99-3096. March Metalfab, Inc., Hayward, California; Confirmatory Order Prohibiting Involvement in NRC-Licensed Activities (Effective Immediately)  

  • [Federal Register Volume 64, Number 26 (Tuesday, February 9, 1999)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 6386-6387]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 99-3096]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
    
    [Docket No. 72-1007, EA 98-529]
    
    
    March Metalfab, Inc., Hayward, California; Confirmatory Order 
    Prohibiting Involvement in NRC-Licensed Activities (Effective 
    Immediately)
    
    I
    
        March Metalfab, Inc. (MMI) is a subcontractor of Sierra Nuclear 
    Corporation (SNC), which holds NRC Certificate of Compliance 72-1007 
    for the VSC-24 cask, used by general licensees, Palisades Nuclear Plant 
    (PNP) and Arkansas Nuclear One (ANO). The general license (10 CFR 
    72.210) relied on by PNP and ANO is for the storage of spent nuclear 
    fuel under 10 CFR part 72.
    
    II
    
        In March 1995, PNP loaded spent fuel into a multi-assembly sealed 
    basket (MSB) spent fuel cask that had been supplied by SNC and 
    fabricated by MMI. When the cask was pressurized with helium, two leaks 
    were identified in the wall of the MSB adjacent to the closure weld. 
    Subsequent analysis by PNP metallurgical personnel determined that the 
    defects were caused by underbead or hydrogen cracking, resulting from a 
    base metal weld repair to the MSB shell inner wall that was performed 
    during MSB manufacturing. The NRC staff learned of the problem 
    experienced by PNP as a result of inspection activities following a 
    similar closure weld failure at ANO. The staff became concerned that 
    undetected cracks in other MSBs, produced by SNC that were already 
    loaded with spent fuel, could propagate while the casks were in 
    storage, affecting the integrity of the cask confinement boundary. As a 
    result, during the week of March 17-21, 1997, a special inspection was 
    conducted at SNC and MMI.
        During the special inspection, five MMI employees who were 
    considered most likely to have been aware of the fabrication activities 
    during the manufacture of the MSBs that failed were interviewed. They 
    included two managers, the Project Manager and the Quality Assurance 
    (QA) Manager. All of the individuals interviewed denied having any 
    knowledge of any undocumented or unauthorized welds or weld repairs 
    during the manufacture of the MSBs.
        In July 1997, the NRC conducted a further inspection of MMI and 
    SNC. During that inspection, employees of both companies acknowledged 
    that undocumented welds had been made on casks sold to ANO and PNP. In 
    the course of this inspection, both the Project Manager and the QA 
    Manager for MMI admitted that they were aware that repair welding had 
    been performed on the inside of the MSBs during fabrication and that 
    they had not informed the NRC inspectors of those welds during the 
    March 1997 inspection interviews. The NRC continued to investigate the 
    matter and the Office of Investigations issued its report on October 
    16, 1998.
        The NRC has concluded that because the two managers were 
    knowledgeable about the fabrication process and were aware that welding 
    had been done on the insides of the MSBs, they deliberately made 
    statements in March 1997 to SNC and to the NRC that were inaccurate 
    concerning the internal welding. The information involved was material 
    to the NRC's understanding as to the quality of the MSBs and delayed 
    the NRC's action to ensure integrity of MSBs. As a result, the NRC has 
    further concluded that in providing the information, MMI violated 10 
    CFR 72.11, ``Completeness and Accuracy of Information'' and 10 CFR 
    72.12, ``Deliberate Misconduct.'' The NRC believes that the 
    circumstances of this matter raise questions as to MMI's willingness to 
    comply with Commission requirements. MMI has not admitted that a 
    violation occurred.
    
    [[Page 6387]]
    
    III
    
        In a telephone call on December 7, 1998, MMI agreed to issuance of 
    a Confirmatory Order prohibiting MMI from engaging in NRC-licensed 
    activities for a period of five years from the date that the Order is 
    issued. The staff believes that such a prohibition will adequately 
    protect the public health and safety and, therefore, finds this 
    acceptable. MMI requested that if the Order is issued, it be allowed to 
    complete work on one small existing contract to supply 10 plug 
    assemblies for a NUHOMS cask. This provision is acceptable, as the 
    assemblies have a limited safety function that can be verified by 
    measurement at the time of use. On January 6, 1999, the staff forwarded 
    to MMI a copy of the factual basis of the proposed order and the 
    implementation paragraph. On January 10, 1999, MMI consented to the 
    issuance of the order with those provisions and waived its rights to a 
    hearing on this action.
        I find that MMI's commitments as set forth in Section IV are 
    acceptable and necessary and conclude that with these commitments the 
    public health and safety are reasonably assured. In view of the 
    foregoing, I have determined that the public health and safety require 
    that MMI's commitments be confirmed by this Order. Based on the above 
    and MMI's consent to this action, this Order is immediately effective 
    upon issuance.
    
    IV
    
        Accordingly, pursuant to sections 53, 161b, 161i, 161o, 182 and 186 
    of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, and the Commission's 
    regulations in 10 CFR 2.202, 10 CFR part 72, and 10 CFR 72.12, it is 
    hereby ordered, effective immediately, as follows:
        A. Except as noted in paragraph B, MMI is prohibited for five years 
    from the date of this Order from any involvement in NRC-licensed 
    activities. For purposes of this Order, licensed activities include 
    providing or supplying, whether directly to NRC licensees or 
    Certificate of Compliance holders, or as a contractor or subcontractor 
    to a licensee or Certificate of Compliance holder, structures, systems, 
    or components, subject to a procurement contract specifying compliance 
    with 10 CFR Ch. I.
        B. Provided that MMI notifies Transnuclear West, the Certificate of 
    Compliance holder for the NUHOMS cask, of the existence of this Order, 
    MMI may complete work on the contract that was entered into prior to 
    the date of this order to fabricate a total of 10 plug assemblies for a 
    NUHOMS cask.
        The Director, Office of Enforcement, may relax or rescind, in 
    writing, any of the above conditions upon a showing by the Licensee of 
    good cause.
    
    V
    
        Any person adversely affected by this Confirmatory Order, other 
    than MMI, may request a hearing within 20 days of its issuance. Where 
    good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the time 
    to request a hearing. A request for extension of time must be made in 
    writing to the Director, Office of Enforcement, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 
    Commission, Washington, DC 20555, and include a statement of good cause 
    for the extension. Any request for a hearing shall be submitted to the 
    Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Rulemakings and 
    Adjudications Staff, Washington, DC 20555. Copies also shall be sent to 
    the Director, Office of Enforcement, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 
    Commission, Washington, DC 20555, to the Deputy Assistant General 
    Counsel for Enforcement, and to the Director, Office of Nuclear 
    Materials Safety and Safeguards, at the same address, and to Sierra 
    Nuclear Corporation. If such a person requests a hearing, that person 
    shall set forth with particularity the manner in which his or her 
    interest is adversely affected by this Order and shall address the 
    criteria set forth in 10 CFR 2.714(d).
        If a hearing is requested by a person whose interest is adversely 
    affected, the Commission will issue an Order designating the time and 
    place of any hearing. If a hearing is held, the issue to be considered 
    at such hearing shall be whether this Confirmatory Order should be 
    sustained.
        In the absence of any request for hearing, or written approval of 
    an extension of time in which to request a hearing, the provisions 
    specified in Section IV above shall be final 20 days from the date of 
    this Order without further order or proceedings. If an extension of 
    time for requesting a hearing has been approved, the provisions 
    specified in Section IV shall be final when the extension expires if a 
    hearing request has not been received.
    
        Dated this 27th day of January 1999.
    
        For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
    James Lieberman,
    Director, Office of Enforcement.
    [FR Doc. 99-3096 Filed 2-8-99; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
02/09/1999
Department:
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
99-3096
Pages:
6386-6387 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 72-1007, EA 98-529
PDF File:
99-3096.pdf