96-3278. Pelargonic Acid; Exemption From the Requirement of a Tolerance on Apples and Pears  

  • [Federal Register Volume 61, Number 31 (Wednesday, February 14, 1996)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 5716-5718]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 96-3278]
    
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    40 CFR Part 180
    
    [PP 4F4396/R2202; FRL-5348-9]
    RIN 2070-AC78
    
    
    Pelargonic Acid; Exemption From the Requirement of a Tolerance on 
    Apples and Pears
    
    AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This rule establishes an exemption from the requirement of a 
    tolerance for residues of pelargonic acid when used as a blossom 
    thinning agent on apples and pears. A request for an exemption from the 
    requirement of a tolerance was submitted by Mycogen Corporation. This 
    regulation eliminates the need to establish a maximum permissible level 
    for residues of this plant regulator on apples and pears.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE: Effective on February 14, 1996.
    
    ADDRESSES: Written objections and hearing requests, identified bythe 
    docket number [PP 4F4396/R2202] may be submitted to: Hearing Clerk 
    (1900), Environmental Protection Agency, Rm. M3708, 401 M St., SW., 
    Washington, DC 20460. A copy of any objections and hearing requests 
    filed with the Hearing Clerk should be identified by the document 
    control number and submitted to: Public Response and Program Branch, 
    Field Operations Division (7506C), Office of Pesticide Programs, 
    Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M St. SW., Washington, DC 20460. 
    In person, bring copy of objections and hearing requests to: Rm. 1132, 
    CM #2, 1921 Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington, VA. 22202. Fees 
    accompanying objections shall be labeled ``tolerance Petition Fees'' 
    and forwarded to: EPA Headquarters Accounting Operations Branch, OPP 
    (tolerance Fees) P.O. Box 360277M, Pittsburgh, PA 15251.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: By mail: Mike Mendelsohn, 
    Biopesticides and Pollution Prevention Division, Office of Pesticide 
    Programs, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M St., SW., 
    Washington, DC 20460. Office location and telephone number: 5th Floor 
    CS, 2800 Crystal Drive, Arlington, VA 22202, (Telephone No. (703)-308-
    8715), e-mail: mendelsohn.mike@epamail.epa.gov.
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA issued a notice, published in the 
    Federal Register of February 8, 1995 (60 FR 7539), which announced that 
    Mycogen Corporation, 4980 Carroll Canyon Rd., San Diego, CA 92121 had 
    submitted a pesticide petition (PP) 4F4396 to EPA requesting that the 
    Administrator, pursuant to section 408(d) of the Federal Food, Drug, 
    and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), 21 U.S.C. 346a(d), establish an exemption 
    from the requirement of a tolerance for the plant growth regulator 
    pelargonic acid on apples and pears.
        There were no adverse comments, or requests for referral to an 
    advisory committee received in response to the notice of filing of the 
    PP 4F4396.
    
    I. Existing Food Clearances
    
        Pelargonic acid is an approved secondary direct food additive under 
    21 CFR 173.315 for use in the lye peeling of fruits and vegetables. An 
    aliphatic acid mixture of valeric, caproic, enanthoic, caprylic and 
    pelargonic acids may be used at a level not to exceed 1 percent in a 
    lye peeling solution. The conditions for use include a stipulation that 
    following the use of chemicals cleared under 21 CFR 173.315 the fruit 
    
    [[Page 5717]]
    and vegetables must be rinsed with potable water to remove, to the 
    extent possible, residues of the chemical.
        Pelargonic acid is listed by the U.S. Department of Agriculture 
    under the USDA List of Authorized Substances, 1990, section 5.14, Fruit 
    and Vegetable Washing Compounds.
        Pelargonic acid is approved as part of a sanitizing solution for 
    use on food-processing equipment and utensils, and dairyprocessing 
    equipment. Its use must be in combination with decanoic acid, 
    phosphoric acid, propionic acid, and sodium 1octanesulfonate. The 
    pelargonic acid-containing sanitizing solution must be drained from the 
    treated equipment and utensils before contact with food. (21 CFR 
    178.1010(b)(42))
        Pelargonic acid also is approved as a synthetic food flavoring 
    agent (21 CFR 172.515) provided the minimum quantity required to 
    produce its intended effect is used in accordance with the principles 
    of good manufacturing practice.
    
    II. Pelargonic Acid Natural Occurrence and Treated Apple Residue 
    Data
    
        Pelargonic acid is naturally present at levels up to 224 parts per 
    billion (ppb) in apples, 385 parts per million (ppm) in the skin of 
    grapes, and 143 ppm in grape pulp. It has been determined to be present 
    in a number of other foods as well. The highest residues of pelargonic 
    acid reported in apples subsequent to blossom treatment were less than 
    360 ppb.
    
    A. Toxicology Assessment; Supporting Data
    
        1. Acute toxicology of a 60% pelargonic acid emulsifiable 
    concentrate.
        Acute Oral LD50 > 5,000 mg/kg
        Acute Dermal LD50 > 2,000 mg/kg
        Acute Inhalation LC50 = 5.29 mg/L
        Primary Dermal Irritation - Moderate Irritant
        Primary Eye Irritation - Severe Irritant
        Dermal Sensitization - Non-sensitizer
    
    
        2. Mammalian cells in culture gene mutation assay in mouse lymphoma 
    cells (L5178Y TK ). Pelargonic acid was considered weakly 
    positive for inducing mutations at the TK locus of culture mouse L5178Y 
    TK  cells in the presence of S9-induced metabolic 
    activation. Mutations were induced at levels greater than or equal to 
    50 g/ml. However, this occurred in the presence of increasing 
    moderate-to-severe cytotoxicity and small colony development and may 
    reflect gross chromosomal changes or damage rather than actual 
    mutational changes within the TK gene locus.
        3. In vivo mammalian cytogenetics - mouse micronucleus assay. In an 
    -in vivo mouse micronucleus assay, groups of ICR mice (15/sex/dose) 
    were administered single oral doses of 1,250, 2,500, and 5,000 mg/kg n-
    pelargonic acid. The bone marrow cells were harvested 24, 48, and 72 
    hours post-treatment. No significant increases in the frequency of 
    micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes (PCEs) were observed in 
    either sex at any dose; thus, n-pelargonic acid was negative in the 
    micronucleus assay.
        4. Reverse gene mutation assay (Ames Test). Pelargonic acid was not 
    mutagenic under the conditions of the study.
        5. Metabolism. Pelargonic acid is a naturally occurring, nine-
    carbon saturated fatty acid. The oxidative degradation of fatty acids 
    is a central metabolic pathway in both animals and plants. Fatty acids 
    of varying chain lengths are metabolized into two-carbon fragments 
    through a sequence of enzyme-catalyzed reactions. The metabolic 
    products are then incorporated into fats, carbohydrates and amino 
    acids.
        6. Carcinogenicity. A summary of the results of a dermal 
    carcinogenicity study in mice with pelargonic acid was submitted. Fifty 
    mice were treated twice-weekly with 50 mg doses of undiluted pelargonic 
    acid for 80 weeks. No evidence of severe dermal or systemic toxicity 
    was seen. Histopathology revealed no tumors of the skin or the internal 
    organs.
        7. Developmental toxicity. The results of a developmental toxicity 
    study in rats with pelargonic acid was submitted. Groups of 22 pregnant 
    CD rats were given oral administration of 0 mg (corn oil) or 1,500 mg/
    kg pelargonic acid during days 6 through 15 of gestation. No evidence 
    of maternal toxicity was seen. Maternal body weights and weight gain 
    were comparable to that of the controls. No treatment-related effects 
    were seen at C-section. No developmental toxicity was seen. Based on 
    the above information, EPA concludes that the quantity of pelargonic 
    acid that is proposed for use will not be harmful to humans since:
        (1) The lowest level shown to weakly induce mutations in an in 
    vitro test system in the presence of cytotoxicity was at the 50,000 
    parts per million level and the highest residues seen in treated apples 
    were less than 360 parts per billion (ppb).
        (2) Other than weak mutation at high levels in an in vitro test 
    system and eye irritation, the data on pelargonic acid show no other 
    adverse effects.
        (3) The maximum application rate of pelargonic acid for blossom-
    thinning is 4.2 pounds per acre in a spray solution containing up to 
    0.31% pelargonic acid.
        (4) Pelargonic acid is applied before fruit set.
    
    B. Analytical Enforcement Method
    
        This rule establishes an exemption from the requirement of a 
    tolerance; therefore, the Agency has concluded that a analytical method 
    is not required for enforcement purposes for pelargonic acid.
    
    III. Conclusion
    
        Based on the low toxicity of pelargonic acid and the low residue 
    levels expected in apples and pears, the Agency concludes that 
    establishment of a tolerance is not necessary to protect the public 
    health for blossom thinning uses. Therefore, the exemption from 
    tolerance is established as set forth below.
    
    IV. Filing of Objections
    
        Any person adversely affected by this regulation may, within 30 
    days after publication of this document in the Federal Register, file 
    written objections to the regulation and may also request a hearing on 
    those objections. Objections and hearing requests must be filed with 
    the Hearing Clerk, at the address given above (40 CFR 178.20). A copy 
    of the objections and/or hearing requests filed with the Hearing Clerk 
    should be submitted to the OPP docket for this rulemaking. The 
    objections submitted must specify the provisions of the regulation 
    deemed objectionable and the grounds for the objections (40 CFR 
    178.25). Each objection must be accompanied by the fee prescribed by 40 
    CFR 180.33(i). If a hearing is requested, the objections must include a 
    statement of the factual issue(s) on which a hearing is requested, the 
    requestor's contentions on such issues, and a summary of any evidence 
    relied upon by the objector (40 CFR 178.27). A request for a hearing 
    will be granted if the Administrator determines that the material 
    submitted shows the following: There is genuine and substantial issue 
    of fact; there is a reasonable possibility that available evidence 
    identified by the requestor would, if established, resolve one or more 
    of such issues in favor of the requestor, taking into account 
    uncontested claims or facts to the contrary; and resolution of the 
    factual issue(s) in the manner sought by the requestor would be 
    adequate to justify the action requested (40 CFR 178.32).
    
    [[Page 5718]]
    
    
    V. Regulatory Assessment Requirements
    
    A. Executive Order 12866
    
        Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), the 
    Agency must determine whether the regulatory action is ``significant'' 
    and therefore subject to all the requirements of the Executive Order 
    (i.e., Regulatory Impact Analysis, review by the Office of Management 
    and Budget (OMB)). Under section 3(f), the order defines 
    ``significant'' as those actions likely to lead to a rule (1) having an 
    annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more, or adversely and 
    materially affecting a sector of the economy, productivity, 
    competition, jobs, the environment, public health or safety, or State, 
    local or tribal governments or communities (also known as 
    ``economically significant''); (2) creating serious inconsistency or 
    otherwise interfering with an action taken or planned by another 
    agency; (3) materially altering the budgetary impacts of entitlement, 
    grants, user fees, or loan programs; or (4) raising novel legal or 
    policy issues arising out of legal mandates, the President's 
    priorities, or the principles set forth in this Executive Order.
        Pursuant to the terms of this Executive Order, EPA has determined 
    that this rule is not ``significant'' and is therefore not subject to 
    OMB review.
    
    B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
    
        Pursuant to the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act 
    (Pub. L. 96-354, 94 Stat. 1164, 5 U.S.C. 601-612), the Administrator 
    has determined that regulations establishing new tolerances or raising 
    tolerance levels or establishing exemptions from tolerance requirements 
    do not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of 
    small entities. A certification statement to this effect was published 
    in the Federal Register of May 4, 1981 (46 FR 24950).
    
    List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
    
        Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, 
    Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and 
    recordkeeping requirements.
    
        Dated: February 6, 1996.
    
    Daniel1 M. Barolo,
    
    Director, Office of Pesticide Programs.
    
    PART 180--[AMENDED]
    
        Therefore, 40 CFR Part 180 is amended as follows:
        1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as 
    follows:
        Authority: 21 U.S.C. 346a and 371.
    
    
        2. In subpart D, by adding Sec. 180.1159, to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 180.1159  Pelargonic acid.
    
        Pelargonic acid is exempt from the requirement of a tolerance on 
    apples and pears provided it is used as a blossom thinner only and is 
    in a dilution of 100 gallons of water applied to blooms at a rate not 
    to exceed 4.2 lbs/acre with the maximum number of applications not 
    exceeding two per year.
    
    [FR Doc. 96-3278 Filed 2-13-96; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6560-50-F
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
2/14/1996
Published:
02/14/1996
Department:
Environmental Protection Agency
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
96-3278
Dates:
Effective on February 14, 1996.
Pages:
5716-5718 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
PP 4F4396/R2202, FRL-5348-9
RINs:
2070-AC78: Guidance on Environmentally Preferable Purchasing for Federal Agencies
RIN Links:
https://www.federalregister.gov/regulations/2070-AC78/guidance-on-environmentally-preferable-purchasing-for-federal-agencies
PDF File:
96-3278.pdf
CFR: (1)
40 CFR 180.1159