[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 133 (Wednesday, July 10, 1996)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 36307-36308]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-17537]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 133 / Wednesday, July 10, 1996 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 36307]]
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. 96-NM-91-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-9-10, -20, -
30, -40, and -50 Series Airplanes and C-9 (Military) Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document proposes the adoption of a new airworthiness
directive (AD) that is applicable to certain McDonnell Douglas Model
DC-9 series airplanes and C-9 (military) airplanes. This proposal would
require either replacement or modification of the hydraulic damper
assembly. This proposal is prompted by reports indicating that
insufficient damping of the hydraulic shimmy damper in the main landing
gear (MLG) can allow high torsional vibration to occur. The actions
specified by the proposed AD are intended to prevent such vibration,
which can damage the MLG assembly and lead to its collapse.
DATES: Comments must be received by August 19, 1996.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments in triplicate to the Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate, ANM-103,
Attention: Rules Docket No. 96-NM-91-AD, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98055-4056. Comments may be inspected at this location
between 9:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. -
The service information referenced in the proposed rule may be
obtained from McDonnell Douglas Corporation, 3855 Lakewood Boulevard,
Long Beach, California 90846, Attention: Technical Publications
Business Administration, Department C1-L51 (2-60). This information may
be examined at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office, 3960 Paramount
Boulevard, Lakewood, California.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Walter Eierman, Aerospace Engineer,
Systems and Equipment Branch, ANM-130L, FAA, Los Angeles Aircraft
Certification Office, 3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, California
90712; telephone (310) 627-5336; fax (310) 627-5210.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited -
Interested persons are invited to participate in the making of the
proposed rule by submitting such written data, views, or arguments as
they may desire. Communications shall identify the Rules Docket number
and be submitted in triplicate to the address specified above. All
communications received on or before the closing date for comments,
specified above, will be considered before taking action on the
proposed rule. The proposals contained in this notice may be changed in
light of the comments received. -
Comments are specifically invited on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the proposed rule. All
comments submitted will be available, both before and after the closing
date for comments, in the Rules Docket for examination by interested
persons. A report summarizing each FAA-public contact concerned with
the substance of this proposal will be filed in the Rules Docket. -
Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments
submitted in response to this notice must submit a self-addressed,
stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments
to Docket Number 96-NM-91-AD.'' The postcard will be date stamped and
returned to the commenter.
Availability of NPRMs -
Any person may obtain a copy of this NPRM by submitting a request
to the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, ANM-103, Attention: Rules
Docket No. 96-NM-91-AD, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington
98055-4056.
Discussion -
The FAA has received several reports of incidents in which
components of the main landing gear (MLG) on McDonnell Douglas Model
DC-9 series airplanes have been damaged. In one incident, the MLG
torque link was broken; in another incident, the nut was stripped off
of the torque link apex bolt. Investigation has revealed that, under
maximum loading of the hydraulic damper assembly, which occurs during
landing, the metal-to-metal seal between the cap and damper assembly
housing can leak (hydraulic fluid) internally. Such leakage can reduce
the effectiveness of the damper. -
Insufficient damping of the MLG hydraulic shimmy damper allows
torsional vibration to occur in the MLG. High torsional vibration can
damage the MLG, which can result in collapse of the MLG and can cause
additional damage to other parts of the airplane.
Explanation of Relevant Service Information -
The FAA has reviewed and approved McDonnell Douglas Service
Bulletin DC9-32-289, dated March 7, 1996, which describes procedures
for either replacing or modifying the hydraulic damper assembly. The
replacement entails replacing the current assembly with an improved
assembly. The modification involves removing shims located between the
cap and damper assembly housing, increasing the torque on damper
housing assembly bolts, and incorporating changes to increase the
volume of fluid passing between the two damper chambers. These actions
will enhance the performance of the shimmy damper and reduce the
potential for torsional vibration in the MLG.
Explanation of Requirements of Proposed Rule -
Since an unsafe condition has been identified that is likely to
exist or develop on other products of this same type design, the
proposed AD would require either replacing or modifying the hydraulic
damper assembly. The actions would be required to be accomplished in
accordance with the service bulletin described previously.
[[Page 36308]]
Other Relevant Rulemaking -
The FAA previously issued AD 96-01-09, amendment 39-9485 (61 FR
2407, January 26, 1996), which addresses a similar problem found on
McDonnell Douglas Model DC-9-80 series airplanes and Model MD-88
airplanes.
Cost Impact -
There are approximately 878 Model DC-9 series airplanes and C-9
(military) airplanes of the affected design in the worldwide fleet. The
FAA estimates that 590 airplanes of U.S. registry would be affected by
this proposed AD. -
To accomplish the proposed replacement would take approximately 5.9
work hours per airplane, at an average labor rate of $60 per work hour.
Required parts would cost approximately $11,139 per airplane (two
assemblies at $5,569 each). Based on these figures, the cost impact of
the proposed replacement action on U.S. operators is estimated to be
$11,492 per airplane. -
To accomplish the proposed modification would take approximately
10.9 work hours per airplane, at an average labor rate of $60 per work
hour. Required parts would cost approximately $2,907 per airplane.
Based on these figures, the cost impact of the proposed modification
action on U.S. operators is estimated to be $3,561 per airplane. -
Based on the figures discussed above, the cost impact of this
proposed AD on the U.S. fleet would be between $2,100,990 and
$6,780,280. These cost impact figures are based on assumptions that no
operator has yet accomplished any of the proposed requirements of this
AD action, and that no operator would accomplish those actions in the
future if this AD were not adopted.
Regulatory Impact -
The regulations proposed herein would not have substantial direct
effects on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in
accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this
proposal would not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant
the preparation of a Federalism Assessment. -
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this proposed
regulation (1) is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
and (3) if promulgated, will not have a significant economic impact,
positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under
the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. A copy of the draft
regulatory evaluation prepared for this action is contained in the
Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained by contacting the Rules
Docket at the location provided under the caption ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 -
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment -
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration proposes to amend
part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as
follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES -
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended] -
2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new
airworthiness directive:
McDonnell Douglas: Docket 96-NM-91-AD.
-Applicability: Model DC-9-10, -20, -30, -40, and -50 series
airplanes, and C-9 (military) airplanes; as listed in McDonnell
Douglas Service Bulletin DC9-32-289, dated March 7, 1996;
certificated in any category.
-Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the
preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been
modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the
requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified,
altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of
this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an
alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (b) of
this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of
the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition
addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been
eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to
address it.
-Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished
previously. -
To prevent high torsional vibration from occurring, which can
damage the main landing gear (MLG) assembly and lead to its
collapse, accomplish the following: -
(a) Within 24 months after the effective date of this AD, either
replace or modify the MLG hydraulic damper assembly, in accordance
with the procedures specified as either Option 1 or Option 2,
respectively, in McDonnell Douglas Service Bulletin DC9-32-289,
dated March 7, 1996. -
(b) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the
compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used if approved by the Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification
Office (ACO), FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate. Operators shall
submit their requests through an appropriate FAA Principal
Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the
Manager, Los Angeles ACO.
-Note 2: Information concerning the existence of approved
alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be
obtained from the Los Angeles ACO.
(c) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with
sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14
CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where
the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on July 3, 1996.
Darrell M. Pederson,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 96-17537 Filed 7-9-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-U
