99-8408. Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Helicopter Systems (MDHS) Model 369E, 369FF, 500N, and 600N Helicopters  

  • [Federal Register Volume 64, Number 65 (Tuesday, April 6, 1999)]
    [Proposed Rules]
    [Pages 16656-16658]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 99-8408]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    
    Federal Aviation Administration
    
    14 CFR Part 39
    
    [Docket No. 99-SW-11-AD; Amendment 39-11113; AD 99-08-07]
    RIN 2120-AA64
    
    
    Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Helicopter Systems 
    (MDHS) Model 369E, 369FF, 500N, and 600N Helicopters
    
    AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
    
    ACTION: Final rule; request for comments.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This amendment supersedes an existing priority letter 
    airworthiness directive (AD) 98-17-14, applicable to MDHS Model 369E, 
    369FF, 500N, and 600N helicopters, that currently requires, within the 
    next 14 calendar days, inspecting each relay receptacle contact socket 
    for correct size of the contact socket holes and replacing incorrectly-
    sized contact sockets with airworthy contact sockets. This amendment 
    requires the same inspections and replacements as the existing priority 
    letter AD, but changes the serial numbers affected for the MDHS Model 
    500N and 600N helicopters and changes a part number that was 
    incorrectly referenced in the existing AD. This amendment is prompted 
    by three incidences in which a MDHS Model 600 helicopter's Engine 
    Control Unit (ECU) Fail light illuminated, even though the ECU 
    continued to automatically control the engine. The cause of the ECU 
    malfunction indication was determined to be contact sockets that did 
    not properly fit the corresponding pins of the affected relay. 
    Improperly sized contact sockets could create multiple unsafe 
    conditions. These conditions, if not corrected, could result in the 
    loss of various engine control or warning systems including the 
    undetected loss of the auto-reignition function after an engine 
    flameout, failure of an engine to reignite, and a subsequent forced 
    landing and the inability to immediately detect an engine-out condition 
    or to properly govern main rotor speed following loss of the Full 
    Authority Digital Engine Control (FADEC), and subsequent loss of 
    control of the helicopter.
    
    DATES: Effective April 21, 1999.
        Comments for inclusion in the Rules Docket must be received on or 
    before June 7, 1999.
    
    ADDRESSES: Submit comments in triplicate to the Federal Aviation 
    Administration (FAA), Office of the Regional Counsel, Southwest Region, 
    Attention: Rules Docket No. 99-SW-11-AD, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663, 
    Fort Worth, Texas 76137.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bruce Conze, Aerospace Engineer, FAA, 
    Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office, 3960 Paramount Blvd., 
    Lakewood, California 90712, telephone (562) 627-5261, fax (562) 627-
    5210.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On August 14, 1998, the FAA issued Priority 
    Letter AD 98-17-14, applicable to MDHS Model 369E, 369FF, 500N and 600N 
    helicopters, that requires, within the next 14 calendar days, 
    inspecting each relay receptacle, part number (P/N) HS4256-1, contact 
    sockets for correct size of the contact socket holes, and
    
    [[Page 16657]]
    
    replacing incorrectly-sized contact sockets with airworthy contact 
    sockets, P/N 019-0075-002. That action was prompted by an incident in 
    which a MDHS Model 600 helicopter's ECU Fail light illuminated, even 
    though the ECU continued to automatically control the engine. The 
    helicopter manufacturer reported two additional similar incidents on 
    other MDHS Model 600N helicopters. The cause of the ECU malfunction 
    indication was determined to be contact sockets that did not properly 
    fit the corresponding pins of the affected relay. That condition, if 
    not corrected, could result in the loss of the Battery Hi Temp. relay 
    and the Auto-Re-Ignition Igniter relay on MDHS Model 369E, 369FF, and 
    500N helicopters. The loss of these engine control or warning systems 
    could result in multiple unsafe conditions, including the undetected 
    loss of the auto-reignition function after an engine flameout, failure 
    of an engine to reignite, and a subsequent forced landing. Also, that 
    condition, if not corrected, could result in the undetected loss of the 
    Battery Hi Temp. relay and the FADEC-related relays (which includes the 
    ECU Fail relay, the Engine-Out relay, the Manual Mode relay, the FADEC 
    Start relay, and the Voice Warning Unit) on MDHS Model 600N 
    helicopters. The undetected loss of these engine control or warning 
    systems could result in multiple unsafe conditions, including the 
    inability to immediately detect an engine-out condition or to properly 
    govern main rotor speed following loss of the FADEC, and subsequent 
    loss of control of the helicopter.
        Since the issuance of that AD, the FAA has determined that not all 
    of the previously affected MDHS Model 600N helicopters have the unsafe 
    condition; the prefix ``RN'' for the serial number for the MDHS Model 
    500N helicopters is incorrect; and the part number for the relay 
    receptacle was incorrectly stated in Figure 1.
        Since an unsafe condition has been identified that is likely to 
    exist or develop on other MDHS Model 369E, 369FF, 500N and 600N 
    helicopters of the same type design, this AD supersedes Priority Letter 
    AD 98-17-14 to require, within the next 14 calendar days, inspecting 
    each affected relay receptacle contact socket for correct size of the 
    contact socket holes, and replacing incorrectly-sized sockets with 
    airworthy contact sockets. The short compliance time involved is 
    required because the previously described critical unsafe condition can 
    adversely affect the controllability of the helicopter. Therefore, 
    inspecting each suspect relay receptacle contact socket for correct 
    size of the contact socket holes and replacing incorrectly-sized 
    sockets with airworthy contact sockets is required within the next 14 
    calendar days, and this AD must be issued immediately.
        Since a situation exists that requires the immediate adoption of 
    this regulation, it is found that notice and opportunity for prior 
    public comment hereon are impracticable, and that good cause exists for 
    making this amendment effective in less than 30 days.
        The FAA estimates that 156 helicopters of U.S. registry will be 
    affected by this AD, that it will take approximately 4 work hours per 
    helicopter to inspect and replace all contact sockets, and that the 
    average labor rate is $60 per work hour. Required parts will cost 
    approximately $864 per helicopter. Based on these figures, the total 
    cost impact of the AD on U.S. operators is estimated to be $172,224 
    assuming one inspection per helicopter and replacement of all contact 
    sockets on all the helicopters in the U.S. fleet.
    
    Comments Invited
    
        Although this action is in the form of a final rule that involves 
    requirements affecting flight safety and, thus, was not preceded by 
    notice and an opportunity for public comment, comments are invited on 
    this rule. Interested persons are invited to comment on this rule by 
    submitting such written data, views, or arguments as they may desire. 
    Communications should identify the Rules Docket number and be submitted 
    in triplicate to the address specified under the caption ADDRESSES. All 
    communications received on or before the closing date for comments will 
    be considered, and this rule may be amended in light of the comments 
    received. Factual information that supports the commenter's ideas and 
    suggestions is extremely helpful in evaluating the effectiveness of the 
    AD action and determining whether additional rulemaking action would be 
    needed.
        Comments are specifically invited on the overall regulatory, 
    economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the rule that might 
    suggest a need to modify the rule. All comments submitted will be 
    available, both before and after the closing date for comments, in the 
    Rules Docket for examination by interested persons. A report that 
    summarizes each FAA-public contact concerned with the substance of this 
    AD will be filed in the Rules Docket.
        Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments 
    submitted in response to this rule must submit a self-addressed, 
    stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments 
    to Docket No. 99-SW-11-AD. The postcard will be date stamped and 
    returned to the commenter.
        The regulations adopted herein will not have substantial direct 
    effects on the States, on the relationship between the national 
    government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
    responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in 
    accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this final 
    rule does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the 
    preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
        The FAA has determined that this regulation is an emergency 
    regulation that must be issued immediately to correct an unsafe 
    condition in aircraft, and that it is not a ``significant regulatory 
    action'' under Executive Order 12866. It has been determined further 
    that this action involves an emergency regulation under DOT Regulatory 
    Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979). If it is 
    determined that this emergency regulation otherwise would be 
    significant under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures, a final 
    regulatory evaluation will be prepared and placed in the Rules Docket. 
    A copy of it, if filed, may be obtained from the Rules Docket at the 
    location provided under the caption ADDRESSES.
    
    List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
    
        Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
    
    Adoption of the Amendment
    
        Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the 
    Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of 
    the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
    
    PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
    
        1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
    
    
    Sec. 39.13  [Amended]
    
        2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding a new airworthiness directive 
    (AD) to read as follows:
    
    AD 99-08-07  McDonnell Douglas Helicopter Systems: Amendment 39-
    11113. Docket No. 99-SW-11-AD. Supersedes Priority Letter AD 98-17-
    14, Docket No. 98-SW-32-AD.
    
        Applicability: Model 369E (serial numbers (S/N) 384E through 
    0539E); Model 369FF (S/
    
    [[Page 16658]]
    
    N 076FF through 0128FF); Model 500N (serial numbers up to and 
    including LN085); and Model 600N (serial numbers RN002 through 
    RN039) helicopters, certificated in any category.
    
        Note 1: This AD applies to each helicopter identified in the 
    preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been 
    otherwise modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the 
    requirements of this AD. For helicopters that have been modified, 
    altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of 
    this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an 
    alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (e) of 
    this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of 
    the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition 
    addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been 
    eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to 
    address it.
    
        Compliance: Required within the next 14 calendar days, unless 
    accomplished previously.
        To prevent undetected loss of engine control or warning systems, 
    accomplish the following:
        (a) Access relays K1, K2, K3, K5, K104, and K200 (relays, part 
    number (P/N) HS4240).
        (b) Remove each relay specified in paragraph (a) from its relay 
    receptacle (receptacle), P/N HS4256-1.
        (c) Using a No. 60 drill bit or a 0.040-in. diameter wire as a 
    gauge, attempt to insert the gauge into every contact socket 
    (socket) of each relay. Ensure the gauge is inserted perpendicular 
    to the face of the receptacle, to prevent damage to the receptacle 
    and the socket (Figure 1). If the gauge can be inserted into a 
    socket, it is unairworthy and must be replaced with an airworthy 
    socket, P/N 019-0075-002.
    
    BILLING CODE 4910-13-U
    [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP06AP99.000
    
    
    BILLING CODE 4910-13-C
    
        (d) Any replacement relay, P/N HS4240, must be inspected prior 
    to further flight, in accordance with paragraph (c) of this AD.
    
        Note 2: Boeing MDHS Service Bulletin, SB369E-090, SB369F-077, 
    SB500N-017, SB600N-014, dated July 6, 1998, pertains to the subject 
    of this AD.
    
        (e) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the 
    compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be 
    used if approved by the Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification 
    Office, FAA. Operators shall submit their requests through an FAA 
    Principal Maintenance Inspector, who may concur or comment and then 
    send it to the Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office.
    
        Note 3: Information concerning the existence of approved 
    alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be 
    obtained from the Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office.
    
        (f) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with 
    sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 
    CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the helicopter to a location where 
    the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
    
        Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on March 30, 1999.
    Eric Bries,
    Acting Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
    [FR Doc. 99-8408 Filed 4-5-99; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-13-U
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
4/21/1999
Published:
04/06/1999
Department:
Federal Aviation Administration
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Final rule; request for comments.
Document Number:
99-8408
Dates:
Effective April 21, 1999.
Pages:
16656-16658 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 99-SW-11-AD, Amendment 39-11113, AD 99-08-07
RINs:
2120-AA64: Airworthiness Directives
RIN Links:
https://www.federalregister.gov/regulations/2120-AA64/airworthiness-directives
PDF File:
99-8408.pdf
CFR: (1)
14 CFR 39.13