96-12390. Airworthiness Directives; The New Piper Aircraft, Inc. (Formerly Piper Aircraft Corporation) PA31, PA31P, and PA31T Series Airplanes  

  • [Federal Register Volume 61, Number 97 (Friday, May 17, 1996)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 24878-24881]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 96-12390]
    
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    
    Federal Aviation Administration
    
    14 CFR Part 39
    
    [Docket No. 90-CE-62-AD; Amendment 39-9621; AD 96-10-14]
    RIN 2120-AA64
    
    
    Airworthiness Directives; The New Piper Aircraft, Inc. (Formerly 
    Piper Aircraft Corporation) PA31, PA31P, and PA31T Series Airplanes
    
    AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This amendment supersedes Airworthiness Directive (AD) 88-05-
    05, which currently requires the following on certain The New Piper 
    Aircraft, Inc. (Piper) PA31, PA31P, and PA31T series airplanes: 
    repetitively inspecting both
    
    [[Page 24879]]
    
    the left and right main landing gear (MLG) forward sidebrace, and 
    replacing any cracked MLG forward sidebrace. The Federal Aviation 
    Administration's policy on aging commuter-class aircraft is to 
    eliminate or, in certain instances, reduce the number of certain 
    repetitive short-interval inspections when improved parts or 
    modifications are available. This action retains the current repetitive 
    inspection and necessary replacement requirements contained in AD 88-
    05-05, and requires incorporating both a left and right MLG forward 
    sidebrace of improved design as terminating action for the repetitive 
    inspection requirement. The actions specified in this AD are intended 
    to prevent the MLG from retracting because of a cracked MLG forward 
    side brace, which, if not detected and corrected, could result in gear 
    collapse and loss of control of the airplane during landing operations.
    
    DATES: Effective June 27, 1996.
        The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in 
    the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as 
    of June 27, 1996.
    
    ADDRESSES: Service information that applies to this AD may be obtained 
    from The New Piper Aircraft, Inc., Customer Services, 2926 Piper Drive, 
    Vero Beach, Florida 32960. This information may also be examined at the 
    Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Central Region, Office of the 
    Assistant Chief Counsel, Attention: Rules Docket 90-CE-62-AD, Room 
    1558, 601 E. 12th Street, Kansas City, Missouri 64106; or at the Office 
    of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street NW., suite 700, 
    Washington, DC.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christina Marsh, Aerospace Engineer, 
    FAA, Atlanta Aircraft Certification Office, Campus Building, 1701 
    Columbia Avenue, suite 2-160, College Park, Georgia 30337-2748; 
    telephone (404) 305-7362; facsimile (404) 305-7348.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Events Leading to the AD
    
        A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 
    CFR part 39) to include an AD that would apply to Piper PA31, PA31P, 
    and PA31T series airplanes was published in the Federal Register on 
    December 7, 1995 (60 FR 62776). The action proposed to supersede AD 88-
    05-05 with a new AD that would (1) retain the requirement of 
    repetitively inspecting both the left and right MLG forward sidebrace 
    for cracks, and replacing any cracked MLG forward sidebrace; and (2) 
    require replacing both the left and right MLG forward sidebrace with a 
    part of improved design, part number (P/N) 85165-02 (left) and 85165-03 
    (right) or P/N 85166-02 (left) and 85166-03 (right), as applicable, as 
    terminating action for the repetitive inspection requirement. 
    Accomplishment of the proposed inspections would be in accordance with 
    Piper Service Bulletin No. 845A, dated October 9, 1987. The improved 
    MLG forward sidebrace installations would be accomplished in accordance 
    with the applicable maintenance manual.
        Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate 
    in the making of this amendment. No comments were received on the 
    proposed rule or the FAA's determination of the cost to the public.
        After careful review of all available information related to the 
    subject presented above, the FAA has determined that air safety and the 
    public interest require the adoption of the rule as proposed except for 
    minor editorial corrections. The FAA has determined that these minor 
    corrections will not change the meaning of the AD and will not add any 
    additional burden upon the public than was already proposed.
    
    Cost Impact
    
        The FAA estimates that 2,384 airplanes in the U.S. registry will be 
    affected by this AD, that it will take approximately 8 workhours per 
    airplane to accomplish the required replacement, and that the average 
    labor rate is approximately $60 an hour. Parts cost approximately 
    $1,000 per airplane (2 MLG forward sidebraces per airplane at 
    approximately $500 per sidebrace). Based on these figures, the total 
    cost impact of this AD on U.S. operators is estimated to be $3,528,320 
    or $1,480 per airplane. This figure is based on the assumption that no 
    affected airplane owner/operator has accomplished the required 
    replacement.
        Piper has informed the FAA that parts have been distributed to 
    owners/operators to equip 2,123 of the affected airplanes (4,246 MLG 
    forward sidebraces of improved design). Assuming that each set of parts 
    has been installed on an affected airplane, the cost impact of the 
    required replacement upon U.S. owners/operators of the affected 
    airplanes is reduced by $3,142,040 from $3,528,320 to $386,280.
    
    The FAA's Aging Commuter Class Aircraft Policy
    
        This AD is part of the FAA's aging commuter class airplane policy, 
    which briefly states that, when a modification exists that could 
    eliminate or reduce the number of required critical inspections, the 
    modification should be incorporated.
        The intent of the FAA's aging commuter airplane program is to 
    ensure safe operation of commuter-class airplanes that are in 
    commercial service without adversely impacting private operators. The 
    FAA believes that a large number of the remaining 261 affected 
    airplanes (2,384 affected airplanes - 2,123 airplanes with a set of 
    parts distributed) that will be affected by this AD are operated in 
    various types of air transportation. This includes scheduled passenger 
    service, air cargo, and air taxi.
        This AD allows 1,200 hours time-in-service (TIS) after the 
    effective date of the AD before mandatory accomplishment of the design 
    modification. The average utilization of the fleet for those airplanes 
    in air transportation is between 25 to 40 hours TIS per week. Based on 
    these figures, operators of commuter-class airplanes involved in 
    commercial operation will have to accomplish the required replacement 
    within 7 to 12 months after the AD becomes effective. For private 
    owners, who typically operate between 100 to 200 hours TIS per year, 
    this allows 6 to 12 years before the required replacement will be 
    mandatory.
        The FAA established the 1,200 hours TIS replacement compliance time 
    based on its engineering evaluation of the problem. Among the issues 
    examined during this engineering evaluation were analysis of service 
    difficulty reports, the difficulty level of the inspection, and how 
    critical the situation would be if cracks occurred in the subject area 
    despite accomplishment of the repetitive inspections.
        Usually, the FAA establishes the mandatory design modification 
    compliance time on AD's affecting aging commuter-class airplanes upon 
    the accumulation of a certain number of hours TIS on the airplane. For 
    this action, the FAA is mandating the replacement for all operators 
    ``within the next 1,200 hours TIS after the effective date of this 
    AD.'' The total TIS levels of the airplane fleet vary from under 1,000 
    hours TIS to over 5,000 hours TIS, and annual accumulation rates vary 
    from 50 hours TIS to over 1,000 hours TIS. Establishing a long-term set 
    compliance time of hours TIS accumulated on Piper PA31, PA31P, and 
    PA31T series airplanes (such as 5,000 hours TIS) imposes an undue 
    burden on the manufacturer of having to maintain a supply of 
    replacement parts for the entire fleet when many airplanes in the fleet 
    may never reach this compliance time.
    
    [[Page 24880]]
    
        Instead, the FAA believes that Piper should maintain parts for 
    several years; in this case about 12 years to allow low-usage airplanes 
    time to accumulate the 1,200 hours TIS after the effective date of the 
    AD. The FAA has determined that the compliance time of this AD provides 
    the level of safety required for commuter air service while still 
    minimizing the impact on the private airplane owners of Piper PA31, 
    PA31P, and PA31T series airplanes.
    
    Regulatory Impact
    
        The regulations adopted herein will not have substantial direct 
    effects on the States, on the relationship between the national 
    government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
    responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in 
    accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this final 
    rule does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the 
    preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
        For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is 
    not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866; 
    (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and 
    Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a 
    significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial 
    number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory 
    Flexibility Act. A copy of the final evaluation prepared for this 
    action is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained 
    by contacting the Rules Docket at the location provided under the 
    caption ADDRESSES.
    
    List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
    
        Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by 
    reference, Safety.
    
    Adoption of the Amendment
    
        Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the 
    Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of 
    the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
    
    PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
    
        1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 49 U.S.C 106(g), 40113, 44701.
    
    
    Sec. 39.13  [Amended]
    
        2. Section 39.13 is amended by removing Airworthiness Directive 
    (AD) 88-05-05, Amendment 39-5861, and by adding a new AD to read as 
    follows:
    
    96-10-14  The New Piper Aircraft, Inc. (formerly Piper Aircraft 
    Corporation): Amendment 39-9621; Docket No. 90-CE-62-AD. Supersedes 
    AD 88-05-05, Amendment 39-5861.
    
        Applicability: The following model and serial number airplanes, 
    certificated in any category, that do not have left and right main 
    landing gear (MLG) forward sidebraces of improved design installed, 
    part numbers (P/N) 85165-02 (left) and 85165-03 (right) or P/N 
    85166-02 (left) and 85166-03 (right).
    
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                   Models                             Serial Nos.           
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    PA31, PA31-300, and PA31-325........  31-2 through 31-8312019.          
    PA31-350............................  31-5001 through 31-8553002.       
    PA31P...............................  31P-2 through 31P-7730012.        
    PA31P-350...........................  31P-8414001 through 31P-8414050.  
    PA31T...............................  31T-7400002 through 31T-8120104.  
    PA31T1..............................  31T-7804001 through 31T-8304003   
                                           and 31T-1104004 through 31T-     
                                           1104017.                         
    PA31T2..............................  31T-8166001 through 31T-8166076   
                                           and 31T-1166001 through 31T-     
                                           1166008.                         
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the 
    preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been 
    modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the 
    requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified, 
    altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of 
    this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an 
    alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (g) of 
    this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of 
    the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition 
    addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been 
    eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to 
    address it.
        Compliance: Required as indicated in the body of this AD, unless 
    already accomplished.
        To prevent the MLG from retracting because of a cracked MLG 
    forward side brace, which, if not detected and corrected, could 
    result in gear collapse and loss of control of the airplane during 
    landing operations, accomplish the following:
        (a) Within the next 100 hours time-in-service (TIS) after the 
    effective date of this AD, unless already accomplished (compliance 
    with AD 88-05-05), and thereafter at intervals not to exceed 100 
    hours TIS until the modification required by paragraph (d) of this 
    AD is incorporated, inspect (using dye penetrant methods) both the 
    left and right MLG sidebraces for cracks. Accomplish the inspections 
    in accordance with the INSTRUCTIONS section of Piper Service 
    Bulletin No. 845A, dated October 9, 1987.
        (b) The initial dye penetrant inspection type must be utilized 
    for all future repetitive inspections. Dye penetrant inspection 
    types consist of Type I: fluorescent; Type II: non-fluorescent or 
    visible dye; and Type III: dual sensitivity.
        (c) If cracks are found during any of the inspections required 
    in paragraph (a) of this AD, prior to further flight, replace the 
    cracked MLG sidebrace with a part of improved design, P/N 85165-02 
    (left) or 85165-03 (right) or P/N 85166-02 (left) or 85166-03 
    (right), as applicable. Accomplish this replacement in accordance 
    with the applicable maintenance manual.
        (d) Within the next 1,200 hours TIS after the effective date of 
    this AD, unless already accomplished as required by paragraph (c) of 
    this AD, replace both the left and right MLG side braces with parts 
    of improved design,   P/N 85165-02 (left) and 85165-03 (right) or   
    P/N 85166-02 (left) and 85166-03 (right), as applicable. Accomplish 
    these replacements in accordance with the applicable maintenance 
    manual.
        (e) Installing both the left and right MLG side braces with 
    parts of improved design,   P/N 85165-02 (left) and 85165-03 (right) 
    or   P/N 85166-02 (left) and 85166-03 (right), as applicable, as 
    required by paragraph (d) of this AD is considered terminating 
    action for the repetitive inspection requirement of this AD.
        (f) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with 
    sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 
    CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where 
    the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
        (g) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the 
    initial or repetitive compliance times that provides an equivalent 
    level of safety may be approved by the Manager, Atlanta Aircraft 
    Certification Office (ACO), Campus Building, 1701 Columbia Avenue, 
    suite 2-160, College Park, Georgia 30337-2748. The request shall be 
    forwarded through an appropriate FAA Maintenance Inspector, who may 
    add comments and then send it to the Manager, Atlanta ACO.
    
        Note 2: Information concerning the existence of approved 
    alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be 
    obtained from the Atlanta ACO.
        Note 3: Alternative methods of compliance approved in accordance 
    with AD 88-05-05 (superseded by this AD) are not considered approved 
    for this AD.
    
        (h) The inspection required by this AD shall be done in 
    accordance with Piper Service Bulletin No. 845A, dated October 9, 
    1987. This incorporation by reference was approved by the Director 
    of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR 
    part 51. Copies may be obtained from The New Piper Aircraft, Inc., 
    2926 Piper Drive, Vero Beach, Florida 32960. Copies may be inspected 
    at the FAA, Central Region, Office of the Assistant Chief Counsel, 
    Room 1558, 601 E. 12th Street, Kansas City, Missouri, or at the 
    Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street NW., suite 
    700, Washington, DC.
        (i) This amendment (39-9621) supersedes AD 88-05-05, Amendment 
    39-5861.
        (j) This amendment (39-9621) becomes effective on June 27, 1996.
    
    
    [[Page 24881]]
    
    
        Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on May 8, 1996.
    Henry A. Armstrong,
    Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
    Service.
    [FR Doc. 96-12390 Filed 5-16-96; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-13-U
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
6/27/1996
Published:
05/17/1996
Department:
Federal Aviation Administration
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
96-12390
Dates:
Effective June 27, 1996.
Pages:
24878-24881 (4 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 90-CE-62-AD, Amendment 39-9621, AD 96-10-14
RINs:
2120-AA64: Airworthiness Directives
RIN Links:
https://www.federalregister.gov/regulations/2120-AA64/airworthiness-directives
PDF File:
96-12390.pdf
CFR: (1)
14 CFR 39.13