99-3292. Vehicle Certification; Contents of Certification Labels for Altered Vehicles  

  • [Federal Register Volume 64, Number 28 (Thursday, February 11, 1999)]
    [Proposed Rules]
    [Pages 6852-6854]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 99-3292]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    
    National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
    
    49 CFR Part 567
    
    [Docket No. NHTSA-99-5073]
    RIN 2127-AH49
    
    
    Vehicle Certification; Contents of Certification Labels for 
    Altered Vehicles
    
    AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), 
    Department of Transportation.
    
    ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This notice proposes to amend NHTSA's regulations on vehicle 
    certification that specify the contents of the certification labels 
    that vehicle alterers are required to affix to motor vehicles that they 
    alter. The amendment would require the certification label affixed by 
    the alterer to state that the vehicle, as altered, conforms to all 
    applicable Federal motor vehicle safety, bumper, and theft prevention 
    standards affected by the alteration. Under the existing regulations, 
    the certification
    
    [[Page 6853]]
    
    labels on altered vehicles need only state that the vehicles, as 
    altered, comply with all applicable Federal motor vehicle safety and 
    bumper standards affected by the alteration. The proposed amendment 
    would make the certification requirements for vehicle alterers 
    consistent with those for vehicle manufacturers.
    
    DATES: Comments. Comments must be received on or before March 29, 1999.
        Applicability Date. If adopted, the proposed amendment would apply 
    to motor vehicles manufactured on or after September 1, 1999.
    
    ADDRESSES: Comments should refer to the docket number above and be 
    submitted to: Docket Management, Room PL-401, 400 Seventh Street, SW, 
    Washington, DC 20590. Docket hours are 9 am to 5 pm, Monday through 
    Friday.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Coleman Sachs, Office of Chief 
    Counsel, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 400 Seventh 
    Street, SW, Washington, DC 20590. (202-366-5238).
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In a final rule published today, NHTSA is 
    amending its regulations on vehicle certification at 49 CFR 567.4 to 
    require the certification label for multipurpose passenger vehicles 
    (MPVs) and trucks with a gross vehicle weight rating (GVWR) of 6,000 
    pounds or less to specify that the vehicle complies with all applicable 
    Federal motor vehicle safety and theft prevention standards. As 
    explained in the final rule, this amendment was prompted by a letter 
    that NHTSA had received from a vehicle manufacturer noting that under a 
    provision of the Anti Car Theft Act of 1992 now codified at 49 U.S.C. 
    33101, the definition of vehicles subject to the major parts marking 
    requirements of the theft prevention standard was expanded to include 
    ``a multi-purpose passenger vehicle or light duty truck when that 
    vehicle or truck is rated at not more than 6,000 pounds gross vehicle 
    weight.''
        One of the comments submitted in response to the notice of proposed 
    rulemaking (NPRM) that preceded this final rule (published on June 25, 
    1998 at 63 FR 34623) was from John Russell Deane III, who identified 
    himself as the General Counsel of the Speciality Equipment Market 
    Association (SEMA). In his comment, Mr. Deane recommended that NHTSA 
    amend 49 CFR 567.7, the provision in the certification regulations that 
    prescribes requirements for persons who alter certified vehicles, so 
    that it is consistent with the amendments to the certification 
    requirements for manufacturers at 49 CFR 567.4 that the agency was 
    proposing.
        The certification requirements in section 567.7 apply to a person 
    who alters a previously certified vehicle before it is first purchased 
    for purposes other than resale. The certification requirements are 
    triggered only when the vehicle is altered ``other than by the 
    addition, substitution, or removal of readily attachable components 
    such as mirrors or tire and rim assemblies, or minor finishing 
    operations such as painting,'' or when the vehicle is altered ``in such 
    a manner that its stated weight ratings are no longer valid.''
        In his comment, Mr. Deane noted that although vehicle alterers have 
    a statutory responsibility to certify that any vehicle they alter that 
    is subject to the theft prevention standard remains in compliance with 
    that standard following the completion of the alterations, section 
    567.7 has never been amended to reflect that requirement.
        In its response to Mr. Deane's comment, NHTSA acknowledged the 
    validity of the issue that he raised, and stated that the agency would 
    commence rulemaking shortly to address the disparity between the 
    certification responsibilities for manufacturers and those for alterers 
    with regard to the theft prevention standard.
        Accordingly, NHTSA is proposing to amend the certification 
    regulations to require the label affixed by vehicle alterers to state 
    that the vehicle, as altered, conforms to all applicable Federal motor 
    vehicle safety, bumper, and theft prevention standards affected by the 
    alteration. So that vehicle alterers have adequate lead time to exhaust 
    their existing inventory of certification labels and have new labels 
    printed, if the proposed amendment is adopted, this requirement would 
    apply to vehicles manufactured on or after September 1, 1999.
    
    Rulemaking Analyses and Notices
    
    1. Executive Order 12866 (Federal Regulatory Planning and Review) and 
    DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
    
        This proposal was not reviewed under E.O. 12866. NHTSA has analyzed 
    this proposal and determined that it is not ``significant'' within the 
    meaning of the Department of Transportation's regulatory policies and 
    procedures.
    
    2. Regulatory Flexibility Act
    
        In accordance with the Regulatory Flexibility Act, NHTSA has 
    evaluated the effects of this action on small entities. Based upon this 
    evaluation, I certify that the proposed amendment would not have a 
    significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. 
    Although most vehicle alterers are likely to qualify as small entities, 
    the proposed rule would have no adverse economic impact upon them 
    because they would be afforded adequate lead time to exhaust their 
    existing inventory of certification labels and have new labels printed. 
    This amendment would also have no effect on small organizations, and 
    small governmental units. Accordingly, no regulatory flexibility 
    analysis has been prepared.
    
    3. Executive Order 12612 (Federalism)
    
        This action has been analyzed in accordance with the principles and 
    criteria contained in Executive Order 12612, and it has been determined 
    that the proposed rule would not have sufficient Federalism 
    implications to warrant preparation of a Federalism Assessment. No 
    State laws would be affected.
    
    4. National Environmental Policy Act
    
        The agency has considered the environmental implications of this 
    proposed rule in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act 
    of 1969 and determined that the proposed rule would not significantly 
    affect the human environment.
    
    5. Civil Justice Reform
    
        This proposed rule would not have any retroactive effect. It would 
    modify an existing Federal regulation to make it consistent with a 
    statutory requirement. A petition for reconsideration or other 
    administrative proceeding will not be a prerequisite to an action 
    seeking judicial review of this proposed rule. This proposed rule does 
    not preempt the states from adopting laws or regulations on the same 
    subject, except that if adopted, the resulting Federal regulation would 
    preempt a state regulation that is in actual conflict with the Federal 
    regulation or makes compliance with the Federal regulation impossible 
    or interferes with the implementation of the Federal statute.
    
    Public Comments
    
        Interested persons are invited to submit comments on the proposal. 
    It is requested but not required that 10 copies be submitted.
        All comments must not exceed 15 pages in length. (49 CFR 553.21). 
    Necessary attachments may be appended to these submissions without 
    regard to the 15-page limit. This limitation is intended to encourage 
    commenters to detail their primary arguments in a concise fashion.
        If a commenter wishes to submit certain information under a claim 
    of
    
    [[Page 6854]]
    
    confidentiality, three copies of the complete submission, including 
    purportedly confidential business information, should be submitted to 
    the Chief Counsel, NHTSA, at the street address given above, and seven 
    copies from which the purportedly confidential information has been 
    deleted should be submitted to the Docket Section. A request for 
    confidentiality should be accompanied by a cover letter setting forth 
    the information specified in the agency's confidential business 
    information regulation. 49 CFR Part 512.
        All comments received before the close of business on the comment 
    closing date indicated above for the proposal will be considered, and 
    will be available for examination in the docket at the above address 
    both before and after that date. To the extent possible, comments filed 
    after the closing date will also be considered. Comments received too 
    late for consideration in regard to the final rule will be considered 
    as suggestions for further rulemaking action. NHTSA will continue to 
    file relevant information as it becomes available in the docket after 
    the closing date, and it is recommended that interested persons 
    continue to examine the docket for new material. Comments will also be 
    available on line at www.dms.dot.gov.
        Those persons desiring to be notified upon receipt of their 
    comments in the rules docket should enclose a self-addressed, stamped 
    postcard in the envelope with their comments. Upon receiving the 
    comments, the docket supervisor will return the postcard by mail.
    
    List of Subjects in 49 CFR Part 567
    
        Labeling, Motor vehicle safety, Motor vehicles.
    
        In consideration of the foregoing, the agency proposes to amend 
    Sec. 567.7, Requirements for persons who alter certified vehicles, in 
    Title 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations at Part 567 as follows:
    
    PART 567--[AMENDED]
    
        1. The authority citation for part 567 would continue to read as 
    follows:
    
        Authority: 49 U.S.C. 322, 30111, and 30115, 30117, 30166, 32502, 
    32504, 33101-33104, and 33109; delegation of authority at 49 CFR 
    1.50.
    
        2. Section 567.7 would be amended by revising paragraph (a) to read 
    as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 567.7  Requirements for persons who alter certified vehicles.
    
    * * * * *
        (a) The statement: ``This vehicle was altered by (individual or 
    corporate name) in (month and year in which alterations were completed) 
    and as altered it conforms to all applicable Federal Motor Vehicle 
    Safety Standards affected by the alteration and in effect in (month, 
    year).'' The second date shall be no earlier than the manufacturing 
    date of the original vehicle, and no later than the date alterations 
    were completed.
        (1) In the case of passenger cars manufactured on or after 
    September 1, 1999, the expression ``safety, bumper, and theft 
    prevention'' shall be substituted in the statement for the word 
    ``safety''.
        (2) In the case of multipurpose passenger vehicles (MPVs) and 
    trucks with a GVWR of 6,000 pounds or less manufactured on or after 
    September 1, 1999, the expression ``and theft prevention'' shall be 
    included in the statement following the word ``safety''.
    * * * * *
        Issued on: January 29, 1999.
    L. Robert Shelton,
    Associate Administrator for Safety Performance Standards.
    [FR Doc. 99-3292 Filed 2-10-99; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-59-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
02/11/1999
Department:
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
Document Number:
99-3292
Dates:
Comments. Comments must be received on or before March 29, 1999.
Pages:
6852-6854 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. NHTSA-99-5073
RINs:
2127-AH49: Certification Requirements for Vehicle Alterers
RIN Links:
https://www.federalregister.gov/regulations/2127-AH49/certification-requirements-for-vehicle-alterers
PDF File:
99-3292.pdf
CFR: (1)
49 CFR 567.7