98-15588. Executive Office for Immigration Review; Motion to Reopen: Suspension of Deportation and Cancellation of Removal  

  • [Federal Register Volume 63, Number 112 (Thursday, June 11, 1998)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 31890-31895]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 98-15588]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
    
    8 CFR Part 3
    
    [EOIR No. 121P; AG Order No. 2162-98]
    RIN 1125-AA23
    
    
    Executive Office for Immigration Review; Motion to Reopen: 
    Suspension of Deportation and Cancellation of Removal
    
    AGENCY: Executive Office for Immigration Review, Justice.
    
    ACTION: Interim rule with request for comments.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This rule amends the regulations of the Executive Office for 
    Immigration Review (EOIR) by establishing a special procedure for the 
    filing and adjudication of motions to reopen to apply for suspension of 
    deportation and cancellation of removal pursuant to section 203(c) of 
    the Nicaraguan Adjustment and Central American Relief Act.
    
    DATES: Effective date: This interim rule is effective June 11, 1998.
        Comment date: Written comments must be submitted on or before July 
    13, 1998.
    
    ADDRESSES: Please submit written comments, in triplicate, to Margaret 
    M. Philbin, General Counsel, Executive Office for Immigration Review, 
    Suite 2400, 5107 Leesburg Pike, Falls Church, Virginia 22041.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Margaret M. Philbin, General Counsel, 
    Executive Office for Immigration Review, Suite 2400, 5107 Leesburg 
    Pike, Falls Church, Virginia 22041, telephone (703) 305-0470.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This interim rule with request for comments 
    amends 8 CFR part 3 by creating new Sec. 3.43.
    
    Background
    
        This regulation relates to a previous notice, signed by the 
    Attorney General
    
    [[Page 31891]]
    
    on January 15, 1998, and published at 63 FR 3154, on January 21, 1998, 
    which designated the time period for filing motions to reopen pursuant 
    to section 203(c) of the Nicaraguan Adjustment and Central American 
    Relief Act (Pub. L. 105-100; 111 Stat. 2160, 2193) (NACARA). Section 
    203 of NACARA, signed into law on November 19, 1997, amended section 
    309 of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act 
    of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-208; 110 Stat. 3009-625) (IIRIRA) to provide 
    special rules regarding applications for suspension of deportation and 
    cancellation of removal by certain aliens. These aliens include 
    Guatemalan, Salvadoran, and certain former Soviet bloc nationals 
    described in section 309(c)(5)(C)(i) of IIRIRA, as amended by section 
    203 of NACARA.
        Section 203(c) of NACARA also amended section 309 of IIRIRA by 
    creating a provision for motions to reopen under NACARA. Section 309(g) 
    of IIRIRA, as amended, permits aliens with final orders of deportation 
    or removal who have become eligible for cancellation of removal or 
    suspension of deportation as a result of the amendments made by section 
    203 of NACARA to file one motion to reopen removal or deportation 
    proceedings to apply for such relief, without regard to the limitations 
    imposed by law on motions to reopen. Section 309(g) of IIRIRA, as 
    amended, further requires the Attorney General to designate a specific 
    time period for filing motions to reopen for such relief beginning no 
    later than 60 days after the date of enactment of NACARA and extending 
    for a period not to exceed 240 days.
        The Attorney General's notice in the Federal Register designated 
    from January 16, 1998 to September 11, 1998 as the time period for 
    filing NACARA motions to reopen. See 63 FR 3154. That notice waived the 
    filing fee for motions to reopen filed pursuant to NACARA, but did not 
    disturb any other regulatory provisions with respect to the filing or 
    adjudication of motions to reopen.
    
    The Interim Rule
    
        The Attorney General is simplifying the filing process for NACARA 
    motions to reopen in two ways. First, this rule clarifies who can file 
    a motion to reopen pursuant to section 309(g) of IIRIRA, as amended by 
    section 203(c) of NACARA, by defining who has become eligible for 
    ``special rule'' cancellation of removal or suspension of deportation 
    as a result of the amendments made by section 203 of NACARA. Second, 
    the rule permits any alien who is moving to reopen pursuant to section 
    309(g) of IIRIRA, as amended by section 203(c) of NACARA, to file such 
    motion initially without a suspension or cancellation application and 
    supporting documents. The alien then will have until February 8, 1999 
    to file the application for suspension of deportation or cancellation 
    of removal and to provide all other supporting evidence and arguments 
    in favor of reopening. The alien should note at that time that he or 
    she is filing such application to complete a NACARA motion to reopen 
    filed earlier without an application and supporting documentation.
        The Attorney General is clarifying who can file a motion to reopen 
    pursuant to section 309(g) of IIRIRA, as amended by section 203(c) of 
    NACARA, to ensure a fair and efficient administrative process. In 
    addition, the Attorney General has decided to permit the initial filing 
    of NACARA motions to reopen to pursue relief under NACARA without 
    applications for relief and supporting documents because NACARA gives 
    eligible aliens the opportunity to file only one NACARA-based motion to 
    reopen and permits a 240-day time period during which the motion must 
    be filed. Many potential NACARA beneficiaries may have been in 
    proceedings years ago and it may take some time to accumulate the 
    documents necessary to prepare an application for suspension of 
    deportation.
    
    Aliens Eligible To File a Motion To Reopen Pursuant to NACARA
    
        Section 309(g) of IIRIRA, as amended by section 203(c) of NACARA, 
    permits an alien who has a final order of deportation or removal to 
    file one motion to reopen only if he or she has become eligible for 
    cancellation of removal or suspension of deportation as a result of the 
    amendments made by section 203 of NACARA. Section 203(c) of NACARA 
    provides: ``[N]otwithstanding any limitation imposed by law on motions 
    to reopen removal or deportation proceedings (except limitations 
    premised on an alien's conviction of an aggravated felony (as defined 
    in section 101(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act)), any alien 
    who has become eligible for cancellation of removal or suspension of 
    deportation as a result of the amendments made by section 203 of the 
    Nicaraguan Adjustment and Central American Relief Act may file one 
    motion to reopen removal or deportation proceedings to apply for 
    cancellation of removal or suspension of deportation.'' See Public Law 
    105-100, Sec. 203(c).
        This rule clarifies who can file a motion to reopen pursuant to 
    NACARA by defining ``who has become eligible for cancellation of 
    removal or suspension of deportation as a result of the amendments made 
    by section 203 of the Nicaraguan Adjustment and Central American Relief 
    Act.'' Several provisions of IIRIRA must be examined to determine ``who 
    has become eligible'' for cancellation of removal or suspension of 
    deportation as a result of the amendments made by NACARA.
        IIRIRA consolidated deportation and exclusion proceedings into one 
    unified removal proceeding and abolished the relief from deportation 
    known as ``suspension of deportation'' contained in section 244(a) of 
    the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) (as it existed prior to April 
    1, 1997). Persons placed in removal proceedings after April 1, 1997 
    may, instead, apply for cancellation of removal pursuant to section 
    240A of the INA, as amended. While cancellation of removal resembles 
    suspension of deportation, an applicant for cancellation must generally 
    establish continuous physical presence for ten years instead of seven 
    years, must establish ``exceptional and extremely unusual hardship'' 
    instead of ``extreme hardship,'' and must establish hardship to the 
    applicant's United States citizen or lawful permanent resident spouse, 
    parent, or child rather than hardship to the applicant or a United 
    States citizen or lawful permanent resident spouse, parent, or child.
        Special rules terminating continuous physical presence also apply 
    to cancellation of removal relief. Section 240A(d) (1) and (2) provides 
    three rules relating to the termination of continuous residence or 
    physical presence. Any period of continuous residence or continuous 
    physical presence in the United States shall be deemed to end when the 
    alien is: (1) served a notice to appear under section 239(a); or (2) 
    has committed an offense referred to in section 212(a)(2) that renders 
    the alien inadmissible to the United States under section 212(a)(2) or 
    removable from the United States under section 237(a)(2) or 237(a)(4), 
    whichever is earlier. See section 240A(d)(1) of the INA, as amended. In 
    addition, an alien shall be considered to have failed to maintain 
    continuous physical presence in the United States if the alien has 
    departed the United States for any period in excess of 90 days or for 
    any periods in the aggregate exceeding 180 days. See section 240A(d)(2) 
    of the INA, as amended. These ``stop-time rules'' of IIRIRA apply to 
    all aliens in removal proceedings under section 240A of the INA, as 
    amended.
        Section 309(c)(5) of IIRIRA as in effect prior to amendment by 
    NACARA contained a transitional rule providing
    
    [[Page 31892]]
    
    that paragraphs (1) and (2) of section 240A(d) of the INA (which 
    established these ``stop-time rules'' relating to continuous physical 
    presence) shall apply to notices to appear issued before, on, or after 
    the date of enactment of IIRIRA. This transitional rule has been 
    interpreted as applying the ``stop-time rules'' of IIRIRA also to 
    orders to show cause issued against persons in deportation proceedings 
    seeking suspension of deportation relief. Under this interpretation, an 
    alien affected by any of the ``stop-time rules'' relating to continuous 
    physical presence--for example, an alien who failed to accrue seven 
    years of continuous physical presence before being served with an order 
    to show cause--was made ineligible for suspension of deportation. 
    Therefore, under IIRIRA an alien generally must establish seven years 
    of continuous physical presence in the United States prior to service 
    of a charging document, along with good moral character and extreme 
    hardship, in order to qualify for suspension of deportation. (Aliens 
    who cannot establish continuous physical presence because of commission 
    of an offense, or because the continuity of their physical presence was 
    interrupted by a departure from the United States exceeding 90 days (or 
    180 days in the aggregate), would also be ineligible for suspension of 
    deportation.)
        Section 203 of NACARA amends section 309(c)(5) of IIRIRA by 
    eliminating this transitional restriction on suspension of deportation 
    for six classes of aliens in deportation proceedings and similarly 
    exempts persons in removal proceedings who are within those six 
    categories from operation of the ``stop-time rules'' contained in 
    section 240A(d)(1) of the INA. Section 203 also creates a ``special 
    rule'' for cancellation of removal which generally restores pre-IIRIRA 
    suspension rules for those who are applying for cancellation of removal 
    and fall within the six classes of aliens.
        Generally, an alien within one of the six classes who would have 
    been ineligible for suspension of deportation at the time of 
    adjudication as a result of section 309(c)(5) of IIRIRA may now be 
    eligible for suspension under the NACARA amendments. Thus, an alien who 
    was served with an order to show cause before being physically present 
    in the United States for a continuous period of seven years may now be 
    eligible for suspension of deportation as a result of the amendments 
    made by section 203 of NACARA. Similarly, an alien within one of the 
    six classes who was ineligible for cancellation of removal under the 
    heightened standard of ``exceptional and extremely unusual hardship'' 
    may now be eligible under the special rule for cancellation of removal. 
    For example, an alien served with a notice to appear before being 
    physically present in the United States for a continuous period of 10 
    years, or an alien who could not establish that his removal would 
    result in exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to a United States 
    citizen or lawful permanent resident spouse, parent, or child, may now 
    be eligible for the special rule for cancellation of removal as a 
    result of the amendments made by section 203 of NACARA.
        This rule provides that a motion to reopen pursuant to section 
    309(g) of IIRIRA, as amended by section 203(c) of NACARA, must 
    establish that the alien: (1) is prima facie eligible for suspension of 
    deportation pursuant to section 244(a) of the INA (as in effect prior 
    to April 1, 1997) or the special rule for cancellation of removal 
    pursuant to section 309(f) of IIRIRA, as amended by section 203(b) of 
    NACARA; and (2) was or would be ineligible (a) for suspension of 
    deportation by operation of section 309(c)(5) of IIRIRA (as in effect 
    prior to November 19, 1997); or (b) for cancellation of removal 
    pursuant to section 240A of the INA, but for operation of section 
    309(f) of IIRIRA, as amended by section 203(b) of NACARA; and (3) has 
    not been convicted at any time of an aggravated felony; and (4) falls 
    within one of the six classes of aliens described in section 203(a)(1) 
    of NACARA.
    
    Prima Facie Eligibility and Statutory Bars
    
        As mentioned above, an alien reopening pursuant to NACARA must 
    establish prima facie eligibility for suspension of deportation or 
    cancellation of removal under the applicable standards governing such 
    forms of discretionary relief pursuant to section 244 of the INA, as in 
    effect prior to April 1, 1997. In general, the alien must have been 
    physically present in the United States for a continuous period of at 
    least seven years immediately preceding the date of such application; 
    must be a person of good moral character during such period; and must 
    establish that deportation or removal would result in extreme hardship 
    to the alien or to the alien's spouse, parent, or child who is a 
    citizen of the United States or an alien lawfully admitted for 
    permanent residence. Different standards apply to aliens who are 
    deportable because of a criminal conviction or certain other grounds. 
    See section 244(a)(2) of the INA, as in effect prior to April 1, 1997. 
    The period of continuous physical presence must be established as of no 
    later than September 11, 1998.
        Further, to be prima facie eligible to apply for suspension of 
    deportation or cancellation of removal, the alien must not be subject 
    to any of the statutory bars to seeking such relief. Section 240A(c) of 
    the INA, and section 244(f) of the INA as it existed prior to April 1, 
    1997, provide that certain categories of aliens are ineligible for 
    cancellation of removal or suspension of deportation. Moreover, an 
    alien who was previously granted voluntary departure and received oral 
    and written notice of the consequences of failing to depart, but did 
    not depart the United States voluntarily within the time specified, is 
    barred for a specific period of time from various forms of 
    discretionary relief, including cancellation of removal and suspension 
    of deportation, pursuant to section 240B(d) of the INA and section 
    242B(e)(2) of the INA as it existed prior to April 1, 1997. Sections 
    242B(e)(1), (3) and (4) of the INA as it existed prior to April 1, 
    1997, also bar eligibility for such relief for certain aliens who, 
    after receiving the required oral and written notices, failed to appear 
    at their removal or deportation hearings, failed to appear as ordered 
    for deportation, or failed to appear at an asylum hearing. These and 
    any other statutory bars to eligibility for suspension of deportation 
    or cancellation of removal are not waived by the provisions of NACARA. 
    Although there may be only a limited number of aliens who are affected 
    by these provisions, the Attorney General has no authority to waive 
    these statutory bars in the cases where they do apply.
    
    Motion To Reopen Without Application for Relief
    
        The Attorney General is creating an exception to the regulatory 
    requirements, found at 8 CFR Secs. 3.2(c) and 3.23(b)(3), providing 
    that ``[a]ny motion to reopen for the purpose of acting on an 
    application for relief must be accompanied by the appropriate 
    application for relief and all supporting documents'' for any alien 
    eligible to reopen under section 309(g) of IIRIRA, as amended by 
    section 203 of NACARA. Such aliens may elect to file a motion to reopen 
    initially without an application for relief and supporting documents. 
    The alien must allege in such motion that the alien: (1) is prima facie 
    eligible for suspension of deportation pursuant to section 244(a) of 
    the INA (as in effect prior to April 1, 1997) or the special rule for 
    cancellation of removal pursuant to section 309(f) of IIRIRA, as 
    amended by section 203(b) of NACARA; and (2) was or would be
    
    [[Page 31893]]
    
    ineligible (a) for suspension of deportation by operation of section 
    309(c)(5) of IIRIRA (as in effect prior to November 19, 1997); or (b) 
    for cancellation of removal pursuant to section 240A of the INA, but 
    for operation of section 309(f) of IIRIRA, as amended by section 203(b) 
    of NACARA; and (3) has not been convicted at any time of an aggravated 
    felony; and (4) falls within one of the six classes of aliens described 
    in section 203(a)(1) of NACARA. The alien will then have until February 
    8, 1999 to file an application for suspension of deportation or 
    cancellation of removal and all other supporting documents that would 
    have been filed initially with a standard motion to reopen. A copy of 
    both the motion to reopen and the subsequently filed application for 
    suspension of deportation or cancellation of removal with all other 
    supporting evidence must be served on the Immigration and 
    Naturalization Service (INS or Service). The Service shall have 45 days 
    from the date of service of the completed motion to respond to the 
    motion.
        The motion will be adjudicated only after it has been completed by 
    the filing of the required application for suspension of deportation or 
    cancellation of removal and the Service has submitted a response or the 
    time for response has elapsed. The completed motion will be adjudicated 
    under all applicable statutory and regulatory provisions. Persons 
    filing a motion to reopen under NACARA should follow standard motion 
    practice, as set forth in the regulations, with the exception of the 
    special provisions regarding the filing fee, the submission of the 
    application for relief, and the provisions relating to Immigration 
    Court jurisdiction as set forth in this rule.
        If the alien fails to file the required application by February 8, 
    1999, the motion will be denied as abandoned. In that case, the alien 
    will have lost the alien's one opportunity to move to reopen under 
    section 309(g) of IIRIRA, as amended by section 203(c) of NACARA, for 
    suspension of deportation or cancellation of removal relief. However, 
    an individual may still be eligible to reopen for other reasons as 
    permitted by statute and regulation. The front page of a motion to 
    reopen pursuant to section 309(g) of IIRIRA, as amended by section 
    203(c) of NACARA, and any envelope containing such motion should 
    include the notation ``Special NACARA Motion.'' The $110 filing fee is 
    waived for these motions to reopen pursuant to section 203(c) of 
    NACARA. The requirements and procedures in 8 CFR Secs. 3.31(b), 
    103.7(b)(1) and 240.11(f) for paying the application fee for suspension 
    or cancellation after a motion to reopen is granted, however, are not 
    waived. The alien should submit an Application for Suspension of 
    Deportation (Form EOIR-40) whether or not he or she is in deportation 
    or removal proceedings. The time period for filing the motion is from 
    January 16, 1998 to September 11, 1998. See 63 FR 3154.
        This special provision allowing for the filing of a motion to 
    reopen without the application for relief and supporting documents 
    applies only to motions to reopen under the special rules of section 
    309(g) of IIRIRA, as amended by section 203(c) of NACARA. An alien 
    moving to reopen pursuant to section 309(g) of IIRIRA, as amended by 
    section 203(c) of NACARA, may choose to file a complete motion to 
    reopen accompanied by an application for suspension of deportation or 
    cancellation of removal and all other supporting evidence within the 
    designated time period of January 16, 1998 to September 11, 1998. The 
    Service will then have 45 days to respond to the motion.
    
    ABC Class Members
    
        Any alien listed in section 309(c)(5)(C)(i) of IIRIRA with a final 
    order of deportation or removal must file a motion to reopen pursuant 
    to section 309(g) of IIRIRA, as amended by section 203(c) of NACARA, in 
    order to apply for suspension of deportation or ``special rule'' 
    cancellation of removal. This includes, but is not limited to, the 
    defined class of Salvadorans and Guatemalans who are afforded de novo 
    asylum adjudications pursuant to the settlement agreement in American 
    Baptist Churches v. Thornburgh, 760 F. Supp. 796 (1991) (ABC class 
    members) who were issued final orders by the Board or the Immigration 
    Judge.
        The Attorney General anticipates promulgating regulations this year 
    to delegate to Service asylum officers the authority to adjudicate the 
    applications of certain NACARA beneficiaries for suspension of 
    deportation and ``special rule'' cancellation of removal. It is 
    anticipated that ABC class members who are eligible for ABC benefits 
    (that is, are registered for ABC benefits and have filed an asylum 
    application by the requisite dates: for Guatemalans, by January 3, 
    1995; for Salvadorans, by February 16, 1996) and who have a final order 
    of deportation will have the option to seek adjudication of suspension 
    of deportation before an asylum officer at INS if the motion to reopen 
    is granted. Thus, ABC class members may request administrative closure 
    at the time they file their motion to reopen or after the motion is 
    granted. Their cases may be administratively closed pending 
    promulgation of regulations governing adjudication of suspension of 
    deportation or ``special rule'' cancellation of removal before the INS. 
    An ABC class member who is eligible for ABC benefits, as described 
    above, and whose case previously had been administratively closed by 
    the Immigration Court, is not required to file a motion to reopen under 
    section 309(g) of IIRIRA, as amended by section 203(c) of NACARA , 
    however, as no final order has been issued in such a case.
    
    Jurisdiction Over Motions To Reopen Under Section 203 of NACARA
    
        All motions to reopen filed pursuant to the special rules of 
    section 309(g) of IIRIRA, as amended by section 203(c) of NACARA, shall 
    be filed with the Immigration Court, even if the Board of Immigration 
    Appeals (Board) issued an order in the case. An alien should make all 
    efforts to file such motion to reopen and the completed application for 
    suspension of deportation or cancellation of removal with the 
    Immigration Court that last had jurisdiction over the proceedings 
    because that is the Immigration Court that will adjudicate the motion 
    to reopen. Any motion to reopen under the special rules of section 
    309(g), as amended by section 203(c) of NACARA, filed with the Board or 
    with an Immigration Court other than the one that last had jurisdiction 
    over the proceedings, will be forwarded to the appropriate Immigration 
    Court for adjudication as a timely filed motion if filed on or before 
    September 11, 1998.
        The Department's implementation of this rule as an interim rule, 
    with provision for post-promulgation public comment, is based upon the 
    exception for rules of agency organization, procedures, or practice in 
    5 U.S.C. Sec. 553(b)(3)(A) and upon the ``good cause'' exception found 
    at 5 U.S.C. Secs. 553(b)(3)(B), 553(d)(3). Immediate implementation is 
    necessary because the time period has already been designated for 
    filing motions to reopen under NACARA and will terminate on September 
    11, 1998.
    
    Regulatory Flexibility Act
    
        The Attorney General, in accordance with the Regulatory Flexibility 
    Act (5 U.S.C. 605(b)), has reviewed this regulation and, by approving 
    it, certifies that this rule will not have a significant economic 
    impact on a substantial number of small entities because it affects 
    individual aliens, not small entities.
    
    [[Page 31894]]
    
    Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
    
        This rule will not result in the expenditure by State, local, and 
    tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100 
    million or more in any one year, and it will not significantly or 
    uniquely affect small governments. Therefore, no actions were deemed 
    necessary under the provisions of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 
    1995.
    
    Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
    
        This rule is not a major rule as defined by section 804 of the 
    Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Act of 1996. This rule will not 
    result in annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more; a major 
    increase in costs or prices; or significant adverse effects on 
    competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or on 
    the ability of United States-based companies to compete with foreign-
    based companies in domestic and export markets.
    
    Executive Order 12866
    
        The Attorney General has determined that this rule is a significant 
    regulatory action under Executive Order 12866, and accordingly this 
    rule has been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget.
    
    Executive Order 12612
    
        The regulation adopted herein will not have substantial direct 
    effects on the States, on the relationship between the National 
    government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
    responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in 
    accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this rule 
    does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the 
    preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
    
    Executive Order 12988: Civil Justice Reform
    
        This interim rule meets the applicable standards set forth in 
    sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988.
    
    List of Subjects in 8 CFR Part 3
    
        Administrative practice and procedure, Immigration, Organization 
    and functions (Government agencies).
        Accordingly, part 3 of chapter I of Title 8 of the Code of Federal 
    Regulations is amended as follows:
    
    PART 3--EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW
    
        1. The authority citation for part 3 is revised to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 8 U.S.C. 1103, 1252 note, 1252b, 1324b, 
    1362; 28 U.S.C. 509, 510, 1746; sec. 2 Reorg. Plan No. 2 of 1950; 3 
    CFR, 1949-1953 Comp., p. 1002; section 203 of Pub. L. 105-100.
    
        2. Section 3.43 is added to subpart C to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 3.43  Motion to Reopen for Suspension of Deportation and 
    Cancellation of Removal pursuant to Section 203(c) of the Nicaraguan 
    Adjustment and Central American Relief Act (NACARA).
    
        (a) Standard for Adjudication. Except as provided in this section, 
    a motion to reopen proceedings under section 309(g) of IIRIRA, as 
    amended by section 203(c) of NACARA, will be adjudicated under 
    applicable statutes and regulations governing motions to reopen.
        (b) Aliens eligible to reopen proceedings under section 203 of 
    NACARA. A motion to reopen proceedings to apply for suspension of 
    deportation or cancellation of removal under the special rules of 
    section 309(g) of IIRIRA, as amended by section 203(c) of NACARA, must 
    establish that the alien:
        (1) Is prima facie eligible for suspension of deportation pursuant 
    to section 244(a) of the INA (as in effect prior to April 1, 1997) or 
    the special rule for cancellation of removal pursuant to section 309(f) 
    of IIRIRA, as amended by section 203(b) of NACARA;
        (2) Was or would be ineligible:
        (i) For suspension of deportation by operation of section 309(c)(5) 
    of IIRIRA (as in effect prior to November 19, 1997); or
        (ii) For cancellation of removal pursuant to section 240A of the 
    INA, but for operation of section 309(f) of IIRIRA, as amended by 
    section 203(b) of NACARA;
        (3) Has not been convicted at any time of an aggravated felony; and
        (4) Is within one of the following six classes:
        (i) A national of El Salvador who:
        (A) First entered the United States on or before September 19, 
    1990;
        (B) Registered for benefits pursuant to the settlement agreement in 
    American Baptist Churches, et al. v. Thornburgh, 760 F.Supp. 796 (N.D. 
    Cal. 1991) (ABC) on or before October 31, 1991, or applied for 
    Temporary Protected Status (TPS) on or before October 31, 1991; and
        (C) Was not apprehended after December 19, 1990, at time of entry; 
    or
        (ii) A national of Guatemala who:
        (A) First entered the United States on or before October 1, 1990;
        (B) Registered for ABC benefits on or before December 31, 1991; and
        (C) Was not apprehended after December 19, 1990, at time of entry; 
    or
        (iii) A national of Guatemala or El Salvador who applied for asylum 
    with INS on or before April 1, 1990; or
        (iv) An alien who:
        (A) Entered the United States on or before December 31, 1990;
        (B) Applied for asylum on or before December 31, 1991; and
        (c) At the time of filing such application for asylum was a 
    national of the Soviet Union, Russia, any republic of the former Soviet 
    Union, Latvia, Estonia, Lithuania, Poland, Czechoslovakia, Romania, 
    Hungary, Bulgaria, Albania, East Germany, Yugoslavia, or any state of 
    the former Yugoslavia; or
        (v) The spouse or child of a person described under paragraphs 
    (b)(4)(i) through (b)(4)(iv) of this section who was a spouse or child 
    of such person at the time the person was granted suspension of 
    deportation or cancellation of removal; or
        (vi) An unmarried son or daughter of a parent, who is described 
    under paragraphs (b)(4)(i) through (b)(4)(iv) of this section, at the 
    time the parent is granted suspension of deportation or cancellation of 
    removal, provided that, if the son or daughter is 21 years of age or 
    older at the time the parent is granted suspension of deportation or 
    cancellation of removal, the son or daughter must have entered the 
    United States on or before October 1, 1990.
        (c) Motion to reopen under section 203 of NACARA. (1) An alien 
    filing a motion to reopen proceedings pursuant to section 309(g) of 
    IIRIRA, as amended by section 203(c) of NACARA, may initially file a 
    motion to reopen without an application for suspension of deportation 
    or cancellation of removal and supporting documents, but the motion 
    must be filed no later than September 11, 1998. The alien must allege 
    in such motion to reopen that the alien:
        (i) Is prima facie eligible for suspension of deportation pursuant 
    to section 244(a) of the INA (as in effect prior to April 1, 1997) or 
    the special rule for cancellation of removal pursuant to section 309(g) 
    of IIRIRA, as amended by section 203(b) of NACARA;
        (ii) Was or would be ineligible:
        (A) For suspension of deportation by operation of section 309(c)(5) 
    of IIRIRA (as in effect prior to November 19, 1997); or
        (B) For cancellation of removal pursuant to section 240A of the 
    INA, but for operation of section 309(f) of IIRIRA, as amended by 
    section 203(b) of NACARA;
        (iii) Has not been convicted at any time of an aggravated felony; 
    and
    
    [[Page 31895]]
    
        (iv) Falls within one of the six classes described in paragraph 
    (b)(4) of this section.
        (2) A motion to reopen filed without an application for suspension 
    of deportation or cancellation of removal shall not be considered 
    complete until it has been supplemented with the application for 
    suspension of deportation or cancellation of removal and all other 
    supporting documentation. An alien shall have until February 8, 1999 to 
    complete that motion. A motion to reopen filed without an application 
    and supporting documents will not be adjudicated until it is completed 
    with the required application for suspension of deportation or 
    cancellation of removal and supporting documents. The Service shall 
    have 45 days from the date of service of the application for suspension 
    of deportation or cancellation of removal to respond to that completed 
    motion. If the alien fails to file the required application by 150 days 
    after September 11, 1998 the motion will be denied as abandoned.
        (c) Fee for motion to reopen waived. No filing fee is required for 
    a motion to reopen to apply for suspension of deportation or 
    cancellation of removal under the special rules of section 309(g) of 
    IIRIRA, as amended by section 203(c) of NACARA.
        (d) Jurisdiction over motions to reopen under section 203 of NACARA 
    and remand of appeals. (1) Notwithstanding any other provisions, any 
    motion to reopen filed pursuant to the special rules of section 309(g) 
    of IIRIRA, as amended by section 203(c) of NACARA, shall be filed with 
    the Immigration Court, even if the Board of Immigration Appeals issued 
    an order in the case. The Immigration Court that last had jurisdiction 
    over the proceedings will adjudicate a motion to reopen filed pursuant 
    to the special rules of section 309(g) of IIRIRA, as amended by section 
    203(c) of NACARA.
        (2) The Board will remand to the Immigration Court any presently 
    pending appeal in which the alien appears eligible to apply for 
    suspension of deportation or cancellation of removal under the special 
    rules of section 309(g) of IIRIRA, as amended by section 203 of NACARA, 
    and appears prima facie eligible for that relief. The alien will then 
    have the opportunity to apply for suspension or cancellation under the 
    special rules of NACARA before the Immigration Court.
    
        Dated: June 5, 1998.
    Janet Reno,
    Attorney General.
    [FR Doc. 98-15588 Filed 6-10-98; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4410-30-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
6/11/1998
Published:
06/11/1998
Department:
Justice Department
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Interim rule with request for comments.
Document Number:
98-15588
Dates:
Effective date: This interim rule is effective June 11, 1998.
Pages:
31890-31895 (6 pages)
Docket Numbers:
EOIR No. 121P, AG Order No. 2162-98
RINs:
1125-AA23
PDF File:
98-15588.pdf
CFR: (1)
8 CFR 3.43