98-6053. Richfield Gas Storage System; Notice of Application  

  • [Federal Register Volume 63, Number 46 (Tuesday, March 10, 1998)]
    [Notices]
    [Page 11669]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 98-6053]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
    
    Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
    [Docket No. CP98-254-000]
    
    
    Richfield Gas Storage System; Notice of Application
    
    March 4, 1998.
        Take notice that on February 25, 1998, Richfield Gas Storage System 
    (Richfield), Two Warren Place, 6120 S. Yale, Suite 1200, Tulsa, 
    Oklahoma 74136 filed an application pursuant to Section 7(b) of the 
    Natural Gas Act (NGA) and Part 157 of the Commission's Regulations 
    thereunder for an order granting permission and approval to abandon, in 
    place, by sale to its affiliate, Duke Energy Field Services, Inc. 
    (Duke), certain facilities located in Morton and Stevens Counties, 
    Kansas, all as more fully set forth in the application on file with the 
    Commission and open to public inspection.
        Richfield proposes to abandon its storage field, 2578 horsepower of 
    compression, approximately 66.4 miles of 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 inch 
    pipeline, its injection/withdrawal and observation wells located in the 
    storage field, and its remaining recoverable base gas. The facilities 
    will be transferred to Duke at net book value estimated to be 
    $11,481,571. Richfield states that existing storage customers will not 
    be affected by the proposal, since March 31, 1998, is the last day for 
    storage withdrawals pursuant to Richfield's tariff. All customers have 
    been notified that all gas for their account in the storage field 
    should be withdrawn by April 30, 1998. Thus, with the final withdrawal 
    of customer storage volumes by April 30, 1998, Richfield will be 
    effectively out of the storage business.
        In addition, although not anticipated to be necessary, Richfield 
    also requests authorization to withdraw any customer-owned gas from the 
    storage facilities to be abandoned in the event that any such gas may 
    be remaining in the field subsequent to April 30, 1998.
        Richfield states that upon approval of the requested abandonment, 
    the facilities will be operated as a part of Duke's gathering system. 
    Coincident with this application, Duke has filed a Petition for 
    Declaratory Order in Docket No. CP98-252-000 seeking an affirmative 
    declaration that the facilities, once acquired and operated by Duke, 
    are gathering facilities exempt from NGA Jurisdiction under Section 
    1(b).
        Any person desiring to be heard or to make any protest with 
    reference to said application should on or before March 11, 1998, file 
    with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
    Washington, D.C. 20426, a petition to intervene or a protest in 
    accordance with the requirements of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
    and Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or 385.211) and the Regulations under the 
    Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.10). All protests filed with the Commission 
    will be considered by it in determining the appropriate action to be 
    taken but will not serve to make the protestants parties to the 
    proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party to a proceeding or to 
    participate as a party in any hearing therein must file a petition to 
    intervene in accordance with the Commission's Rules.
        Take further notice that, pursuant to the authority contained in 
    and subject to the jurisdiction conferred upon the Federal Energy 
    Regulatory Commission by Sections 7 and 15 of the Natural Gas Act and 
    the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, a hearing will be 
    held without further notice before the Commission or its designee on 
    this application if no petition to intervene is filed within the time 
    required herein, if the Commission on its own review of the matter 
    finds that a grant of the certificate is required by the public 
    convenience and necessity. If a petition for leave is timely filed, or 
    if the Commission on its own motion believes that a formal hearing is 
    required, further notice of such hearing will be duly given.
        Under the procedure provided for, unless otherwise advised, it will 
    be unnecessary for Richfield to appear or be represented at the 
    hearing.
    David P. Boergers,
    Acting Secretary.
    [FR Doc. 98-6053 Filed 3-9-98; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
03/10/1998
Department:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
98-6053
Pages:
11669-11669 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. CP98-254-000
PDF File:
98-6053.pdf