99-9314. Fisheries of the Gulf of Mexico; Amendment 16B to the Fishery Management Plan (FMP) for the Reef Fish Resources of the Gulf of Mexico (Amendment 16B)  

  • [Federal Register Volume 64, Number 71 (Wednesday, April 14, 1999)]
    [Proposed Rules]
    [Pages 18395-18396]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 99-9314]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
    
    National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
    
    50 CFR Part 622
    
    [I.D. 033199C]
    RIN 0648-AM15
    
    
    Fisheries of the Gulf of Mexico; Amendment 16B to the Fishery 
    Management Plan (FMP) for the Reef Fish Resources of the Gulf of Mexico 
    (Amendment 16B)
    
    AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
    Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
    
    ACTION: Notice of availability of Amendment 16B to the FMP for the reef 
    fish resources of the Gulf of Mexico; request for comments.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: Amendment 16B would authorize size limits for banded 
    rudderfish, lesser amberjack, cubera snapper, dog snapper, mahogany 
    snapper, mutton snapper, schoolmaster, scamp, gray triggerfish, and 
    hogfish; exclude banded rudderfish, lesser amberjack, dwarf sand perch, 
    sand perch, and hogfish from the 20-fish aggregate (combined) reef fish 
    bag limit; authorize new bag limits for hogfish, speckled hind, warsaw 
    grouper, and for banded rudderfish and lesser amberjack combined; 
    remove queen triggerfish from the Reef Fish FMP and authorize removal 
    from the applicable regulations; and eliminate the distinction between 
    species in the management unit and species in the fishery, but not 
    included in the management unit. The intended effect of Amendment 16B 
    is to conserve and manage the reef fish resources of the Gulf of 
    Mexico.
    
    DATES: Written comments must be received on or before June 14, 1999.
    
    ADDRESSES: Comments must be mailed to the Southeast Regional Office, 
    NMFS, 9721 Executive Center Drive N., St. Petersburg, FL 33702. 
    Requests for copies of the FMP, which includes an Environmental 
    Assessment and a Regulatory Impact Review, should be sent to the Gulf 
    of Mexico Fishery Management Council (Council), The Commons at 
    Rivergate, 3018 U.S. Highway 301 North, Suite 1000, Tampa, FL 33619-
    2266; Phone: 813-228-2815; fax: 813-225-7015.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Roy E. Crabtree, 727-570-5305, fax 
    727-570-5583.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation 
    and Management Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act), as amended by the 
    Sustainable Fisheries Act, requires each Regional Fishery Management 
    Council to submit any FMP or amendment to NMFS for review and approval, 
    disapproval, or partial approval. The Magnuson-Stevens Act also 
    requires that NMFS, upon receiving a FMP or amendment, immediately 
    publish a document in the Federal Register stating that the FMP or 
    amendment is available for public review and comment.
        Amendment 16B would authorize more conservative bag and size limits 
    for several reef fish species and improve consistency with Florida 
    state regulations, thereby improving enforcement. Fish trap phase-out 
    measures that were the subject of public hearings as part of draft 
    Amendment 16, and approved by the Council, were included in Amendment 
    16A, which was partially approved by NMFS on March 18, 1999.
    
    Minor Amberjack Measures
    
        A 1996 NMFS stock assessment suggests that the number of young 
    greater amberjack has decreased steadily since 1991. In addition, 
    anecdotal information from anglers along Florida's Gulf coast suggests 
    that greater amberjack have decreased in size and abundance in recent 
    years. In response to this information, the Council developed Amendment 
    12 to the Reef Fish FMP, which established a 1-fish bag limit for 
    greater amberjack, and Amendment 15 to the FMP, which established a 
    seasonal closure of the commercial fishery. Greater amberjack are also 
    subject to minimum size limits of 28 inches (71.1 cm) fork length for 
    the recreational fishery and 36 inches (91.4 cm) for the commercial 
    fishery.
        Juvenile greater amberjack, lesser amberjack, and banded rudderfish 
    are difficult to distinguish and are often confused by the public; 
    consequently, misidentified juvenile greater amberjack may be landed as 
    lesser amberjack or banded rudderfish, species that are currently 
    unregulated. Therefore, the Council believes that additional protection 
    for juvenile greater amberjack is warranted. The intent of Amendment 
    16B is to reduce the harvest of misidentified juvenile greater 
    amberjack by limiting the harvest of these minor amberjack species. The 
    word ``minor'' used by the Council in Amendment 16B is not intended to 
    reflect on the significance of these measures; instead it refers to the 
    species banded rudderfish and lesser amberjack.
        In Reef Fish Amendment 12 the Council proposed to apply an 
    aggregate bag limit and a minimum size limit of 28 inches (71.1 cm) to 
    greater amberjack, lesser amberjack, and banded rudderfish. These 
    proposed actions would have effectively eliminated the recreational 
    harvest of banded rudderfish and lesser amberjack because these species 
    rarely, if ever, reach 28 inches (71.1 cm). The Council did not present 
    this aspect of the measure as a deliberate, direct allocation; however, 
    the effect of the measure would have been to shift the allocation of 
    these species from principally recreational to entirely commercial. 
    Therefore, this aspect of the measure would have operated as the 
    functional equivalent of a direct allocation, and NMFS considered this 
    allocation unfair and inequitable. Accordingly, NMFS disapproved this 
    portion of Amendment 12 based on national standard 4 of the Magnuson-
    Stevens Act, which requires that allocations of fishing privilege be 
    fair and equitable to all fishermen.
        Amendment 16B would authorize new bag and size limits that should 
    reduce the harvest of banded rudderfish, lesser amberjack, and 
    misidentified greater amberjack while continuing to allow a limited 
    recreational harvest. Amendment 16B would authorize: (1) Establishment 
    of a ``slot limit'' of 14 inches (35.6 cm) (minimum) to 22 inches (55.9 
    cm) (maximum) fork length for the commercial and recreational harvest 
    of banded rudderfish and lesser amberjack; and (2) establishment of a 
    5-fish aggregate bag limit for banded rudderfish and lesser amberjack 
    and exclude both species from the 20-fish aggregate reef fish bag 
    limit.
    
    [[Page 18396]]
    
    Species Not Listed in the Management Unit
    
        Since its inception, the FMP has included two lists of reef fishes: 
    One of species in the management unit and another of species in the 
    fishery, but not included in the management unit. The designation of 
    species in the fishery, but not included in the management unit was 
    originally intended for data collection purposes only; however, the 
    existence of two lists has created confusion regarding which species 
    are subject to regulations. Amendment 16B would eliminate the 
    distinction in the FMP between these two lists and create a single list 
    of ``species in the reef fish FMP,'' which identifies the reef fish 
    management unit. There are only four reef fish species that are 
    ``species in the fishery but not in the management unit''-sand perch, 
    dwarf sand perch, queen triggerfish, and hogfish. Amendment 16B would 
    include hogfish, dwarf sand perch, and sand perch in the management 
    unit and remove queen triggerfish from the FMP. Amendment 16B would 
    authorize removal of queen triggerfish from the regulations 
    implementing the FMP, and thus allow Florida to regulate vessels 
    registered in the State of Florida and fishing for that species in the 
    exclusive economic zone (EEZ) under that state's more conservative 
    management measures. Although queen triggerfish occur rarely or 
    occasionally throughout the Gulf of Mexico, they are abundant only off 
    Florida and are seldom landed outside Florida.
    
    Florida Compatible Size and Bag Limits
    
        Florida has established bag limits and size limits for several reef 
    fish species for which there are either no corresponding limits in the 
    EEZ, or for which the Federal limits differ from the state limits. In 
    response to a request from the Florida Marine Fisheries Commission 
    (FMFC) that the Council consider implementing size and bag limits 
    consistent with those in Florida state waters, the Council proposes new 
    compatible bag and size limits. In a November 3, 1994, letter the FMFC 
    provided to the Council biological information that formed the basis 
    for Florida's regulations. Although limited, the best scientific 
    information available to the Council, and the precautionary approach to 
    fisheries management, indicate a need for greater protection for these 
    species. The Council concluded that bag and size limits compatible with 
    Florida's would be the most effective means of achieving greater 
    protection, because compatible regulations would facilitate compliance 
    and enforcement. Furthermore, the Council states that with the possible 
    exception of gray triggerfish, Florida accounts for most of the 
    recreational and commercial landings of these species. The proposed 
    minimum size limit for gray triggerfish is based on a 1995 NMFS stock 
    assessment, and, thus, it is an appropriate measure to extend 
    throughout the Gulf EEZ.
        Amendment 16B would authorize the establishment of the following 
    minimum size limits: cubera snapper (12 inches (30.5 cm), total length 
    (TL)), dog snapper (12 inches (30.5 cm), TL), mahogany snapper (12 
    inches (30.5 cm), TL), schoolmaster (12 inches (30.5 cm), TL), mutton 
    snapper (16 inches (40.6 cm), TL), scamp (16 inches (40.6 cm), TL), 
    gray triggerfish (12 inches 30.5 cm), TL), and hogfish (12 inches (30.5 
    cm), fork length). In addition, Amendment 16B would authorize the 
    establishment of a 5-fish bag limit for hogfish, exclude hogfish from 
    the 20-fish aggregate reef fish bag limit, and clarify that sand perch 
    and dwarf sand perch are excluded from the 20-fish aggregate bag limit. 
    Sand perch and dwarf sand perch are often used as bait, and there is no 
    evidence to suggest their stocks are in need of management.
    
    Speckled Hind and Warsaw Grouper
    
        The NMFS Office of Protected Resources has added speckled hind and 
    warsaw grouper to the list of candidates for possible listing as 
    threatened or endangered under the Endangered Species Act. Candidate 
    status does not afford any specific level of additional protection for 
    a species, but it does reflect a significant level of concern regarding 
    a species' status. Amendment 16B would authorize the establishment of a 
    recreational bag limit of one speckled hind and one warsaw grouper per 
    vessel. These new restrictions would also prohibit the sale of these 
    species by the recreational sector because the FMP and existing 
    regulations prohibit the sale of reef fish subject to bag limits. The 
    commercial harvest of warsaw grouper and speckled hind would continue 
    and be limited by the deep-water grouper quota. The Council believes 
    that because warsaw grouper and speckled hind are usually caught in 
    relatively deep water, the mortality rate of released fish is high; 
    consequently, closure of the fishery would provide little additional 
    protection. Furthermore, the Council states that commercial vessels do 
    not target these species, and since the intent is to eliminate 
    targeting of these species, additional restrictions on the commercial 
    fishery are not needed.
        A proposed rule to implement Amendment 16B has been completed. In 
    accordance with the Magnuson-Stevens Act, NMFS is evaluating the 
    proposed rule to determine whether it is consistent with the FMP, the 
    Magnuson-Stevens Act, and other applicable law. If that determination 
    is affirmative, NMFS will publish that finding in the Federal Register 
    for public review and comment.
        Comments received by June 14, 1999, whether specifically directed 
    to Amendment 16B or the proposed rule, will be considered by NMFS in 
    its decision to approve, disapprove, or partially approve the FMP. 
    Comments received after that date will not be considered by NMFS in 
    this decision. All comments received by NMFS on Amendment 16B or the 
    proposed rule during their respective comment periods will be addressed 
    in the final rule.
    
        Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
    
        Dated: April 8, 1999.
    Gary C. Matlock,
    Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries 
    Service.
    [FR Doc. 99-9314 Filed 4-13-99; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 3510-22-F
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
04/14/1999
Department:
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Notice of availability of Amendment 16B to the FMP for the reef fish resources of the Gulf of Mexico; request for comments.
Document Number:
99-9314
Dates:
Written comments must be received on or before June 14, 1999.
Pages:
18395-18396 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
I.D. 033199C
RINs:
0648-AM15: Fishery Management Plan for Pelagic Sargassum Habitat of the South Atlantic Region
RIN Links:
https://www.federalregister.gov/regulations/0648-AM15/fishery-management-plan-for-pelagic-sargassum-habitat-of-the-south-atlantic-region
PDF File:
99-9314.pdf
CFR: (1)
50 CFR 622