96-2683. Airworthiness Directives; Beech Aircraft Corporation Model 58P and 58PA Airplanes  

  • [Federal Register Volume 61, Number 27 (Thursday, February 8, 1996)]
    [Proposed Rules]
    [Pages 4756-4758]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 96-2683]
    
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    
    Federal Aviation Administration
    
    14 CFR Part 39
    
    [Docket No. 95-CE-89-AD]
    
    
    Airworthiness Directives; Beech Aircraft Corporation Model 58P 
    and 58PA Airplanes
    
    AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
    
    ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This document proposes to adopt a new airworthiness directive 
    (AD) that would apply to certain Beech Aircraft Corporation (Beech) 
    Model 58P and 58PA airplanes. The proposed action would require 
    inspecting for cracks and missing rivets in the cabin structure 
    (longeron) adjacent to and aft of the second right hand cabin window, 
    and repairing any cracked structure and installing rivets, if missing. 
    The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has received reports of 
    airplanes with cracks in the cabin structure. The airplanes are missing 
    rivets that should have been installed in the cabin structure to secure 
    the frame, splice, and longeron together. The missing rivets, which 
    could lead to cabin structure cracks, prompted the proposed AD action. 
    The actions specified by the proposed AD are intended to prevent 
    structural damage to the cabin caused by missing rivets, which if not 
    corrected, could cause decompression injuries to passengers, structural 
    damage to the fuselage, and loss of the airplane.
    
    DATES: Comments must be received on or before April 12, 1996.
    
    ADDRESSES: Submit comments in triplicate to the Federal Aviation 
    Administration (FAA), Central Region, Office of the Assistant Chief 
    Counsel, Attention: Rules Docket No. 95-CE-89-AD, Room 1558, 601 E. 
    12th Street, Kansas City, Missouri 64106. Comments may be inspected at 
    this location between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, 
    holidays excepted.
        Service information that applies to the proposed AD may be obtained 
    from Beech Aircraft Corporation, P.O. Box 85, Wichita, Kansas 67201-
    0085. This information also may be examined at the Rules Docket at the 
    address above.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Ostrodka, Aerospace Engineer, 
    FAA, Wichita Aircraft Certification Office, 1801 Airport Road, Room 
    100, Mid-Continent Airport, Wichita, Kansas 67209; telephone (316) 946-
    4129, facsimile (316) 946-4407.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Comments Invited
    
        Interested persons are invited to participate in the making of the 
    proposed rule by submitting such written data, views, or arguments as 
    they may desire. Communications should identify the Rules Docket number 
    and be submitted in triplicate to the address specified above. All 
    communications received on or before the closing date for comments, 
    specified above, will be considered before taking action on the 
    proposed rule. The proposals contained in this notice may be changed in 
    light of the comments received.
        Comments are specifically invited on the overall regulatory, 
    economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the proposed rule. All 
    comments submitted will be available, both before and after the closing 
    date for comments, in the Rules Docket for examination by interested 
    persons. A report that summarizes each FAA-public contact concerned 
    with the substance of this proposal will be filed in the Rules Docket.
        Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments 
    
    
    [[Page 4757]]
    submitted in response to this notice must submit a self-addressed, 
    stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments 
    to Docket No. 95-CE-89-AD.'' The postcard will be date stamped and 
    returned to the commenter.
    
    Availability of NPRMs
    
        Any person may obtain a copy of this NPRM by submitting a request 
    to the FAA, Central Region, Office of the Assistant Chief Counsel, 
    Attention: Rules Docket No. 95-CE-89-AD, Room 1558, 601 E. 12th Street, 
    Kansas City, Missouri 64106.
    
    Discussion
    
        The FAA has received reports of cracks in the fuselage on Beech 
    airplane Models 58P and 58PA. Upon investigating the source of the 
    cracks, FAA has learned that four rivets attaching the longeron to the 
    frame and splice had been omitted during the manufacturing process in 
    some of these airplanes. These four rivets are installed to secure the 
    cabin structure to the airplane frame and splice. Without the rivets in 
    place to reinforce the area around the cabin windows, cracking can 
    occur in this area resulting in possible cabin decompression or 
    structural failure of the fuselage.
        Beech Service Bulletin (SB) No. 2630, Issued: November, 1995, 
    specifies procedures for inspecting for cracks and repairing any cracks 
    found in the longeron around certain cabin windows, and installing any 
    rivets, if missing.
        After examining the circumstances and reviewing all available 
    information related to the reports described above, including the 
    referenced service information, the FAA has determined that AD action 
    should be taken to prevent structural damage to the cabin caused by 
    missing rivets, which if not corrected, could cause decompression 
    injuries to passengers, structural damage to the fuselage, and loss of 
    the airplane.
        Since an unsafe condition has been identified that is likely to 
    exist or develop in other Beech 58P and 58PA airplanes of the same type 
    design, the proposed AD would require inspecting the cabin window upper 
    longeron (next to the upper aft splice) between the second and third 
    right hand windows for cracks and missing rivets, repairing any cracks 
    found, and installing rivets if missing. Accomplishment of the proposed 
    action would be in accordance with Beech SB No. 2630, Issued: November, 
    1995.
        The FAA estimates that 386 airplanes in the U.S. registry would be 
    affected by the proposed AD, that it would take approximately 3 
    workhours to accomplish the inspection and that the average labor rate 
    is approximately $60 an hour. In estimating the total cost impact of 
    the proposed AD on U.S. operators, the FAA is only using the proposed 
    inspection criteria (3 workhours). This estimate is based on the 
    assumption that no affected airplane will have missing rivets or a 
    cracked longeron.
        Based on these figures, the total cost impact of the proposed AD on 
    U.S. operators is estimated to be $69,480 or $180 per airplane.
        If during the proposed inspection cracks are found and rivets are 
    missing, the estimated costs for accomplishing the following proposed 
    actions would be:
    
    --2 workhours to install rivets at an estimated cost of $125 per 
    airplane ($120 for labor and $5 for rivets) and,
    --8 workhours to repair any crack in the desiginated area at an 
    estimated cost of $675 per airplane ($480 for labor and $195 for 
    parts).
    
        Beech has informed FAA that parts have been distributed to equip 
    approximately 19 airplanes. Assuming that each set of these parts is 
    installed on an affected airplane, the estimated cost impact of the 
    proposed AD on U.S. operators would be reduced by $3,420 from $59,480 
    to $66,060.
        The regulations proposed herein would not have substantial direct 
    effects on the States, on the relationship between the national 
    government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
    responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in 
    accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this 
    proposal would not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant 
    the preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
        For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is 
    not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866; 
    (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and 
    Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) if promulgated, 
    will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a 
    substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the 
    Regulatory Flexibility Act. A copy of the draft regulatory evaluation 
    prepared for this action has been placed in the Rules Docket. A copy of 
    it may be obtained by contacting the Rules Docket at the location 
    provided under the caption ADDRESSES.
    
    List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
    
        Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
    
    The Proposed Amendment
    
        Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the 
    Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration proposes to amend 
    part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as 
    follows:
    
    PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
    
        1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
    
    
    Sec. 39.13  [Amended]
    
        2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding a new airworthiness directive 
    (AD) to read as follows:
    
    Beech Aircraft Corporation: Docket No. 95-CE-89-AD.
    
        Applicability: Models 58P and 58PA airplanes, having the 
    following serial numbers, and certificated in any category:
    
    TJ-2 through TJ-177
    TJ-179
    TJ-181 through TJ-212
    TJ-214 through TJ-270
    TJ-272 through TJ-283
    TJ-285 through TJ-288
    TJ-290 through TJ-313
    TJ-315 through TJ-321
    TJ-323, TJ-324
    TJ-326 through TJ-368, and
    TJ-370 through TJ-497
    
        Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the 
    preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been 
    modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the 
    requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified, 
    altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of 
    this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an 
    alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (c) of 
    this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of 
    the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition 
    addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been 
    eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to 
    address it.
    
        Compliance: Required within the next 100 hours time-in-service 
    (TIS) after the effective date of this AD, unless already 
    accomplished:
        To prevent structural damage to the cabin caused by missing 
    rivets, which if not corrected, could cause decompression injuries 
    to passengers, structural failure of the fuselage, and loss of the 
    airplane, accomplish the following:
        (a) Inspect cabin window upper longeron (next to the upper aft 
    splice) between the second and third right hand cabin side windows 
    for cracks and missing rivets in accordance with the ACCOMPLISHMENT 
    INSTRUCTIONS section of Beech Service Bulletin No. 2630, Issued: 
    November 1995.
        (1) If cracks are found in the longeron, prior to further 
    flight, repair the cracks in accordance with the ACCOMPLISHMENT 
    INSTRUCTIONS section of Beech Service Bulletin No. 2630, Issued: 
    November 1995. 
    
    [[Page 4758]]
    
        (2) If rivets are found missing, prior to further flight, 
    install the rivets in accordance with the ACCOMPLISHMENT 
    INSTRUCTIONS section of Beech Service Bulletin No. 2630, Issued: 
    November 1995.
        (b) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with 
    sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviations Regulations (14 
    CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where 
    the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
        (c) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the 
    compliance time that provides an equivalent level of safety may be 
    approved by the Manager, Wichita Aircraft Certification Office, 1801 
    Airport Road, Room 100, Mid-Continent Airport, Wichita, Kansas 
    67209. The request shall be forwarded through an appropriate FAA 
    Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the 
    Manager, Wichita Aircraft Certification Office.
    
        Note 2: Information concerning the existence of approved 
    alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be 
    obtained from the Wichita Aircraft Certification Office.
    
        (d) All persons affected by this directive may obtain copies of 
    the document referred to herein upon request to Beech Aircraft 
    Corporation, P.O. Box 85, Wichita, Kansas 67201-0085; or may examine 
    this document at the FAA, Central Region, Office of the Assistant 
    Chief Counsel, Room 1558, 601 E. 12th Street, Kansas City, Missouri 
    64106.
    
        Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on February 2, 1996.
    John R. Colomy,
    Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
    Service.
    [FR Doc. 96-2683 Filed 2-7-96; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-13-U
    
    

Document Information

Published:
02/08/1996
Department:
Federal Aviation Administration
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
Document Number:
96-2683
Dates:
Comments must be received on or before April 12, 1996.
Pages:
4756-4758 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 95-CE-89-AD
PDF File:
96-2683.pdf
CFR: (1)
14 CFR 39.13