96-3681. Exemption of Records System Under the Privacy Act  

  • [Federal Register Volume 61, Number 34 (Tuesday, February 20, 1996)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 6315-6317]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 96-3681]
    
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    [[Page 6316]]
    
    
    DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
    
    28 CFR Part 16
    
    [AAG/A Order No. 113-96]
    
    
    Exemption of Records System Under the Privacy Act
    
    AGENCY: Department of Justice.
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The Department of Justice, Bureau of Prisons (BOP), is 
    exempting a Privacy Act system of records from subsections (c)(3) and 
    (4), (d), (e)(2), and (3), (e)(5) and (e)(8), (f), and (g) of the 
    Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. 552a. This system of records is the BOP 
    ``Telephone Activity Record System (JUSTICE/BOP-011).'' Information in 
    this system relates to inmate telephone activity and may include 
    information relating to official Federal investigations and matters of 
    law enforcement of the BOP pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 2510 et. seq., 3621, 
    4003, 4042, and 4082. The exemptions are necessary to protect third 
    party privacy and to avoid interference with law enforcement 
    activities, e.g., to preclude the disclosure of investigative 
    techniques, to prevent subjects of investigations from frustrating the 
    investigative process, and to more effectively ensure the safety, 
    security and good order of Federal correctional facilities.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE: February 20, 1996.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patricia E. Neely (202-616-0178).
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On April 21, 1995 (60 FR 19871), a proposed 
    rule was published in the Federal Register with invitation to comment 
    by May 22, 1995. On May 26, 1995 (60 FR 27933), BOP extended the 
    comment period to June 26, 1995. BOP informally provided a further 
    extension of the comment period to the record subjects until July 26, 
    1995.
        One comment was received from a record subject (an inmate) who 
    contended that the proposed exemption would violate privacy rights of 
    the record subjects. Although the basis for this contention is not 
    clear, it appears to be based upon the commenter's belief that the 
    exemptions are unnecessary since ``conversations are monitored now and 
    obviously this would deter anyone in his right mind from conducting 
    criminal activities over the phone while incarcerated.'' However, while 
    the monitoring of inmate telephone calls is successful in deterring 
    many inmates from using BOP telephones to conduct criminal activities 
    or violate BOP regulations, it nevertheless does not deter all inmates 
    or all cases. Therefore, these exemptions are essential for the reasons 
    stated in this final rule.
        This order relates to individuals rather than small business 
    entities. Nevertheless, pursuant to the requirements of the Regulatory 
    Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, it is hereby stated that the order 
    will not have a ``significant economic impact on a substantial number 
    of small entities.''
    
    List of Subjects in 28 CFR Part 16
    
        Administrative Practices and Procedure, Freedom of Information Act, 
    Government in the Sunshine Act, and the Privacy Act.
    
        Pursuant to the authority vested in the Attorney General by 5 
    U.S.C. 552a and delegated to me by the Attorney General Order No. 793-
    78, 28 CFR part 16 is amended as set forth below.
    
        Dated: February 7, 1996.
    Stephen R. Colgate,
    Assistant Attorney General for Administration.
    
    PART 16--[AMENDED]
    
        The authority for Part 16 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301, 552, 552a, 552b(g) and 553; 18 U.S.C. 
    4203(a)(1); 28 U.S.C. 509, 510, 534; 31 U.S.C. 3717 and 9701.
    
        2. 28 CFR 16.97 is amended by adding and reserving paragraph (d) 
    and by adding paragraphs (e) and (f) to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 16.97  Exemption of Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) Systems--
    limited access.
    
    * * * * *
        (d) [Reserved]
        (e) The following system of records is exempt from 5 U.S.C. 552a 
    (c) (3) and (4), (d), (e) (2) and (3), (e)(5) and (e)(8), (f) and (g):
    
    Telephone Activity Record System (JUSTICE/BOP-011).
    
        (f) These exemptions apply only to the extent that information in 
    this system is subject to exemption pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a (j)(2) 
    and/or (k)(2). Where compliance would not appear to interfere with or 
    adversely affect the law enforcement process, and/or where it may be 
    appropriate to permit individuals to contest the accuracy of the 
    information collected, the applicable exemption may be waived, either 
    partially or totally, by the BOP. Exemptions from the particular 
    subsections are justified for the following reasons:
        (1) From subsection (c)(3) to the extent that this system of 
    records is exempt from subsection (d), and for such reasons as those 
    cited for subsection (d) in paragraph (f)(3) below.
        (2) From subsection (c)(4) to the extent that exemption from 
    subsection (d) makes this exemption inapplicable.
        (3) From the access provisions of subsection (d) because exemption 
    from this subsection is essential to prevent access of information by 
    record subjects that may invade third party privacy; frustrate the 
    investigative process; jeopardize the legitimate correctional interests 
    of safety, security, and good order to prison facilities; or otherwise 
    compromise, impede, or interfere with BOP or other law enforcement 
    agency activities.
        (4) From the amendment provisions from subsection (d) because 
    amendment of the records may interfere with law enforcement operations 
    and would impose an impossible administrative burden by requiring that, 
    in addition to efforts to ensure accuracy so as to withstand possible 
    judicial scrutiny, it would require that law enforcement information be 
    continuously reexamined, even where the information may have been 
    collected from the record subject. Also, some of these records come 
    from other Federal criminal justice agencies or State, local and 
    foreign jurisdictions, or from Federal and State probation and judicial 
    offices, and it is administratively impossible to ensure that the 
    records comply with this provision.
        (5) From subsection (e)(2) because the nature of criminal and other 
    investigative activities is such that vital information about an 
    individual can be obtained from other persons who are familiar with 
    such individual and his/her activities. In such investigations it is 
    not feasible to rely solely upon information furnished by the 
    individual concerning his/her own activities since it may result in 
    inaccurate information.
        (6) From subsection (e)(3) because in view of BOP's operational 
    responsibilities, application of this provision to the collection of 
    information is inappropriate. Application of this provision could 
    provide the subject with substantial information which may in fact 
    impede the information gathering process or compromise an 
    investigation.
        (7) From subsection (e)(5) because in the collection and 
    maintenance of information for law enforcement purposes, it is 
    impossible to determine in advance what information is accurate, 
    relevant, timely and complete. Material which may seem unrelated, 
    irrelevant or incomplete when collected may take on added meaning or 
    significance at a later date or as an investigation progresses. Also, 
    some of these records may come from other Federal, State, local and 
    foreign law 
    
    [[Page 6317]]
    enforcement agencies, and from Federal and State probation and judicial 
    offices and it is administratively impossible to ensure that the 
    records comply with this provision. It would also require that law 
    enforcement information be continuously reexamined even where the 
    information may have been collected from the record subject.
        (8) From subsection (e)(8) because the nature of BOP law 
    enforcement activities renders impractical the notice of compliance 
    with compulsory legal process. This requirement could present a serious 
    impediment to law enforcement such as revealing investigative 
    techniques or the existence of confidential investigations, jeopardize 
    the security of third parties, or otherwise compromise law enforcement 
    efforts.
        (11) From subsections (f) and (g) to the extent that this system is 
    exempt from the access and amendment provisions of subsection (d).
    
    [FR Doc. 96-3681 Filed 2-16-96; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4410-05-M
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
2/20/1996
Published:
02/20/1996
Department:
Justice Department
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
96-3681
Dates:
February 20, 1996.
Pages:
6315-6317 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
AAG/A Order No. 113-96
PDF File:
96-3681.pdf
CFR: (1)
28 CFR 16.97