98-8710. Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 747 Series Airplanes  

  • [Federal Register Volume 63, Number 64 (Friday, April 3, 1998)]
    [Proposed Rules]
    [Pages 16449-16451]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 98-8710]
    
    
    
    [[Page 16449]]
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    
    Federal Aviation Administration
    
    14 CFR Part 39
    
    [Docket No. 97-NM-308-AD]
    RIN 2120-AA64
    
    
    Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 747 Series Airplanes
    
    AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
    
    ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This document proposes to revise an existing airworthiness 
    directive (AD), applicable to certain Boeing Model 747 series 
    airplanes, that currently requires repetitive inspections to detect 
    cracks, corrosion, or damage of the lower spar fitting body and lug, 
    and corrective actions, if necessary. That AD also provides for 
    optional terminating action for the repetitive inspection requirements. 
    The existing AD was prompted by reports that fatigue cracking was found 
    in the lower spar fitting lug on the number 3 pylon and in the lower 
    spar fitting body. The actions specified by that AD are intended to 
    detect and correct such fatigue cracking, which could result in failure 
    of the strut and separation of the engine from the airplane. This new 
    action references additional service bulletins for accomplishment of 
    the optional replacement, and clarifies that accomplishment of certain 
    AD's terminates the repetitive inspections.
    
    DATES: Comments must be received by May 18, 1998.
    
    ADDRESSES: Submit comments in triplicate to the Federal Aviation 
    Administration (FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate, ANM-103, 
    Attention: Rules Docket No. 97-NM-308-AD, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., 
    Renton, Washington 98055-4056. Comments may be inspected at this 
    location between 9:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except 
    Federal holidays.
        The service information referenced in the proposed rule may be 
    obtained from Boeing Commercial Airplane Group, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, 
    Washington 98124-2207. This information may be examined at the FAA, 
    Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, 
    Washington; or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol 
    Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tamara L. Dow, Aerospace Engineer, 
    Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, Seattle 
    Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, 
    Washington 98055-4056; telephone (425) 227-2771; fax (425) 227-1181.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Comments Invited
    
        Interested persons are invited to participate in the making of the 
    proposed rule by submitting such written data, views, or arguments as 
    they may desire. Communications shall identify the Rules Docket number 
    and be submitted in triplicate to the address specified above. All 
    communications received on or before the closing date for comments, 
    specified above, will be considered before taking action on the 
    proposed rule. The proposals contained in this notice may be changed in 
    light of the comments received.
        Comments are specifically invited on the overall regulatory, 
    economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the proposed rule. All 
    comments submitted will be available, both before and after the closing 
    date for comments, in the Rules Docket for examination by interested 
    persons. A report summarizing each FAA-public contact concerned with 
    the substance of this proposal will be filed in the Rules Docket.
        Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments 
    submitted in response to this notice must submit a self-addressed, 
    stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments 
    to Docket Number 97-NM-308-AD.'' The postcard will be date stamped and 
    returned to the commenter.
    
    Availability of NPRMs
    
        Any person may obtain a copy of this NPRM by submitting a request 
    to the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, ANM-114, Attention: Rules 
    Docket No. 97-NM-308-AD, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 
    98055-4056.
    
    Discussion
    
        On September 15, 1997, the FAA issued AD 97-20-01, amendment 39-
    10139 (62 FR 49431, September 22, 1997), applicable to certain Boeing 
    Model 747 series airplanes. That AD requires repetitive detailed visual 
    and ultrasonic inspections to detect cracks, corrosion, or damage of 
    the lower spar fitting body and lug, as applicable, and replacement, if 
    necessary. That AD also provides for an optional replacement of the 
    lower spar fitting with a new steel lower spar fitting, which 
    constitutes terminating action for the repetitive inspection 
    requirements. In lieu of accomplishing this replacement or the 
    repetitive inspections, that AD also provides for an optional 
    terminating modification of the nacelle strut and wing structure. That 
    action was prompted by reports that fatigue cracking was found in the 
    lower spar fitting lug on the number 3 pylon and in the lower spar 
    fitting body. The requirements of that AD are intended to detect and 
    correct such fatigue cracking, which could result in failure of the 
    strut and separation of the engine from the airplane.
    
    Actions Since Issuance of Previous Rule
    
        Since issuance of AD 97-20-01, the FAA finds that it inadvertently 
    omitted from paragraph (b) of that AD, the following service bulletins:
         Boeing Service Bulletin 747-54-2062, Revision 1, dated 
    November 13, 1980;
         Boeing Service Bulletin 747-54-2062, Revision 2, dated 
    March 19, 1981;
         Boeing Service Bulletin 747-54-2062, Revision 3, dated 
    August 28, 1981;
         Boeing Service Bulletin 747-54-2062, Revision 4, dated 
    June 30, 1982;
         Boeing Service Bulletin 747-54-2062, Revision 5, dated 
    June 1, 1984;
         Boeing Service Bulletin 747-54-2062, Revision 6, dated 
    October 2, 1986; and
         Boeing Service Bulletin 747-54-2062, Revision 7, dated 
    December 21, 1994.
        The FAA has reviewed and approved these service bulletins as 
    additional sources of service information for accomplishment of the 
    optional replacement specified in paragraph (b) of AD 97-20-01. The 
    replacement procedures are similar to those specified in Boeing Service 
    Bulletin 747-54-2062, Revision 8, dated August 21, 1997, which was 
    referenced in AD 97-20-01 as the appropriate source of service 
    information for accomplishing the optional replacement. Therefore, the 
    FAA has included these new service bulletins in paragraph (b) of this 
    proposed AD.
        The FAA also finds that referencing Boeing Alert Service Bulletins 
    747-54A2159, dated November 3, 1994, and 747-54A2158, dated November 
    30, 1994, for accomplishment of the modification of the nacelle strut 
    and wing structure, rather than referencing the AD's associated with 
    those service bulletins, could be misleading to operators. Therefore, 
    the applicability, paragraph (a)(2)(ii), and paragraph (b) of the 
    proposed AD specify that accomplishment of the subject modification 
    required by AD 95-10-16, amendment 39-9233 (60 FR 27008, May 22, 1995), 
    or AD 95-13-07, amendment
    
    [[Page 16450]]
    
    39-9287 (60 FR 33336, June 28, 1995) constitutes terminating action for 
    the repetitive inspection requirements of this proposed AD.
    
    Explanation of the Requirements of the Rule
    
        Since an unsafe condition has been identified that is likely to 
    exist or develop on other products of this same type design, the 
    proposed action would revise AD 97-20-01 to continue to require 
    repetitive detailed visual and ultrasonic inspections to detect cracks, 
    corrosion, or damage of the lower spar fitting body and lug, as 
    applicable; and replacement, if necessary. It also would continue to 
    provide for an optional replacement of the lower spar fitting with a 
    new steel lower spar fitting, which would constitute terminating action 
    for the repetitive inspection requirements. In lieu of accomplishing 
    the repetitive inspections or replacement of the lower spar fitting, 
    this proposed AD would also continue to provide for an optional 
    terminating modification of the nacelle strut and wing structure. In 
    addition, the proposed AD references additional service bulletins for 
    accomplishment of the optional replacement, and clarifies that 
    accomplishment of certain AD's terminates the repetitive inspections.
    
    Cost Impact
    
        There are approximately 367 airplanes of the affected design in the 
    worldwide fleet. The FAA estimates that 152 airplanes of U.S. registry 
    would be affected by this proposed AD, that it would take approximately 
    19 work hours per airplane to accomplish the proposed inspections, and 
    that the average labor rate is $60 per work hour. Based on these 
    figures, the cost impact of the inspections proposed by this AD on U.S. 
    operators is estimated to be $173,280, or $1,140 per airplane, per 
    inspection cycle.
        The cost impact figure discussed above is based on assumptions that 
    no operator has yet accomplished any of the proposed requirements of 
    this AD action, and that no operator would accomplish those actions in 
    the future if this AD were not adopted.
    
    Regulatory Impact
    
        The regulations proposed herein would not have substantial direct 
    effects on the States, on the relationship between the national 
    government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
    responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in 
    accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this 
    proposal would not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant 
    the preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
    
        For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this proposed 
    regulation (1) is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under 
    Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT 
    Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); 
    and (3) if promulgated, will not have a significant economic impact, 
    positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under 
    the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. A copy of the draft 
    regulatory evaluation prepared for this action is contained in the 
    Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained by contacting the Rules 
    Docket at the location provided under the caption ADDRESSES.
    
    List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
    
        Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
    
    The Proposed Amendment
    
        Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the 
    Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration proposes to amend 
    part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as 
    follows:
    
    PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
    
        1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
    
    
    Sec. 39.13  [Amended]
    
        2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new 
    airworthiness directive:
    
    Boeing: Docket 97-NM-308-AD. Revises AD 97-20-01, amendment 39-
    10139.
    
        Applicability: Model 747 series airplanes, having line numbers 1 
    through 500 inclusive, equipped with Pratt & Whitney Model JT9D-3, -
    7, or -7Q engines, or having line numbers 202, 204, 232, or 257, 
    equipped with General Electric Model CF6 series engines; 
    certificated in any category; and on which the strut/wing 
    modification has not been accomplished in accordance with either of 
    the following AD's:
         AD 95-10-16, amendment 39-9233 (60 FR 27008, May 22, 
    1995), or
         AD 95-13-07, amendment 39-9287 (60 FR 33336, June 28, 
    1995).
    
        Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the 
    preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been 
    otherwise modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the 
    requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified, 
    altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of 
    this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an 
    alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (c) of 
    this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of 
    the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition 
    addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been 
    eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to 
    address it.
    
        Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished 
    previously.
        To detect and correct fatigue cracking in the lower spar fitting 
    lug or the lower spar fitting body, which could result in failure of 
    the strut and separation of the engine from the airplane, accomplish 
    the following:
        (a) Within 90 days after October 7, 1997 (the effective date of 
    AD 97-20-01, amendment 39-10139), perform a detailed visual 
    inspection and an ultrasonic inspection to detect cracks, corrosion, 
    or damage of the lower spar fitting body and lug, as applicable, in 
    accordance with Figures 9 and 10 of Boeing Service Bulletin 747-54-
    2062, Revision 8, dated August 21, 1997.
    
        Note 2: This AD does not require an inspection of the inboard 
    strut-to-diagonal brace attach fitting as described in Figure 1 of 
    Boeing Service Bulletin 747-54-2062, Revision 8, dated August 21, 
    1997. However, this inspection is required to be accomplished as 
    part of AD 95-20-05, amendment 39-9383 (60 FR 51705, October 10, 
    1995).
    
        (1) If no crack, corrosion, or damage is detected, repeat the 
    detailed visual and ultrasonic inspections thereafter at intervals 
    not to exceed 400 landings.
        (2) If any crack, corrosion, or damage is detected, prior to 
    further flight, accomplish either paragraph (a)(2)(i) or (a)(2)(ii) 
    of this AD.
        (i) Replace the lower spar fitting with a new steel lower spar 
    fitting, in accordance with Part II of the Accomplishment 
    Instructions of the service bulletin. Or
        (ii) Modify the nacelle strut and wing structure in accordance 
    with AD 95-10-16, amendment 39-9233 (60 FR 27008, May 22, 1995), or 
    AD 95-13-07, amendment 39-9287 (60 FR 33336, June 28, 1995).
        (b) Replacement of the lower spar fitting with a new steel lower 
    spar fitting, in accordance with Part II of the Accomplishment 
    Instructions of any of the following service bulletins listed below, 
    or accomplishment of modification of the nacelle strut and wing 
    structure required by AD 95-10-16, amendment 39-9233 (60 FR 27008, 
    May 22, 1995), or AD 95-13-07, amendment 39-9287 (60 FR 33336, June 
    28, 1995); constitutes terminating action for the repetitive 
    inspection requirements of this AD.
         Boeing Service Bulletin 747-54-2062, Revision 1, dated 
    November 13, 1980;
         Boeing Service Bulletin 747-54-2062, Revision 2, dated 
    March 19, 1981;
         Boeing Service Bulletin 747-54-2062, Revision 3, dated 
    August 28, 1981;
         Boeing Service Bulletin 747-54-2062, Revision 4, dated 
    June 30, 1982;
         Boeing Service Bulletin 747-54-2062, Revision 5, dated 
    June 1, 1984;
         Boeing Service Bulletin 747-54-2062, Revision 6, dated 
    October 2, 1986;
         Boeing Service Bulletin 747-54-2062, Revision 7, dated 
    December 21, 1994;
    
    [[Page 16451]]
    
         Boeing Service Bulletin 747-54-2062, Revision 8, dated 
    August 21, 1997;
        (c) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the 
    compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be 
    used if approved by the Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification 
    Office (ACO), FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate. Operators shall 
    submit their requests through an appropriate FAA Principal 
    Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the 
    Manager, Seattle ACO.
    
        Note 3: Information concerning the existence of approved 
    alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be 
    obtained from the Seattle ACO.
        (d) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with 
    sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 
    CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where 
    the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
    
        Issued in Renton, Washington, on March 27, 1998.
    Darrell M. Pederson,
    Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
    Service.
    [FR Doc. 98-8710 Filed 4-2-98; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
04/03/1998
Department:
Federal Aviation Administration
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
Document Number:
98-8710
Dates:
Comments must be received by May 18, 1998.
Pages:
16449-16451 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 97-NM-308-AD
RINs:
2120-AA64: Airworthiness Directives
RIN Links:
https://www.federalregister.gov/regulations/2120-AA64/airworthiness-directives
PDF File:
98-8710.pdf
CFR: (1)
14 CFR 39.13