94-8326. Airworthiness Directives; de Havilland Model DHC-8-100 Series Airplanes  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 67 (Thursday, April 7, 1994)]
    [Unknown Section]
    [Page 0]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-8326]
    
    
    [[Page Unknown]]
    
    [Federal Register: April 7, 1994]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    
    Federal Aviation Administration
    
    14 CFR Part 39
    
    [Docket No. 94-NM-06-AD]
    
     
    
    Airworthiness Directives; de Havilland Model DHC-8-100 Series 
    Airplanes
    
    AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
    
    ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This document proposes the adoption of a new airworthiness 
    directive (AD) that is applicable to certain de Havilland Model DHC-8-
    100 series airplanes. This proposal would require modification of the 
    potentiometer lever stops on the nose wheel steering. This proposal is 
    prompted by a report that the potentiometer stops installed currently 
    on these airplanes are too short to limit excessive uncontrolled 
    potentiometer movement in the event of a mechanical link failure. The 
    actions specified by the proposed AD are intended to prevent the 
    airplane from departing the runway during takeoff or landing in the 
    event of the failure of the mechanical link between the rudder pedals 
    and the potentiometer.
    
    DATES: Comments must be received by June 1, 1994.
    
    ADDRESSES: Submit comments in triplicate to the Federal Aviation 
    Administration (FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate, ANM-103, 
    Attention: Rules Docket No. 94-NM-06-AD, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, 
    Washington 98055-4056. Comments may be inspected at this location 
    between 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal 
    holidays.
        The service information referenced in the proposed rule may be 
    obtained from Bombardier Inc., Bombardier Regional Aircraft Division, 
    Garratt Boulevard, Downsview, Ontario M3K 1Y5, Canada. This information 
    may be examined at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind 
    Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the FAA, Engine and Propeller 
    Directorate, New York Aircraft Certification Office, 181 South Franklin 
    Avenue, Valley Stream, New York.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bradford Chin, Electronics Engineer, 
    Systems and Equipment Branch, ANE-173, FAA, Engine and Propeller 
    Directorate, New York Aircraft Certification Office, 181 South Franklin 
    Avenue, room 202, Valley Stream, New York 11581; telephone (516) 791-
    6427; fax (516) 791-9024.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Comments Invited
    
        Interested persons are invited to participate in the making of the 
    proposed rule by submitting such written data, views, or arguments as 
    they may desire. Communications shall identify the Rules Docket number 
    and be submitted in triplicate to the address specified above. All 
    communications received on or before the closing date for comments, 
    specified above, will be considered before taking action on the 
    proposed rule. The proposals contained in this notice may be changed in 
    light of the comments received.
        Comments are specifically invited on the overall regulatory, 
    economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the proposed rule. All 
    comments submitted will be available, both before and after the closing 
    date for comments, in the Rules Docket for examination by interested 
    persons. A report summarizing each FAA-public contact concerned with 
    the substance of this proposal will be filed in the Rules Docket.
        Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments 
    submitted in response to this notice must submit a self-addressed, 
    stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments 
    to Docket Number 94-NM-06-AD.'' The postcard will be date stamped and 
    returned to the commenter.
    
    Availability of NPRMs
    
        Any person may obtain a copy of this NPRM by submitting a request 
    to the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, ANM-103, Attention: Rules 
    Docket No. 94-NM-06-AD, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 
    98055-4056.
    
    Discussion
    
        Transport Canada Aviation, which is the airworthiness authority for 
    Canada, recently notified the FAA that an unsafe condition may exist on 
    certain de Havilland Model DHC-8-100 series airplanes. Transport Canada 
    Aviation advises that when a Model DHC-8 series airplane is in the high 
    speed taxi mode during takeoff or landing, nose gear steering is 
    limited to 7 degrees left or right of center and is controlled through 
    rudder pedal movement. Rotary movement of the rudder input quadrant is 
    transmitted to a dual potentiometer via a mechanical link and fork 
    lever. The potentiometer converts this movement into electrical 
    signals, which are sent to an electronic control unit (ECU) located in 
    the nose of the airplane. Subsequently, the ECU signals the electro-
    hydraulic actuator on the nose gear, thereby rotating the nose gear in 
    the required direction.
        If the mechanical link connecting the potentiometer to the rudder 
    input quadrant fails, excessive uncontrolled potentiometer lever 
    movement is restricted by small metal stops located outside the normal 
    angular travel of the fork lever. These ``potentiometer stops'' limit 
    the size of the signal sent to the ECU only in the event of a 
    mechanical link failure. On certain Model DHC-8-100 series airplanes, 
    the currently installed potentiometer stops are too short to restrict 
    excessive fork lever movement in the event of a mechanical link 
    failure. In this case, a signal that is too large would be sent to the 
    ECU, which could cause the nose gear to exceed its 7-degree limitation. 
    This condition, if not corrected, could result in the airplane 
    departing the runway during takeoff or landing.
        Bombardier Inc. has issued de Havilland Service Bulletin S.B. 8-32-
    99, Revision `A,' dated July 26, 1993, that describes procedures for 
    modification of the potentiometer lever stops on the nose wheel 
    steering (Modification 8/1809) on certain Model DHC-8-100 and -300 
    series airplanes. Accomplishment of this modification will restore 
    overtravel protection by relocating the potentiometer lever stops. 
    Relocation of the stops will ensure that excessive fork lever movement 
    is restricted in the event of a mechanical link failure. Transport 
    Canada Aviation classified this service bulletin as mandatory and 
    issued Canadian Airworthiness Directive (AD) No. CF-93-24, dated 
    September 29, 1993, in order to assure the continued airworthiness of 
    these airplanes in Canada.
        Although the effectivity of the service bulletin includes certain 
    Model DHC-8-100 and -300 series airplanes, Canadian AD No. CF-93-24 is 
    applicable only to certain Model DHC-8-100 series airplanes. The 
    service bulletin states that the potentiometer stops on certain Model 
    DHC-8-300 series airplanes are contacted by the lever prematurely, 
    resulting in deformation of the stops. However, the FAA has been 
    advised that, although deformation of the potentiometer stops on these 
    airplanes can occur, excessive potentiometer lever movement would still 
    be restricted in the event of failure of a mechanical link. In light of 
    this information, the FAA finds that Model DHC-8-300 series airplanes 
    are not subject to the addressed unsafe condition.
        This airplane model is manufactured in Canada and is type 
    certificated for operation in the United States under the provisions of 
    Sec. 21.29 of the Federal Aviation Regulations and the applicable 
    bilateral airworthiness agreement. Pursuant to this bilateral 
    airworthiness agreement, Transport Canada Aviation has kept the FAA 
    informed of the situation described above. The FAA has examined the 
    findings of Transport Canada Aviation, reviewed all available 
    information, and determined that AD action is necessary for products of 
    this type design that are certificated for operation in the United 
    States.
        Since an unsafe condition has been identified that is likely to 
    exist or develop on other airplanes of the same type design registered 
    in the United States, the proposed AD would require modification of the 
    potentiometer lever stops on the nose wheel steering. The actions would 
    be required to be accomplished in accordance with the service bulletin 
    described previously.
        The FAA estimates that 48 airplanes of U.S. registry would be 
    affected by this proposed AD, that it would take approximately 3 work 
    hours per airplane to accomplish the proposed actions, and that the 
    average labor rate is $55 per work hour. The cost for required parts 
    would be minimal. Based on these figures, the total cost impact of the 
    proposed AD on U.S. operators is estimated to be $7,920, or $165 per 
    airplane.
        The total cost impact figure discussed above is based on 
    assumptions that no operator has yet accomplished any of the proposed 
    requirements of this AD action, and that no operator would accomplish 
    those actions in the future if this AD were not adopted.
        The regulations proposed herein would not have substantial direct 
    effects on the States, on the relationship between the national 
    government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
    responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in 
    accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this 
    proposal would not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant 
    the preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
        For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this proposed 
    regulation (1) is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under 
    Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT 
    Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); 
    and (3) if promulgated, will not have a significant economic impact, 
    positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under 
    the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. A copy of the draft 
    regulatory evaluation prepared for this action is contained in the 
    Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained by contacting the Rules 
    Docket at the location provided under the caption ADDRESSES.
    
    List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
    
        Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
    
    The Proposed Amendment
    
        Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the 
    Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration proposes to amend 14 
    CFR part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations as follows:
    
    PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES-
    
        1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 49 U.S.C. App. 1354(a), 1421 and 1423; 49 U.S.C. 
    106(g); and 14 CFR 11.89.
    
    
    Sec. 39.13  [Amended]
    
        2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new 
    airworthiness directive:
    
    De Havilland, Inc.: Docket 94-NM-06-AD.
    
        Applicability: Model DHC-8-102, -103, and -106 airplanes, serial 
    numbers 003 through 334 inclusive; certificated in any category.
        Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished 
    previously.
        To prevent the airplane from departing the runway during takeoff 
    or landing, accomplish the following:
        (a) Within 6 months after the effective date of this AD, modify 
    the potentiometer lever stops on the nose wheel steering in 
    accordance with de Havilland Service Bulletin S.B. 8-32-99, Revision 
    ``A,'' dated July 26, 1993.
        (b) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the 
    compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be 
    used if approved by the Manager, New York Aircraft Certification 
    Office (ACO), FAA, Engine and Propeller Directorate.
        Operators shall submit their requests through an appropriate FAA 
    Principal Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send 
    it to the Manager, New York ACO.
    
        Note: Information concerning the existence of approved 
    alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be 
    obtained from the New York ACO.
    
        (c) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with 
    Federal Aviation Regulations (FAR) 21.197 and 21.199 to operate the 
    airplane to a location where the requirements of this AD can be 
    accomplished.
    
        Issued in Renton, Washington, on April 1, 1994.
    S.R. Miller,
    Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
    Service.
    [FR Doc. 94-8326 Filed 4-6-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-13-U
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
04/07/1994
Department:
Federal Aviation Administration
Entry Type:
Uncategorized Document
Action:
Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
Document Number:
94-8326
Dates:
Comments must be received by June 1, 1994.
Pages:
0-0 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: April 7, 1994, Docket No. 94-NM-06-AD
CFR: (2)
14 CFR 21.29
14 CFR 39.13