94-16814. Airworthiness Directives: British Aerospace, Regional Aircraft Limited, HP 137 Mk1, Jetstream Models 200, 3101, and 3201 Airplanes  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 132 (Tuesday, July 12, 1994)]
    [Unknown Section]
    [Page 0]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-16814]
    
    
    [[Page Unknown]]
    
    [Federal Register: July 12, 1994]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    14 CFR Part 39
    
    [Docket No. 94-CE-02-AD]
    
     
    
    Airworthiness Directives: British Aerospace, Regional Aircraft 
    Limited, HP 137 Mk1, Jetstream Models 200, 3101, and 3201 Airplanes
    
    AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
    
    ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This document proposes to supersede two existing AD's that 
    require repetitively inspecting the universal joints and universal 
    rivets on British Aerospace (BAe), Regional Aircraft Limited, HP 137 
    Mk1, Jetstream Models 200, 3101, and 3201 airplanes, and replacing any 
    damaged part, and limiting the in-service life of the torque tube shaft 
    assembly. Jetstream Aircraft Limited has introduced an improved flap 
    torque shaft assembly that includes universal joints that are not life 
    limited. The Federal Aviation Administration's policy on aging 
    commuter-class aircraft is to eliminate or, in certain instances, 
    reduce the number of certain repetitive short-interval inspections when 
    improved parts or modifications are available. The proposed action 
    would require installing this improved flap torque shaft assembly in 
    place of the repetitive inspection and life limit requirements of the 
    two existing AD's. The actions specified by the proposed AD are 
    intended to prevent failure of the flap torque shaft assembly, which 
    could result in asymmetric flap deployment and loss of control of the 
    airplane.
    
    DATES: Comments must be received on or before September 26, 1994.
    
    ADDRESSES: Submit comments in triplicate to the Federal Aviation 
    Administration (FAA), Central Region, Office of the Assistant Chief 
    Counsel, Attention: Rules Docket No. 94-CE-02-AD, room 1558, 601 E. 
    12th Street, Kansas City, Missouri 64106. Comments may be inspected at 
    this location between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, 
    holidays excepted.
        Service information that applies to the proposed AD may be obtained 
    from Jetstream Aircraft Limited, Manager Product Support, Prestwick 
    Airport, Ayrshire, KA9 2RW Scotland; telephone (44-292) 79888; 
    facsimile (44-292) 79703; or Jetstream Aircraft Inc., Librarian, P.O. 
    Box 16029, Dulles International Airport, Washington, DC 20041-6029; 
    telephone (703) 406-1161; facsimile (703) 406-1469. This information 
    also may be examined at the Rules Docket at the address above.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Raymond A. Stoer, Program Officer, 
    Brussels Aircraft Certification Office, FAA, Europe, Africa, and Middle 
    East Office, c/o American Embassy, B-1000 Brussels, Belgium; telephone 
    (322) 513.3830; facsimile (322) 230.6899; or Mr. John P. Dow, Sr., 
    Project Officer, Small Airplane Directorate, Airplane Certification 
    Service, FAA, 1201 Walnut, suite 900, Kansas City, Missouri 64106; 
    telephone (816) 426-6932; facsimile (816) 426-2169.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Comments Invited
    
        Interested persons are invited to participate in the making of the 
    proposed rule by submitting such written data, views, or arguments as 
    they may desire. Communications should identify the Rules Docket number 
    and be submitted in triplicate to the address specified above. All 
    communications received on or before the closing date for comments, 
    specified above, will be considered before taking action on the 
    proposed rule. The proposals contained in this notice may be changed in 
    light of the comments received.
        Comments are specifically invited on the overall regulatory, 
    economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the proposed rule. All 
    comments submitted will be available, both before and after the closing 
    date for comments, in the Rules Docket for examination by interested 
    persons. A report that summarizes each FAA-public contact concerned 
    with the substance of this proposal will be filed in the Rules Docket.
        Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments 
    submitted in response to this notice must submit a self-addressed, 
    stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments 
    to Docket No. 94-CE-02-AD.'' The postcard will be date stamped and 
    returned to the commenter.
    
    Availability of NPRMs
    
        Any person may obtain a copy of this NPRM by submitting a request 
    to the FAA, Central Region, Office of the Assistant Chief Counsel, 
    Attention: Rules Docket No. 94-CE-02-AD, Room 1558, 601 E. 12th Street, 
    Kansas City, Missouri 64106.
    
    Discussion
    
        The FAA has determined that reliance on critical repetitive 
    inspections on aging commuter-class airplanes carries an unnecessary 
    safety risk when a design change exists that could eliminate or, in 
    certain instances, reduce the number of those critical inspections. In 
    determining what inspections are critical, the FAA considers (1) the 
    safety consequences of the airplane if the known problem is not 
    detected by the inspection; (2) the reliability of the inspection such 
    as the probability of not detecting the known problem; (3) whether the 
    inspection area is difficult to access; and (4) the possibility of 
    damage to an adjacent structure as a result of the problem.
        These factors have led the FAA to establish an aging commuter-class 
    aircraft policy that requires incorporating a known design change when 
    it could eliminate, or, in certain instances, reduce the number of 
    critical repetitive inspections.
        In 1991, the FAA issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to 
    amend part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) with 
    an airworthiness directive (AD) that would apply to BAe, Regional 
    Aircraft Limited, HP 137 Mk1, Jetstream Models 200, 3101, and 3201 
    airplanes. This NPRM (56 FR 11976, March 21, 1991) proposed inspecting 
    the flap torque shaft to identify all Type ``F'' universal joints, and 
    replacing these universal joints with Type ``M'' or part number A16123 
    universal joints.
        Since issuance of the notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM), 
    Jetstream Aircraft Limited has introduced an improved flap torque shaft 
    assembly that includes universal joints that are not life limited, and 
    that incorporates the actions proposed in the referenced NPRM and 
    required by the following AD's:
         AD 87-04-04, Amendment 39-5529, which requires limiting 
    the in-service life of the torque tube shaft assembly on BAe HP 137 
    Mk1, Jetstream Models 200, 3101, and 3201 airplanes; and
         AD 89-16-02, Amendment 39-6273, which requires 
    repetitively inspecting the universal joints and universal joint rivets 
    on BAe HP 137 Mk1, Jetstream Models 200, 3101, and 3201 airplanes, and 
    replacing any damaged part.
        Jetstream Aircraft Limited has issued Service Bulletin (SB) No. 27-
    JA 920340, which incorporates the following pages:
    
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                            Revision                        
                   Pages                     level              Date        
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    1 through 6 and 9 through 16........  2...........  Dec. 21, 1993.      
    7, 8, and 17 through 28.............  Original      Sept. 2, 1992.      
                                           issue.                           
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    This service information specifies procedures for installing the 
    improved flap torque shaft assembly.
        Based on its aging commuter-class aircraft policy and after 
    reviewing all available information, the FAA has determined that (1) 
    installing the new improved flap torque shaft assemblies incorporates 
    the actions proposed in the previously referenced NPRM and AD 87-04-04 
    and AD 89-16-02, and replaces critical repetitive inspections with a 
    design modification; and (2) AD action should be taken to prevent 
    failure of the flap torque shaft assembly, which could result in 
    asymmetric flap deployment and loss of control of the airplane. With 
    this in mind, the FAA issued a document, withdrawing the previously 
    referenced NPRM, on February 14, 1994 (59 FR 8878, February 24, 1994).
        Since an unsafe condition has been identified that is likely to 
    exist or develop in other BAe, Regional Aircraft Limited, HP 137 Mk1, 
    Jetstream Models 200, 3101, and 3201 airplanes of the same type design, 
    the proposed AD would supersede both AD 87-04-04 and AD 89-16-02 with a 
    new AD that would require installing this improved flap torque shaft 
    assembly in place of the repetitive inspection and life limit 
    requirements of the two existing AD's. The proposed actions would be 
    accomplished in accordance with Jetstream Aircraft Limited SB No. 27-JA 
    920340.
        The subsequent final rule action (if promulgated) would have an 
    effective date of 12 months after publication in the Federal Register 
    and a compliance time of 50 hours time-in-service after the effective 
    date. This would allow operators time to schedule the flap torque shaft 
    assembly replacement. The requirements of AD 87-04-04 and AD 89-16-02 
    would remain in effect until this date.
        The FAA estimates that 245 airplanes in the U.S. registry would be 
    affected by the proposed AD, that it would take approximately 31 
    workhours per airplane to accomplish the proposed action, and that the 
    average labor rate is approximately $55 an hour. Parts cost 
    approximately $1010 per airplane. Based on these figures, the total 
    cost impact of the proposed AD on U.S. operators is estimated to be 
    $665,175. This figure is based on the assumption that none of the 
    affected airplane operators have accomplished the proposed actions. In 
    addition, this action would eliminate the repetitive inspections 
    required by AD 87-04-04 and AD 89-16-02. The FAA has no way of 
    determining the operation levels of each individual operator of the 
    affected airplanes, and subsequently cannot determine the repetitive 
    inspections costs that would be eliminated by the proposed action. The 
    FAA estimates these costs to be substantial over the long-term.
        The regulations proposed herein would not have substantial direct 
    effects on the States, on the relationship between the national 
    government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
    responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in 
    accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this 
    proposal would not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant 
    the preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
        For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is 
    not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866; 
    (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and 
    Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) if promulgated, 
    will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a 
    substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the 
    Regulatory Flexibility Act. A copy of the draft regulatory evaluation 
    prepared for this action has been placed in the Rules Docket. A copy of 
    it may be obtained by contacting the Rules Docket at the location 
    provided under the caption ADDRESSES.
    
    List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
    
        Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
    
    The Proposed Amendment
    
        Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the 
    Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration proposes to amend 
    part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as 
    follows:
    
    PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
    
        1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 49 U.S.C. App. 1354(a), 1421 and 1423; 49 U.S.C. 
    106(g); and 14 CFR 11.89.
    
    
    Sec. 39.13  [Amended]
    
        2. Section 39.13 is amended by removing both AD 87-04-04, Amendment 
    39-5529, and AD 89-16-02, Amendment 39-6273, and by adding a new 
    airworthiness directive to read as follows:
    
    British Aerospace, Regional Aircraft Limited: Docket No. 94-CE-02-
    AD; Supersedes AD 87-04-04, Amendment 39-5529, and AD 89-16-02, 
    Amendment 39-6273.
    
        Applicability: HP 137 Mk1, Jetstream Models 200, 3101, and 3201 
    airplanes (all serial numbers), certificated in any category.
        Compliance: Required within the next 50 hours time-in-service 
    (TIS) after the effective date of this AD, unless already 
    accomplished.
        To prevent failure of the flap torque shaft assembly, which 
    could result in asymmetric flap deployment and loss of control of 
    the airplane, accomplish the following:
        (a) Install an improved torque shaft assembly in accordance with 
    Part 1 of the ACCOMPLISHMENT INSTRUCTIONS section of Jetstream 
    Aircraft Limited Service Bulletin (SB) No. 27-JA 920340; or modify 
    the existing torque shaft assembly in accordance with Part 2 of the 
    ACCOMPLISHMENT INSTRUCTIONS section of Jetstream Aircraft Limited SB 
    No. 27-JA 920340, which incorporates the following pages:
    
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                            Revision                        
                   Pages                     level              Date        
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    1 through 6 and 9 through 16........  2...........  Dec. 21, 1993.      
    7, 8, and 17 through 28.............  Original      Sept. 2, 1992.      
                                           issue.                           
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        (b) The life limit requirements of the torque tube shaft 
    assembly required by AD 87-04-04, and the repetitive inspections of 
    the universal joints and universal joint rivets required by AD 89-
    16-02 remain mandatory until the effective date of this AD or upon 
    accomplishing the installation or modification referenced by 
    paragraph (a) of this AD, whichever occurs first.
        (c) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with 
    sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 
    CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where 
    the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
        (d) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the 
    compliance time that provides an equivalent level of safety may be 
    approved by the Manager, Brussels Aircraft Certification Office, 
    Europe, Africa, Middle East office, FAA, c/o American Embassy, 1000 
    Brussels, Belgium. The request should be forwarded through an 
    appropriate FAA Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then 
    send it to the Manager, Brussels Aircraft Certification Office.
    
        Note: Information concerning the existence of approved 
    alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be 
    obtained from the Brussels Aircraft Certification Office.
    
        (e) All persons affected by this directive may obtain copies of 
    the document referred to herein upon request to Jetstream Aircraft 
    Limited, Manager Product Support, Prestwick Airport, Ayrshire, KA9 
    2RW Scotland; or Jetstream Aircraft Inc., Librarian, P.O. Box 16029, 
    Dulles International Airport, Washington, DC; or may examine this 
    document at the FAA, Central Region, Office of the Assistant Chief 
    Counsel, Room 1558, 601 E. 12th Street, Kansas City, Missouri 64106.
        (f) This amendment supersedes both AD 87-04-04, Amendment 39-
    5529, and AD 89-16-02, Amendment 39-6273.
    
        Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on July 6, 1994.
    Henry A. Armstrong,
    Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
    Service.
    [FR Doc. 94-16814 Filed 7-11-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-13-U
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
07/12/1994
Department:
Transportation Department
Entry Type:
Uncategorized Document
Action:
Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
Document Number:
94-16814
Dates:
Comments must be received on or before September 26, 1994.
Pages:
0-0 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: July 12, 1994, Docket No. 94-CE-02-AD
CFR: (1)
14 CFR 39.13