99-16326. Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 747-300 and -400 Series Airplanes  

  • [Federal Register Volume 64, Number 124 (Tuesday, June 29, 1999)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 34707-34710]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 99-16326]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    
    Federal Aviation Administration
    
    14 CFR Part 39
    
    [Docket No. 99-NM-45-AD; Amendment 39-11212; AD 99-14-04]
    RIN 2120-AA64
    
    
    Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 747-300 and -400 Series 
    Airplanes
    
    AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
    
    ACTION: Final rule; request for comments.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD) that 
    is applicable to certain Boeing Model 747-300 and -400 series 
    airplanes. This action requires repetitive inspections of the E-42 
    satellite communications (SATCOM) rack and fuselage (supporting) 
    structure to detect cracking in the area surrounding the fastener 
    holes, and to detect broken and missing fasteners; and corrective 
    actions, if necessary. This amendment is prompted by reports indicating 
    that cracking and broken and/or missing fasteners were found on the E-
    42 SATCOM equipment rack structure that attaches to the fuselage 
    structure. The actions specified in this AD are intended to detect and 
    repair cracking of the E-42 SATCOM rack and its supporting structure, 
    which could result in the SATCOM equipment falling from the rack, loss 
    of SATCOM capabilities, injury to passengers, and reduced 
    controllability of the airplane.
    
    DATES: Effective July 14, 1999.
        The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in 
    the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as 
    of July 14, 1999.
        Comments for inclusion in the Rules Docket must be received on or 
    before August 30, 1999.
    
    ADDRESSES: Submit comments in triplicate to the Federal Aviation 
    Administration (FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate, ANM-114, 
    Attention: Rules Docket No. 99-NM-45-AD, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, 
    Washington 98055-4056.
        The service information referenced in this AD may be obtained from 
    Boeing Commercial Airplane Group, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, Washington 
    98124-2207. This information may be examined at the FAA, Transport 
    Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at 
    the Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., 
    suite 700, Washington, DC.
    
    
    [[Page 34708]]
    
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth A. Gnehm, Aerospace 
    Engineer, Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, Transport Airplane 
    Directorate, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue, 
    SW., Renton, Washington 98055-4056; telephone (425) 227-1426; fax (425) 
    227-1181.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA has received reports indicating that 
    cracking and broken and/or missing fasteners were found on the E-42 
    SATCOM equipment rack structure that attaches to the fuselage structure 
    on several Boeing Model 747-300 and -400 series airplanes. 
    Investigation revealed that one of the four stanchions (i.e., a 
    supporting prop or brace) was found completely broken on two airplanes 
    (one that had accumulated 23,693 total flight hours and the other with 
    24,752 total flight hours). Further investigation revealed that the 
    rigid joints of the supporting structure of the E-42 SATCOM rack, 
    coupled with environmental vibration of the airplane, may have caused 
    the cracking to initiate in the area surrounding the fastener holes 
    (located at the rigid joints) of the supporting structure of the E-42 
    SATCOM rack. The FAA also has received a report indicating that 
    cracking has been detected on four freighter airplanes; one of the 
    airplanes had accumulated less than 1,500 total flight hours.
        On all airplanes, the E-42 SATCOM rack hangs above the main deck 
    ceiling. On freighter airplanes and ``combi'' airplanes (i.e., 
    configurations with provisions for passenger seating and cargo on the 
    main deck), the E-42 SATCOM rack is located near rudder and elevator 
    control cables, and the SATCOM wires run above the rudder and elevator 
    control cables.
        On all airplanes, failure of the rack and its supporting structure 
    could result in loss of support for the E-42 SATCOM equipment, which 
    could lead to chafing and arcing of the electrical wires and loss of 
    SATCOM capabilities. Such failure also could result in the following 
    unsafe conditions:
         On passenger-only airplanes, the E-42 SATCOM equipment 
    could break through the ceiling, which could result in injury to 
    passengers.
         On freighter and ``combi'' airplanes, the E-42 SATCOM 
    equipment could fall and cause the SATCOM wires to pull and possibly 
    break the rudder and/or elevator control cables, which could result in 
    reduced controllability of the airplane. Failure of the SATCOM rack on 
    ``combi'' airplanes carrying passengers also could result in injury to 
    the passengers.
    
    Explanation of Relevant Service Information
    
        The FAA has reviewed and approved Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 
    747-53A2428, dated December 17, 1998, which describes procedures for 
    repetitive close visual inspections of the E-42 SATCOM rack and 
    fuselage (supporting) structure to detect cracking in the area 
    surrounding the fastener holes, and to detect broken or missing 
    fasteners.
    
    Explanation of the Requirements of the Rule
    
        Since an unsafe condition has been identified that is likely to 
    exist or develop on other airplanes of the same type design, this AD is 
    being issued to detect and repair cracking of the E-42 SATCOM rack and 
    its supporting structure, which could result in the SATCOM equipment 
    falling from the rack, loss of SATCOM capabilities, injury to 
    passengers, and reduced controllability of the airplane. This AD 
    requires accomplishment of the actions specified in the alert service 
    bulletin described previously, except as discussed below. This AD also 
    requires that operators report results of initial inspection findings 
    to the manufacturer.
    
    Interim Action
    
        This is considered to be interim action. The manufacturer has 
    advised that it currently is developing a modification that will 
    positively address the unsafe condition addressed by this AD. Once this 
    modification is developed, approved, and available, the FAA may 
    consider additional rulemaking.
    
    Differences Between AD and Alert Service Bulletin
    
        Operators should note that, although the Boeing alert service 
    bulletin specifies that the manufacturer may be contacted for 
    disposition of certain conditions, this proposal would require the 
    repair of those conditions to be accomplished in accordance with a 
    method approved by the FAA.
        Operators also should note that the Boeing alert service bulletin 
    specifies that the manufacturer determine the repetitive inspection 
    intervals in the event a repair and/or replacement of the fasteners is 
    necessary. This AD would require repetitive inspections of the E-42 
    SATCOM rack and its supporting structure at intervals not exceeding 
    3,000 flight cycles, whether a repair and/or replacement of fasteners 
    is required or not. While a manufacturer Designated Engineering 
    Representative (DER) is authorized to determine whether a design or 
    repair method complies with a specific requirement, at this time the 
    FAA has not delegated the authority to a manufacturer DER to make the 
    discretionary determination for repetitive inspection requirements.
    
    Explanation of Applicability
    
        Operators should note that the Boeing alert service bulletin 
    (previously described), does not specify the line number for the 
    effectivity of Boeing Model 747-400 series airplanes, but states that 
    ``a line number will be specified at a later date,'' when a design 
    improvement can be incorporated into the production line. To account 
    for this interpretative effectivity, this AD is applicable to Boeing 
    Model 747-300 series airplanes as listed in the alert service bulletin 
    and Boeing Model 747-400 series airplanes equipped with a Boeing-
    installed E-42 SATCOM rack. As discussed previously, because this AD is 
    considered interim action, applicability may be revised accordingly in 
    subsequent AD action.
    
    Explanation of Compliance Time
    
        Operators should note that the Boeing alert service bulletin 
    (previously described) recommends that the initial inspection be 
    performed at the applicable time, as specified below:
         For airplanes identified in the alert service as Group 1: 
    Within 500 flight hours or within 14,000 flight hours since the E-42 
    SATCOM rack was installed and populated with equipment.
         For airplanes identified in the alert service as Groups 2, 
    3, and 4: Within 500 flight hours or 20,000 flight hours since the E-42 
    SATCOM rack was installed and populated with equipment.
        This AD would require that the initial inspection be performed at 
    the applicable time, as specified below:
         For airplanes identified in the alert service bulletin as 
    Group 1: Within 30 days after the effective date of this AD.
         For airplanes identified in the alert service bulletin as 
    Groups 2, 3, and 4: Within 90 days after the effective date of this AD.
        The FAA finds that, in view of a recent report indicating that 
    cracking has been detected on an airplane that had accumulated less 
    than 1,500 total flight hours, and because of the safety implications 
    and consequences associated with such cracking, the initial compliance 
    time specified in this AD is appropriate.
    
    Determination of Rule's Effective Date
    
        Since a situation exists that requires the immediate adoption of 
    this regulation, it is found that notice and
    
    [[Page 34709]]
    
    opportunity for prior public comment hereon are impracticable, and that 
    good cause exists for making this amendment effective in less than 30 
    days.
    
    Comments Invited
    
        Although this action is in the form of a final rule that involves 
    requirements affecting flight safety and, thus, was not preceded by 
    notice and an opportunity for public comment, comments are invited on 
    this rule. Interested persons are invited to comment on this rule by 
    submitting such written data, views, or arguments as they may desire. 
    Communications shall identify the Rules Docket number and be submitted 
    in triplicate to the address specified under the caption ADDRESSES. All 
    communications received on or before the closing date for comments will 
    be considered, and this rule may be amended in light of the comments 
    received. Factual information that supports the commenter's ideas and 
    suggestions is extremely helpful in evaluating the effectiveness of the 
    AD action and determining whether additional rulemaking action would be 
    needed.
        Comments are specifically invited on the overall regulatory, 
    economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the rule that might 
    suggest a need to modify the rule. All comments submitted will be 
    available, both before and after the closing date for comments, in the 
    Rules Docket for examination by interested persons. A report that 
    summarizes each FAA-public contact concerned with the substance of this 
    AD will be filed in the Rules Docket.
        Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments 
    submitted in response to this rule must submit a self-addressed, 
    stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments 
    to Docket Number 99-NM-45-AD.'' The postcard will be date stamped and 
    returned to the commenter.
    
    Regulatory Impact
    
        The regulations adopted herein will not have substantial direct 
    effects on the States, on the relationship between the national 
    government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
    responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in 
    accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this final 
    rule does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the 
    preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
        The FAA has determined that this regulation is an emergency 
    regulation that must be issued immediately to correct an unsafe 
    condition in aircraft, and that it is not a ``significant regulatory 
    action'' under Executive Order 12866. It has been determined further 
    that this action involves an emergency regulation under DOT Regulatory 
    Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979). If it is 
    determined that this emergency regulation otherwise would be 
    significant under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures, a final 
    regulatory evaluation will be prepared and placed in the Rules Docket. 
    A copy of it, if filed, may be obtained from the Rules Docket at the 
    location provided under the caption ADDRESSES.
    
    List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
    
        Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by 
    reference, Safety.
    
    Adoption of the Amendment
    
        Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the 
    Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of 
    the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
    
    PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
    
        1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
    
    
    Sec. 39.13  [Amended]
    
        2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new 
    airworthiness directive:
    
    99-14-04 Boeing: Amendment 39-11212. Docket 99-NM-45-AD.
    
        Applicability: Model 747-300 series airplanes, as listed in 
    Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2428, dated December 17, 1998; 
    and Model 747-400 series airplanes equipped with a Boeing installed 
    E-42 satellite communications (SATCOM) rack; certificated in any 
    category.
    
        Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the 
    preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been 
    modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the 
    requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified, 
    altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of 
    this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an 
    alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (d) of 
    this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of 
    the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition 
    addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been 
    eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to 
    address it.
    
        Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished 
    previously.
        To detect and repair cracking of the E-42 SATCOM rack and its 
    supporting structure, which could result in the SATCOM equipment 
    falling from the rack, loss of SATCOM capabilities, injury to 
    passengers, and reduced controllability of the airplane, accomplish 
    the following:
    
    Initial and Repetitive Detailed Visual Inspections
    
        (a) Perform a detailed visual inspection of the E-42 SATCOM rack 
    and fuselage (supporting) structure to detect cracking in the area 
    surrounding the fastener holes, and to detect broken or missing 
    fasteners, in accordance with Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-
    53A2428, dated December 17, 1998, at the time specified in paragraph 
    (a)(1) or (a)(2) of this AD, as applicable. Thereafter, repeat the 
    inspection at intervals not to exceed 3,000 flight hours.
        (1) For airplanes identified as Group 1: Within 30 days after 
    the effective date of this AD.
        (2) For airplanes identified as Groups 2, 3, and 4: Within 90 
    days after the effective date of this AD.
    
        Note 2: For the purposes of this AD, a detailed inspection is 
    defined as: ``An intensive visual examination of a specific 
    structural area, system, installation or assembly to detect damage, 
    failure or irregularity. Available lighting is normally supplemented 
    with a direct source of good lighting at intensity deemed 
    appropriate by the inspector. Inspection aids such as mirror, 
    magnifying lenses, etc. may be used. Surface cleaning and elaborate 
    access procedures may be required.''
    
    Corrective Actions
    
        (b) If any cracking is found, or if any fastener is broken or 
    missing, during any inspection required by paragraph (a) of this AD, 
    prior to further flight: Repair in accordance with a method approved 
    by the Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA, 
    Transport Airplane Directorate; or in accordance with data meeting 
    the type certification basis of the airplane approved by a Boeing 
    Company Designated Engineering Representative who has been 
    authorized by the Manager, Seattle ACO, to make such findings. 
    Repeat the detailed visual inspection of the SATCOM rack and 
    fuselage (supporting) structure thereafter at the intervals 
    specified by paragraph (a) of this AD.
    
    Reporting Requirements
    
        (c) Submit a report of the initial inspection findings (positive 
    and negative) to Boeing Commercial Airplane Group, Attention: 
    Manager, Airline Support, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, Washington 98124-
    2207; at the time specified in paragraph (c)(1) or (c)(2) of this 
    AD, as applicable. The report must include a description of any 
    discrepancy found, the airplane serial number, the number of 
    landings and flight hours on the airplane, and, when possible, 
    sketches and photographs of the inspected area. Information 
    collection requirements contained in this regulation have been 
    approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the 
    provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et 
    seq.) and have been assigned OMB Control Number 2120-0056.
    
    [[Page 34710]]
    
        (1) For airplanes on which the initial inspection is 
    accomplished after the effective date of this AD: Submit the report 
    within 10 days after performing the initial inspection required by 
    paragraph (a) of this AD.
        (2) For airplanes on which the initial inspection has been 
    accomplished prior to the effective date of this AD: Submit the 
    report within 30 days after the effective date of this AD.
    
    Alternative Methods of Compliance
    
        (d) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the 
    compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be 
    used if approved by the Manager, Seattle ACO. Operators shall submit 
    their requests through an appropriate FAA Principal Maintenance 
    Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the Manager, 
    Seattle ACO.
    
        Note 3: Information concerning the existence of approved 
    alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be 
    obtained from the Seattle ACO.
    
    Special Flight Permits
    
        (e) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with 
    sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 
    CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where 
    the requirements of this AD can be accomplished, provided that all 
    the equipment is removed from the E-42 SATCOM rack.
    
    Incorporation by Reference
    
        (f) The inspections shall be done in accordance with Boeing 
    Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2428, dated December 17, 1998. This 
    incorporation by reference was approved by the Director of the 
    Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 
    51. Copies may be obtained from Boeing Commercial Airplane Group, 
    P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, Washington 98124-2207. Copies may be 
    inspected at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind 
    Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the Office of the Federal 
    Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.
        (g) This amendment becomes effective on July 14, 1999.
    
        Issued in Renton, Washington, on June 22, 1999.
    D.L. Riggin,
    Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
    Service.
    [FR Doc. 99-16326 Filed 6-28-99; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
7/14/1999
Published:
06/29/1999
Department:
Federal Aviation Administration
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule; request for comments.
Document Number:
99-16326
Dates:
Effective July 14, 1999.
Pages:
34707-34710 (4 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 99-NM-45-AD, Amendment 39-11212, AD 99-14-04
RINs:
2120-AA64: Airworthiness Directives
RIN Links:
https://www.federalregister.gov/regulations/2120-AA64/airworthiness-directives
PDF File:
99-16326.pdf
CFR: (1)
14 CFR 39.13