96-13609. Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-9-80 Series Airplanes, and Model MD-88 and MD-90 Airplanes  

  • [Federal Register Volume 61, Number 108 (Tuesday, June 4, 1996)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 28028-28029]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 96-13609]
    
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    
    Federal Aviation Administration
    
    14 CFR Part 39
    
    [Docket No. 95-NM-188-AD; Amendment 39-9642; AD 96-11-18]
    RIN 2120-AA64
    
    
    Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-9-80 Series 
    Airplanes, and Model MD-88 and MD-90 Airplanes
    
    AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD), 
    applicable to certain McDonnell Douglas Model DC-9-80 series airplanes, 
    and Model MD-88 and MD-90 airplanes, that requires a one-time 
    measurement of the length of the oxygen mask lanyards of the passenger 
    service unit (PSU), and modification of lanyards that are longer than 
    the proper length. This amendment is prompted by a report that the 
    length of the oxygen mask lanyards of the PSU were found to be too 
    long, apparently due to improper installation during production. The 
    actions specified by this AD are intended to ensure that the length of 
    these oxygen mask lanyards is correct, so that the oxygen canister will 
    be properly activated when needed during an emergency.
    
    DATES: Effective July 9, 1996.
        The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in 
    the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as 
    of July 9, 1996.
    
    ADDRESSES: The service information referenced in this AD may be 
    obtained from McDonnell Douglas Corporation, 3855 Lakewood Boulevard, 
    Long Beach, California 90846, Attention: Technical Publications 
    Business Administration, Department C1-L51 (2-60). This information may 
    be examined at the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Transport 
    Airplane Directorate, Rules Docket, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, 
    Washington; or at the FAA, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office, 
    Transport Airplane Directorate, 3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, 
    California; or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol 
    Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Walter Eierman, Aerospace Engineer, 
    Systems and Equipment Branch, ANM-130L, FAA, Los Angeles Aircraft 
    Certification Office, 3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, California 
    90712; telephone (310) 627-5336; fax (310) 627-5210.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal 
    Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to include an airworthiness 
    directive (AD) that is applicable to certain McDonnell Douglas Model 
    DC-9-80 series airplanes, and Model MD-88 and MD-90 airplanes was 
    published in the Federal Register on February 12, 1996 (61 FR 5334). 
    That action proposed to require, for Model DC-9-80 series airplanes and 
    Model MD-88 airplanes, a one-time measurement of the length of the 
    oxygen mask lanyards of the PSU, and modification, if necessary. For 
    Model MD-90 airplanes, the action proposed to require modification of 
    the oxygen mask lanyards of the PSU.
        Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate 
    in the making of this amendment. Due consideration has been given to 
    the comments received.
    
    Support for the Proposal
    
        Several commenters support the proposed rule.
    
    Request To Extend Compliance Time
    
        Two commenters request that the compliance time be extended from 
    the proposed 24 months to 36 months. One of these commenters states 
    that it would have to special schedule its fleet of airplanes in order 
    to accomplish the proposed measurement and modification within the 
    proposed compliance time; this would entail considerable additional 
    expenses and schedule disruptions.
        The FAA does not concur. In developing an appropriate compliance 
    time for this action, the FAA considered not only the degree of urgency 
    associated with addressing the subject unsafe condition, but the 
    practical aspect of completing the required modification within an 
    interval of time that parallels normal scheduled maintenance for the 
    majority of affected operators. However, under the provisions of 
    paragraph (c) of the final rule, the FAA may approve requests for 
    adjustments to the compliance time if data are submitted to 
    substantiate that such an adjustment would provide an acceptable level 
    of safety.
    
    Request To Provide Time Frame of Improper Installation
    
        One commenter maintains that the unsafe condition occurred because 
    correct procedures were not followed during aircraft production. In 
    light of this, the commenter requests that the proposal be revised to 
    provide a time frame during which the addressed problem occurred and 
    allow operators to inspect a sampling of airplanes produced during that 
    time to determine if the lanyard problem is present on those airplanes.
        The FAA does not concur with the commenter's request. The FAA is 
    unable to determine the time frame during which the apparent improper 
    installation occurred because the manufacturing procedures that existed 
    during the production of all of the affected airplanes did not contain 
    provisions for monitoring the length of the lanyard. Therefore, all 
    airplanes listed in the applicability of the final rule may be subject 
    to the addressed unsafe condition.
    
    Conclusion
    
        After careful review of the available data, including the comments 
    noted above, the FAA has determined that air safety and the public 
    interest require the adoption of the rule as proposed.
    
    Cost Impact
    
        There are approximately 1,200 McDonnell Douglas Model DC-9-80 
    series airplanes, Model MD-88 airplanes, and Model MD-90 airplanes of 
    the affected design in the worldwide fleet. The FAA estimates that 650 
    airplanes of U.S. registry will be affected by this AD.
        For airplanes on which inspection of the lanyard is required, it 
    will take approximately 81 work hours per airplane to accomplish the 
    required inspection, at an average labor rate of $60 per work hour. 
    Based on these figures, the cost impact of the inspection required by 
    this AD on U.S. operators is estimated to be $4,860 per airplane.
        For airplanes on which modification of the lanyard is required, it 
    will take approximately 121 work hours per airplane to accomplish the 
    required modification at an average labor rate of $60 per work hour. 
    Based on these figures, the cost impact of the
    
    [[Page 28029]]
    
    modification required by this AD on U.S. operators is estimated to be 
    $7,260 per airplane.
        The cost impact figures discussed above are based on assumptions 
    that no operator has yet accomplished any of the requirements of this 
    AD action, and that no operator would accomplish those actions in the 
    future if this AD were not adopted.
    
    Regulatory Impact
    
        The regulations adopted herein will not have substantial direct 
    effects on the States, on the relationship between the national 
    government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
    responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in 
    accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this final 
    rule does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the 
    preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
        For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is 
    not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866; 
    (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and 
    Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a 
    significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial 
    number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory 
    Flexibility Act. A final evaluation has been prepared for this action 
    and it is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained 
    from the Rules Docket at the location provided under the caption 
    ADDRESSES.
    
    List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
    
        Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by 
    reference, Safety.
    
    Adoption of the Amendment
    
        Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the 
    Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of 
    the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
    
    PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
    
        1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
    
    
    Sec. 39.13  [Amended]
    
        2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new 
    airworthiness directive:
    
    96-11-18  McDonnell Douglas: Amendment 39-9642. Docket 95-NM-188-AD.
    
        Applicability: Model DC-9-80 series airplanes and Model MD-88 
    airplanes, having manufacturer's fuselage numbers 924 through 1094 
    inclusive, and 1095 through 2113 inclusive; and Model MD-90 
    airplanes, having manufacturer's fuselage numbers 2094 through 2098 
    inclusive, and 2100; certificated in any category.
    
        Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the 
    preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been 
    modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the 
    requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified, 
    altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of 
    this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an 
    alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (c) of 
    this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of 
    the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition 
    addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been 
    eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to 
    address it.
        Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished 
    previously.
        To ensure that the length of the oxygen mask lanyards is 
    correct, so that the oxygen canister will be properly activated when 
    needed during an emergency, accomplish the following:
        (a) For Model DC-9-80 series airplanes and Model MD-88 
    airplanes, having manufacturer's fuselage numbers 1095 through 2113 
    inclusive; and Model MD-90 airplanes: Within 2 years after the 
    effective date of this AD, perform a one-time measurement of the 
    length of the oxygen mask lanyards of the passenger service unit 
    (PSU) from the loop on the firing pin or aluminum ring to the mask, 
    in accordance with McDonnell Douglas Service Bulletin MD80-35-022, 
    dated August 29, 1995 (for Model DC-9-80 series airplanes and Model 
    MD-88 airplanes), or McDonnell Douglas Service Bulletin MD90-35-001, 
    dated August 29, 1995 (for Model MD-90 airplanes), as applicable.
        (1) If the length of all oxygen mask lanyards is found to be 
    within the limits specified in the applicable service bulletin, no 
    further action is required by this paragraph.
        (2) If the length of any oxygen mask lanyard is found to exceed 
    the limits specified in the applicable service bulletin, prior to 
    further flight, modify that oxygen mask lanyard of the PSU in 
    accordance with the applicable service bulletin.
        (b) For Model DC-9-80 series airplanes having manufacturer's 
    fuselage numbers 924 through 1094 inclusive: Within 2 years after 
    the effective date of this AD, modify the oxygen mask lanyards of 
    the PSU in accordance with McDonnell Douglas Service Bulletin MD80-
    35-022, dated August 29, 1995.
        (c) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the 
    compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be 
    used if approved by the Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification 
    Office (ACO), FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate. Operators shall 
    submit their requests through an appropriate FAA Principal 
    Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the 
    Manager, Los Angeles ACO.
    
        Note 2: Information concerning the existence of approved 
    alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be 
    obtained from the Los Angeles ACO.
    
        (d) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with 
    sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 
    CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where 
    the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
        (e) The measurement and modification shall be done in accordance 
    with McDonnell Douglas Service Bulletin MD80-35-022, dated August 
    29, 1995 (for Model DC-9-80 series airplanes and Model MD-88 
    airplanes), or McDonnell Douglas Service Bulletin MD90-35-001, dated 
    August 29, 1995 (for Model MD-90 airplanes). This incorporation by 
    reference was approved by the Director of the Federal Register in 
    accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Copies may be 
    obtained from McDonnell Douglas Corporation, 3855 Lakewood 
    Boulevard, Long Beach, California 90846, Attention: Technical 
    Publications Business Administration, Department C1-L51 (2-60). 
    Copies may be inspected at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 
    1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the FAA, Los 
    Angeles Aircraft Certification Office, Transport Airplane 
    Directorate, 3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, California; or at 
    the Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., 
    suite 700, Washington, DC.
        (f) This amendment becomes effective on July 9, 1996.
    
        Issued in Renton, Washington, on May 23, 1996.
    John J. Hickey,
    Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
    Service.
    [FR Doc. 96-13609 Filed 6-3-96; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-13-U
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
7/9/1996
Published:
06/04/1996
Department:
Federal Aviation Administration
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
96-13609
Dates:
Effective July 9, 1996.
Pages:
28028-28029 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 95-NM-188-AD, Amendment 39-9642, AD 96-11-18
RINs:
2120-AA64: Airworthiness Directives
RIN Links:
https://www.federalregister.gov/regulations/2120-AA64/airworthiness-directives
PDF File:
96-13609.pdf
CFR: (1)
14 CFR 39.13