94-9337. Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 747-400 Series Airplanes  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 76 (Wednesday, April 20, 1994)]
    [Unknown Section]
    [Page 0]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-9337]
    
    
    [[Page Unknown]]
    
    [Federal Register: April 20, 1994]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    14 CFR Part 39
    
    [Docket No. 93-NM-64-AD; Amendment 39-8887; AD 91-26-05 R1]
    
     
    
    Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 747-400 Series Airplanes
    
    AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This amendment revises an existing airworthiness directive 
    (AD), applicable to Boeing Model 747-400 series airplanes, that 
    currently requires revising the FAA-approved Airplane Flight Manual 
    (AFM) to impose an operational limitation that requires the right very 
    high frequency (VHF) radio communication system to be operational for 
    dispatch. That action was prompted by the discovery of a single point 
    failure within the audio management unit (AMU) that will disable the 
    transmission functions of both the left and center VHF radios. The 
    actions specified by that AD are intended to prevent loss of all VHF 
    radio voice communication transmission capability. This amendment 
    limits the applicability of the rule, and provides an optional 
    terminating action for the required AFM limitation.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE: May 20, 1994.
    
    ADDRESSES: The service information referenced in this AD may be 
    obtained from Boeing Commercial Airplane Group, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, 
    Washington 98124-2207. This information may be examined at the Federal 
    Aviation Administration (FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate, Rules 
    Docket, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Matt Wade, Aerospace Engineer, Systems 
    and Equipment Branch, ANM-130S, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 
    Seattle Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, 
    Washington 98055-4056; telephone (206) 227-2751; fax (206) 227-1181.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal 
    Aviation Regulations by revising AD 91-26-05, amendment 39-8116 (56 FR 
    65181, December 16, 1991), which is applicable to all Boeing Model 747-
    400 series airplanes, was published in the Federal Register on July 26, 
    1993 (58 FR 39688). The action proposed to revise AD 91-26-05 to 
    continue to require the addition of a limitation in the FAA-approved 
    Airplane Flight Manual (AFM) requiring that the right very high 
    frequency (VHF) radio communication system be operational for dispatch. 
    Additionally, the action proposed to provide for replacement of the 
    currently-installed audio management unit (AMU) with a modified AMU, as 
    optional terminating action for the requirements of this AD for certain 
    airplanes.
        The action also proposed to limit the applicability of the rule to 
    exclude airplanes having variable numbers RT681 and RT682. These 
    airplanes were determined not to be subject to the addressed unsafe 
    condition, since they were equipped with the modified AMU during 
    production.
        Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate 
    in the making of this amendment. Due consideration has been given to 
    the two comments received.
        Both commenters support the proposed rule.
        Subsequent to the issuance of the notice, the manufacturer advised 
    the FAA that the proposed terminating action had been installed 
    previously on certain additional airplanes. Airplanes having production 
    line numbers 961 and higher were modified during production to include 
    the modified AMU. In light of this, the FAA finds that these airplanes 
    are not subject to the addressed unsafe condition and, therefore, has 
    revised the applicability of the final rule to exclude these airplanes. 
    Additionally, the applicability has been revised to call out the 
    production line numbers (816 and 839), rather than the variable numbers 
    (RT681 and RT682), of the two excluded airplanes that were specified in 
    the notice.
        After careful review of the available data, including the comments 
    noted above, the FAA has determined that air safety and the public 
    interest require the adoption of the rule with the changes previously 
    described. The FAA has determined that these changes will neither 
    increase the economic burden on any operator nor increase the scope of 
    the AD.
        There are approximately 235 Model 747-400 series airplanes of the 
    affected design in the worldwide fleet. The FAA estimates that 28 
    airplanes of U.S. registry will be affected by this AD. The 
    requirements of this revised rule will not add any new additional 
    economic burden on affected operators. The AFM revision, currently 
    required by AD 91-26-05, takes approximately 1 work hour per airplane 
    to accomplish, at an average labor rate of $55 per work hour. Based on 
    these figures, the total cost impact of the existing requirements of 
    this AD on U.S. operators is estimated to be $1,540, or $55 per 
    airplane.
        The total cost impact figure discussed above is based on 
    assumptions that no operator has yet accomplished any of the 
    requirements of this AD action, and that no operator would accomplish 
    those actions in the future if this AD were not adopted. However, based 
    on the fact that the effective date of AD 91-26-05 was December 30, 
    1994, the FAA assumes that all affected U.S. operators already have 
    complied with the requirements of that AD. Therefore, there will be no 
    future cost impact of those requirements of this rule.
        Should an operator elect to install the modified AMU as terminating 
    action, it will take approximately 1 work hour per airplane to 
    accomplish, at an average labor charge of $55 per work hour. The cost 
    of required costs will be approximately $250 per airplane. Based on 
    these figures, the total cost impact of the optional terminating action 
    is expected to be $305 per airplane.
        The regulations adopted herein will not have substantial direct 
    effects on the States, on the relationship between the national 
    government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
    responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in 
    accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this final 
    rule does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the 
    preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
        For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is 
    not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866; 
    (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and 
    Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a 
    significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial 
    number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory 
    Flexibility Act. A final evaluation has been prepared for this action 
    and it is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained 
    from the Rules Docket at the location provided under the caption 
    ADDRESSES.
    
    List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
    
        Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
    
    Adoption of the Amendment
    
        Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the 
    Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends 14 CFR part 
    39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations as follows:
    
    PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
    
        1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 49 U.S.C. App. 1354(a), 1421 and 1423; 49 U.S.C. 
    106(g); and 14 CFR 11.89.
    
    
    Sec. 39.13  [Amended]
    
        2. Section 39.13 is amended by removing amendment 39-8116 (56 FR 
    65181, December 16, 1991), and by adding a new airworthiness directive 
    (AD), amendment 39-8887, to read as follows:
    
    91-26-05 R1 Boeing: Amendment 39-8887. Docket 93-NM-64-AD. Revises 
    AD 91-26-05, Amendment 39-8116.
    
        Applicability: Model 747-400 series airplanes, excluding 
    airplanes having production line numbers 816, 839, and 961 and 
    subsequent; certificated in any category.
        Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished 
    previously.
    
        Note 1: Paragraph (a) of this AD restates the requirements of 
    paragraph (a) of AD 91-26-05, amendment 39-8116. As allowed by the 
    phrase, ``unless accomplished previously,'' if the requirements of 
    AD 91-26-05 have been accomplished previously, paragraph (a) of this 
    revised AD does not require the insertion of the Airplane Flight 
    Manual (AFM) limitation to be repeated.
    
        To prevent loss of all very high frequency (VHF) radio voice 
    communication transmission capability, accomplish the following:
        (a) Within 14 days after December 30, 1991 (the effective date 
    of AD 91-26-05, amendment 39-8116): Add the following statement to 
    the Limitations Section of the FAA-approved AFM. This may be 
    accomplished by placing a copy of this AD in the AFM.
    
    ``Electronic Systems
    
    VHF Radio Voice Communications
    
        Right VHF radio (VHF R) communication system must be operational 
    for dispatch.''
        (b) Replacement of the currently-installed audio management unit 
    (AMU) of the VHF radio communication system having Boeing part 
    numbers S220U000-101, -102, or -104, (Hughes-Avicom part numbers 
    1167014-140, -141, or -142), with a modified AMU having Boeing part 
    number S220U000-105 (Hughes part number 1167014-143), in accordance 
    with Boeing Service Bulletin 747-23-2321, dated May 20, 1993, 
    constitutes terminating action for the requirements of this AD. 
    Following accomplishment of this replacement, the AFM limitation 
    required by paragraph (a) of this AD may be removed.
        (c) As of the effective date of this AD, no AMU having Boeing 
    part numbers S220U000-101, -102, or -104, (Hughes-Avicom part 
    numbers 1167014-140, -141, or -142), shall be installed on any 
    airplane, unless the requirements of paragraph (a) of this AD have 
    been accomplished.
        (d) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the 
    compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be 
    used if approved by the Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification 
    Office (ACO), FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate. Operators shall 
    submit their requests through an appropriate FAA Principal 
    Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the 
    Manager, Seattle ACO.
    
        Note 2: Information concerning the existence of approved 
    alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be 
    obtained from the Seattle ACO.
    
        (e) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with 
    Secs. 21.197 and 21.199 Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.197 
    and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where the 
    requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
        (f) This amendment becomes effective on May 20, 1994.
    
        Issued in Renton, Washington, on April 13, 1994.
    Darrell M. Pederson,
    Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
    Service.
    [FR Doc. 94-9337 Filed 4-19-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
04/20/1994
Department:
Transportation Department
Entry Type:
Uncategorized Document
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
94-9337
Dates:
May 20, 1994.
Pages:
0-0 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: April 20, 1994, Docket No. 93-NM-64-AD, Amendment 39-8887, AD 91-26-05 R1
CFR: (1)
14 CFR 39.13