission, which could result in flap asymmetry, flap 
    skew, or collateral system damage. This condition, if not corrected, 
    could result in reduced lateral controllability of the airplane.
    
    Explanation of Relevant Service Information
    
        The FAA has reviewed and approved Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 
    747-27A2376, dated July 1, 1999, which describes procedures for a one-
    time general visual inspection to determine whether H-11 steel bolts 
    are installed as attach and support bolts at the trailing edge flap 
    transmissions. If an H-11 steel bolt is installed, the alert service 
    bulletin describes procedures for replacement with an Inconel bolt. 
    Accomplishment of the replacement specified in the alert service 
    bulletin is intended to adequately address the identified unsafe 
    condition.
    
    Explanation of Requirements of Proposed Rule
    
        Since an unsafe condition has been identified that is likely to 
    exist or develop on other products of this same type design, the 
    proposed AD would require a one-time general visual inspection to 
    determine whether H-11 steel bolts are installed as attach and support 
    bolts at the trailing edge flap transmissions, and replacement of any 
    H-11 steel bolt with an Inconel bolt. The actions would be required to 
    be accomplished in accordance with the alert service bulletin described 
    previously, except as discussed below.
    
    Differences Between Proposed Rule and Alert Service Bulletin
    
        Operators should note that, if any H-11 steel bolt is detected 
    during the inspection specified in this proposed AD, the proposed AD 
    would require replacement of any H-11 steel bolt with an Inconel bolt 
    prior to further flight. The alert service bulletin describes an option 
    to defer replacement of an H-11 steel bolt by performing a torque 
    inspection to determine whether the H-11 steel bolt is broken. If an H-
    11 steel bolt is not broken, the alert service bulletin allows 
    replacement of the H-11 steel bolt to be deferred for up to 18 months 
    after accomplishment of the inspection. The FAA has determined that 
    such a compliance time would not address the identified unsafe 
    condition in a timely manner. In developing an appropriate compliance 
    time for this AD, the FAA considered not only the manufacturer's 
    recommendation, but the degree of urgency associated with addressing 
    the subject unsafe condition, and the time necessary to perform the 
    replacement (approximately four hours per affected flap transmission). 
    In light of these factors, the FAA finds a requirement to replace any 
    H-11 steel bolt with an Inconel bolt prior to further flight to be 
    warranted, in order to ensure the continued safety of the transport 
    airplane fleet.
    
    Cost Impact
    
        There are approximately 775 airplanes of the affected design in the 
    worldwide fleet. The FAA estimates that 226 airplanes of U.S. registry 
    would be affected by this proposed AD, and that it would take 
    approximately 6 work hours per airplane to accomplish the proposed 
    inspection, at an average labor rate of $60 per work hour. Based on 
    these figures, the cost impact of the inspection proposed by this AD on 
    U.S. operators is estimated to be $81,360, or $360 per airplane.
        The cost impact figure discussed above is based on assumptions that 
    no operator has yet accomplished any of the proposed requirements of 
    this AD action, and that no operator would accomplish those actions in 
    the future if this AD were not adopted.
    
    Regulatory Impact
    
        The regulations proposed herein would not have substantial direct 
    effects on the States, on the relationship between the national 
    government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
    responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in 
    accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this 
    proposal would not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant 
    the preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
        For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this proposed 
    regulation (1) is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under 
    Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT 
    Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); 
    and (3) if promulgated, will not have a significant economic impact, 
    positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under 
    the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. A copy of the draft 
    regulatory evaluation prepared for this action is contained in the 
    Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained by contacting the Rules 
    Docket at the location provided under the caption ADDRESSES.
    
    List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
    
        Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
    
    The Proposed Amendment
    
        Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the 
    Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration proposes to amend 
    part
    
    [[Page 72584]]
    
    39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
    
    PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
    
        1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
    
    
    Sec. 39.13  [Amended]
    
        2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new 
    airworthiness directive:
    
    Boeing: Docket 99-NM-206-AD.
    
        Applicability: Model 747-100, -100B, -100B SUD, -200B, -200C, -
    200F, -300, -400, -400D, -400F, and 747SR series airplanes; line 
    positions 1 through 871 inclusive; certificated in any category.
    
        Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the 
    preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been 
    modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the 
    requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified, 
    altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of 
    this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an 
    alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (b) of 
    this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of 
    the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition 
    addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been 
    eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to 
    address it.
    
        Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished 
    previously.
        To prevent loss of a flap transmission, which could reduce 
    lateral controllability of the airplane, accomplish the following:
    
    Replacement
    
        (a) Within 1 year after the effective date of this AD, perform a 
    one-time general visual inspection to determine whether H-11 steel 
    bolts are installed as attach and support bolts at the trailing edge 
    flap transmissions, in accordance with Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 
    747-27A2376, dated July 1, 1999.
        (1) If no H-11 steel bolt is found, no further action is 
    required by this AD.
        (2) If any H-11 steel bolt is found, prior to further flight, 
    replace with an Inconel bolt, in accordance with the alert service 
    bulletin.
    
        Note 2: For the purposes of this AD, a general visual inspection 
    is defined as: ``A visual examination of an interior or exterior 
    area, installation, or assembly to detect obvious damage, failure, 
    or irregularity. This level of inspection is made under normally 
    available lighting conditions such as daylight, hangar lighting, 
    flashlight, or drop-light, and may require removal or opening of 
    access panels or doors. Stands, ladders, or platforms may be 
    required to gain proximity to the area being checked.''
    
    Alternative Methods of Compliance
    
        (b) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the 
    compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be 
    used if approved by the Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification 
    Office (ACO), FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate. Operators shall 
    submit their requests through an appropriate FAA Principal 
    Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the 
    Manager, Seattle ACO.
    
        Note 3: Information concerning the existence of approved 
    alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be 
    obtained from the Seattle ACO.
    
    Special Flight Permits
    
        (c) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with 
    sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 
    CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where 
    the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
    
        Issued in Renton, Washington, on December 21, 1999.
    D.L. Riggin,
    Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
    Service.
    [FR Doc. 99-33570 Filed 12-27-99; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-13-U
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
12/28/1999
Department:
Federal Aviation Administration
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
Document Number:
99-33570
Dates:
Comments must be received by February 11, 2000.
Pages:
72582-72584 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 99-NM-206-AD
RINs:
2120-AA64: Airworthiness Directives
RIN Links:
https://www.federalregister.gov/regulations/2120-AA64/airworthiness-directives
PDF File:
99-33570.pdf
CFR: (1)
14 CFR 39.13