97-10314. Southwestern Region, Arizona, New Mexico, West Texas and Oklahoma; Proposed Projects in the Agua/Caballos Analysis Area, Carson National Forest, Rio Arriba County, NM  

  • [Federal Register Volume 62, Number 77 (Tuesday, April 22, 1997)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 19542-19543]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 97-10314]
    
    
    ========================================================================
    Notices
                                                    Federal Register
    ________________________________________________________________________
    
    This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
    or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
    and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
    delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
    statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
    appearing in this section.
    
    ========================================================================
    
    
    Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 77 / Tuesday, April 22, 1997 / 
    Notices
    
    [[Page 19542]]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
    
    Forest Service
    
    
    Southwestern Region, Arizona, New Mexico, West Texas and 
    Oklahoma; Proposed Projects in the Agua/Caballos Analysis Area, Carson 
    National Forest, Rio Arriba County, NM
    
    AGENCY: Forest Service.
    
    ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare a new draft environmental impact 
    statement.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The Carson National Forest, El Rito Ranger District will 
    prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) to disclose the 
    environmental consequences of the Agua/Caballos Proposed Projects. 
    These projects include the allocation of old growth, harvesting of 
    trees for sawtimber and forest products, prescribed burning, thinning, 
    construction of new roads and closure of existing roads.
        A Notice of Intent (NOI) was published for this project in December 
    1992, and a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) was published 
    in April 1995. Since the DEIS was distributed to the public a Forest 
    Plan Amendment went into effect, which changed the standards and 
    guidelines of the Carson Forest Plan. This notice is to disclose the 
    Forest Service's intention to issue a new DEIS for Agua/Caballos by the 
    end of June 1997.
    
    DATES: Comments in response to this NOI should be received by June 1, 
    1997.
    
    ADDRESSES: Send written comments to Carson Forest Supervisor's Office, 
    112 Cruz Alta Road, Taos, NM 87571, Attn: Carson Core Team.
    
    RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: The Forest Supervisor, Carson National Forest, 
    will be the responsible official and will decide on what, where, how 
    and when projects will be implemented by the Forest Service in the 
    Agua/Caballos analysis area.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
    Carson Core Team, Carson Forest Supervisor's Office (505) 758-6200.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Proposed Action
    
        The Forest Service is planning to manage the existing vegetation 
    through the allocation old growth, harvesting of trees for sawtimber 
    and forest products (e.g., fuelwood, vigas and latillas), prescribed 
    burning, and thinning of forested stands. The proposal also includes 
    the construction of new roads and the closure of existing roads.
    
    Location
    
        The Agua/Caballos analysis area is in Rio Arriba County in northern 
    New Mexico, northeast of the village of El Rito. It is 23,767 acres and 
    makes up one-third of the Vallecitos Federal Sustained Yield Unit 
    (VFSYU).
    
    Purpose
    
        The purpose of allocating old growth is to preserve large, old 
    vegetation structure for old growth dependent wildlife species. It is 
    also necessary to provide a regular, sustained flow of saw logs to the 
    Vallecitos sawmill and forest products, such as fuelwood, vigas and 
    latillas, to small, local operators to be consistent with the stated 
    purpose of the VFSYU and standards identified in the Carson Forest 
    Plan. Prescribed burning is needed to create openings and maintain 
    meadows as part of the natural variation and to support grasses and 
    forbs for wildlife. Burning is also needed to produce conditions 
    suitable for natural pine and aspen regeneration. In the pine/oak type, 
    prescribed fire is needed to stimulate the growth of oak and other 
    shrubs, which provide important habitat for turkey and browse for mule 
    deer. Prescribed fire is also needed to reduce unnatural fuel buildup 
    and decrease the possibility of a catastrophic fire in the analysis 
    area. The purpose of thinning dense, forested stands is to reduce tree 
    competition, therefore increasing the growth rate of trees left behind. 
    The construction of new roads will access stands to be harvested and 
    the closure of roads will move the analysis area to a desired density 
    of 1 mile per square mile (Carson Forest Plan).
    
    Decisions
    
        The decisions to be made are:
    
    --Whether additional areas should be allocated to old growth. If so, 
    where and how much?
    --Whether a timber sale(s) should be used to help achieve the desired 
    condition. If so, which stands in the Agua/Caballos analysis area 
    should be harvested and what vegetation conditions should be created in 
    the harvest areas?
    --Whether forest products should be offered. If so, what type of 
    products (firewood, vigas, poles, etc.) and how much?
    --Whether prescribed fire should be used. If so, where and how much 
    area should be burned?
    --Whether areas should be thinned. If so, where?
    --Whether new roads ought to be built. If so where and how much?
    --Whether roads should be closed. If so, which ones and where should 
    the closures be?
    
    Scoping
    
        The Agua/Caballos project proposal has been through initial 
    analysis in a DEIS (4/96). Comments of the draft and its preferred 
    alternative (Alternative B) were received from the public and other 
    federal and state agencies. These comments will be used in the 
    development of new alternatives for a new draft document. Also, during 
    the period between the issuance of the first DEIS and the present, new 
    issues about the proposal have surfaced and will be incorporated into 
    the new DEIS. Issues include preserving old growth vegetation 
    structure, improving forest health through the cutting of trees and the 
    use of fire, providing sawtimber and forest products to sustain the 
    local economy, the use of prescribed burning close to communities, the 
    construction of more roads and the closure of existing roads.
    
    Alternatives
    
        Alternatives will include the no action alternative and Alternative 
    B from the first DEIS: Alternative B was the preferred alternative and 
    will be used to demonstrate how the analysis has changed since the 
    issuance of the first draft document. New alternatives will be 
    developed based on the issues that surfaced during the comment period 
    of the first DEIS and any new issues that have become apparent over the 
    past year. The new action alternatives will also comply with the
    
    [[Page 19543]]
    
    new Forest Plan Amendment (6/96) guidelines on managing habitat for the 
    Mexican spotted owl and northern goshawk.
    
    Supplemental Information for Public Participation
    
        There will be a 45 day comment period on the new draft 
    environmental impact statement beginning when the legal notice of 
    availability appears in The Taos News, the paper of record for the 
    Carson National Forest. Comments received in response to this NOI or 
    the DEIS, including names and addresses of those who comment, will be 
    considered part of the public record on this proposed action and will 
    be available for public inspection. Comments submitted anonymously will 
    be accepted and considered; however, those who submit anonymous 
    comments will not have standing to appeal the subsequent decision under 
    36 CFR Parts 215 or 217. Additionally, pursuant to 7 CFR 1.27(d), any 
    person may request the agency to withhold a submission from the public 
    record by showing how the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) permits 
    such confidentiality. Persons requesting such confidentiality should be 
    aware that, under the FOIA; confidentiality may be granted in only very 
    limited circumstances, such as to protect trade secrets. The Forest 
    Service will inform the requester of the agency's decision regarding 
    the request for confidentiality, and where the request is denied, the 
    agency will return the submission and notify the requester that the 
    comments may be resubmitted with or without name and address within 10 
    days.
        The Forest Service believes it is important to give reviewers 
    notice of several court rulings related to public participation in the 
    environmental review process. To be the most helpful, comments on the 
    DEIS should be as specific as possible and may address the adequacy of 
    the statement or the merits of the alternatives discussed (see Council 
    of Environmental Quality Regulations for implementing the procedural 
    provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act at 40 CFR 1503.3).
        In addition, Federal Court decisions have established that 
    reviewers of draft environmental impact statements must structure their 
    participation in the environmental review of the proposal so that it is 
    meaningful and alerts the agency to the reviewer's position and 
    contentions. Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. versus NRDC, 435 US 
    519, 533 (1978). Environmental objections that could have been raised 
    at the draft stage may be waived if not raised until after completion 
    of the final environmental impact statement. City of Angoon versus 
    Hodel (9th Circuit, 1986) and Wisconsin Heritages, Inc. versus Harris, 
    490 F. Supp. 1334, 1338 (E.D. Wis. 1980). The reason for this is to 
    ensure that substantive comments and objections are made available to 
    the Forest Service at a time when it can meaningfully consider them and 
    respond to them in the final environmental impact statement.
    
        Dated: April 14, 1997.
    Leonard L. Lucero,
    Forest Supervisor, Carson National Forest.
    [FR Doc. 97-10314 Filed 4-21-97; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
04/22/1997
Department:
Forest Service
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Notice of intent to prepare a new draft environmental impact statement.
Document Number:
97-10314
Dates:
Comments in response to this NOI should be received by June 1, 1997.
Pages:
19542-19543 (2 pages)
PDF File:
97-10314.pdf