[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 44 (Thursday, March 6, 1997)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 10236-10237]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-5470]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. 96-CE-23-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Aviat Aircraft, Inc. Models S-1S, S-1T,
S-2, S-2A, S-2S, and S-2B Airplanes (formerly known as Pitts Models S-
1S, S-1T, S-2, S-2A, S-2S, and S-2B Airplanes)
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document proposes to revise AD 96-12-03, which applies to
Aviat Aircraft, Inc. (Aviat) Models S-1S, S-1T, S-2, S-2A, S-2S, and S-
2B airplanes that are equipped with aft lower fuselage wing attach
fittings incorporating either part number (P/N) 76090, 2-2107-1, or 1-
210-102. That AD currently requires repetitively inspecting the aft
lower fuselage wing attach fitting on both wings for cracks, and
modifying any cracked aft lower fuselage wing attach fitting. Modifying
both aft lower fuselage wing attach fittings eliminates the repetitive
inspection requirement of AD 96-12-03. Aviat recently started
incorporating modified aft lower fuselage wing attach fittings on newly
manufactured airplanes. The proposed AD would retain the requirements
of AD 96-12-03, but would exempt airplanes that had the modified aft
lower fuselage wing attach fittings incorporated at manufacture. The
actions specified by the proposed AD are intended to prevent possible
in-flight separation of the wing from the airplane caused by a cracked
fuselage wing attach fitting.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before June 4, 1997.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments in triplicate to the Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Central Region, Office of the Assistant Chief
Counsel, Attention: Rules Docket No. 96-CE-23-AD, Room 1558, 601 E.
12th Street, Kansas City, Missouri 64106. Comments may be inspected at
this location between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday,
holidays excepted.
Service information that applies to the proposed AD may be obtained
from Aviat Aircraft, Inc., P.O. Box 1240 (postal service delivery), 672
South Washington Street (express mail), Afton, Wyoming 83110. This
information also may be examined at the Rules Docket at the address
above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Roger Caldwell, Aerospace
Engineer, FAA, Denver Aircraft Certification Office, 26805 E. 68th
Avenue, Room 214, Denver, Colorado 80249; telephone (303) 342-1086;
facsimile (303) 342-1088.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
Interested persons are invited to participate in the making of the
proposed rule by submitting such written data, views, or arguments as
they may desire. Communications should identify the Rules Docket number
and be submitted in triplicate to the address specified above. All
communications received on or before the closing date for comments,
specified above, will be considered before taking action on the
proposed rule. The proposals contained in this notice may be changed in
light of the comments received.
Comments are specifically invited on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the proposed rule. All
comments submitted will be available, both before and after the closing
date for comments, in the Rules Docket for examination by interested
persons. A report that summarizes each FAA-public contact concerned
with the substance of this proposal will be filed in the Rules Docket.
Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments
submitted in response to this notice must submit a self-addressed,
stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments
to Docket No. 96-CE-23-AD.'' The postcard will be date stamped and
returned to the commenter.
Availability of NPRMs
Any person may obtain a copy of this NPRM by submitting a request
to the FAA, Central Region, Office of the Assistant Chief Counsel,
Attention: Rules Docket No. 96-CE-23-AD, Room 1558, 601 E. 12th Street,
Kansas City, Missouri 64106.
Events Leading to the Proposed AD
AD 96-12-03, Amendment 39-9645 (61 FR 28730, June 6, 1996), applies
to Aviat Models S-1S, S-1T, S-2, S-2A, S-2S, and S-2B airplanes that
are equipped with aft lower fuselage wing attach fittings incorporating
either part number (P/N) 76090, 2-2107-1, or 1-210-102. The AD
currently requires repetitively inspecting the aft lower fuselage wing
attach fitting on both wings for cracks, and modifying any cracked aft
lower fuselage wing attach fitting. Modifying both aft lower fuselage
wing attach fittings eliminates the repetitive inspection requirement
of AD 96-12-03. Accomplishment of the actions required by AD 96-12-03
is in accordance with Aviat Service Bulletin (SB) No. 25, dated April
3, 1996.
Aviat recently started incorporating modified aft lower fuselage
wing attach fittings on newly manufactured Models S-1S, S-1T, S-2, S-
2A, S-2S, and S-2B airplanes. In addition, Aviat revised SB No. 25
(Revised November 12, 1996) to include this airplane serial number
effectivity change.
The FAA's Determination
After examining the circumstances and reviewing all available
information related to the incidents described above, the FAA has
determined that (1) those airplanes with modified aft lower fuselage
wing attach fittings incorporated at manufacture should be exempt from
AD 96-12-03; and (2) AD action should be taken to prevent possible in-
flight separation of the wing from the airplane caused by a cracked
fuselage wing attach fitting.
Explanation of the Provisions of the Proposed AD
Since an unsafe condition has been identified that is likely to
exist or develop in other Aviat Models S-1S, S-1T, S-2, S-2A, S-2S, and
S-2B airplanes of the same type design that are equipped with aft lower
fuselage wing attach fittings incorporating either P/N 76090, 2-2107-1,
or 1-210-102, the FAA is proposing to revise AD 96-12-03. The proposed
AD would retain the requirements of AD 96-12-03, but would exempt
airplanes that had the modified aft lower fuselage wing attach fittings
incorporated at manufacture. Accomplishment of the proposed AD would be
in accordance with Aviat SB No. 25, dated April 3, 1996, Revised
November 12, 1996.
Cost Impact
The FAA estimates that 500 airplanes in the U.S. registry would be
affected by the proposed AD, that it would take approximately 2
workhours per airplane
[[Page 10237]]
to accomplish the proposed initial inspection, and that the average
labor rate is approximately $60 an hour. Parts to accomplish the
repetitive inspections cost approximately $100 per airplane. Based on
these figures, the total cost impact of the proposed AD on U.S.
operators is estimated to be $110,000. These figures do not take into
account the cost of repetitive inspections. The FAA has no way of
determining how many repetitive inspections each owner/operator may
incur over the life of the airplane.
In addition, AD 96-12-03 currently requires the same inspections as
the proposed AD for all 500 of the affected airplanes. The only
difference is that newly manufactured airplanes would be exempt from
the actions because they have modified aft lower fuselage wing attach
fittings incorporated at manufacture. Therefore, the cost impact of the
proposed AD for operators of all affected airplanes is the same as AD
96-12-03.
Regulatory Impact
The regulations proposed herein would not have substantial direct
effects on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in
accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this
proposal would not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant
the preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is
not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866;
(2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) if promulgated,
will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a
substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act. A copy of the draft regulatory evaluation
prepared for this action has been placed in the Rules Docket. A copy of
it may be obtained by contacting the Rules Docket at the location
provided under the caption ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration proposes to amend
part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as
follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 USC 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. Section 39.13, is amended by removing Airworthiness Directive
(AD) 96-12-03, Amendment 39-9645, and by adding a new AD to read as
follows:
Aviat Aircraft, Inc.: Docket No. 96-CE-23-AD. Revises AD 96-12-03,
Amendment 39-9645.
Applicability: The following airplane models and serial numbers,
certificated in any category, that are equipped with aft lower
fuselage wing attach fittings incorporating part number (P/N) 76090,
2-2107-1, or 1-210-102, and where these aft lower fuselage wing
attach fittings on both wings have not been modified in accordance
with the ACCOMPLISHMENT INSTRUCTIONS section of Aviat Service
Bulletin (SB) No. 25, dated April 3, 1996, Revised November 12,
1996; or Aviat SB No. 25, dated April 3, 1996:
--Models S-1S, S-1T, S-2, S-2A, and S-2S airplanes, all serial
numbers.
--Model S-2B airplanes, serial numbers 5000 through 5348.
Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the
preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been
modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the
requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified,
altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of
this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an
alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (e) of
this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of
the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition
addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been
eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to
address it.
Compliance: Required initially within the next 50 hours time-in-
service (TIS) after the effective date of this AD, unless already
accomplished (compliance with AD 96-12-03), and thereafter at
intervals not to exceed 50 hours TIS.
To prevent possible in-flight separation of the wing from the
airplane caused by a cracked aft lower fuselage wing attach fitting,
accomplish the following:
(a) Inspect the aft lower fuselage wing attach fitting on both
wings for cracks in accordance with the ACCOMPLISHMENT INSTRUCTIONS
section of Aviat SB No. 25, dated April 3, 1996, Revised November
12, 1996; or Aviat SB No. 25, dated April 3, 1996.
(b) If any cracked aft lower fuselage wing attach fitting is
found during any inspection required by this AD, prior to further
flight, modify the cracked aft lower fuselage wing attach fitting in
accordance with the ACCOMPLISHMENT INSTRUCTIONS section of Aviat SB
No. 25, dated April 3, 1996, Revised November 12, 1996; or Aviat SB
No. 25, dated April 3, 1996. Repetitive inspections are no longer
necessary on an aft lower fuselage wing attachment fitting that was
found cracked and has the referenced modification incorporated.
(c) Modifying the aft lower fuselage wing attach fitting on both
wings in accordance with the ACCOMPLISHMENT INSTRUCTIONS section of
Aviat SB No. 25, dated April 3, 1996, Revised November 12, 1996; or
Aviat SB No. 25, dated April 3, 1996, is considered terminating
action for the repetitive inspection requirement of this AD.
(d) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with
sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14
CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where
the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
(e) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the
initial or repetitive compliance times that provides an equivalent
level of safety may be approved by the Manager, Denver Aircraft
Certification Office, 26805 E. 68th Avenue, Room 214, Denver,
Colorado 80249. The request shall be forwarded through an
appropriate FAA Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then
send it to the Manager, Denver ACO. Alternative methods of
compliance approved in accordance with AD 96-12-03 are considered
approved for this AD.
Note 2: Information concerning the existence of approved
alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be
obtained from the Denver ACO.
(f) All persons affected by this directive may obtain copies of
the service bulletin referred to herein upon request to Aviat
Aircraft, Inc., P.O. Box 1240 (postal service delivery), 672 South
Washington Street (express mail), Afton, Wyoming 83110; or may
examine this service bulletin at the FAA, Central Region, Office of
the Assistant Chief Counsel, Room 1558, 601 E. 12th Street, Kansas
City, Missouri 64106.
(g) This amendment revises AD 96-12-03, Amendment 39-9645.
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on February 24, 1997.
Michael Gallagher,
Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 97-5470 Filed 3-5-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-U
