99-13322. Airworthiness Directives; Pratt & Whitney JT9D Series Turbofan Engines  

  • [Federal Register Volume 64, Number 101 (Wednesday, May 26, 1999)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 28357-28358]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 99-13322]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    
    Federal Aviation Administration
    
    14 CFR Part 39
    
    [Docket No. 94-ANE-54 AD; Amendment 39-11180; AD 99-11-09]
    RIN 2120-AA64
    
    
    Airworthiness Directives; Pratt & Whitney JT9D Series Turbofan 
    Engines
    
    AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This document supersedes an existing airworthiness directive 
    (AD), applicable to Pratt & Whitney (PW) JT9D series turbofan engines, 
    that currently requires initial and repetitive in-shop or on-wing 
    inspections of the diffuser case rear rail for cracking, and removal, 
    if necessary, of the diffuser case. This AD will reduce the allowable 
    crack length, reduce the inspection intervals, and introduce an 
    improved inspection method. This AD is prompted by continued reports of 
    diffuser case ruptures, and improved understanding of crack propagation 
    rates. The actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent 
    diffuser case rupture, uncontained engine failure, and damage to the 
    aircraft.
    
    DATES: Effective July 26, 1999. The incorporation by reference of 
    certain publications listed in the regulations is approved by the 
    Director of the Federal Register as of July 26, 1999.
    
    ADDRESSES: The service information referenced in this AD may be 
    obtained from. Pratt & Whitney, 400 Main St., East Hartford, CT 06108; 
    telephone (860) 565-6600, fax (860) 565-4503. This information may be 
    examined at the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), New England 
    Region, Office of the Regional Counsel, 12 New England Executive Park, 
    Burlington, MA 01803-5299; or at the Office of the Federal Register, 
    800 North Capitol Street, NW, suite 700, Washington, DC.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peter White, Aerospace Engineer, 
    Engine Certification Office, FAA, Engine and Propeller Directorate, 12 
    New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803-5299; telephone (617) 
    238-7128, fax (617) 238-7199.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal 
    Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) by superseding airworthiness 
    directive (AD) 94-26-06, Amendment 39-9102 (59 FR 67176, December 29, 
    1996, applicable to certain Pratt & Whitney (PW) (PW) JT9D-59A, -70A, -
    7Q, and -7Q3 series turbofan engines, was published in the Federal 
    Register on January 11, 1999 (64 FR 1552). That action proposed to 
    require initial and repetitive in-shop or on-wing inspections of the 
    diffuser case rear rail for cracking, and removal, if necessary, of the 
    diffuser case.
        Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate 
    in the making of this amendment. Due consideration has been given to 
    the comments received.
        Two commenters state that they are not affected by this AD.
        A third commenter states that minimal impact is expected from the 
    AD as premature removal of the affected parts is planned.
        After careful review of the available data, including the comments 
    noted above, the FAA has determined that air safety and the public 
    interest require the adoption of the rule as proposed.
        There are approximately 566 engines of the affected design in the 
    worldwide fleet. The FAA estimates that 157 engines installed on 
    aircraft of U.S. registry will be affected by this AD, that it would 
    take approximately 29 work hours per engine to accomplish the proposed 
    actions, and that the average labor rate is $60 per work hour. Based on 
    these figures, the total cost impact of the proposed AD on U.S. 
    operators is estimated to be $273,180.
        The regulations adopted herein will not have substantial direct 
    effects on the States, on the relationship between the national 
    government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
    responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in 
    accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this final 
    rule does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the 
    preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
        For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is 
    not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866; 
    (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies and 
    Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a 
    significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial 
    number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory 
    Flexibility Act. A final evaluation has been prepared for this action 
    is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained by 
    contacting the Rules Docket at the location provided under the caption 
    ADDRESSES.
    
    List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
    
        Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by 
    reference, Safety.
    
    Adoption of the Amendment
    
        Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the 
    Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of 
    the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
    
    [[Page 28358]]
    
    PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
    
        1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
    
    
    Sec. 39.13  [Amended]
    
        2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new 
    airworthiness directive:
    
    99-11-09  Pratt & Whitney: Amendment 39-11180. Docket No. 94-ANE-54. 
    Supersedes AD 94-26-06, Amendment 39-9102.
    
        Applicability: Pratt & Whitney (PW) JT9D-59A, -70A, -7Q, and -7Q3 
    series turbofan engines, installed on but not limited to Airbus A300 
    series, Boeing 747 series, and McDonnell Douglas DC-10 series aircraft.
    
        Note 1: This airworthiness directive (AD) applies to each engine 
    identified in the preceding applicability provision, regardless of 
    whether it has been modified, altered, or repaired in the area 
    subject to the requirements of this AD. For engines that have been 
    modified, altered, or repaired so that the performance of the 
    requirements of this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request 
    approval for an alternative method of compliance in accordance with 
    paragraph (b) of this AD. The request should include an assessment 
    of the effect of the modification, alteration, or repair on the 
    unsafe condition addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition 
    has not been eliminated, the request should include specific 
    proposed actions to address it.
    
        Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished 
    previously.
        To prevent diffuser case rupture, an uncontained engine failure, 
    and damage to the aircraft, accomplish the following:
        (a) Perform initial and repetitive fluorescent penetrant 
    inspections (FPI) or eddy current inspections (ECI) of diffuser case 
    rear rails for cracks in accordance with the Accomplishment 
    Instructions of PW JT9D (SB) No. 5749, Revision 8, dated October 30, 
    1998, as follows:
        (1) For engines on-wing that have not had the diffuser case rear 
    rail FPI or ECI inspected using the procedures referenced in PW JT9D 
    SB No. 5749, Revision 4, dated May 10, 1993; Revision 5, dated 
    September 29, 1995; Revision 6, dated May 8, 1998; Revision 7, dated 
    August 19, 1998; or Revision 8, dated October 30, 1998; Section 2, 
    Part 1 A (1)-(3), accomplish the following:
        (i) Perform an initial on-wing inspection within 25 cycles of 
    the effective date of this AD in accordance with Section 2, Part 2 
    of PW JT9D SB No. 5749, Revision 8, dated October 30, 1998.
        (ii) Thereafter, except as provided in paragraph (a)(4) of this 
    AD, perform on-wing inspections in accordance with the time 
    requirements listed in Section 2, Part 2 of PW JT9D SB No. 5749, 
    Revision 8, dated October 30, 1998.
        (2) For engines on-wing that have had the diffuser case rear 
    rail FPI or ECI inspected using the procedures referenced in PW JT9D 
    SB No. 5749, Revision 4, dated May 10, 1993; Revision 5, dated 
    September 29, 1995; Revision 6, dated May 8, 1998; Revision 7, dated 
    August 19, 1998; or Revision 8, dated October 30, 1998; Section 2, 
    Part 1 A (1)-(3), perform initial and repetitive on-wing inspections 
    in accordance with PW JT9D SB 5749, Revision 8, dated October 30, 
    1998, within the time requirements listed in Section 2, Part 2 of 
    that SB, except as provided in paragraph (a) (4) of this AD.
        (3) Remove from service diffuser cases that do not meet the 
    return to service criteria stated in PW JT9D SB No. 5749, Revision 
    8, dated October 30, 1998, Section 2, Part 2 D, and replace with 
    serviceable parts.
        (4) For engines that are overdue for an inspection on the 
    effective date of this AD, accomplish the required inspection within 
    25 cycles in service of the effective date of this AD.
        (b) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the 
    compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be 
    used if approved by the Manager, Engine Certification Office. 
    Operators shall submit their requests through an appropriate FAA 
    Principal Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send 
    it to the Manager, Engine Certification Office.
    
        Note 2: Information concerning the existence of approved 
    alternative methods of compliance with this airworthiness directive, 
    if any, may be obtained from the Engine Certification Office.
    
        (c) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with 
    Secs. 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 
    21.197 and 21.199) to operate the aircraft to a location where the 
    requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
        (d) The actions required by this AD shall be accomplished in 
    accordance with the following Pratt & Whitney SB:
    
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Document No.                           Pages                Revision                Date
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    5749..............................  1, 2............................          8  October 30, 1998.
                                        3...............................          6  May 8, 1998.
                                        4...............................          7  August 19, 1998.
                                        5-7.............................          6  May 8, 1998.
                                        8, 9............................          8  October 30, 1998.
                                        10, 11..........................          6  May 8, 1998.
                                        12..............................          7  August 19, 1998.
                                        13-18...........................          6  May 8, 1998.
    Total pages: 18.
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        This incorporation by reference was approved by the Director of 
    the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR 
    part 51. Copies may be obtained from Pratt & Whitney, Publication 
    Department, Supervisor Technical Publications Distribution, M/S 132-
    30, 400 Main St., East Hartford, CT 06108; telephone (860) 565-7700, 
    fax (860) 565-4503. Copies may be inspected at the FAA, New England 
    Region, Office of Regional Counsel, 12 New England Executive Park, 
    Burlington, MA; or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800 North 
    Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.
        (e) This amendment becomes effective on July 26, 1999.
    
    Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on May 18, 1999.
    David A. Downey,
    Assistant Manager, Engine and Propeller Directorate, Aircraft 
    Certification Service.
    [FR Doc. 99-13322 Filed 5-25-99; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-13-U
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
7/26/1999
Published:
05/26/1999
Department:
Federal Aviation Administration
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
99-13322
Dates:
Effective July 26, 1999. The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as of July 26, 1999.
Pages:
28357-28358 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 94-ANE-54 AD, Amendment 39-11180, AD 99-11-09
RINs:
2120-AA64: Airworthiness Directives
RIN Links:
https://www.federalregister.gov/regulations/2120-AA64/airworthiness-directives
PDF File:
99-13322.pdf
CFR: (1)
14 CFR 39.13