94-10517. Regulations for the Administration of Special Use Permits on National Wildlife Refuges in Alaska  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 85 (Wednesday, May 4, 1994)]
    [Unknown Section]
    [Page 0]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-10517]
    
    
    [[Page Unknown]]
    
    [Federal Register: May 4, 1994]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
    
    Fish and Wildlife Service
    
    50 CFR Part 36
    
     
    
    Regulations for the Administration of Special Use Permits on 
    National Wildlife Refuges in Alaska
    
    AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
    
    ACTION: Advance notice of proposed rulemaking and request for comments.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) gives notice to 
    the public that it will be developing regulations that will clarify, 
    update, and add to existing regulations for the administration of 
    special use permits (permits) on national wildlife refuges (refuges) in 
    Alaska. These changes will include but not be limited to: Permit 
    application, denial, and appeal procedures; permit fees; and the 
    process for issuing permits where a competitive selection process is 
    used to select the permit holder (e.g., big game guide-outfitters).
    
    DATES: Comments must be received on or before July 5, 1994.
    
    ADDRESSES: Comments should be addressed to: U.S. Fish and Wildlife 
    Service, Regional Director, Attention: Daryle R. Lons, 1011 E. Tudor 
    Road, Anchorage, Alaska 99503.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Daryle R. Lons at the above address; 
    telephone 907-786-3361.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Alaska National Interest Lands 
    Conservation Act of 1980 (ANILCA) (43 U.S.C. 1602-1784), the National 
    Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act of 1966 (16 U.S.C. 668dd-
    668ee), and the Refuge Recreation Act of 1962 (16 U.S.C. 460k-460k-4) 
    authorize the Secretary of the Interior to prescribe regulations as 
    necessary to administer permits for compatible activities on refuges in 
    Alaska.
        The current regulations governing issuance of permits on refuge 
    units in Alaska, codified at 50 CFR 36.41, were originally published in 
    the Federal Register at 46 FR 40192 on August 7, 1981, and later 
    amended at 51 FR 44794 on December 12, 1986. Since that time, the 
    permit administration program on refuges in Alaska has continued to 
    evolve. The purpose of the proposed regulations is to provide up-to-
    date guidance to both commercial users and Service employees for the 
    administration of permits in Alaska. Prior to promulgating these 
    revised regulations, the Service will be reviewing its existing permit 
    administration program and will be proposing revisions based on over 12 
    years of experience with the program and the implementation of ANILCA.
        The evolution of the program for administering permits has been 
    influenced by a number of factors since the original regulations were 
    promulgated. One factor has been the increased public awareness and 
    understanding of the need for securing permits prior to engaging in 
    many activities on refuges in Alaska.
        Another factor is the November 1984 Inspector General's Audit 
    Report that found that the Service was not collecting fees which were 
    commensurate with the value of the commercial activities authorized. 
    This audit resulted in the Service developing a fee schedule based on 
    client use days instead of charging a fixed $100 administrative fee for 
    all permits regardless of the scope of income generated by the 
    commercial permittee.
        Another event causing a significant impact on refuge permit 
    administration in Alaska was the decision of the Alaska Supreme Court 
    in Owsichek v. State Guide Licensing and Control Board, 763 P.2d 488 
    (Alaska, 1988). That ruling found the State's system of assigning 
    exclusive guide areas unconstitutional. Prior to this ruling, the 
    Service had depended upon the State's system for selecting and 
    assigning guides to areas which were located within refuge lands. In an 
    attempt to allow the State an opportunity to develop a constitutionally 
    acceptable system, and one which would satisfy Service needs, the 
    Service imposed a moratorium on the issuance of permits to new guide 
    applicants. This effectively limited the availability of permits to 
    those who were guiding at the time of the 1988 court ruling.
        After some time, the Service decided to develop its own interim 
    program in order to provide an equal opportunity for all registered big 
    game guide-outfitters to compete for permits. During late 1991 and 
    early 1992, the Service proposed an interim system to select big game 
    guide-outfitters. After soliciting public comment on the system, and 
    making revisions based on substantive comments, an interim program was 
    implemented in June 1992. Requests for proposals were then solicited 
    and applicants were notified of selections in January 1993. Successful 
    applicants were awarded 5-year permits effective July 1, 1993.
        It now appears that the State may not be able to implement a 
    satisfactory system for the selection of guide-outfitters prior to the 
    expiration of the 5-year permits the Service issued in 1993. 
    Accordingly, the Service proposes to initiate development of 
    regulations related to the big game guide-outfitter program and include 
    them in the revised regulations pertaining to the general 
    administration of permits in Alaska (50 CFR 36.41).
        The Service has identified several issues at this preliminary stage 
    for which it invites public comment:
        (1) Is the existing 180 day period allowed for filing appeals of 
    adverse decisions on permits appropriate in this instance? Should a 
    separate appeal system be developed which speaks directly to big game 
    guide-outfitters?
        (2) To what extent should the existing interim system for selecting 
    big game guide-outfitters be made part of the regulations?
        (3) If the State develops a selection system that meets Service 
    requirements, should provision be made for the suspension of the 
    Service permit selection system?
        Comments on the foregoing issues, as well as other related aspects 
    of this process, are encouraged. The Service will follow this comment 
    period with the publication of a proposed rule which will allow, also, 
    for additional comments prior to publication of a final rule.
    
        Dated: April 1, 1994.
    Mollie H. Beattie,
    Director.
    [FR Doc. 94-10517 Filed 5-3-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4310-55-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
05/04/1994
Department:
Fish and Wildlife Service
Entry Type:
Uncategorized Document
Action:
Advance notice of proposed rulemaking and request for comments.
Document Number:
94-10517
Dates:
Comments must be received on or before July 5, 1994.
Pages:
0-0 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: May 4, 1994
CFR: (1)
50 CFR 36