96-15166. Negotiated Rulemaking Advisory Committee on Tuna Management in the Mid-Atlantic  

  • [Federal Register Volume 61, Number 116 (Friday, June 14, 1996)]
    [Proposed Rules]
    [Page 30214]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 96-15166]
    
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
    50 CFR Part 285
    
    [I.D. 112995B]
    
    
    Negotiated Rulemaking Advisory Committee on Tuna Management in 
    the Mid-Atlantic
    
    AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
    Atmospheric Administration, Commerce.
    
    ACTION: Notice of intent; update.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: In February 1996, NMFS announced that Commerce was considering 
    establishing a new advisory committee under the Federal Advisory 
    Committee Act (FACA) to negotiate certain issues between commercial and 
    recreational fishermen competing for tuna off the Mid-Atlantic coast. 
    NMFS has decided to schedule a public meeting for early fall 1996 to 
    brief interested parties on the negotiated rulemaking process and 
    obtain their views as to immediate steps for action that would permit 
    resolution prior to next year's fishing season.
    
    ADDRESSES: Comments should be submitted to the Highly Migratory Species 
    Division, NMFS, 1315 East-West Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark Murray-Brown, 301-713-2347.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On February 1, 1996, NMFS announced that 
    Commerce was considering establishing a new advisory committee under 
    FACA to negotiate issues leading to a proposed rule resolving the gear 
    conflict between recreational and commercial fishermen competing for 
    tuna off the Mid-Atlantic coast (61 FR 3666, February 1, 1996). The 
    decision to use a negotiated rulemaking process--in accordance with the 
    Presidential Directive of March 4, 1995, the report of the National 
    Performance Review, and EO 12866--came in response to the National 
    Fishing Association's petition to employ such a procedure in connection 
    with the tuna dispute. The goal is to produce better regulations, use 
    parties' time and resources more wisely, and reduce litigation, 
    controversy, and uncertainty. The announcement described generally how 
    an advisory committee would be established, participants selected, and 
    requests for representation narrowed. It also set forth a list of 
    possible interests and participants and sought comment on the tentative 
    pool of representatives. Finally, the document set forth a tentative 
    schedule, indicating NMFS' plans to hold meetings of the advisory 
    committee at 2-week intervals starting in March 1996. This document 
    supplements the February announcement, and is intended to provide an 
    update. While NMFS had hoped to start, and finish, the negotiated 
    rulemaking process before the 1996 fishery, this has not been possible.
        Following the announcement, NMFS contracted with two dispute 
    resolution professionals, Philip J. Harter and Charles Pou of 
    Washington, DC, for advice on establishment of the advisory committee 
    and to facilitate and mediate the negotiations. The contractors have 
    begun to contact representatives of groups that responded to NMFS's 
    announcement and will be speaking to all of these persons in the near 
    future. The initial contacts indicate that most fishermen are now 
    concentrating on preparing for the summer tuna fishery and, hence, it 
    would be more convenient to postpone any negotiations until near the 
    end of the 1996 season. The contractors have therefore recommended that 
    NMFS hold a public briefing on the negotiated rulemaking process in 
    early fall 1996 and select advisory committee members and commence 
    negotiations soon after the public briefing. NMFS agrees with, and will 
    implement, these recommendations.
        The fall 1996 session will bring together representatives of as 
    many affected interests as possible, as well as any others who want to 
    attend, for a briefing on the negotiated rulemaking process; an 
    opportunity for interested persons to offer views and discuss specific 
    potential issues that should be addressed in such a process; and a 
    chance to consider immediate steps for action that would permit 
    resolution prior to commencement of next year's fishing season.
        NMFS will work with the contractors over the summer to clarify 
    issues and develop an agenda for the fall briefing, and welcomes input 
    on these matters from interested persons. In addition, the discussion 
    at the fall session, and subsequent negotiations, will be improved 
    substantially if parties collect relevant data and other useful 
    information over the summer, to permit these talks to proceed on the 
    basis of fact. For this reason, NMFS encourages all parties to use the 
    summer to identify and collect information that substantiates or 
    illuminates their claims and concerns.
    
        Authority: 16 U.S.C. 971 et seq.
    
        Dated: June 7, 1996.
    Richard H. Schaefer,
    Director, Office of Fisheries Conservation and Management, National 
    Marine Fisheries Service.
    [FR Doc. 96-15166 Filed 6-13-96; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 3510-22-F
    
    

Document Information

Published:
06/14/1996
Department:
Commerce Department
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Notice of intent; update.
Document Number:
96-15166
Pages:
30214-30214 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
I.D. 112995B
PDF File:
96-15166.pdf
CFR: (1)
50 CFR 285