98-10330. Lourdes T. Boschuk, Canonsburg, Pennsylvania; Order Prohibiting Involvement in NRC-Licensed Activities  

  • [Federal Register Volume 63, Number 75 (Monday, April 20, 1998)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 19525-19526]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 98-10330]
    
    
    
    [[Page 19525]]
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
    
    [IA 98-020]
    
    
    Lourdes T. Boschuk, Canonsburg, Pennsylvania; Order Prohibiting 
    Involvement in NRC-Licensed Activities
    
    I
    
        J&L Testing Company, Inc., (Licensee or JLT) is the holder of 
    Byproduct Nuclear Material License No. 37-28442-02 issued by the 
    Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or Commission) pursuant to 10 CFR 
    part 30. The license authorizes possession and use of Troxler portable 
    nuclear gauges containing cesium-137 and americium-241 in sealed 
    sources. The license, originally issued on February 7, 1995, was 
    amended on August 22, 1995, and is due to expire on February 29, 2000. 
    The License was suspended by Order, dated September 27, 1995. Lourdes 
    T. Boschuk is the President and owner of JLT. Concurrently with this 
    Order, the NRC is issuing an Order Revoking License to JLT (EA 96-110).
    
    II
    
        Based on an NRC inspection and an investigation by the NRC's Office 
    of Investigations, the NRC has determined that Ms. Boschuk, while 
    President and owner of JLT,\1\ engaged in a pattern and practice of 
    willfully violating NRC requirements and otherwise violated NRC 
    requirements. Among such violations are the following:
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \1\ Lourdes Boschuk is the wife of John Boschuk, Jr., President 
    and Owner of J&L Engineering, Inc. (JLE). JLT and JLE are located at 
    the same address and share the same telephone and facsimile numbers.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    A. Materially Inaccurate Statements Made to NRC
    
        (1) A letter accompanying JLT's Application for Material License 
    for Troxler Nuclear Density Gauges, dated November 21, 1994, and signed 
    by Lourdes Boschuk as President of JLT, represented to the NRC that 
    since the revocation of J&L Engineering's License to operate the same 
    Troxler gauges on August 30, 1993, the gauges had not been removed from 
    storage or used in any way. In fact, JLT admittedly used a gauge on at 
    least four occasions and invoiced customers for that use after 
    revocation of the JLE license and before the NRC issued a license to 
    JLT. JLT used the gauge for the following customers: DelSir Supply in 
    December 1993, Johnson Construction in May 1994, Johnson Construction 
    in June 1994, and PA Soil & Rock Company in July 1994. The materially 
    inaccurate statement in the JLT application was in violation of 10 CFR 
    30.9(a) and made with careless disregard for the facts by Ms. Boschuk.
        (2) A letter to the NRC dated September 11, 1995, signed by Lourdes 
    Boschuk as President of JLT, stated that the Troxler gauge that was 
    missing at the time of the NRC inspection on August 1, 1995, was in 
    Watertown, New York; and was returned the next day. In fact, the gauge 
    was transferred to SE Technologies, Inc., located in Bridgeville, 
    Pennsylvania, in July 1995 and was not returned to JLT until August 17, 
    1995. This statement was in violation of 10 CFR 30.9(a) and was made 
    with careless disregard for the facts by Ms. Boschuk. In addition, the 
    letter represented that since the NRC inspection on August 1, 1995, all 
    three Troxler gauges were located in a locked storage cabinet at JLT's 
    premises and would remain there until the apparent violations 
    identified in the NRC's Inspection Report were resolved. In fact, one 
    of the gauges had been transferred on September 6, 1995, to Cashin 
    Associates, P.C. in New York State, and was not returned to JLT until 
    September 19 or 20, 1995. This was an inaccurate statement in violation 
    of 10 CFR 30.9(a) and was made by Ms. Boschuk with careless disregard 
    for the facts.
        (3) During an enforcement conference with the NRC on September 15, 
    1995, Lourdes Boschuk, as President of JLT, stated that JLT's operable 
    Troxler gauge was in storage and had not been used. In fact, one of the 
    gauges was transferred by JLT on September 6, 1995, to Cashin 
    Associates, P.C. for use at the Brookhaven Landfill in New York State, 
    and was not returned to JLT until September 19 or 20, 1995. This 
    inaccurate statement was in violation of 10 CFR 30.9(a) and was made by 
    Ms. Boschuk with careless disregard for the facts.
        (4) A letter to the NRC dated September 18, 1995, signed by Lourdes 
    Boschuk as President of JLT, and sent to the NRC in response to the 
    September 15, 1995, NRC letter confirming JLT's commitment at the 
    September 15, 1995, enforcement conference to refrain from using the 
    Troxler density gauges pending resolution of the apparent violations, 
    made several materially inaccurate statements. The letter stated that 
    all JLT's gauges have been in the storage cabinet on the JLT premises 
    since the visit of the NRC inspector. This was a deliberately 
    inaccurate statement by Ms. Boschuk in violation of 10 CFR 30.9(a) and 
    30.10(a)(2). In fact, Ms. Boschuk knew no later than September 15, 
    1995, during a telephone call with the Director of JLT, immediately 
    after the September 15, 1995 enforcement conference, that one of JLT's 
    Troxler gauges had been transferred on September 6, 1995 to Cashin 
    Associates, P.C. in New York State.
        In addition, the letter stated that all three JLT Troxler gauges 
    are currently locked in the designated storage cabinet on the JLT 
    premises. This inaccurate statement was in violation of 10 CFR 30.9(a) 
    and was made with at least careless disregard as to its truth or 
    falsity by Ms. Boschuk. In fact, Lourdes Boschuk sent the JLT RSO to 
    retrieve the gauge which had been transferred to Cashin Associates, 
    P.C., but the RSO did not return to JLT with the gauge until late in 
    the evening of September 19 or early in the morning of September 20, 
    1995.
    
    B. Destruction of Records Relating to Gauge Usage
    
        According to a witness, Lourdes Boschuk and others destroyed, 
    altered, sanitized, or otherwise disposed of business and transactional 
    records shortly after the August 1995 NRC inspection of JLT, in order 
    to conceal from the NRC the unauthorized use and/or transfer of Troxler 
    gauges by JLT. Among the records destroyed or disposed of were invoices 
    and a log documenting use of the Troxler density gauges. According to a 
    handwritten note, created by a JLT employee immediately after the 
    September 15, 1995 enforcement conference, although utilization records 
    were made available to the NRC inspector, those records could not be 
    subsequently located. The note further reflected a question whether the 
    utilization records were ``thrown away during sanitization of 
    records?'' Shortly after the August 1995 inspection, the NRC inspector 
    requested JLT to provide a copy of a utilization record found during 
    the inspection and which documented the rental of a gauge to SE 
    Technologies in September 1994, when neither JLE nor JLT had a valid 
    NRC license. JLT did not provide the invoice and claimed it could no 
    longer find the document. Condition 19 of JLT's License requires that 
    JLT conduct its licensed activities in accordance with its Application 
    dated January 6, 1995. The Application mandates that JLT comply with 
    conditions requiring the creation of a utilization log for the gauges 
    and the maintenance of the log for audit purposes. The destruction of 
    the utilization log was in violation of the 10 CFR 30.3 and 30.9(a). 
    The participation of Lourdes Boschuk in the deliberate destruction of 
    the utilization log was in violation of 10 CFR 30.10(a).
    
    [[Page 19526]]
    
    III
    
        Based on the above, the NRC concludes that Lourdes Boschuk, 
    President and owner of JLT, deliberately violated NRC requirements, and 
    otherwise committed willful violations of NRC requirements. These 
    violations raise a serious doubt as to whether Ms. Boschuk can be 
    relied upon to comply with NRC requirements and to provide complete and 
    accurate information to the NRC. The NRC must rely upon the integrity 
    of persons involved in licensed activities, especially owners and 
    officials of NRC licensees. Deliberate misconduct of the type 
    demonstrated by Ms. Boschuk cannot be tolerated. Notwithstanding the 
    revocation of the JLT license, given Ms. Boschuk's repeated failures to 
    adhere to regulatory requirements, the NRC no longer has the necessary 
    assurance that Ms. Boschuk's participation in licensed activities would 
    be performed safely and in accordance with requirements.
        Consequently, I lack the requisite reasonable assurance that 
    licensed activities can be conducted in compliance with the 
    Commission's requirements and that the health and safety of the public 
    will be protected if Ms. Boschuk were permitted at this time to be 
    involved in NRC-licensed activities. Therefore, the public health, 
    safety and interest require that Ms. Boschuk be prohibited from any 
    involvement in NRC-licensed activities for a period of five years from 
    the date of this Order, and if she is currently involved with another 
    licensee in NRC-licensed activities, she must immediately cease such 
    activities, and inform the NRC of the name, address and telephone 
    number of the licensee, and provide a copy of this Order to the 
    licensee. Additionally, Ms. Boschuk is required to notify the NRC of 
    her first employment or involvement in NRC-licensed activities 
    following the prohibition period.
    
    IV
    
        Accordingly, pursuant to sections 81, 161b, 161i, 161o, 182 and 186 
    of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, and the Commission's 
    regulations in 10 CFR 2.202, 10 CFR 30.10, and 10 CFR 150.20, it is 
    hereby ordered that:
        1. For a period of five years from the date of this Order, Ms. 
    Boschuk is prohibited from engaging in NRC-licensed activities. NRC-
    licensed activities are those activities that are conducted pursuant to 
    a specific or general license issued by the NRC, including, but not 
    limited to, those activities of Agreement State licensees conducted in 
    areas of NRC jurisdiction pursuant to the authority granted by 10 CFR 
    150.20.
        2. For a period of five years from the date of this Order, Ms. 
    Boschuk shall provide a copy of this Order to any prospective employer 
    or business partner who engages in NRC-licensed activities (as 
    described in Section IV.1 above) prior to her acceptance of any 
    employment (whether involved in licensed activities or not) by, or 
    partnership or ownership interest in, a licensee (as described in 
    Section IV.1 above). The purpose of this requirement is to ensure that 
    the licensee is aware of Ms. Boschuk's prohibition from engaging in 
    NRC-licensed activities.
        3. The first time Ms. Boschuk is employed in NRC-licensed 
    activities, or acquires a partnership or ownership interest in a 
    licensee (as described in Section IV.1 above), following the five year 
    prohibition in Section IV.1, above, she shall notify the Regional 
    Administrator, NRC Region I, 475 Allendale Road, King of Prussia, 
    Pennsylvania 19406, prior to acquiring such an interest or prior to 
    engaging in NRC-licensed activities, including activities under an 
    Agreement State license when activities under that license are 
    conducted in areas of NRC jurisdiction pursuant to 10 CFR 150.20. The 
    notice shall include the name, address, and telephone number of the NRC 
    or Agreement State licensee and the location where licensed activities 
    will be performed.
        The Director, Office of Enforcement, may, in writing, relax or 
    rescind any of the above conditions upon demonstration by the Licensee 
    of good cause.
    
    V
    
        In accordance with 10 CFR 2.202, Ms. Boschuk must, and any other 
    person adversely affected by this Order may, submit an answer to this 
    Order and may request a hearing on this Order, within 20 days of the 
    date of this Order. Where good cause is shown, consideration will be 
    given to extending the time to request a hearing. A request for 
    extension of time must be made in writing to the Director, Office of 
    Enforcement, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555, 
    and include a statement of good cause for the extension. The answer may 
    consent to this Order. Unless the answer consents to this Order, the 
    answer shall, in writing and under oath or affirmation, specifically 
    admit or deny each allegation or charge made in this Order and shall 
    set forth the matters of fact and law on which Ms. Boschuk or other 
    person adversely affected relies and the reasons as to why the Order 
    should not have been issued. Any answer or request for a hearing shall 
    be submitted to the Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 
    Attn: Chief, Rulemaking and Adjudications Staff, Washington, DC 20555. 
    Copies also shall be sent to the Director, Office of Enforcement, U.S. 
    Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555, to the Deputy 
    Assistant General Counsel for Enforcement at the same address, to the 
    Regional Administrator, NRC Region I, 475 Allendale Road, King of 
    Prussia, Pennsylvania 19406, to Ms. Boschuk if the answer or hearing 
    request is by a person other than Ms. Boschuk. If a person other than 
    Ms. Boschuk requests a hearing, that person shall set forth with 
    particularity the manner in which his or her interest is adversely 
    affected by this Order and shall address the criteria set forth in 10 
    CFR 2.714(d).
        If a hearing is requested by Ms. Boschuk or a person whose interest 
    is adversely affected, the Commission will issue an Order designating 
    the time and place of any hearing. If a hearing is held, the issue to 
    be considered at such hearing shall be whether this Order should be 
    sustained.
        In the absence of any request for hearing, or written approval of 
    an extension of time in which to request a hearing, the provisions 
    specified in Section IV above shall be final 20 days from the date of 
    this Order without further order or proceedings. If an extension of 
    time for requesting a hearing has been approved, the provisions 
    specified in Section IV shall be final when the extension expires if a 
    hearing request has not been received.
    
        Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 10th day of April 1998.
    
        For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
    James Lieberman,
    Director, Office of Enforcement.
    [FR Doc. 98-10330 Filed 4-17-98; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
04/20/1998
Department:
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
98-10330
Pages:
19525-19526 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
IA 98-020
PDF File:
98-10330.pdf