96-1944. Negotiated Rulemaking Advisory Committee on Tuna Management in the Mid-Atlantic  

  • [Federal Register Volume 61, Number 22 (Thursday, February 1, 1996)]
    [Proposed Rules]
    [Pages 3666-3667]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 96-1944]
    
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
    
    National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
    
    50 CFR Part 285
    
    [I.D. 112995B]
    
    
    Negotiated Rulemaking Advisory Committee on Tuna Management in 
    the Mid-Atlantic
    
    AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
    Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
    
    ACTION: Notice of intent; request for comments.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: Commerce is considering establishing a new advisory committee 
    under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA). The committee's 
    purpose would be to negotiate issues leading to a proposed rulemaking 
    that will resolve the gear conflict between recreational and commercial 
    fishermen competing for tuna off the Mid-Atlantic coast. The committee 
    would consist of representatives of parties with a definable stake in 
    the outcome of the proposed rule.
    
    DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before March 4, 1996.
    
    ADDRESSES: Comments should be submitted to the Highly Migratory Species 
    Division, NMFS, 1315 East-West Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark Murray-Brown, 301-713-2347.
    
    I. Introduction
    
        In accordance with the Presidential directive of March 4, 1995, the 
    report of the National Performance Review, entitled ``Creating a 
    Government that Works Better and Costs Less'', and Executive Order 
    12866 to utilize Negotiated Rulemaking (NRM), the Secretary of Commerce 
    (Secretary) pledged to utilize the technique of NRM, where appropriate. 
    In March 1995, NOAA suggested, and Commerce accepted, the National 
    Fishing Association's petition as the basis for such a procedure.
        The project's stated purpose is to resolve the gear conflict 
    between the recreational and commercial fishermen competing for access 
    to tuna fishery areas off the Mid-Atlantic coast. The project will 
    bring together a balanced mix of parties and interests to negotiate at 
    the pre-proposal stage. The goal of the negotiation is to reach 
    consensus on proposals and/or language that will be the basis of the 
    rule. Negotiations will be conducted through an advisory committee 
    chartered under FACA. All procedural requirements of the Administrative 
    Procedure Act and other applicable statutes continue to apply.
        A senior official selected by NMFS will act as the designated 
    Federal officer on behalf of NMFS. Individuals representing definable 
    interests in the fishing industry, environmental community, academia, 
    governmental and quasi-governmental entities will negotiate on behalf 
    of their constituencies. A neutral mediator will keep the process 
    moving smoothly and assist in resolving disputes.
        NMFS is optimistic that this process can produce better 
    regulations, use all parties' time and resources more wisely, and 
    reduce litigation and uncertainty.
    
    II. Procedures and Guidelines
    
    A. Procedures for Establishing an Advisory Committee
    
        NMFS has prepared a charter and has initiated the requisite 
    consultation process. Only upon the successful completion of this 
    process and the receipt of the approved charter will Commerce form the 
    committee and commence negotiations.
    
    B. Participants
    
        The negotiating group should not exceed 21 participants. 
    Participants must be willing to negotiate in good faith and be 
    authorized to do so. One purpose of this notice is to help determine 
    whether the rule that NMFS is developing would substantially affect 
    interests not adequately represented by the proposed participants 
    (listed later in this notice). NMFS does not believe that each 
    potentially affected organization or individual must necessarily have 
    its own representative, but each interest must be adequately 
    represented. The intent is to have a group that as a whole reflects a 
    proper balance and mix of interests.
        The National Marine Fisheries Service will provide the necessary 
    administrative support, including technical assistance, for the 
    proposed committee.
    
    C. Requests for Representation
    
        If, in response to this notice, an additional individual or 
    representative of an interest requests membership or representation in 
    the negotiating group, NMFS, in consultation with the facilitator, will 
    determine whether that individual or representative should be added to 
    the group. The Secretary will make the final decision based on whether 
    the individual or interest would be substantially affected by the rule 
    or whether the individual is already adequately represented in the 
    negotiating group.
    
    D. Tentative Schedule
    
        NMFS plans to hold the first meeting of the advisory committee in 
    March 1996, with three additional meetings to follow, scheduled at 2-
    week intervals or until consensus is reached on a proposed rule, 
    whichever occurs first. Another committee meeting may be necessary 
    after publication of the proposed rule if the comments received reflect 
    that substantial controversy 
    
    [[Page 3667]]
    exists regarding the proposed rule. In the event that the committee is 
    unable to reach consensus, NMFS will proceed to develop its own 
    proposal with the insight gained through the negotiation process.
    
    E. Potential Interests and Participants
    
        NMFS has tentatively identified the following list of possible 
    interests and parties:
    
    4Recreational Fishery Interests
        American Sportfishing Association
        Billfish Foundation
        Coastal Conservation Association
        Confederation of Associations of Atlantic Charterboat Captains
        Delaware Captain's Association
        Jersey Coast Anglers' Association
        Maryland Saltwater Sportfishermen's Association, Inc.
        Mystic Marlin and Tuna Club
        National Coalition for Marine Conservation
        National Fishing Association
        New York Sportfishing Federation
        Ocean City Marlin & Tuna Club
        Oregon Inlet Fishing Center
        Rhode Island Marine Trade Association
        Thousand Fathom Club of South Jersey
        United Boatmen of New York and New Jersey
    
    Commercial Fishery Interests
        Blue Water Fishermen's Association
        East Coast Fisheries Federation
        East Coast Tuna Association
        General Category Tuna Association
        National Fishing Institute
        Purse Seiner Owners and Operators
    
    Shore-side Industry Interests
        A&J
        American Sportfishing Association
        Associated Fisheries of Maine
        Etheridge
        Great Circle
        National Marine Manufacturers' Association
        Reel Seat Tackle
        Seafarers International Union
        Other dealers, processors, harvesters
    
    Representatives with Special Experience in Fishery Issues
        Economist
        Fishery Biologist
        Gear and Technical Specialist
        Social Scientist
    
    Representatives of the Environmental Community
        Center for Marine Conservation
        National Audubon Society
        Ocean Wildlife Campaign
        World Wildlife Fund
    
    Representatives of Government or Quasi-government
        Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission
        Caribbean Fishery Management Council
        Commerce's Marine Fisheries Advisory Committee
        Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council
        New England Fishery Management Council
        South Atlantic Fishery Management Council
        U.S. International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic 
    Tunas Advisory Committee
    
        Comments and suggestions on this tentative pool of representatives 
    are invited. The listing of a potential group does not necessarily mean 
    that the group has been chosen or has agreed to participate. NMFS will 
    use this pool to develop a list of participants for the Advisory 
    Committee. Those who feel that their interests are not adequately 
    represented by the forementioned list may apply to be included or 
    nominate another organization or individual to represent their 
    interests. The application should include:
        1. The name of the applicant or nominee and a description of the 
    interest such person shall represent;
        2. Evidence that the applicant or nominee is authorized to 
    represent parties related to the interest the person proposes to 
    represent;
        3. A written commitment that the applicant or nominee shall 
    actively participate in good faith in the development of the rule under 
    consideration; and
        4. The reasons that the organizations specified in this notice do 
    not adequately represent the interests of the person submitting the 
    application or nomination.
    
        Authority: 16 U.S.C. 971 et seq.
    
        Dated: January 25, 1996.
    Gary Matlock,
    Program Management Officer, National Marine Fisheries Service.
    [FR Doc. 96-1944 Filed 1-31-96; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 3510-22-F
    
    

Document Information

Published:
02/01/1996
Department:
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Notice of intent; request for comments.
Document Number:
96-1944
Dates:
Comments must be submitted on or before March 4, 1996.
Pages:
3666-3667 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
I.D. 112995B
PDF File:
96-1944.pdf
CFR: (1)
50 CFR 285