98-16697. Airworthiness Directives; Saab Model SAAB SF340A, SAAB 340B, and SAAB 2000 Series Airplanes  

  • [Federal Register Volume 63, Number 122 (Thursday, June 25, 1998)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 34587-34589]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 98-16697]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    
    Federal Aviation Administration
    
    14 CFR Part 39
    
    [Docket No. 96-NM-212-AD; Amendment 39-10627; AD 98-13-36]
    RIN 2120-AA64
    
    
    Airworthiness Directives; Saab Model SAAB SF340A, SAAB 340B, and 
    SAAB 2000 Series Airplanes
    
    AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD), 
    applicable to certain Saab Model SAAB SF340A, SAAB 340B, and SAAB 2000 
    series airplanes, that requires repetitive operational tests of the 
    pitch trim system of the elevator trim-tab of the flight control unit 
    to ensure that the system operates correctly, and repair if necessary. 
    This amendment is prompted by a report of uncommanded movement of the 
    right-hand elevator trim-tab to a maximum deflection position, which 
    was apparently due to a failure in the aircraft harness and a fault in 
    the pitch trim synchronizer. The actions specified by this AD are 
    intended to prevent such uncommanded movement of the elevator trim-tab, 
    which could lead to structural overload of the horizontal stabilizers 
    at speeds above 180 knots, and consequent reduced controllability of 
    the airplane.
    
    DATES: Effective July 30, 1998.
        The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in 
    the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as 
    of July 30, 1998.
    
    ADDRESSES: The service information referenced in this AD may be 
    obtained from SAAB Aircraft AB, SAAB Aircraft Product Support, S-
    581.88, Linkoping, Sweden. This information may be examined at the 
    Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate, 
    Rules Docket, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the 
    Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 
    700, Washington, DC.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Norman B. Martenson, Manager, 
    International Branch, ANM-116, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 
    1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98055-4056; telephone (425) 
    227-2110; fax (425) 227-1149.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal 
    Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to
    
    [[Page 34588]]
    
    include an airworthiness directive (AD) that is applicable to certain 
    Saab Model SAAB SF340A, SAAB 340B, and SAAB 2000 series airplanes was 
    published in the Federal Register on May 9, 1997 (62 FR 25566). That 
    action proposed to require repetitive operational tests of the pitch 
    trim system of the elevator trim-tab of the flight control unit to 
    ensure that the system operates correctly, and repair, if necessary.
    
    Consideration of Comments Received
    
        Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate 
    in the making of this amendment. Due consideration has been given to 
    the comments received.
        Two commenters support the proposed AD.
    
    Requests to Withdraw the AD
    
        Two commenters suggest that the proposed AD is no longer required 
    because the proposed action already is being performed by the operators 
    in accordance with their usual maintenance procedures. One commenter 
    states that it is redundant to issue an AD that would require the 
    operational tests to be performed when those checks are already a 
    mandatory task in its maintenance program. The manufacturer states that 
    procedures for these tests have been included in the Saab Maintenance 
    Review Board (MRB) Document (task 27-3210), which specifies repetitive 
    checks every 150 flight hours. In addition, commenters state that Saab 
    Service Bulletin 340-27-079, dated December 22, 1995, which describes 
    procedures for the tests required by the proposed AD, has been 
    canceled.
        The FAA acknowledges that the operator's maintenance program and 
    manufacturer's MRB document may include the same information as the 
    proposed AD and service bulletin. However, the FAA has determined that 
    such programs and documents are not the appropriate means to address 
    the unsafe condition; an airworthiness directive is issued to address 
    an unsafe condition. In addition, the FAA has determined that allowing 
    each operator to determine whether and how often operational tests 
    should be conducted will not ensure an acceptable level of safety, and 
    that allowing this degree of operator discretion is not appropriate in 
    this case. Therefore, this AD is necessary to ensure that operators 
    accomplish operational tests in a common manner and at common intervals 
    to ensure compliance and public safety.
    
    Request to Limit the Applicability of the AD
    
        The manufacturer states that, on all Saab Model SAAB 2000 series 
    airplanes, the mechanical elevator control system (MECS) has been 
    replaced by the powered elevator control system (PECS). For this 
    reason, the manufacturer maintains that operational tests for the pitch 
    trim system on these airplanes are no longer required.
        The FAA infers that the manufacturer requests that the FAA limit 
    the applicability of the proposed AD to exclude Model SAAB 2000 series 
    airplanes equipped with PECS. The FAA concurs with this request and 
    agrees that, for Model SAAB SF340A, SAAB 340B, and SAAB 2000 series 
    airplanes equipped with PECS, the actions required by the proposed AD 
    are no longer required. Therefore, the FAA has removed such airplanes 
    from the applicability of the final rule.
    
    Requests to Incorporate the Manufacturer's Repair Instructions Into 
    the Final Rule
    
        Two commenters request that the proposed AD be revised to 
    incorporate the manufacturer's repair instructions into the final rule. 
    In support of these requests, the manufacturer has provided repair 
    instructions in its comments. The commenters state that, if a problem 
    is encountered during an inspection, the requirement to contact the FAA 
    for repair instructions could cause operators to incur long down times 
    while waiting for such instructions.
        Although the FAA does not concur with the requests to incorporate 
    the manufacturer's repair instructions into the final rule, it has 
    taken into account the commenters' concerns about potential delays in 
    receiving repair instructions. The FAA has been advised by the 
    manufacturer that it has developed a repair procedure to isolate the 
    fault and has developed a repair for the elevator trim synchronizer 
    system in the event that the operational test fails. The FAA also has 
    been advised that this repair procedure now has been included in the 
    Saab 340 Aircraft Maintenance Manual (AMM) 27-32-30, dated January 1, 
    1998. The FAA has reviewed this procedure and finds that it may be used 
    as an acceptable means of compliance for the repair required by 
    paragraph (a)(2) of this AD. Accordingly, the FAA has revised this 
    final rule to include a new NOTE specifying that the repair may be 
    accomplished in accordance with the Saab 340 AMM.
        In addition, the FAA has revised paragraph (a)(2) of the final rule 
    to specify that repairs may be accomplished in accordance with a method 
    approved by either the Manager, International Branch, ANM-116, FAA, 
    Transport Airplane Directorate, or the Luftfartsverket (LFV), which is 
    the airworthiness authority for Sweden. In light of the type of repair 
    required to ensure that the pitch trim system operates correctly, and 
    in consonance with existing bilateral airworthiness agreements, the FAA 
    has determined that, for this AD, such a repair approved by either the 
    FAA or the LFV (or its delegated agent) would be acceptable for 
    compliance with this AD.
    
    Conclusion
    
        After careful review of the available data, including the comments 
    noted above, the FAA has determined that air safety and the public 
    interest require the adoption of the rule with the changes previously 
    described. The FAA has determined that these changes will neither 
    increase the economic burden on any operator nor increase the scope of 
    the AD.
    
    Interim Action
    
        This is considered to be interim action until final action is 
    identified, at which time the FAA may consider further rulemaking.
    
    Cost Impact
    
        The FAA estimates that 235 Model SAAB SF340A and SAAB 340B series 
    airplanes of U.S. registry will be affected by this AD. Currently, 
    there are no Model SAAB 2000 series airplanes of U.S. registry that 
    would be affected by this AD. The FAA estimates that it will take 
    approximately 1 work hour per airplane to accomplish the required 
    actions, and that the average labor rate is $60 per work hour. Based on 
    these figures, the cost impact of the AD on U.S. operators is estimated 
    to be $14,100, or $60 per airplane, per operational test.
        The cost impact figure discussed above is based on assumptions that 
    no operator has yet accomplished any of the requirements of this AD 
    action, and that no operator would accomplish those actions in the 
    future if this AD were not adopted.
    
    Regulatory Impact
    
        The regulations adopted herein will not have substantial direct 
    effects on the States, on the relationship between the national 
    government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
    responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in 
    accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this final 
    rule does
    
    [[Page 34589]]
    
    not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the preparation 
    of a Federalism Assessment.
        For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is 
    not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866; 
    (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and 
    Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a 
    significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial 
    number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory 
    Flexibility Act. A final evaluation has been prepared for this action 
    and it is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained 
    from the Rules Docket at the location provided under the caption 
    ADDRESSES.
    
    List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
    
        Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by 
    reference, Safety.
    
    Adoption of the Amendment
    
        Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the 
    Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of 
    the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
    
    PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
    
        1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
    
    
    Sec. 39.13  [Amended]
    
        2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new 
    airworthiness directive:
    
    98-13-36  SAAB Aircraft AB: Amendment 39-10627. Docket 96-NM-212-AD.
    
        Applicability: Model SAAB SF340A series airplanes, serial 
    numbers -004 through -159, inclusive; Model SAAB 340B series 
    airplanes, serial numbers -160 and subsequent; and SAAB 2000 series 
    airplanes, serial numbers -005 and -007 through -009, inclusive; 
    equipped with a mechanical elevator control system (MECS); 
    certificated in any category.
    
        Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the 
    preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been 
    modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the 
    requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified, 
    altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of 
    this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an 
    alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (b) of 
    this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of 
    the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition 
    addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been 
    eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to 
    address it.
    
        Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished 
    previously.
        To prevent uncommanded movement of the right-hand elevator trim-
    tab to a maximum deflection position, which could lead to structural 
    overload of the horizontal stabilizers at speeds above 180 knots, 
    and consequent reduced controllability of the airplane, accomplish 
    the following:
        (a) Within 150 hours time-in-service after the effective date of 
    this AD, perform an operational test of the pitch trim system that 
    moves the elevator trim-tab of the flight control unit to ensure 
    that the system operates correctly, in accordance with Saab Service 
    Bulletins 340-27-079 (for Model SAAB SF340A and SF340B series 
    airplanes); or 2000-27-018 (for Model SAAB 2000 series airplanes); 
    both dated December 22, 1995; as applicable.
        (1) If no discrepancy is found, repeat the operational test of 
    the pitch trim system thereafter at intervals not to exceed 150 
    hours time-in-service.
        (2) If any discrepancy is found, prior to further flight, 
    accomplish repairs in accordance with a method approved by either 
    the Manager, International Branch, ANM-116, FAA, Transport Airplane 
    Directorate, or the Luftfartsverket (LFV), or its delegated agent.
    
        Note 2: Accomplishment of the repair required by paragraph 
    (a)(2) of this AD, in accordance with Saab 340 Aircraft Maintenance 
    Manual 27-32-30, dated January 1, 1998, is considered acceptable for 
    compliance with the applicable action specified in this AD.
    
        (b) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the 
    compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be 
    used if approved by the Manager, International Branch, ANM-116. 
    Operators shall submit their requests through an appropriate FAA 
    Principal Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send 
    it to the Manager, International Branch, ANM-116.
    
        Note 3: Information concerning the existence of approved 
    alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be 
    obtained from the International Branch, ANM-116.
    
        (c) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with 
    sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 
    CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where 
    the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
        (d) The operational test shall be done in accordance with Saab 
    Service Bulletin 340-27-079, dated December 22, 1995, or Saab 
    Service Bulletin 2000-27-018, dated December 22, 1995, as 
    applicable. This incorporation by reference was previously approved 
    by the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 
    552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Copies may be obtained from SAAB Aircraft 
    AB, SAAB Aircraft Product Support, S-581.88, Linkoping, Sweden. 
    Copies may be inspected at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 
    1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the Office of the 
    Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, 
    Washington, DC.
    
        Note 4: The subject of this AD is addressed in Swedish 
    airworthiness directive SAD No. 1-083, Revision 1, dated January 2, 
    1996.
    
        (e) This amendment becomes effective on July 30, 1998.
    
        Issued in Renton, Washington, on June 17, 1998.
    Darrell M. Pederson,
    Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
    Service.
    [FR Doc. 98-16697 Filed 6-24-98; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-13-U
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
7/30/1998
Published:
06/25/1998
Department:
Federal Aviation Administration
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
98-16697
Dates:
Effective July 30, 1998.
Pages:
34587-34589 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 96-NM-212-AD, Amendment 39-10627, AD 98-13-36
RINs:
2120-AA64: Airworthiness Directives
RIN Links:
https://www.federalregister.gov/regulations/2120-AA64/airworthiness-directives
PDF File:
98-16697.pdf
CFR: (1)
14 CFR 39.13